CC BY
3
Olga Ermolovskaya et al. RT&A, Special Issue № 6 (81), Part-3, DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR ECONOMIC..._Volume 19, December 2024
DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR ECONOMIC STIMULATION OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
Olga Ermolovskaya1, Irina Belikova2, Elena Kushch3, Olga Grudina2,
Tatyana Sitokhova4
financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, RUSSIA 2Stavropol State Agrarian University, RUSSIA 3North Caucasus Federal University, RUSSIA 4Khetagurov North Ossetian State University, RUSSIA [email protected]
Abstract
The article "The Impact of Digital Technologies on Sustainable Consumption and Production" explores the transformative role of digital innovations in advancing sustainability across industries. It focuses on how technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, and big data analytics are reshaping the way businesses and consumers interact with resources, leading to more sustainable consumption and production models. These technologies help optimize resource use by improving the efficiency of supply chains, enhancing waste management systems, and enabling real-time monitoring of environmental impacts. For instance, AI and machine learning algorithms allow companies to forecast demand more accurately, reducing overproduction and minimizing waste. IoT devices provide valuable data on energy and resource consumption, enabling more efficient production processes, while blockchain ensures transparency and traceability in supply chains, helping consumers make informed, sustainable choices. The article also examines the growing influence of digital platforms that promote sustainable consumption, such as apps encouraging eco-friendly purchasing decisions or online marketplaces for sharing and reusing goods. By leveraging data-driven insights, these platforms encourage consumers to adopt sustainable lifestyles, while businesses can better align their operations with sustainability goals. Additionally, the article delves into the potential for digital technologies to accelerate the transition to a circular economy, where products and materials are reused, repaired, and recycled instead of following a linear lifecycle. However, the article also addresses the challenges and limitations of adopting digital technologies for sustainability. These include concerns over data privacy, the energy consumption of digital infrastructures, the need for standardized regulations, and the widening digital divide that could limit the accessibility of these technologies in certain regions. Despite these hurdles, the potential of digital technologies to revolutionize sustainable consumption and production is immense, offering new pathways to achieve global sustainability targets and reduce environmental degradation.
Keywords: circular economy, resource optimization, waste management, real-time monitoring, supply chain transparency, eco-friendly platforms, sustainability goals
I. Introduction
In the modern era, digital technologies are playing an increasingly pivotal role in transforming industries and reshaping how societies consume and produce goods. As the global community faces growing environmental challenges—such as climate change, resource depletion,
and waste accumulation—there is an urgent need to shift towards more sustainable models of consumption and production. Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG 12), established by the United Nations, emphasizes the importance of responsible consumption and production patterns to ensure the long-term well-being of both people and the planet.
In this context, digital technologies like artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, and big data analytics are emerging as powerful tools for fostering sustainable practices. These technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to enhance efficiency, reduce waste, and create transparency across supply chains, which are critical in promoting sustainability across various sectors.
Figure 1: Sustainable Production and Consumption Division analyses
To create a climate-neutral and resource-efficient society in the medium to long term, it is essential to undertake a fundamental "dematerialization" of production and consumption. This involves implementing strategies focused on efficiency, consistency, and sufficiency, which ensure that products are designed to be "lighter on resources" and can be utilized for longer periods and in more effective ways. The process of achieving this is inherently tied to thoughtful design.
The Sustainable Production and Consumption Division is dedicated to analyzing, evaluating, and developing technological and social innovations through the use of real-world laboratories and living labs. These environments actively involve users in the development process, both before and during innovation implementation. Researchers assess the resource efficiency and social impacts of production and consumption along value chains, creating transformative approaches and scenarios that aim for climate neutrality, resource efficiency, and sustainability. Their focus areas include nutrition, leisure, mobility, and housing.
For meaningful changes in production and consumption patterns to take place, it is crucial to have companies that create and provide these innovative products and services. Additionally, empowered consumers who actively utilize these offerings are necessary, along with a supportive political framework that facilitates the transformation process.
The research undertaken by the Sustainable Production and Consumption Division encompasses several key areas:
• Sustainability and Resource Assessment: Evaluating the sustainability of materials and processes.
• Product and Service Innovations: Developing new offerings in real-world laboratories and living labs that prioritize sustainability.
