CC BY
27
UDC: 351.851:005.332.3
Semenets-Orlova Inna Andriivna,
PhD (Politics), Doctoral Candidate of Education Management Department, National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, 03057, Kiev, Str. Eugene Potier, 20, tel.: (044) 455 69 00, e-mail: innaorlova@ukr.net
ORCID: 0000-0001-9227-7426
Семенець-Орлова 1нна Андривна,
кандидат полтичних наук, докторант кафедри управлтня освтою, Нащональ-на академiя державного управлтня при Президентовi Украти, 03057, м. Кигв, вул. Ежена Потье, 20, тел.: (044) 455 69 00, e-mail: innaorlova@ukr.net
ORCID: 0000-0001-9227-7426
Семенец-Орлова Инна Андреевна,
кандидат политических наук, докторант кафедры управления образованием, Национальная академия государственного управления при Президенте Украины, 03057, г. Киев, ул. Эжена Потье, 20, тел.: (044) 455 69 00, e-mail: innaorlova@ukr.net
ORCID: 0000-0001-9227-7426
TRANSFORMATION iN EDUCATiON iNSTiTUTiONS iN A CONTEXT OF SOCiAL CONFLiCTS:
UPON M. MAFFESOLI'S CONCEPT OF THE "NEO-TRiBALiSM" ARCHETYPE
Abstract. This article analyzes trends neo-tribalism, reflecting the complex of social transformation in modern society. The author examines the characteristic features neo-tribes, performs comparative analysis of modern traditional tribes. In the context of this problem much attention paid to the concepts ethnocentrism and tribalism, regionalism, regional patriotism. The author analyzes educational institutional transformation within the regulatory phase 3rd epochal cycle. On the basis of bias neo-tribalism author proves critical need for successful completion of power decentralization reform, ensuring real autonomy of educational institutions in modern Ukraine, which will create an organic basis for the reform of secondary education and the implementation of other major educational changes.
Keywords: archetypes, neo-tribes, ethnocentrism, educational institutional transformation cycle paradigm.
ДИНАМ1КА ОСВ1ТН1Х 1НСТИТУЦ1ЙНИХ ЗМ1Н У КОНТЕКСТ КОНФЛ1КТНОСТ1 СОЦ1УМУ: АРХЕТИПНИЙ КОНЦЕПТ "НЕОТРАЙБАЛ1ЗМУ" М. МАФФЕСОЛ1
Анотацiя. Стаття присвячена аналiзу тенденци неотрайбалiзму, що вщо-бражае складну трансформацiю соцiальностi в сучасному сустльствь Автор дослiджуe характеры ознаки неотрайбiв, здiйснюе компаративний аналiз традицiйних племен iз сучасними племенами. У контекст дано! проблематики значну увагу придшено концепцiям етноцентризму i трайбалiзму, реriоналiзащl, територiального патрютизму. Автор аналiзуe освiтнi шститу-цшш трансформаци в межах нормативних фаз 3-го епохального циклу. На основi врахування тенденцшносп неотрайбалiзму автор обгрунтовуе кри-тичну потребу успiшного закшчення реформи децентра^зацп влади, забез-печення реально! автономи закладiв освiти в сучаснш Укра1ш, що створить оргашчну основу для здiйснення реформи середньо! освiти та впроваджен-ня шших масштабних освiтнiх змiн.
Ключовi слова: архетипи, неотрайби, етноцентризм, освiтнi шституцшш трансформаций циклiчна парадигма.
ДИНАМИКА ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНЫХ ИНСТИТУЦИОНАЛЬНЫХ
ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ В КОНТЕКСТЕ КОНФЛИКТНОСТИ СОЦИУМА: АРХЕТИПИЧЕСКИЙ КОНЦЕПТ "НЕОТРАЙБАЛИЗМА" М. МАФФЕСОЛИ
Аннотация. Статья посвящена анализу тенденции неотрайбализма, которая отражает сложную трансформацию социальности в современном обществе. Автор исследует наиболее характерные черты неотрайбов, осуществляет компаративный анализ традиционных племен с современными племенами. В контексте данной проблематики значительное внимание уделено концепциям этноцентризма и трайбализма, регионализации, территориального патриотизма. Автор анализирует образовательные институциональные трансформации в рамках нормативных фаз 3-го эпохального цикла. На основе учета тенденциозности неотрайбализма автор обосновывает критическую потребность успешного окончания реформы децентрализации власти, обеспечение реальной автономии учебных заведений в современной Украине. Это создаст органическую основу для осуществления реформы среднего образования и внедрения других масштабных образовательных изменений.
Ключевые слова: архетипы, неотрайбы, этноцентризм, образовательные институциональные трансформации, циклическая парадигма.
