CC BY
0
3.2 The Influence of English
With the growth of global markets and international trade, English has become the dominant language in global business and economics. As Turkmenistan integrates more with the global economy, English has become an important source of new economic terminology. However, like Russian-derived terms, English terms are often adapted into Turkmen, either through direct borrowing or by translating the meanings into Turkmen equivalents. References:
1. Berdimuhamedov, G.M. (2020). Language and National Identity: The Role of the Turkmen Language in Economic Development. Ashgabat University Press.
2. Hakimov, S. (2018). The Influence of Russian and English on the Turkmen Language: A Case Study in Economic Terms. Journal of Central Asian Linguistics, 12(3), 145-160.
3. Turkmenistan State Statistical Committee. (2019). Economic Reforms and Language Development in Turkmenistan. Ashgabat: Government Printing House.
4. Kuznetcov, A. (2021). Globalization and Language Change: The Impact of English on Central Asian Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(4), 211-225.
5. Nurmuhammedov, M. (2017). Adapting New Economic Terms in Turkmen: Challenges and Strategies. Turkmen Language Studies Review, 5(2), 88-102.
© Myradov M., Guvanjova Ch., 2024
УДК: 80. 801. 3310
Nomozova D. M.
4 th-year student of University of Economics and Pedagogy, Karshi city, Republic of Uzbekistan Scientific supervisor: prof. Daniyeva M. J.,
Doctor of Sciences in Philology, University of Economics and Pedagogy, Karshi city, Republic of Uzbekistan
SEMANTIC FIELD OF THE WORD "MOTHERLAND" IN ENGLISH
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the study of linguistic characters of semantic field of the word "Motherland". One of the actual and important problems of modern linguistic researches is to study the linguistic semantics. However, there have been researched a large number of semantic study, many aspect of the linguistic semantics are not sufficiently researched up to our time. Especially, this concern the Semantic Fields.
Keywords
semantics, lexicology, research, domain, field theory, describing the structure, construction.
Номозова Д.М.
студентка 4 курса Университета Экономики и педагогики, г. Карши, Узбекистан Научный руководитель: проф. Даниева М.Дж.,
Доктор филологических наук, Университет Экономики и педагогики, г. Карши, Узбекистан
СЕМАНТИЧЕСКОЕ ПОЛЕ СЛОВА «РОДИНА» В АНГЛИЙСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ
Аннотация
Статья посвящена изучению лингвистических характеристик семантического поля слова «Родина». Одной из актуальных и важных проблем современных лингвистических исследований является изучение лингвистической семантики. Однако, несмотря на большое количество исследований в области семантики, многие аспекты лингвистической семантики до сих пор недостаточно исследованы. Особенно это касается семантических полей.
Ключевые слова
семантика, лексикология, исследование, область, теория поля, описание структуры, построение.
The theories of semantic field is very important and actual topic of Lexicology science. These theories are difficult in comprehension because they ask a special attention and good knowledge of lexicology science. I tried my best to interpret them in an understandable way. Besides this, in this paper I do not attempt to present a semantic theory of a natural language, but rather to characterize the form of such a theory. A semantic theory of a natural language is part of linguistic description of that language.
Our problem, on the other hand, is the part of the general theory of language, fully on a part with the problem of characterizing the structure of grammars of natural languages. A characterization of the abstract form of semantic theory is given by a metatheory which answer such question as these: What is domain a semantic theory? What are the descriptive and explanatory goals of a semantic theory? What mechanisms are employed in pursuit of these goals? What are the empirical and methodological constrains upon a semantic theory? What are the lexical characters of the words in the field "Motherland"? The present paper approaches the problem of characterizing the form of semantic theories by describing the structure of a semantic theory of English. There can be little doubt but that the results achieved will apply directly to semantic theories of languages closely related to English. The question of their applicability to semantic theories of more distant languages will be left for subsequent investigations to explore. Nevertheless, the present investigation will provide results that can be applied to semantics theories of languages related to English and suggestions about how to proceed with the construction of such theories. We may put our problem this way: what form should a semantic theory of a natural language take to accommodate in the most revealing way facts about the semantic structure of that language supplied by descriptive research? This question is of primary importance at the present stage of the development of semantics because semantics suffers not from a dearth of facts about meanings and meaning relations in natural languages , but rather from the lack of an adequate theory to organize, systematize, and generalize these facts. Facts about the semantics natural languages have been contributed to abundance by many diverse fields, including philosophy, linguistics, philology, and psychology. Indeed, a compendium of such facts is readily available in any good dictionary. But at present the superabundance of facts obscures a clear view of their interrelations, while such theories as have been proposed to account for the facts have, in general, been either too closely formulated or too weak in explanatory and descriptive power to succeed.
Used Literature:
1. Barantsev S.T., English Lexicology in Practice. Kiev,1954.
2. Ginzburg. Modern English Lexicology. Moscow, 1987.
3. Daniyeva M.Dj. Theoretical background of notion of grammar and grammatical categories// Научный электронный журнал «Матрица научного познания». Уфа, № 5-2/2024. - С. 334-337
© Номозова Д.М., 2024