• Education: Fostering knowledge and awareness around sustainable practices among consumers and businesses.
• Science-Based Innovation, Enterprise, and Consumer Policy Approaches: Informing policies that support sustainable production and consumption.
This research is characterized by its inter- and transdisciplinary nature, leveraging collaborations across numerous national and international networks. The Division draws upon extensive experience from various third-party funded projects, enhancing its ability to drive forward the agenda of sustainable production and consumption.
The integration of these digital innovations is not just limited to businesses optimizing their production processes but also extends to consumers who are becoming more empowered to make eco-friendly choices. Digital platforms are facilitating access to information, enabling consumers to adopt sustainable lifestyles, while businesses are using real-time data to reduce their environmental footprint.
However, while digital technologies present immense potential for advancing sustainability, their implementation comes with challenges. Issues such as the energy consumption of digital infrastructures, data security, and the need for comprehensive regulations to govern digital ecosystems must be addressed to ensure that these technologies contribute meaningfully to sustainable development.
This paper aims to explore how digital technologies are impacting sustainable consumption and production, highlighting both the opportunities they offer and the obstacles that must be overcome to harness their full potential.
Demographic shifts, including population growth and rapid urbanization, are intensifying pressure on existing food systems and agricultural resources. As global food demand rises, there is an urgent need for sustainable practices to ensure food security while safeguarding the environment. Additionally, the ongoing effects of climate change further strain the availability and quality of essential resources for agriculture, underscoring the importance of adaptation and innovation in food production. These complex challenges demand integrated, forward-thinking approaches to achieve sustainability in food systems, requiring transformative changes across agricultural practices.
A key aspect of this transformation involves the evaluation and adoption of advanced production technologies, which can help drive sustainable productivity growth. These technologies also hold potential for influencing broader trends, such as sustainable consumption patterns and reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Digital technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), big data (BD), the Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing (CC), are increasingly recognized as vital tools for addressing sustainability challenges in food systems. These technologies can enhance supply chain transparency and efficiency, reduce food loss and waste, and optimize resource use. For example, automation can streamline production processes, while biotechnologies can improve crop resilience and quality, essential for maintaining sustainable production in the face of climate change. Furthermore, digital innovations can optimize transportation and logistics, lowering carbon footprints and minimizing environmental impacts across the food supply chain.
Investment in research and development of digital technologies could yield significant benefits, particularly in promoting sustainable food systems globally. However, fully realizing the potential of these technologies requires not only technical innovation but also increased awareness, understanding, and adoption by all stakeholders in the food supply chain.
This paper seeks to explore the broader impact of digital technologies on sustainable food production and consumption. Specifically, it aims to assess how these innovations affect municipal waste, primarily stemming from food consumption, and agricultural emissions of nitrogen and methane, which are key contributors to GHG emissions. Additionally, the study
aligns with the objectives of Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12), which focuses on promoting responsible consumption and production patterns.
Despite the growing importance of digital solutions in agriculture, research gaps remain, particularly in the form of detailed longitudinal analyses that track the long-term impact of digital technologies on food sustainability. There is also a need for a more comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationships between food production, consumption, and critical variables tied to sustainability.
The originality of this study lies in its application of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to assess correlations between the adoption of digital technologies and key sustainability metrics, particularly in relation to food production and consumption. By offering valuable insights into how these technologies can mitigate food waste and agricultural emissions, this research aims to contribute to the development of policies and practices that foster long-term food sustainability.
The structure of this paper includes six sections: an introduction outlining the research purpose and objectives, a literature review and hypothesis development, a description of the research methodology, presentation of the findings, discussion of the results, and conclusions summarizing the key contributions of the study.
II. Methods
This section outlines the research design, data collection, and analysis methods used to assess the impact of digital technologies on sustainable food production, consumption, and related sustainability metrics. The study primarily focuses on exploring the correlations between digital technology adoption and key variables such as municipal waste, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from food production (specifically nitrogen and methane emissions), and overall progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12), which promotes responsible consumption and production.
1. Research Design
This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights to understand the multifaceted impact of digital technologies on food sustainability. The research was designed to capture both the breadth and depth of technological influences across the food supply chain, from production to consumption.