The formulation of the problem:
Education systems are closely connected with culture and social institutions. In the 21st century, the scientific
community can state the formation of a new package of socio-anthropologi-cal projects in response to which new educational practices are being cre-
ated. The education and the pedagogical activities are always guided by the leading type of sociality. So at the stage of postmodernity the imperative to "teach everyone everything in the traditional institutions of education" has lost relevance long time ago. During the post-modern period, the way of the "pedagogy of knowledge" to "the pedagogy of research, design, activity", the teacher ("the one that lays the foundation" [31, p. 137]) mastered the new roles of the coach and tutor — now he does not broadcast knowledge, but he manages the educational search for applicants. According to M. Pyatkov, the substantive basis and law of development of the entire social are placed in a single archetype — the archetype of changes [29]. What will be the direction of the following educational transformations in the era of large-scale, and sometimes unstable social changes?
The condition of modern society is characterized by the disintegration of meta narratives and their replacement by signs, simulacrums, images, symbols that form a new (postmodern) solidarity, create a new "fascination" of the world in the minds of people. "People bring victims for "Deities" of local importance (love, commerce, territory, food, beauty, etc.), which names have changed in comparison with the era of antiquity, but the functions did not, "said M. Maffesoli, when he is describing the" divine social" [24]. The technological development of modernity is suprainnovations, however, as sociologists show, it is impossible without the synergy of archaic elements that define the framework for a complex transformation of sociality. In our time, noted by American sociologists N. Glazer and
D. Moynihan, the tendency of many people in many circumstances to insist on the importance of their group affiliation and originality, and on the rights that follow from this, has significantly increased [5]. This process is named by scientists like "mass retribaliza-tion, which emergent is in response to the limited ability of large associations of people and systems of power, the uncertainty of the structural links of modernity, and leads to a looseness of social tissue. There is a growing interest in marginalized groups, minorities, ethnic communities, exotic religions, etc. — as the desire of the modern human to "substantiate their world". On the grass-roots level of society there is an active generation of new individual and the collective identities are in connection with which the vertical corpo-rateism is increasingly being replaced by a horizontal one.
In the theory of the well-known professor Sorbonne M. Maffesoli, the new sociality emerges through self-organizing and self-directed affective communities that solve the problems of "domestication" of the surrounding, menacingly unstable world, dehuman-ization of city life, play the role of a defensive association in the conditions of temporary loss of landmarks- neotraiby [7, p. 112]. New tribes widely use the network resources of electronic media, providing their flexibility, the speed of response and energy. According to M. Castells, the power of modern network structures becomes stronger than the institutions of political power [22].
Neotrabalism is an organic and mass process that demarcates the transformation of the social. If within the individualistic paradigm self-contained
individual a person is the bearer of a certain stable function in society, then the societal paradigm, which is actualized by many modern sociologists, is the basis of a new sociality that determines a person who easily merges with a tribal community, beyond the borders his individuality [1, 2; 7; 12; 13]. In the categories of archetypal methodology, Persona is a social image of a person, a certain generalization of it as a civilized entity, which is ideal from a moral and social point of view. However, within the unbeaten person has the ability to very quickly change their masks, so his role behavior is mega-alternative. The neotraibalism, due to its internal pluralization, blurs the boundaries of imposed schemes of the interpretation of reality. Neotraibs are self-valuable polyfunctional, different-structured microcommunities with free membership, the salutary goal of which is the communication, the play, and the spectacle. According to some scholars, M. Maffesoli tries to declare organization and management of the decentralized communication process in such a way that knowledge from him organically emerges, has the right to life [18, p. 82]. So, for modern tribes the educational function is important. The appearance of ample opportunities for distance education, project activities, teamwork, peer education, participation in webinars, hakatons, lecture rooms, whose offers are received from informal communities, groups in social networks, alternative public associations, the media, gives reason to believe that serious competitors appear in traditional educational institutions. Such dynamics around the educational environment is useful, because it creates
a qualitatively new look at the future of education, the role of its traditional and newest institutions, allows to predict the vector of reforming the system of public education management in Ukraine.
At various stages of social development education served different functions and roles, depending on the context in which its institutions functioned, and the prospective request of consumers of educational services. But one thing has remained constant:
The educated people better understand the complexity of the world, and the presence of a critical mass of well-educated individuals serves as a safeguard for most social conflicts. In that article we will consider three blocks of questions: the problems of non-wrestling, correlation with tribalism and ethnocentrism, the modern co-evolutionary stage of development of the Ukrainian society in the context of the cyclic paradigm and the dynamics of global educational transformations in the context of archetypal methodology, on the basis of which we will make generalizations.
The analysis of the latest publications on problems and the identification of previously unsolved parts of a common problem: The postmodern sociology (works of Z. Bauman [1; 2; 13], M. Maffesoli [7; 24; 25]) fixes the symptomatology of the modernist crisis, its exhaustion by the social crisis, which follows, and the need for reconstruction of sociological discourse. "The sociology of postmodern" (the articles of E. Giddens, J. Habermas), on the contrary, postulates the continuity and incompleteness of the modern project. The French sociologist
M. Maffessoli characterizes the transition to postmodernism as a transformation of the "social" (society, mechanical solidarity) into "sociality" (community, organic ("orgiastic") solidarity) [7]. The concept of "neotraib" is the neologism of M. Maffesoli and its widespread use
In scientific discourse is just beginning. The basis of the societal paradigm laid down by the works of W. Sumner [9], which, moreover, conceptualized the concept of ethnocentrism, and his student D. Campbell. The problems of network structures and was discovered in the works of the Spanish sociologist M. Castells [22]. In his opinion, modern networks of social composition replace the previous modern forms of personal and material dependence, and this change in the social system leads new forms in systems of stratification, communication, mobilization, and needs a new flexible culture of relationships. The content characteristics of the "urban tribes" were researched by I. Waters. The archetypal paradigm and sociometric studies are represented in the Ukrainian scientific thought by the works of the scientists of the Ukrainian school of archetypics — E. Afonin [12], A. Sushi, A. Bandurki, A. Martynova [23], etc. The analysis of educational transformations through the prism of neo-urbanism has not yet been the subject to Individual research.
