1338.485:332.145(497.11) DOI: 10.5 937/menhottur2400007L
UDC: 338.48-44(497.11-22)
Original Scientific Paper
Received: 23 January 2024 Revised: 10 March 2024 Accepted: 27 May 2024 Published online: 28 May 2024
Exploring rural tourism potential in rural areas of Vrnjacka Banja
Suzana Lazovic1*, Snezana Milicevic1, Natasa Dordevic1, Vladimir Kraguljac1
1 University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia
Purpose - The paper aims to examine the local populace's perceptions towards the possibilities and approaches of developing rural tourism in the rural areas of the Vrnjacka Banja municipality. The goal of the study is to contribute to the understanding of rural tourism development and the promotion of sustainable rural development while actively involving the local population. Methodology - The collected primary data underwent analysis employing descriptive statistics and factor analysis in IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software. Findings - The analyzed results of the empirical research has shown that rural tourism in rural areas of municipality of Vrnjacka Banja can be developed by including local population. Implications - The research makes a theoretical contribution by enriching the discourse on the socio and economic prosperity of the community and tourism in rural areas. The practical implications of the paper involve contributing to the formulation future strategies for advancing rural tourism in municipality of Vrnjacka Banja. Moreover, the paper can serve as a basis for future improvements in effective rural tourism management and enhancement of the overall quality of life for the rural community in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality.
Keywords: rural tourism, tourism destination, local population perceptions, Vrnjacka Banja JEL classification: Z32, L26, Q13
Istrazivanje potencijala za razvoj ruralnog turizma u ruralnim podrucjima Vrnjacke Banje
Svrha - Rad ima za cilj da ispita percepcije lokalnog stanovnistva o mogucnostima i pristupima razvoja ruralnog turizma u ruralnim podrucjima opstine Vrnjacke Banje. Svrha ovog rada je da doprinese razumevanju razvoja ruralnog turizma i promociji odrzivog ruralnog razvoja uz aktivno ukljuCivanje lokalnog stanovnistva. Metodologija - Primarni podaci su analizirani koriscenjem deskriptivne statistike i faktorske analize u softveru IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0. Rezultati - Analizirani rezultati empirijskog istrazivanja pokazali su da se ruralni turizam moze razvijati u ruralnim oblastima opstine Vrnjacke Banje uz
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http ://creativecommons.org/hcenses/by/4. 0/)_
Abstract
Sazetak
ukljucivanje lokalnog stanovnistva. Implikacije - Teorijski doprinos istrazivanja sluzi socio-ekonomskom prosperitetu ruralne zajednice i obogacuje diskurs o ruralnom turizmu. Prakticne implikacije istrazivanja se odnose na znacaj dobijenih rezultata u izradi buducih strategija razvoja ruralnog turizma Vrnjacke Banje. Osim toga, rad moze posluziti kao osnova za buduca unapredenja efikasnosti menadzmenta ruralnog turizma i poboljsanje ukupnog kvaliteta zivota lokalnog stanovnistva u ruralnim podrucjima opstine Vrnjacke Banje.
Kljucne reci: ruralni turizam, turisticka destinacija, percepcije lokalnog stanovnistva, Vrnjacka Banja
JEL klasifikacija: Z32, L26, Q13 1. Introduction
The paramount industry driving rural community development today is tourism (Milicevic et al., 2023; Puska et al., 2019). As the 21st century began, rural tourism and other new forms of tourism were developed to meet the needs of contemporary tourists. Considering it offers serene surroundings for relaxation and the enjoyment of scenic beauty, rural tourism becomes a pleasant and convenient choice for tourists as well as a promoter of rural development. Furthermore, the development of rural tourism as a central force for the development of rural communities reflects a broader prevailing phenomenon in the 21st century. Contemporary tourists seeking respite from the fast pace of cities are increasingly attracted to the authenticity and tranquility that rural destinations offer. The experience offered by rural tourism goes beyond traditional attractions and embraces a deep connection with nature, local culture and sustainable practices.
The growing desire for tourism services within rural areas empowers community members to generate income through product sales and service provision (Nedeljkovic et al., 2022; Puska et al., 2021; Sanagustin Fons et al., 2011). In the sphere of tourism development, the local populace assumes a vital role as essential stakeholder. In order to formulate a strategy and policy geared towards tourism competitiveness and ensure the sustainable growth of the tourist destination, it is essential to include the perceptions and attitudes of the community regarding tourism (Milicevic et al., 2020; Papastathopoulos et al., 2020). Furthermore, the symbiotic connection between tourism and the rural economy goes beyond income generation. By actively involving residents in supplying products and services to meet tourism needs, community pride and identity are nurtured.