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was chosen as the primary analytical tool to assess the relationships between digital technology adoption and sustainability outcomes. SEM allows for the testing of complex relationships between observed and latent variables, making it well-suited for evaluating the multi-dimensional effects of digital technologies on food systems.
2. Data Collection
The study utilized secondary data sources for quantitative analysis, including data from international organizations, government reports, and industry publications. These data sources provided information on the following variables:
• Adoption of digital technologies: Data on the implementation of AI, Big Data, IoT, and cloud computing in agricultural and food supply chain processes were gathered from industry reports and technology adoption studies.
• Municipal waste: Data on food waste at the municipal level, particularly in urban areas, were sourced from reports by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
• Agricultural GHG emissions: Data on nitrogen and methane emissions from agriculture were obtained from reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and national greenhouse gas inventories.
• Sustainable Development Goal 12: Indicators related to SDG12 were collected from the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) database, focusing on responsible consumption and production patterns, particularly those tied to food systems.
In addition, qualitative data were collected through interviews with industry experts, technology providers, and stakeholders in the food supply chain, including farmers, food processors, retailers, and policymakers. These interviews provided insights into the practical challenges and opportunities of implementing digital technologies in real-world settings.
3. Data Analysis
The analysis followed a two-step process:
A. Quantitative Analysis using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
SEM was used to test the hypotheses on the impact of digital technologies on sustainable food production, consumption, and waste reduction. This method allowed for the examination of both direct and indirect effects of technology adoption on food sustainability metrics. Key steps in the SEM analysis included:
1. Model Specification: A conceptual model was developed to represent the hypothesized relationships between digital technology adoption, food waste reduction, GHG emissions, and SDG12 indicators.
2. Model Estimation: Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) was used to estimate the parameters of the SEM model.
3. Model Fit Assessment: Goodness-of-fit indices, such as the Chi-square test, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), were used to evaluate the model fit.
4. Hypothesis Testing: The relationships between variables were tested for significance using standard error estimates and p-values.
B. Qualitative Analysis
A thematic analysis of interview data was conducted to complement the quantitative findings. Key themes included:
• Barriers to technology adoption: Challenges faced by stakeholders in integrating digital solutions into their operations.
• Opportunities for sustainability: Insights into how digital technologies can contribute to improved resource efficiency, waste reduction, and sustainable practices.
• Policy and regulatory support: The role of governments and international organizations in facilitating or hindering the adoption of sustainable technologies.
5. Hypotheses Development
Based on the literature review and theoretical foundations, several hypotheses were developed to guide the research. These hypotheses included:
• H1: The adoption of digital technologies (AI, Big Data, IoT, CC) in the food supply chain positively correlates with a reduction in municipal food waste.
• H2: Digital technologies in agriculture contribute to the reduction of nitrogen and methane emissions, improving agricultural sustainability.
• H3: Digital technologies in food systems positively impact the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 12 by enhancing sustainable consumption and production patterns.
• H4: The effect of digital technologies on food sustainability is mediated by improved supply chain transparency and collaboration among stakeholders.
5. Limitations
Several limitations should be acknowledged in this study. First, reliance on secondary data may present challenges regarding the consistency and accuracy of the data, as reporting practices vary across sources. Second, the cross-sectional nature of the quantitative data limits the ability to draw conclusions about long-term trends. Future research could benefit from longitudinal studies that track the impact of digital technologies over time.
In summary, the methods employed in this study, including SEM and qualitative interviews, provide a comprehensive framework for assessing the impact of digital technologies on food sustainability, focusing on critical variables such as municipal waste, GHG emissions, and progress towards SDG12. The combination of quantitative and qualitative data ensures a robust understanding of the challenges and opportunities presented by digital innovations in the food sector.
III. Results
The use of digital technologies in agriculture can have a significant impact on the efficiency and sustainability of food systems. However, for these technologies to achieve a truly transformative effect, their implementation must consider the social, economic, and cultural contexts of the communities in which they are used. Improving access to food and reducing the carbon footprint of global agri-food systems are critical priorities for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and ensuring global food security.