The goal of the article is to analyze the manifestation of non-wrestling trends in the modern world, to estimate their significance in the context of attempts to determine the horizon of the institution of education as a model and project, the formation of educational trends.
The exposition of the main material of the research: On the model of "The Revolt of the Masses" by H. Ortega y Gasset, the Russian sociologist L. Ionin named his work "The Revolt of Minorities". In it, the scientist proves that now belonging to minorities becomes a fashion, even a norm [19]. When a person demonstrates the signs of belonging to a minority, it looks prestigious and in a new way [19, p. 5]. For L. Ionin, the Menshi-nas are: subcultural groups, new religious movements, sex minorities, ethnic minorities, networked minorities. In particular, the latter develop most dynamically, because of their space — virtual space — the sphere of maximum freedom of choice, especially facilitates communication, the simultaneous presence of the individual in many collectives. It is believed that being and responding quickly online is the responsibility of the community member, a sign of virtual courtesy. A secret meeting can be held in a closed group, which, of course, does not replace face to face communication. As futurologist M. Kaiku wrote in Physics of the Future: "In constant competition between High-Tech and High-Toch, we want the first and second" [21, p. 33]. That is why in the era of cyberspace, we have still a live theater, tourism. If we are offered photos of the artist and tickets for his concert, we will choose the tickets (High-Toch). This M. Kaiku calls the principle of caveman: for it was not enough that you praise the good hunting. The caveman would have preferred to hold the dead beast in his hands. Our desires, nature and passions for the last 100,000 years have not changed much. We still, having electronic media, pre-
fer to save the paper copies of information. Therefore, the office without paper did not become a reality. And so a digital hologram of a teacher will never completely replace his living analogue.
The more people move physically, the more they tend to create communities in cyberspace and look for a more stable and more permanent place in the virtual world. According to L. Ionin, this place is the electronic address [20]. However, here it is worth noting the existence of a dual tendency: along with the boundless possibilities of virtual space, a person embraces nostalgia for local, natural. Such a need is also a basis for associations in the modern tribes.
In 1997, the british anthropologist R. Jenkins noted that since the 1960s, the word "tribe" began to change more neutral and such that it is not associated with the colonial era — "ethnic group" [6]. At the same time, the tribute returned to scientific discourse, but in a new sense — M. Maffesoli in 1996 used this term to describe the phenomenon of the growth of the number of geographically dispersed micro-tribal groups based on the matrix of collective emotion, religious spirit, proximity to nature [7, p. 40]. In his article "The Time of the Tribes" M. Mafesioli is rejected from global narratives (for example, the national state), successfully transfers the accent from the society to a community that is once again experiencing the myth "here and now". Characterizing the current trend, such the predominance of the whole over the individual, concealing depth on the surface of things, M. Maffesoli uses the term "formism". In his vision, the non-static world is full of social networks,
based on minute and minor everyday situations, emotional excitement with a characteristic catharsis, deep solidarity. The regulators of the sensitivity of neotraibs are joint activities, holidays, rituals, that create the community anew, and open the opportunity to feel together, experience the same passion, build on the shared experience and experience of the Other [7].
According to M. Maffesoli, all institutions from micro-groups to the state are an expression of "divine social" [24]. New tribes in the concept of M. Maffe-soli are formed both on the basis of a local (territorial feature) and an imaginary (general idea) criterion, as well as style, worldview, and game. These are not subcultures, that is, communities based on a somewhat different style than for the overwhelming majority of the population, these are self-sufficient "micro cultures" — youth groups, blog-gers, fans of television series that arise to objectify the idea of "common" as a symbol and space of social life. The social imaginary is cementitious material of neotraibov [7, p. 150], in contrast to the rational choice and the universal moral law of the previous period [7, p. 116].
In the scientific research M. Maffe-soli develops the ideas of his teacher, the cultural anthropologist J. Durand, that the thinking and the Imaginary of human are equal and connected to processes. In the modern world, as many theorists have noted, even a physical space is often replaced by an imaginary one [11]. From here the problem of territorial identity is concerned.
According to A. Musiysdov, territorial identities turn out to be as "natural" (through objective charac-
teristics of the territory), as much as "imaginary" (through the meanings attributed to the territory) [27, p. 27]. In the works of E. Durkheim, French understanding of the "imaginary" can be traced as a landscape of collective aspirations (imaginaire).