The study area of this paper is Vrnjacka Banja. Vrnjacka Banja is a spa tourism destination and municipality located in the Raska District of central Serbia. The urban area of Vrnjacka Banja has 10,065 inhabitants, whereas with the population of the surrounding villages of Vrnjacka Banja included, the total number is 27,527 inhabitants (Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2022). The Vrnjacka Banja municipality has one urban and thirteen rural settlements (Municipality of Vrnjacka Banja, 2024). The paper aims to explore how the local population perceives the possibilities and approaches to advancing tourism in the rural zones of Vrnjacka Banja municipality. Also, the study seeks to contribute theoretically by enhancing discussions about the socio-economic well-being of rural communities and rural tourism, as rural communities are one of the crucial stakeholders in developing this form of tourism.
2. Theoretical framework
Rural tourism has been a topic of interest to numerous authors in recent years and represents a common name for various activities outside of cities and places where mass tourism has developed (Borovic et al., 2022; Cvijanovic & Ruzic, 2017). An essential element in the affirmation and promotion of this kind of tourism is the local community's involvement, which is the focus of rural tourism (Craciun et al., 2022). It has been believed that developing rural tourism can help the local population by fostering social and economic growth (Fang, 2020). Tourism within rural locales connects the economic, wider social and ecological elements of development. At the same time, it contributes positively to employment and the advancement of rural regions (Dimitrijevic et al., 2022). According to Fleischer and Pizam (1997) "many studies show that rural tourism makes an important contribution to the local economy" (p. 368). Rural tourism encompasses "a sphere of double interests: native population (hosts) on the one hand and tourists (guests) on the other hand" (Paresishvili et al., 2017, p. 345).
According to OECD (2020) rural areas, given their essential nature and fundamental differences from urban areas, demand distinct interventions and policies tailored to enhance the income of their populations. Rural tourism has the potential to enhance the development of rural regions by elevating the quality of life for their residents (Njegovan et al., 2015). Dimitrovski et al. (2021) point out that certain researches have shown that tourism in rural areas develops spontaneously, without adequate strategic development elements, while Fleischer and Felsenstein (2000) state that the efficacy of such growth strategies receives limited attention to establish local jobs and generate income. Today's rural tourists are looking for destinations that have natural beauty and diverse tourism products and that have the ability to provide authentic and transformative experiences (Li et al., 2020). It is precisely rural tourism that stands out as a specific form of tourism, which, in addition to other benefits, can enable this type of transformation. There is an increasing need for tourism destinations to motivate their residents to participate in the development and improvement of the tourist offer. The burgeoning interest of urban dwellers in rural areas has catalyzed the growth of rural tourism but rural revitalization not only embodies the requirement to satisfy rural residents' aspirations for a better life but also plays an integral role in enabling rural residents to better enjoy the "policy dividends" of rural revitalization (Brouder et al., 2015; Zhongwei & Ang, 2022).
The inception of research on the local population's perspectives regarding the impact of tourism dates back to 1970s (Kuvan & Akan, 2005). The analysis and understanding of the local population's stance on tourism development is crucial for the success of any tourism type (Blesic et al., 2015). A lot of research has been conducted to examine the attitudes residents and their perception of the possibilities of developing rural tourism and the benefits of this development aimed at enhancing the quality of rural life (Abdollahzadeh & Sharifzadeh, 2014; Andriotis & Vaughn, 2003; Ap, 1992; Blesic et al., 2015; Chang et al., 2018; Kuvan & Akan, 2005; Latkova & Vogt, 2012; Muresan et al., 2016; Podovac et al., 2019; Remoaldo et al., 2017; Scutariu & Scutariu, 2023; Verbole, 2000; Wilson et al., 2001). Latkova and Vogt (2012) state that, although research indicates a connection between the population's perception and economic benefits as well as their support for tourism, there is also a need to establish theoretical frameworks. Residents recognize that tourism development leads to job creation, improves living standards, and boosts demand for local products (Scutariu & Scutariu, 2023).
Podovac et al. (2019) state that residents drive rural tourism by selling agricultural products to tourists and providing accommodation in their homes. Incorporating the views of the local population forms the foundation for supporting tourism (Chang et al., 2018). Ap (1992)
states that acknowledging tourism's role in rural community development has sparked heightened interest in examining its impacts, both positive and negative, on residents' perceptions. Numerous studies indicate that residents' satisfaction with tourism's impact significantly influences their perceptions and attitudes. The support from residents and the attitudes of individuals working in tourism significantly shape how tourists are treated and their overall impressions of the destination. (Wilson et al., 2001). The results of the study of Abdollahzadeh and Sharifzadeh (2014) show that residents values tourism in a way that is consistent with social exchange theory. Host community attitudes are favorable when perceived benefits outweigh perceived impacts, creating a positive social exchange (Andriotis & Vaughn, 2003). Based on case studies conducted in Slovenia, the author Verbole (2000) came to the conclusion that communities do not have the same attitude towards the development of rural tourism, because not everyone benefits equally from its development. Lane (1994) states that for rural tourism, it is of great importance that local communities control it. Rural tourism development is increasingly perceived as an opportunity for the development of rural communities (Long & Lane, 2000).