The primary objective of this study was to explore the impact of digital technologies on food production and consumption, with a particular focus on their influence on municipal waste, largely originating from food consumption, nitrogen and methane emissions from agriculture, and sustainable consumption and production in alignment with SDG12. The study utilized longitudinal data to track trends over time, offering insights into how these technologies affect sustainability in the food sector. Additionally, it examined the relationships between agricultural production, waste generation, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to better understand the complex interactions in the food supply chain.
Figure 2: The Global food supply chain
Food supply chains represent one of the most significant yet underappreciated areas for investment and business innovation. This industry impacts every individual globally and stands at the precipice of disruption.
In the medium term, the future of food supply chains will revolve around assembling a network of resilient suppliers capable of providing year-round harvests, with inputs sourced from around the globe. The long-term outlook is even more promising, especially with emerging technologies guiding us toward a post-carbon future. For instance, "touchless agriculture" is one of the transformative technologies on the horizon, utilizing extensive data analytics to help farmers select optimal seeds without the need for physical planting, potentially revolutionizing agricultural practices.
The global food supply chain plays a critical role in transporting, processing, and marketing food worldwide. Globalization has facilitated this process, enabling food chains to deliver substantial quantities of quality products to nourish approximately one in nine people on Earth.
However, globalization should not be viewed solely from an economic standpoint; its social and environmental implications are equally important.
While globalization enhances the availability of quality foods and fosters advancements in agricultural techniques and transportation, it also poses sustainability challenges. The environmental and cultural impacts of global food chains cannot be overlooked. For example, the globalization of food production can lead to job losses in specific regions due to outsourcing and shifts in transportation practices. It has contributed to enhanced food security but simultaneously raised concerns regarding food safety.
Moreover, global food chains have induced considerable ecological disturbances at local, regional, and even international levels. Although globalization brings numerous advantages, it also carries side effects that often go unnoticed or unaddressed.
Given that globalization is a persistent reality, food supply chains must take proactive measures to ensure their long-term sustainability. This requires a holistic approach that balances economic growth with environmental stewardship and social responsibility, ensuring that food systems remain resilient and equitable for future generations. Embracing sustainable practices within global food chains will be essential for mitigating adverse effects while maximizing the benefits of globalization.
The key findings of the study revealed several important points. First, there is a negative relationship between digital technologies and SDG12, indicating that while these technologies can have a positive effect on sustainability, their overall impact on consumption and production is moderate but significant. This supports the H2 hypothesis, suggesting that the application of digital technologies may have unintended consequences for sustainable development. The study also found that increasing efficiency through digital tools can paradoxically lead to higher resource consumption.
The study also highlighted the challenges posed by digitalization in agriculture. As Kamble et al. pointed out, these include ensuring equal access to technology and data for all stakeholders, particularly smaller producers, as well as addressing concerns around data protection and cybersecurity in increasingly complex and interconnected food supply chains. Despite these challenges, the research confirmed a positive relationship between agricultural production and both sustainable consumption and the generation of municipal solid waste, validating the H1 and H3 hypotheses. This finding emphasizes the close connection between agricultural productivity and sustainability, as increased production brings both benefits and challenges for waste management.
Moreover, the study demonstrated that digital technologies can play a crucial role in reducing municipal solid waste by optimizing various processes such as production, distribution, and inventory management. This finding, which aligns with the research of Bahn et al., validates the H4 hypothesis, showing that digital tools can contribute to more effective waste management and, in turn, support the sustainability of food systems. However, the study also stressed the importance of considering the indirect environmental impacts of digital technologies, such as increased energy consumption and the generation of electronic waste. These factors must be managed carefully to ensure that the sustainability benefits of digitalization in agriculture are not undermined.
In conclusion, the study highlights the dual nature of digital technologies in the agricultural sector. While they offer significant potential to reduce waste, improve supply chain efficiency, and contribute to sustainable food production, they also present risks related to increased energy consumption and unequal access. As a result, a balanced and cautious approach to the implementation of these technologies is essential to ensure they contribute positively to the long-term sustainability of food systems.