The famous theorists M. Castells and E. Giddens, to a certain extent, are considering the question of the so-called societal depoliticization. However, as long as this trend is more correctly described as twofold. Individuals, as before, associate themselves with the place, they consider it important to have a connection with it. Let's remember only the names of volunteer battalions which were created in Ukraine in 2014 — Donbass, Kiev, Slobozhanshchina, Azov, Crimea, Krivbass, Kremenchug, Lviv, Lugansk. Of course, some of them were created under the influence of corporate groups, so this name may sound like a simulacrum, but for others this name is a symbol, a manifestation of the fact that territorial identities continue to play an important role in the self-determination of the individual and in the affairs of the whole state. The presence of territorial communities is conditioned by the existence of common interests for their members related to territorial practices (movement to work, shopping, etc.). Therefore, the foundation for the self-awareness of the territorial community is the necessity to protect these interests — the improvement of the territory, the provision of transport, etc.
The concept of "Territorial patriotism" and "territory consciousness" conceptualizing the Ukrainian conservative V. Lipinsky in his work "Let-
ters to brothers-growers". These issues also acquire the new significance for the processes of decentralization and the creation of joint territorial communities (JTCs) in the modern Ukraine. R. Aron's daughter, sociologist D. Schnaper, refers to the words of T. Parsons that the societal community is a collective organization created in a certain territorial space with a common cultural tradition that relates to "blood" and products of the "contract" [31, p. 179-180]. V. Beck concludes: "Our commitment to a certain region never harms the love of the country as a whole" [3].
According to Musiysdov, in this discourse the constructivist position occupies the main place: the community of the territory is a social construct, and the territorial community is "an imaginary community" [27, p. 29]. As B. Anderson writes, any community is imaginary [11, p. 23]. For example, the nation as an imaginary community was "created" by cartographers, printing machines, newspapers. Now the role of "imagination" in defining the connection between society and the territory is easily traced in the massive spread of attempts to design the image of territories-marketing of territories, is also an important problem for the economic activity of JTC in Ukraine.
Concerning the notation sphere of relations of groups formed on the basis of ethnic attitudes, at the beginning of the 20th century. W. Sumner introduced the notion of "ethnocentrism", considering that in-group relationships (we-group) are always inherent in integration and cooperation, and outgroup (they-group) — competition and hostility [9] (see Table 1). The
Table 1
The comparative analysis of features of modern and traditional tribes*
Traditional tribes (tribes) New tribes (Neotraybs)
Permanent identification of members Temporary identification of members
Generic relations as a factor of unity Leisure, friendly, communal, other connections as a factor associations
Ability to belong to the same tribe Possibility to belong to many tribes (not limited to)
System-forming is tradition The desire for the new is system-forming, but in simultaneous synergy with the sensationalisation of archaic
They have historical content They do not have historical content ("not immortal" in the social sense)
Exist in a uniform cavity time and space Exist in a non-uniform, "multilayer" time and space
The value of territory is the determining factor Some revival of the value of the territory
Focus on uncertain judgments about the future and the eternal, abstract, mythical The emphasis on social experience, all present and natural
Strong on the basis of solidarity, authority center, discipline of members Strong on the basis of solidarity, weak - on the basis of the authority center or discipline of members
Constant structure and essence The temporal structure is blurred, the essence is constantly changing depending on the roles that each participant is authorized to perform
A clear demarcation in relations with Others ("we-they"), which is in a sense a self-identifying sign It is not a general requirement for a clear demarcation in relations with Others ("we-they")
Hierarchical, vertical structure of power Anarchic and horizontal structure of power
The presence of a totem The presence of a "situational" totem (which is much less likely to cause situations of manifestation of fascism, xenophobia than in the case of tribes)
* Authoring
ethnocentrism is a phenomenon of ordinary ethnic consciousness, which can result from the need to protect the eth-nos from the foreign influence in the conditions of (disadaptation) of ethnic groups, uncertainty about the positive image of the "we-group", the desire of the indigenous ethnos to protect their territory from migrants (because of their negative attitude towards them),
etc. The emergence of ethnocentrism is connected with the peculiarities of the group as an ethnosocial organism, historically formed, however, certain features of the actual social, economic and political situation can strengthen or weaken the ethnocentric tendencies. In the modern world, the index of national distancing of citizens has increased significantly, by the way, not
because of the deterioration of the situation in a particular nation, in fact, less tolerance for all. In this context, a state strategy is needed to support and facilitate (patronize) interethnic contacts on the part of the authorities, as well as to ensure cooperative interaction between communities in a regional context, which implies the existence of a common goal on the territorial basis (territorial patriotism). Partially in response to these trends in the modern world, the concept of cultural citizenship is being developed as opposed to the legal (formal — juridical) concept of citizenship. Many scientists are not inclined to interpret the citizenship separately from cultural signs (inacul-ture-blindconcept). After all, the state in this case does not experience inertia needs to be reconciled with society, when before it there is a community of citizens, formally legally identical (have the same rights and obligations) and do not differ on cultural grounds [10].