3. Materials and methods
The research focuses on analyzing the potential and methods for developing rural tourism within rural areas in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality. The paper aims to examine the perceptions of the residents with regard to the possibilities and approaches for the development of rural tourism in this municipality.
Based on the defined subject and research aim, the following research hypotheses were formulated:
H1: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed by engaging the local population in the production and sale of agricultural products.
H2: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed by engaging the local population in the provision of accommodation services for tourists.
H3: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed through the organization of traditional village events.
H4: The involvement of tourists in the daily activities of the local population is an important factor for rural tourism development in the Vrnjacka Banja muncipality.
The empirical research was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire in June and July 2023. The questions were formulated relying on the previous study Podovac et al. (2019), which dealt with the analysis of rural tourism in the function of improving the quality of life of the population of the Goc Mountain, which is located in the immediate vicinity of Vrnjacka Banja. The survey questionnaire is divided into three parts. The first part comprised five questions relating to the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents. The second part consisted of eleven questions and refers to the assessment of the current state of the individual elements of the rural tourist offer of Vrnjacka Banja and the degree of involvement of the local population in the development of rural tourism. The third part contains twenty statements on the approaches to the development of rural tourism in the rural areas of the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja, with an emphasis on the involvement of the local population.
A convenient sample was used and a total of 200 people completed an online survey questionnaire, but only 193 respondents met the basic condition that they live within the territory of the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja (Vrnjacka Banja, Otroci, Vukusica, Vranesi,
Vrnjci, Goc, Gracac, Podunavci, Lipova, Stulac, Rsavci, Rudinci, Novo Selo, Stanisinci). The answers of respondents were examined and presented in the paper. The data was processed and analyzed using descriptive statistics and factor analysis, with IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0.
4. Results
4.1. Descriptive statistics
The respondents of the survey were 71.5% female (138) and 28.5% male (55). The most of respondents (36.8%) belong to the 26-35 age group, while the least respondents (5.7%) are over 55 years old. As per the level of education, most of respondents have a college degree (33.7%) and high school diploma (31.1%), while the 2.1% of respondents have a PhD. In terms of employment status, the 71% of respondents are employed while the 3.1% of respondents are retired. Even 92.7% of the respondents agreed that the Vrnjacka Banja municipality has the potential for the development of rural tourism (Table 1).
Table 1 : Characteristics of respondents
F % SD
Gender Male 55 28.5 0.452
Female 138 71.5
Age 20-25 60 31.1 1.169
26-35 71 36.8
36-45 30 15.5
46-55 21 10.9
More than 55 years 11 5.7
Level of education High school 60 31.1 1.161
College 65 33.7
Faculty 26 13.5
Master 38 19.7
PhD 4 2.1
Professional status Unemployed 20 10.4 0.620
Employed 137 71.0
Student 30 15.5
Retired 6 3.1
Does the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja have potential for the development of rural tourism? Yes 179 92.7 0.260
No 14 7.3
Source: Authors' research
In the latter section of the questionnaire, participants assessed the present condition of individual elements of the rural tourism offer in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality, by using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on the data, it could be concluded that the average rating of the elements of the offer of rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality ranges from 3.21 to 3.96. The aspects garnering the most favorable ratings include natural beauty (M=3.96), as well as hospitality of the local population (M=3.95). Conversely, preserving rural areas (M=3.21) and sports-recreational offerings (M=3.26) receive comparatively lower ratings, as indicated in Table 2.
Table 2: The quality of elements of the offer of rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja _municipality_
Elements of rural tourism offer Very bad Bad Average Very good Excellent M SD
% % % % %
Natural beauties 3.6 6.7 19.2 30.1 40.4 3.96 1.094
Cleanliness 6.7 10.4 35.8 30.1 17.1 3.40 1.095
Preservation of rural areas 7.3 16.1 34.7 31.6 10.4 3.21 1.067
Peace and quiet 6.2 14.5 24.9 31.6 22.8 3.50 1.173
Cultural and historical heritage 2.6 10.4 32.1 31.6 23.3 3.62 1.033
Number and quality of restaurants 6.2 14.5 24.9 30.6 23.8 3.51 1.181
Quality and variety of gastronomic specialties 5.7 13.0 29.0 28.5 23.8 3.51 1.155
Volume and quality of accommodation offer 6.2 6.7 17.6 33.2 33.6 3.86 1.164
Sports and recreational offer 6.7 17.6 31.6 30.1 14.0 3.26 1.113
Traffic availability 6.2 7.8 25.4 38.3 22.3 3.62 1.101
The hospitality of the local population 3.1 3.6 19.7 42.0 31.6 3.95 0.969
Source: Authors' research
The third part of the questionnaire refers to the perceptions of approaches to the tourism development in the rural areas of the Vrnjacka Banja municipality. Employing a 5-point Likert scale respondents expressed their agreement/disagreement with the offered statements. The majority of participants believe that the rural tourism offerings can be enhanced by financial
and institutional backing from local authorities in order to bolster agriculture and tourism -S3 (M=4.47), as well as by increased use of agricultural produce in creating culinary experiences for tourists - S7 (M=4.47). Besides this, the results suggest that the residents can primarily contribute to the rural tourism development by supplying catering establishments with agricultural products - S14 (M=4.53), as well as by producing and selling agricultural products to tourists - S13 (M=4.48) (Table 3).