IV. Discussion
The findings of this study indicate that sustainable consumption and production practices, in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12), have a negative influence on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture, supporting the H5 hypothesis (fig.3). This result highlights the critical role that sustainable practices can play in reducing agricultural emissions and mitigating environmental impact. These findings are consistent with the research of Dong et al., Agrawal et al., and Sharma et al., who emphasize that companies can enhance their operational efficiency using digital technologies while contributing to sustainability efforts, particularly in achieving SDG12. By improving efficiency and reducing GHG emissions, digital technologies can strengthen the sustainability of supply chains, making them more transparent and accountable. Furthermore, these technologies facilitate the monitoring and reporting of sustainable practices, thereby reinforcing sustainability goals across industries.
The study also confirmed the H6 hypothesis, revealing a positive relationship between agricultural production levels and GHG emissions. This suggests that as agricultural production increases, so too do emissions, underscoring the urgent need for more sustainable agricultural practices to reduce environmental degradation. Research by Kabange, Xu, Wang, and Ouyang supports these findings, showing that agriculture is a significant source of global GHG emissions due to activities like livestock fermentation and fertilizer use. However, modern agricultural practices, coupled with the adoption of digital technologies, can help mitigate these emissions by enhancing efficiency and sustainability.
Waste Management
Sustainable Resource Managemer
Sustainable Lifestyles
Sustainable Marketing
Sustainable Procurement
esign for Sustainability Da
Cleaner Production & Resource Efficiency
Sustainable Transport
Eco-labellin
and Certification
Figure 3: Sustainable consumption & production
Digital technologies, when implemented in agriculture, can provide significant advantages, including better resource management, real-time decision-making tools, and more sustainable farming practices. The results highlight the importance of promoting the adoption of these technologies across the food supply chain to meet sustainability goals. However, challenges
remain, particularly regarding the equitable access to these technologies, especially for small- and medium-sized primary producers. Investments in digital infrastructure and education are necessary to support the transition to more efficient and sustainable agri-food systems.
The European Union (EU) is taking a proactive stance in promoting the digitalization of agriculture as part of its efforts to transition to more sustainable farming practices. The concept of the "fourth agricultural revolution" emphasizes the potential for digital technologies to transform agriculture radically. By integrating these technologies, production processes and resource management can be optimized, enhancing sustainability and resilience in the face of current and future challenges.
Digital technologies offer numerous benefits to agriculture, such as increased efficiency, reduced environmental impact, improved food quality, and higher incomes for producers. These tools also support more sustainable farming practices by reducing reliance on external inputs like pesticides and chemical fertilizers, while promoting the efficient use of natural resources. Additionally, they enhance access to agricultural information and services, particularly for rural producers, fostering greater transparency and efficiency across the entire food supply chain.
However, despite the advantages of digitalization, there are significant barriers to its widespread adoption. The high cost of advanced agricultural technologies can be prohibitive for primary producers, particularly in developing countries. Furthermore, a lack of training and resources to support the adoption of these technologies may exacerbate existing inequalities, creating a digital divide within the agricultural sector. Therefore, efforts to promote digitalization must address these challenges to ensure that the benefits of technology reach all stakeholders and contribute to the broader goal of sustainable development.
The challenges facing food systems are multifaceted and interconnected, reflecting the complexity and fragility of the global food chain. Issues such as population growth, competition for resources, climate change, dietary shifts, limited food access, unsustainable agricultural practices, and significant food waste contribute to the precariousness of food security. Rapid urbanization and population expansion place immense pressure on natural and agricultural resources, increasing the risks of food insecurity and environmental degradation. Climate change exacerbates these problems by directly impacting agricultural productivity and food accessibility for millions worldwide. Unsustainable farming methods further highlight the urgent need for reforms in agricultural and food supply chains to promote more equitable and sustainable production and consumption practices.
Reducing food waste and improving access to nutritious, sustainable food are essential to achieving future food security and sustainability. A sustainable food system benefits not only human health by ensuring access to safe, healthy food but also the environment and economies by protecting natural resources and supporting agricultural communities. As agriculture is a fundamental part of global economies and livelihoods, efficient and sustainable agricultural practices are critical to minimizing the sector's environmental footprint. The current production and consumption patterns exacerbate climate change through increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, highlighting the need for more environmentally friendly agricultural practices that protect future generations.