However, the opposition to minority cultures contributes to the preservation of social conflicts. The model of citizenship, conventionally set up to civilian models of different civi-lizational spaces determines R. Rosaldo (Stanford University) through the concept of cultural citizenship (culturalcitizenship) [8] with an emphasis on the culture of citizenship as the spiritual and moral value of the individual. In our opinion, a high level of culture of citizenship in that component of its content that, apart from civil, accommodates moral and ethical values, serves as a means of preventing conflicts not only on an ethnocentric basis, but also possible disputes and
clashes between neotrabams in the event of their destructive behavior. The growth of the value of the value bases of the civil service in Ukraine, including the issue of the further culture of citizenship of civil servants, found meaningful expression in the updated legal and regulatory framework for the civil service (2015-2016). However, we will not analyze this aspect within the framework of this research.
If, in the case of the ethnocentrism, ethnic attitudes on the perception of other groups and ethnostereotypes can be either positive or negative, but they are never neutral (which in itself is a significant factor of conflict), for neo-tribes, as a rule, the need for such a categorical bipolar assessment of others. The re-definition of borders is complicated in today's changing global context of social stress. We can conclude that ethnocentrism and non-wrestling are two different processes that exist in parallel in the modern world and characterize society from several different sides. In our opinion, neotraba-lism corresponds to the trends in the development of modern democracy as the movement towards greater freedom, decentralization, the information society, when the limited political democracy to ensure a more equitable arrangement leads the self-organization of citizens themselves. This is about the emergence of a new level of sociality: mobile, ready for quick action when it is necessary, actively protecting the rights of its bearers and not infringing on the freedom of another. This is a sociality that becomes strong due to the variability of situations of privacy, unprofessional creative activity, self-search in conditions of democracy and publicity.
In the information society, individuals not only consume information, but also produce it, supplementing, changing, constructing structures, creating knowledge and information. The flexibility, the fluidity of content and structural characteristics is provided guaranteed the freedom of creativity of their members for, as a rule, the democratic nature of relations, the constant exchange of knowledge, the search for a new, permanent communication, the mutual motivation to improve. When the freedom of creativity is blocked, the society becomes more conflict. The freedom has a positive effect on the development of members of the non-rake and on the culture of the society as a whole, if an encroachment on the freedom of another or violence is excluded as a means of self-affirmation in the activities of the new tribe. In this case, in the middle of neotraib, new requests for education, its new forms and variations are constantly born. However, in the case of lack of developed critical thinking, even the group's unobtrusive position can be fatal, negative. Of course, knowledge have emancipatory character, and postmaterial reproduction is the dominance of creative work. The stimulation of the creativity of the worker and the confidence in his innovative activity, in our opinion, to form a new economic structure under the fourth industrial revolution.
Ukrainian researcher A. Galchin-sky in this context issues a new socio-centric reality, when a person is not indirectly (as always), but directly becomes a real system-forming the center of the future [14]. In this context, the logic of social transformation begins to dominate in the economic process.
The richness of human is formed by the social environment of our communion, space communications, and intellectual exchange options. These positions are inseparable attributes of the psyche of the individual.
Neotraybs is largely imaginary community than the Tribe. By adding to this the possibilities, provides the information society to the individual towards convenient and comfortable learning in various forms, we can say: the possibilities of educational impact on modern tribes in the case, for example, of the possible use of violence as a symbolic act of action, are quite wide. But as for tribalism (the activity of tribes in the traditional sense), the possibility of education, for example, for the tolerance of different groups more limited. Let us illustrate this with the following situation. The well-known Norwegian anthropologist T. Heyerdahl, who made a historic expedition across the waters of the Pacific Ocean on a raft using the technology of ancient Peruvians, loved to tell a story of how in the eighteenth century a wealthy traveler exchanged the inhabitants of Polynesia for some trivia two children. He honestly educated them in his estate, taught manners and the basics of science. And two years later brought back to their tribe. What a surprise he has, when these children, having just gone ashore, took off their shoes, all their clothes and shoes, and ran to their tribe's members naked and barefoot.
The modern education is not only works for the needs of certain neo-traybs, but also spreads the information about the modern tribe outside of it, warning probably biased perception
for separate unneighboring of a closed type. However at the stage of postmodern social networks are increasingly being empowered, so there are often cases where, perhaps, one education, as a regulator of the conflictuality of the society, will not be enough (for example, the situation with suicides of adolescents — "Blue Whale"). But the general rule is this: if the level of education of members of neotraybs is higher than the less, there will be the probability of conflicts inside the modern tribe and at the level of relations with other neotrabams. For example, if different neotraybs bind different meanings from one territory, will promote the formation of philosophical horizons members and their understanding of the fundamental importance of the manifold. The first woman — rector of Oxford University L. Richardson believes that the best way to resist the radicalization of young people is to give an opportunity to listen to different points of view. To see ways to solve problems from different sides, to promote a culture of dialogue is important for modern democracy. By the way, many educational projects concerning the support of the policy of multicul-turalism have so far been implemented by the efforts of various groups of volunteers — specific unabashed.