Table 3 : Perceptions of approaches to the development of rural tourism in the rural areas of _the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja_
Statements Completely disagree Disagree Not sure Agree Completely agree M SD
% % % % %
S1 - Enhancement and development of sports, recreational, and entertainment offerings for tourists 0.5 3.1 14.0 40.4 42.0 4.20 0.832
S2 - By raising the level of understanding and education of the residents about the importance of rural tourism 0 4.7 13.0 28.5 53.9 4.31 0.871
S3 - Financial and institutional backing from local authorities in order to bolster agriculture and tourism 1.0 3.1 7.3 24.9 63.7 4.47 0.841
S4 - By developing sustainable rural tourism (tourism development that doesn't endangers economic, socio-cultural and ecological development of destination) 0.5 3.6 17.1 30.1 48.7 4.22 0.895
S5 - By integrating the offer of rural areas with the entire tourist offer of Vrnjacka Banja 0.5 1.0 12.4 26.4 59.6 4.43 0.788
S6 - By involving local population in agriculture production 2.1 6.2 15.5 28.0 48.2 4.13 1.028
S7 - Increased use of agricultural produce in creating culinary experiences for tourists 1.0 2.1 6.7 28.5 61.7 4.47 0.797
S8 - By improving the quality of existing and building new accommodation facilities for tourists 4.1 4.7 17.1 31.6 42.5 4.03 1.077
S9 - By employing the local population in offering accommodation for tourists 2.1 3.1 10.9 28.5 55.4 4.32 0.935
S10 - By including tourists in the daily activities of the local population 4.7 6.7 16.1 31.6 40.9 3.97 1.124
S11 - By organizing traditional authentic manifestations 1.0 3.1 8.3 28.5 59.1 4.41 0.850
S12 - Incorporating fishing and hunting as supplementary tourist offer 5.2 8.3 17.1 26.4 43.0 3.93 1.184
S13 - Selling agricultural products to tourists 0.5 0.5 9.3 29.5 60.1 4.48 0.729
S14 - By supplying catering establishments with agricultural products 0.5 0 9.3 25.4 64.8 4.53 0.706
S15 - By providing accommodation services within households of the local population 2.1 2.6 17.6 21.2 56.5 4.27 0.980
S16 - By providing tourists with activities such as: picking mushrooms, plants, 2.6 3.6 18.7 26.4 48.7 4.15 1.017
and forest fruits with an expert local guide
S17 - By active participation of tourists in agricultural work 7.3 6.7 21.8 24.9 39.4 3.82 1.229
S18 - By organizing attractive manifestations (gastronomic manifestations, rural manifestations) 0.5 1.0 9.3 30.1 59.1 4.46 0.749
S19 - By teaching local people about old authentic trades that can be part of rural tourism offer 1.0 2.1 16.6 24.9 55.4 4.31 0.894
S20 - With the opening of an ethnic restaurant 2.1 0.5 12.4 22.8 62.2 4.42 0.881
Source: Authors' research
4.2. Factor analysis
Factor analysis was undertaken to group the twenty statements from the study and highlight observable factors. Factor analysis was used in conjunction with Cronbach's alpha coefficient (a) to provide complementary information regarding the validity and reliability of the scales. According to Melovic (2022), factor analysis looks for "a pattern of relationships between a large number of variables" (p. 16). In this research, factor analysis was applied with the aim of grouping a significant amount of independent variables (findings) into factors. The authors Gasevic et al. (2017) point out that factor analysis is applied to group a large number of variables into a smaller number of variables. According to Pallant (2006), one of the three main steps that factor analysis consists of is the test of the justification of the application of factor analysis - the Kaiser-Meier-Olkin indicator of sample adequacy and Bartlett's test, which was applied in this paper. Using Kaiser-Meier-Olkin-KMO and Bartlett's Test as well as the factor analysis, the conclusion is reached that the results obtained validate the use of factor analysis since-the measure of KMO (0.892) exceeds the lower threshold. A statistically significant correlation exists between the variables because Bartlett's sphericity test showed a statistical value (p= 0.000) (Table 4). Based on the correlation matrix, where correlation coefficients exceed 0.3 and there are no signs of multicollinearity (no values greater than 0.7), the use of factor analysis is justified (Pallant, 2006).