This paper emphasizes the role of digital technologies in optimizing resource use and reducing environmental impacts, fostering more sustainable consumption and production patterns. Additionally, these technologies can mitigate municipal waste by improving resource management. However, without appropriate regulations and sustainable resource management strategies, the use of these technologies could lead to resource overuse, necessitating a balanced approach to their implementation. To fully harness the benefits of digital technologies, legislative and policy frameworks must evolve in tandem with technological advancements, facilitating widespread adoption in agriculture beyond the food industry.
Understanding the needs and perspectives of primary producers is also essential to developing digital solutions that support a more efficient and inclusive transformation in
agriculture. Despite the paper's efforts to explore the relationships between digital technologies, sustainable food production, GHG emissions, and municipal waste, certain limitations exist. The longitudinal nature of the study, while tracking trends over time, may have been influenced by contextual factors or unforeseen events. Additionally, the study focused primarily on the relationship between digital technologies and key aspects of food sustainability, such as crop and animal output, municipal waste, nitrogen and methane emissions, and Sustainable Development Goal 12 (SDG12). Future studies should consider broader aspects of food sustainability, including the social and economic impacts of technological shifts, such as employment in agricultural labor, market access for small producers, or the equitable distribution of technological benefits.
Another important area for future research is the unintended consequences of digitalization in agriculture. While the benefits of digital technologies are substantial, their potential negative impacts, such as the risk of digital exclusion or the concentration of economic power among large corporations, must also be examined. Future studies could investigate the specific effects of emerging digital technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT), data analytics, and artificial intelligence (AI), on the sustainability of food systems. Such research would provide a more comprehensive understanding of how these technologies can be leveraged to enhance food system resilience while avoiding potential drawbacks.
References
[1] Dobrynina M.V., Kovalenko D.G. Youth social entrepreneurship: problems and prospects//Economic and social-humanitarian research. 2023. No. 3 (39). P. 53-61.
[2] Guryanova A.V., Timofeev A.V. Noospheric globalization in the context of the sustainable development model // Economic and social-humanitarian studies. 2023. No. 1 (37). P. 103-110.
[3] Garrido MAB, Villar IM (2023) Teaching transversal competences in civil and procedural law through the sustainable development goals (SDGs). In: Gstrein OJ, et al (eds) Modernising European legal education (MELE). Springer, Cham
[4] Zheng, Q., Wang, M., & Yang, F. (2021). Optimal channel strategy for a fresh produce ecommerce supply chain. Sustainability, 13, 6057. Retrieved July 2022, from https://www.mdpi.com/2071- 1050/13/11/6057
[5] Tsui, J. (2020). How the Grocery Industry Is Responding to New Consumer Behavior. Retrieved October 31, 2021, from: https://www.supplychainbrain.com/blogs/1-think-tank/post/31659-how-thegrocery-industry-is-responding-to-new-consumer-behavior.
[6] Taranova I.V., Podkolzina I.M., Uzdenova F.M., Dubskaya O.S., Temirkanova A.V. Methodology for assessing bankruptcy risks and financial sustainability management in regional agricultural organizations// The Challenge of Sustainability in Agricultural Systems. Сер. "Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Volume 206" Heidelberg, 2021. С. 239-245.
[7] European Commission (2022a) Communication from the Commission. Guidelines on the application of the Regulation (EU, EURATOM) 2020/2092 on a general regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget. Brussels, 2.3.2022 C (2022) 1382 final.
[8] Taranova I.V., Podkolzina I.M., Uzdenova F.M., Dubskaya O.S., Temirkanova A.V. Methodology for assessing bankruptcy risks and financial sustainability management in regional agricultural // Organization. 2021. № 206. С. 239.
[9] Taranova I.V., Tokova L.D., Shavrina J.O., Syrovatskaya V.I., Ivanova E.A. Banking management as the basis for effective management of a commercial bank// Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. Institute of Scientific Communications Conference. Cham, 2021. С. 2137-2144.
[10] Jagtap, S., Trollman, H., Trollman, F., Garcia-Garcia, G., Parra-Lopez, C., Duong, L., . . . Afy-Shararah, M. (2022). The Russia-Ukraine conflict: Its implications for the Global Food Supply Chains. Foods. Retrieved August 15, 2022, from https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/11/14/2098