The flexibility without disregard excludes the aggressive imposition on society of ideas about life on the part of their members. In general, neotraibs are not often based on deviant norms, they can simply be alternative. The anarchism of neotraybs, as well as of any type of activism, can fit within the framework of the law. In modern society there are different norms that allow
certain minorities to be represented in the discourse, depending on the relevance of the issues they are about. All of this does not lead to a reduction in the differences between the communities. Moreover, modern means of communication not only facilitate the communication of different individuals among themselves, but also demarcate the various existing communities into which they enter. In the intention to get the confirmation of one's own identity, people prefer to communicate and interact within their "own" communities.
To the step of stabilization of the social and economic situation in Ukraine to block the possibilities of education significantly, today can be that in the poor and "hopeless" of neotraybs as a rule, modest educational needs. The educational motivation is much higher in conditions of high socioeconomic status of members of the neotraybs, who will accordingly be in a privileged position regarding the request for educational services. The network reality and ample opportunities for learning in the information age to some extent "equalize" this inequality. Another advantage of network communication and democracy on this basis is the possibility of constant dialogue, including with authorities, with different groups of the public on pondering and the definition of public policy objectives.
In the context of the methodology of epochal cycles, which is developed by Ukrainian archetypalists [12, p. 16], the modern Ukrainian society is in a transitional stage from the normative period of involution to the normative period of evolution and, accordingly, is characterized by unsustainable ba-
lance, horizontal mobility. It can testify that even after the actions of civil protest under the name of the Revolution of Virtue, according to polls of the end of 2016, 72,4 % of Ukrainians agreed that it is difficult for them to understand what to believe [17] (the so-called syndrome of traumatized society). At this stage, social institutional control is weakened, but there is a need to monitor the development of social conflicts.
Within the framework of the cyclic paradigm (see Table 2), the revolution is determined by the initial point of the cyclical development of the social system. Behind it comes the normative phase of involution [12]. The involution is changed by the transitional phase of the cycle- coevolution, within which the imperfection of metatheo-ries and existing scientific paradigms becomes apparent. However, the co-evolutionary period is specific to the emergence of a mass of self-sufficient individuals (the subject "I"), which under the influence of growing innovative waves enhance the synthesis of order and chaos [12, p. 17]. The co-evolution is replaced by the normative phase of evolution, which ends with the transitional period of the revolution as the final point of development of the social system. The revolution is characterized by the appearance of qualitatively new hypotheses and conceptual theories on the basis of the accumulated experimental material at the stage of evolution, the growth of the emotional and volitional activity of individuals and the increase in the field of social freedom [12, p. 17].
Neotraibalism for the Ukrainian society is a new trend, which only claims
about itself. One of the most striking examples of Ukrainian non-spying is corporate groups at the power — Donetsk, Dnepropetrovsk, Kiev, Carpathian, Lviv clan-neotraiby. In our opinion, if the Ukrainian society were characterized by a longer stage in the formation and functioning of modern tribes, in particular by territorial features, the process of decentralization in Ukraine would be much quicker and more successful. In this case, it would be of an organic nature and not semi-artificial, like now. Proceeding from this position, it is possible to explain why until JTC educational process more active in the western regions of Ukraine, where the population is a little less long Soviet past, and the regional landscape has a smaller number of "deserts" of large industrial cities with a "dehumanized cultural space" (an inheritance From the USSR). From here we should also expect that the reform of secondary education, which, in the context of decentralization of power, provides for the creation of support schools and the transfer of authority for their administrative services, strategic management to the level of the communities themselves, in the western regions of Ukraine will be faster than in the east. If on average in 2016 in the central regions of Ukraine there were 4 supporting schools per oblast, at the same time in the Lviv region — more than 30. In our opinion, the hope that here the local communities will be able and responsible to take patronage such a large network of supporting schools and, as a result, provide the population with better educational services.