Table 4: KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy 0.892
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 1979.261
Df 190
Sig. 0.000
Source: Authors' research
Through further processing and factor extraction by employing the principal component analysis method, five factors that explain 67.01% of variance were identified (Table 5). To simplify factors interpretation Oblimin rotation was used. At the end, the factors are named, taking into account the level of correlations and the sign of the loading (Penic, 2016).
Table 5: Factor extraction using the method of principal components
Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Total Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 8.079 40.396 40.396 8.079 40.396 40.396
2 1.833 9.166 49.561 1.833 9.166 49.561
3 1.363 6.814 56.375 1.363 6.814 56.375
4 1.066 5.332 61.707 1.066 5.332 61.707
5 1.061 5.305 67.012 1.061 5.305 67.012
6 0.859 4.296 71.309
7 0.752 3.762 75.070
8 0.680 3.402 78.472
9 0.598 2.989 81.461
10 0.517 2.583 84.044
11 0.465 2.325 86.368
12 0.428 2.142 88.511
13 0.410 2.050 90.561
14 0.359 1.797 92.358
15 0.333 1.665 94.023
16 0.307 1.537 95.560
17 0.266 1.331 96.891
18 0.226 1.131 98.021
19 0.205 1.026 99.048
20 0.190 0.952 100.000
Source: Authors' research
Based on the results displayed in Pattern Matrix (Table 6), that two variables are excluded from further analysis as their factors loadings are below 0.5: S4 - developing sustainable rural tourism (tourism development that doesn 't endanger economic, socio-cultural and ecological development of destination) and S5 - by integrating the offer of rural areas with the entire tourist offer of Vrnjacka Banja. It is concluded that the first factor has the highest factor loadings for the variables that describe that the local population of Vrnjacka Banja can be involved in the rural tourism development in rural areas of this municipality through enhancement and development of sports, recreational, and entertainment offerings for tourists - S1 (0.817), by raising the level of understanding and education of the local residents about the importance of rural tourism — S2 (0.775), financial and institutional backing from local authorities in order to bolster agriculture and tourism - S3 (0.534) so this factor can be named Stakeholder inclusion and community awareness in rural tourism development (a=0.717). The second factor has the highest factor loading for the variables that indicate that the local population can be involved in rural development by being involved in agricultural production - S6 (0.753), increased use of agricultural produce in creating culinary experiences for tourists - S7 (0.632), improving the quality of existing and building new accommodation facilities for tourists - S8 (0.609) and employing the local population in offering accommodation for tourists - S9 (0.500), so this factor can be named Community involvement in accommodation and agricultural products for rural tourism advancement (a=0.743)._
The third factor has the highest factor loading for the variables that show that rural development can be achieved by including tourists in the daily activities of the local population - S10 (0.898), and organizing traditional authentic manifestations - S11 (0.620), and this factor can be named Involvement of tourists in community activities and local traditional events (a=0.660).The fourth factor has the highest factor loading for variables that show that rural development can be achieved by incorporating fishing and hunting as supplementary tourist offer - S12 (0.800), selling agricultural products to tourists - S13 (0.795), supplying catering establishments with agricultural products - S14 (0.676), providing accommodation services within households of the local population - S15 (0.642) and providing tourists with activities such as: picking mushrooms, plants, and forest fruits with an expert local guide - S16 (0.631), and this factor can be named Promoting rural tourism through active participation of tourists and locals in activities concerning local natural assets (a=0.745). The fifth factor has the highest factor loading for the variables indicating that rural development can be achieved by active participation of tourists in agricultural work - S17 (0.751), organizing attractive manifestations (gastronomic manifestations, rural manifestations) - S18 (0.745), by teaching local people about old authentic trades that can be part of rural tourism offer - S19 (0.717) and with opening of the ethno-restaurant - S20 (0.615), therefore this factor can be named Traditional values revival via tourism events and offerings (a=0.714). (Table 6). Looking at the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each factor, the reliability of the scales is considered satisfactory (a > 0.7), with the exception of the third factor, where the alpha value indicates almost satisfactory reliability.
Table 6: Pattern Matrix
1 2 3 4 5
S1 0.817
S2 0.775
S3 0.534
S4
S5
S6 0.753
S7 0.692
S8 0.609
S9 0.500
S10 0.898
S11 0.620
S12 0.800
S13 0.795
S14 0.676
S15 0.642
S16 0.631
S17 0.751
S18 0.745
S19 0.717
S20 0.615
Note: Values below 0.5 are excluded Source: Authors' research
5. Discussions
Regarding the quality of rural tourism offerings, the participants rated the natural beauty as well as the hospitality of the local population the highest, while the sports and recreational offer was rated the lowest. Conversely, the residents believes that the offer of rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed through the financial and institutional backing from local authorities with the aim of bolster agriculture and tourism and with increased use of agricultural produce in creating culinary experiences for tourists, while the residents is involved in the rural tourism can include the supply of catering facilities with agricultural products and selling agricultural products to tourists. The study by Maksimovic et al. (2015, p. 163) describes that rural tourism offers a holistic experience that goes beyond natural and architectural beauty and allows visitors to engage in the distinctive culture and customs and way of life of local communities through personal contact, traditional hospitality and a deep connection with nature. Similar results were obtained in this research, where participants feel it is essential to involve visitors in the activities of the local population, such as traditional events, production, and sale of agricultural products, preparation of gastronomic specialties, and other daily activities of the local community. In the of Remoaldo et al. (2017) conducted in Boticas-Portugal, the results show that residents and stakeholders believe that the rural tourism development can achieve local and regional competitiveness by achieving economic development. Also, two main structural factors of tourism development were identified: religion and tradition, as well as culture and sport. According to the results of this research, the quality of sports and recreational equipment is rated the lowest. The results of the study conducted by Muresan et al. (2016) indicate that in the North-West Region of Romania, the development of rural tourism is viewed positively by the local population, because they are conscious of the advantages, such as employment and welfare increase. Also, the results of this study and findings about residents' attitudes toward tourism development lead to the conclusion that tourism development improves the quality of life of residents due to its effect on economic development of the area, which in turn leads to new employment opportunities. An interesting finding of the research is that the residents of Vrnjacka Banja included in this research has mostly secondary or higher education, which could be related to their prevailing belief that raising understanding and educating the residents about the importance of rural tourism development (S2) is essential for the advancement of rural tourism in the region.
The research in this paper, as mentioned above, was conducted based on previous research by the authors Podovac et al. (2019) who were engaged in the analysis of rural tourism in the function of improving the quality of life of the residents of Goc Mountain. A similarity can be observed in terms of the results obtained. Namely, when it comes to the possibility of developing rural tourism on Goc Mountain, the residents of Vrnjacka Banja believes that this mountain has potential for the rural tourism. Based on the research conducted in this paper, the local population of Vrnjacka Banja believes that the villages within the Vrnjacka Banja municipality have the potential for this type of tourism. The results obtained by the research of the authors Podovac et al. (2019), are also similar to the research of this paper regarding the level of involvement of the residents of Vrnjacka Banja in the development of rural tourism within the territory of the municipality.
In this study, factor analysis unveiled five influential factors based on conducted research on rural tourism development in rural areas of the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja: (1) Stakeholder inclusion and community awareness in rural tourism development, (2) Community involvement in accommodation and agricultural products for rural tourism advancement, (3) Involvement of tourists in community activities and local traditional events, (4) Promoting rural tourism through active participation of tourists and locals in activities
concerning local natural assets, (5) Traditional values revival via tourism events and offerings. Drawing from the findings of the study, the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja shows significant potential for the rural tourism, with 92.7% of respondents affirming this view. Additionally, respondents highlighted the natural beauty of the rural areas in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality and the hospitality of the local population, which can be used as key factors in promoting rural tourism. Based on the results of descriptive statistics, the following research hypotheses were confirmed:
- Hj: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed by engaging the local population in the production and sale of agricultural products (MS6=4.I3; Ms7=4.47; Msj3=4.48; Msj4=4.53);
- H2: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed by engaging the local population in the provision of accommodation services for tourists (Ms8=4.03; Ms9=4.32; Msj5=4.27);
- H3: Rural tourism in the Vrnjacka Banja municipality can be developed through the organization of traditional village events (Msjj=4.41; Msj8=4.46);
- H4: The involvement of tourists in the daily activities of the local population is an important factor for rural tourism development in the Vrnjacka Banja muncipality (Mrfo=3.97; Msj7=3.82);
6. Conclusions
Rural tourism is fundamental for both economic growth and the preservation of culture. Involving the residents in the rural tourism of the Vrnjacka Banja municipality would ensure authenticity and community empowerment. Local knowledge is important in creating experiences that highlight the uniqueness of the region while respecting its environment and traditions. This collaboration fosters a sense of pride and ownership among locals and enriches the overall tourist experience.
Limiting factors of the research are reflected in the small sample of respondents. The exclusion of tourists from this research is another limitation, as their perspectives play a pivotal role in shaping rural tourism. In addition to examining the perception and attitudes of residents and the carriers of the tourist offer, it is of great importance to examine the perception of other interested parties for the development of rural tourism in Vrnjacka Banja municipality. Therefore, the obtained results leave room for further research. Future research can be conducted on a larger sample of respondents, including tourists and other stakeholders.
This research enriches the scholarly discourse on the socio and economic dynamics of rural communities and their interplay with rural tourism. The possibility of a future direction of research exists in terms of carrying out more detailed research and examination of the development of rural tourism starting from the identified factors from this research.
On a practical level, the paper recognizes unused potential in the rural areas of Vrnjacka Banja. It goes beyond mere identification by inspiring greater involvement from stakeholders, including residents. By emphasizing the significance of rural tourism and local community, the paper motivates informed decision-making, fostering a collaborative environment. This practical contribution lays the groundwork for sustainable rural tourism development in the region, benefitting both the community and those interested in its growth.