According to Ukrainian archetypal scientists, modern Euro-Atlantic coun-
Table 2
Regulatory (constant) phases in the cyclical model of the development of science*
The cycle / Phases of cycles the involution the evolution
Characteristic features of the phases of the cycle The fundamentally (universality) of scientific knowledge and encyclopaedism of the system of sciences. The science has little to do with practice. This is, first of all, the period of assimilation of new qualities -the stage of socialization. Order, external control, collectivist morality, subject "We", social consent, the power of laws. It (being) determines consciousness, simplification of social structure The development of applied science, the differentiation of science, narrow scientific specialization, comparative and interdisciplinary research, the experimental method, special pluralism and a mixture of research methods. complicating the social structure, increasing social activity, emancipating the individual, the stability of change, freedom of choice, consensus, strong citizens. The consciousness determines the forms of being, personal interests and passions prevail, the individual determines the social, the complexity of the social structure
1 cycle The period of ancient Greece The Period of Ancient (Ancient) Rome
2 cycle The renaissance Period of enlightenment
3 cycle Modern (the basis of socio-his-torical methodology - objective laws and trends. For scientific knowledge it is characterized by the absoluteization of the fragment) Postmodern (the priority of "biological components" of a person - the ethnic and national characteristics)
Social characteristics of the phases of the cycle Extraversion is a "closed society", the direction of the societal psyche to the material essence. Static, logical activity, irrationality, emotionality, intuition Introversion is an "open society", the orientation of the sociocultural psyche to the spiritual essence. The development of social institutions, the formation of dynamic new social qualities, rationality, pragmatism
* Developed on the basis of [12], [23]
tries, in contrast to Ukraine, already come from the stage of evolution in the crisis era of network totalitarianism, to lay the foundation for the normative phase — the involution of the new 4th epochal cycle [12, p. 18]. And in many ways, the realization of the vector of their subsequent development relative to the formation of the subject "We" was prepared by the stage neo-
trabalizu (approximately from the late 60's through the 20th century). Within the normative phase of the evolution of the third cycle — the postmodern. Although in the archetypal scheme, the normative phase of the postmodernism is characterized by dominant of the individualism and a significant influence of the individual in social organization, culture [23, p. 140], we do not think
that the community values of neo-wrestling substantially contradict with such individualistic norms and at this stage coexist with them. For example, Z. Bauman emphasizes the individualistic character, number of storeys and fluidity of neotraybs. According to the scientist, in modern tribes an attempt is made to regain "communities", but instead it only leads to even greater fragmentation [1]. That is why, M. Maffessoli argues, in the place of individualism in a mass society comes collective individualism in postmo-dern-neotrabalism [7, p. 84]. In one of his last research M. Maffesoli clarifies three main characteristics of the modern tribal phenomenon: the significance of living in one territory, the commonality of tastes and the return of the figure of the eternal child [25]. Regarding the latter, in our opinion, in this context, we are talking not only about the infantilism of the eternal child and its desire to play (which is emphasized by M. Maffesoli especially), but also about the irresistible desire of every child to learn new things, which, of course, is connected with education.
The modern education is removed from the gravitation to the real space as the building of the school or university walls, this manifests itself in the growing popularity of the family (in the link of the general average) and distance (on the link of higher education). In ancient Greece, Aristotle spent his lectures on walks in the garden. Also in modern developed countries, politicians try to make all the environment in which an individual lives — educational (through the concept of lifelong learning at any age and even place).
The education becomes more sensitive to the life and needs of different communities. This trend corresponds to the modern processes of decentralization of education management and the expansion of the school's autonomy boundaries. After all, in conditions of broad autonomy, the institution of education can react more quickly to the emergence of new local or social needs, requests, timely preventing conflict situations. In Ukraine, education management processes also follow world trends in this direction.
In October 6, 2016 the draft Law of Ukraine "On Education" was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in the first reading. According to this document, and is based on the explanations provided in the "Methodological recommendations for the development of regulations on the structural division of education of the executive body of the united territorial community" [26], the management and financing of out-of-school, pre-school, elementary and basic schools (up to the 9th grade) To the level of the united communities, which are now being created in Ukraine. The management of the senior profile school should be at a level higher than the unified community (in Poland it is the level of the county), however, since there are no such counties, in Ukraine, and schools I, II, III degrees are not yet separated — the senior school will be managed by the community as well.
The management of education by the local government of the united community differs significantly from the administration of network of educational institutions on the part of district state administrations? First,
the educational management body of the JTC has the authority, apart from the operational authority (ensuring the current activity of the community educational network), and also on the strategic (planning and forecasting of the education system in the JTC) levels. Secondly. If the head of the administrative service entity is appointed by the JTC chairman in the JTC, who is elected by the JTC community, then the head of the district department of education appoints the head of the district state administration and is appointed, in his turn, by the President (without the participation of the community). Hence, the educational management body, like the whole system of local government in JTC, is primarily accountable to the society, and acts in its interests. Also, the administrative maintenance of the network of educational institutions in the JTC is aimed at maximizing the delegation educational and methodical powers to the level of the educational institutions themselves [26]. That is, it is about expanding the autonomy of schools.
The famous American pedagogue, J. T. Gatto argues that the phenomenon of mass forced school education appeared at the stage of modernity as the extreme manifestation of economic rationality in order to standardize the processes of thinking of the worker in the role of a reliable consumer. To do this, the scientific management quickly spread from factories to schools. According to J. T. Gatto, the great destructive myth of the twentieth century. There was a statement that the child would not receive the proper education in the unique conditions of her own family [15, p. XII]. As his-
tory has shown, the model of rational management of schools has somewhat damaged the roots of a free society, as it defended. The school has evolved as the weapon of the leviathan state.
In the XVIII-XIX centuries. Young Americans have acquired all the necessary skills for life in society and the family. And the teachers were given the wrong place — everyone could teach others and everyone could teach themselves. Secular schools were peripheral institutions that were used for resting the mother. Such system in the early stages of statehood, the US was borrowed in Ancient Greece. In ancient Greece, training was characterized as free, based on self-discipline. For applicants for education, it was important not to test by tests, but to achieve real ideals in the cause provided by the local tradition (participatory democracy). The most famous Athenian school was the Plato Academy, a meeting place of thinkers and seekers, favorable for a good conversation and good friendship, everything that, according to Plato, should be the basis of education.