Acknowledgement
This research is supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia by the Decision on the scientific research funding for teaching staff at the accredited higher education institutions in 2024 (No. 451-03-65/202403/200375 of February 5, 2024) and by the Decision on realization and funding of scientific research of Scientific Research Organizations in 2024 (No. 451-03-66/2024-03/200375 of February 5, 2024).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. References
1. Abdollahzadeh, G., & Sharifzadeh, A. (2014). Rural residents' perceptions toward tourism development: A study from Iran. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16(2), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1906
2. Andriotis, K., & Vaughan, R. D. (2003). Urban residents' attitudes toward tourism development: The case of Crete. Journal of Travel Research, 42(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503257488
3. Ap, J. (1992). Residents' perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(4), 665-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3
4. Blesic, I., Pivac, T., Besermenji, S., Ivkov-Dzigurski, A., & Kosic, K. (2014). Residents' attitudes and perception towards tourism development: A case study of rural tourism in Dragacevo, Serbia. Eastern European Countryside, 20(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2014-0007
5. Borovic, S., Stojanovic, K., & Cvijanovic, D. (2022). The future of rural tourism in the Republic of Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, 69(3), 925-938. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2203925B
6. Brouder, P., Karlsson, S., & Lundmark, L. (2015). Hyper-production: A new metric of multifunctionality. European Countryside, 7(3), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2015-0009
7. Chang, K. G., Chien, H., Cheng, H., & Chen, H. I. (2018). The impacts of tourism development in rural indigenous destinations: An investigation of the local residents' perception using Choice Modeling. Sustainability, 10(12), 4766. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124766
8. Craciun, A. M., Dezsi, S., Pop, F., & Cecilia, P. (2022). Rural tourism - Viable alternatives for preserving local specificity and sustainable socio-economic development: Case study "Valley of the Kings" (Gurghiului Valley, Mures County, Romania). Sustainability, 14(23), 16295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316295'
9. Cvijanovic D., & Ruzic, P. (2017). Ruralni turizam [Rural tourism], Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia: Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjacka Banja, University of Kragujevac.
10. Dimitrijevic, M., Ristic, L., & Boskovic, N. (2022). Rural tourism as a driver of the economic and rural development in the Republic of Serbia. Hotel and Tourism Management, 10(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.5937/menhottur2201079D
11. Dimitrovski, D., Milicevic, S., & Lakicevic, M. (2021). Specificni oblici turizma [Specific forms of tourism]. Vrnjacka Banja, Serbia: Faculty of Hotel Management and Tourism in Vrnjacka Banja, University of Kragujevac.
12. Fang, W. T. (2020). Tourism in emerging economies. Singapore: Springer.
13. Fleischer, A., & Felsenstein, D. (2000). Support for rural tourism: Does it make a difference? Annals of Tourism Research, 27(4), 1007-1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00126-7
14. Fleischer, A., & Pizam, A. (1997). Rural tourism in Israel. Tourism Management, 18(6), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(97)00034-4
15. Gasevic, D. L., Jovicic, D., Tomasevic, D., & Vranjes, M. (2017). Primena faktorske analize u istrazivanju potrosackog etnocentrizma [Application of factor analysis in consumer ethnocentrism research]. International Journal of Economic Practice and Policy, 2, 18-37. https://doi.org/10.5937/skolbiz2-16038
16. Kuvan, Y., & Akan, P. (2005). Residents' attitudes toward general and forest-related impacts of tourism: The case of Belek, Antalya. Tourism Management, 26(5), 691-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.02.019
17. Lane, B. (1994). Sustainable rural tourism strategies: A tool for development and conservation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2(1), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510687
18. Látková, P., & Vogt, C. A. (2012). Residents' attitudes toward existing and future tourism development in rural communities. Journal of Travel Research, 51(1), 50-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287510394193
19. Li, S. C. H., Rahimi, R., & Stylos, N. (2020). Selling to Consumers. In A. Oriade & P. Robinson (Eds.), Rural tourism and enterprise management marketing sustainability (pp. 19-33). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
20. Long, P., & Lane, B. (2000). Rural tourism development. In W. C. Gartner & D. W. Lime (Eds.). Trends in outdoor recreation, leisure and tourism (pp. 299-308). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994031.0299
21. Maksimovic, M., Urosevic, S., & Damnjanovic, Z. (2015). Theoretical concepts of rural tourism and opportunities for development in the Republic of Serbia. EMIT-Economics Management Information Technology, 3(3), 162-172.
22. Melovic, M. (2022). Agritourism in Montenegro - Empirical research in the function of strategic development. Hotel and Tourism Management, 10(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.5937/menhottur2201009M
23. Milicevic, S., Bordevic, N., & Mandaric, M. (2023). Rural tourism: Empowering rural development. International Scientific Conference Sustainable Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentIV. Belgrade: Institute of Agricultural Economics.
24. Milicevic, S., Podovac, M., & Bordevic, N. (2020). Local residents' attitudes towards tourism events: A case study of the Carnival of Vrnjci, Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, 66(2), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika2002075M
25. Municipality of Vrnjacka Banja (2024). Strategija poljoprivrede i ruralnog razvoja Opstine Vrnjacka Banja 2014 - 2024. [Strategy of agriculture and rural development of the municipality of Vrnjacka Banja, 2014 - 2024.]. Retrieved January 5, 2024 from https://www.vmjackabanja.gov.rs/images/clanak/633/dokumenta/preuzmite-dokument-strategij a-poljoprivrede-i-ruralnog-razvoj a-opstine-vrnj acka-banj a-2014-2024.pdf
26. Muresan, I. C., Oroian, C. F., Harun, R., Arion, F. H., Porutiu, A., Chiciudean, G. O., Todea, A., & Lile, R. (2016). Local residents' attitude toward sustainable rural tourism development. Sustainability, 8(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010100
27. Nedeljkovic, M., Puska, A., & Krstic, S. (2022). Multicriteria approach to rural tourism development in Republic of Srpska. Economics of Agriculture, 69(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2201013N
28. Njegovan, Z., Demirovic, D. F., & Radovic, G. (2015). Upravljanje odrzivim razvojem ruralnog turizma u Vojvodini [Management of sustainable development of rural tourism in Vojvodina]. Skola biznisa, 1/2015. https://doi.org/10.5937/skolbiz1-7899
29. OECD (2020). OECD Rural studies rural well-being geography of opportunities.
Retrieved November 5, 2023 from https://www.oecd.org/regional/rural-development/PH_Rural-Well-Being.pdf
30. Pallant, J. (2006). SPSS Prirucnik za prezivljavanje [SPSS Survival Manual]. Belgrade, Serbia: Mikro knjiga.
31. Papastathopoulos, A., Ahmad, S. Z., Al Sabri, N., & Kaminakis, K. (2020). Demographic analysis of residents' support for tourism development in the UAE: A Bayesian structural equation modeling multigroup approach. Journal of Travel Research, 59(6), 1119-1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519874131
32. Paresishvili, O., Kvaratskhelia, L., & Mirzaeva, V. (2017). Rural tourism as a promising trend of small business in Georgia: Topicality, capabilities, peculiarities. Annals of Agrarian Science, 15(3), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.aasci.2017.07.008
33. Penic, M. (2016). Kvalitet smestajnih kapaciteta kao indicator razvijenosti ruralnog turizma u Srbiji [The quality of accommodation facilities as an indicator of the development of rural tourism in Serbia] (PhD thesis). University of Novi Sad, Serbia.
34. Podovac, M., Bordevic, N., & Milicevic, S. (2019). Rural tourism in the function of life quality improvement of rural population on Goc mountain. Economics of Agriculture, 66(1), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1901205P
35. Puska, A., Pamucar, D., Stojanovic, I., Cavallaro, F., Kaklauskas, A., & Mardani, A. (2021). Examination of the sustainable rural tourism potential of the Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina using a fuzzy approach based on group decision making. Sustainability, 13(2), 583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020583
36. Puska, A., Stojanovic, I., & Maksimovic, A. (2019). Evaluation of sustainable rural tourism potential in Brcko district of Bosnia and Herzegovina using multi-criteria analysis. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 2(2), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta190261p
37. Remoaldo, P., Freitas, I., Matos, O., Silva, S., & Ribeiro, V. (2017). The planning of tourism on rural areas: The stakeholders' perceptions of the Boticas municipality (Northeastern Portugal). European Countryside, 9(3), 504-525. https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0030'
38. Sanagustin Fons, M. V., Mosene Fierro, J. A., & Gomez y Patino, M. (2011). Rural tourism: A sustainable alternative. Applied Energy, 88(2), 551-557.
39. Scutariu, A. L., & Scutariu, P. (2023). Perceptions of the local government and the residents regarding rural tourism development effects. Survey in the Suceava County -Romania. Ciencia Rural, 53(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210911
40. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2022). Municipalities and Regions in the Republic of Serbia. Retrieved January 10, 2024 from http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs
41. Verbole, A. (2000). Actors, discourses and interfaces of rural tourism development at the local community level in Slovenia: Social and political dimensions of the rural tourism development process. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(6), 479-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667381
42. Wilson, S., Fesenmaier, D. R., Fesenmaier, J., & Van Es, J. C. (2001). Factors for success in rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 40(2), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728750104000203
43. Zhongwei, G., & Ang, H. (2022). Research on the development of rural tourism in the context of comprehensively promoting rural revitalization: A social system-based approach. Contemporary Social Sciences, 5(4), 49-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.19873/j.cnki.2096-0212.2022.05.004