In the last decades of the XIX century, the American education system has been overridden by the Prussian / Spartan model, whose goal satisfied the needs of business and the state through "accompanying each step of the person with official attitudes". At the stage of the Enlightenment, the cultivation of the collective social organism, many European philosophers become supporters of the idea of compulsory schooling, because it was tempting to develop the eastern mechanism for transforming the broad masses of the population into a means of realizing the will of the elites, creating a reliable
foundation for easily managing the society. At the end of the first quarter of the XIX century, in large American cities there are Lancaster schools, children from low grades were brought up obedience under the guise of getting the ability to read and count. In these institutions, children were not required to think, only to repeat, so it was easy to learn. The form of compulsory education in the United States was invented in Massachusetts around 1850. Its implementation was opposed, but in 1880 the last resistance was overcome and American children began to go to school under escort. It was turned out not entirely in favor of society — if before 1850. The literacy rate in the state was 98 %, after 1850 — no more than 91 % [16, p. 40]. Compulsory education served as a tool for creating national unity and reflected the fear of ethnocentrism. The level of prosperity in society has grown, but if you look at psychology, you can see an increase in anxiety. We are convinced that the introduction of compulsory schooling with all the attributes that led to the minimization of the space of freedom and creativity of the student, as well as the introduction of school management in the "factory samples", contributed significantly to the growth of anxiety and depressive moods in the society that lay in the prerequisites for the emergence of neo-urbanism as a phenomenon of modern society.
If before the middle of the XIX century american students could freely choose the model of education that suits them, for example, self-education, for today these options are available only to the most courageous and rich. In the project of law of Ukraine "On Edu-
cation" laid a new status of the home form of education (when the applicant does not need to take a certificate of health or special circumstances to get an opportunity to study at home). And now with any school, not just extramural, parents will be able to conclude an agreement on home schooling for their child and passing examinations for a certificate. The draft Law of Ukraine "On Education" also provides support for various types of schools, in particular public funding for obtaining the general secondary education in a private educational institution in the amount of a financial norm for the budgetary provision of one student. Such changes are fully consistent with the normative phase of postmodernity, it provides for innovation and emergence of the society. The successes of home education in the United States (more than 2,5 million children are covered by this form so far) and various types of schools that are semi-dependent from the state (charter, magnet schools, others) point to an alternative encouraging path of educational change, to which, with some delay, Ukraine is attached.
If before the economy of industrialism could not withstand the generation of young people trained to think critically, postmodernism and the formation of a new 4th epochal cycle are in great need of a generation of enterprising, creative people who will perform work that people can not do. In a healthy community, the learning function belongs to everyone. The current trend of neotrabalism contributes to the effectiveness of this norm to a certain extent, while confirming its prospects in parallel. The state is obliged
to help the new network processes in education and to serve them. Also, the society additionally has a need for government programs for the development of basic sciences, laying the foundation for residual knowledge to ensure progress.
In the context of the reform of decentralization of power and the reactivation of the idea of educational districts in Ukraine, in our opinion, it is important to make service to society an indispensable part of schooling. In addition to the experience of selflessness, the participation of the individual in the life of society is the best way to transfer responsibility in the main spheres of life. And the alienation from society turns into indifference to almost everything [16, p. 74]. The local community is not the best fuse for loss of identity. The developed community has certain historical traditions, differs from the mediocre neotraibu — the friendship and loyalty in society are long-term, and for most modern tribes, this is a temporary phenomenon. Therefore, we agree with JT Gatto that the crisis of school education is associated with a serious crisis of local communities [16, p. 40].
For the modern education it is important to keep the scope of work, rather than producing "educated people". In the near future a new way to be popular is advanced by the humanitarian, ethical, social competence of young people. They will sound new in conditions when 1 billion people can become unemployed, a large number of African children are threatened with death by starvation, the problems of refugees and others become more widespread.
Systemic educational reforms should be preceded by local pedagogical innovations and local efforts, during which local pedagogical experience will be formed [30, p. 23]. The modern model of education — the model of the conveyor — is ineffective. It is the network form of education, in our opinion, that can ensure the content (cultural fullness) of the educational trajectory of the competitor of education — ideas of corporatism, constructiveness, and not consumption of alienated knowledge. Only the collective forms of work and activity will ensure the modern thinking and correct socialization of the individual, even though the personality as an anthropological entity constructs its own way of life.
The modern teacher is the conductor, who initiates the creativity and activity of the competitor of education, his accompaniment, the joint search for solutions, organizes the conditions and scope for creativity. Unfortunately, till now the state managers understand reforms as the organization and reorganization, directed not only on organizational structures, but also on the teachers themselves and students only as a material of transformations. Therefore, it is easy to explain why educational changes are easier to take place at the level of educational institutions (where teachers are self-organizing) and are hindered in the sphere of education management.
Conclusions and prospects for further research: The Postmodernity is characterized by a transition from a modern individualistic paradigm (individual, group) to a postmodern societal paradigm (face, tribal community — neotraybs). It is invisible at
first sight, the potential for influence without forcing on existing traditional educational institutions can not be ignored. The modern networked society differs not only in emphasis on knowledge and information, but in a fundamental change in their role, everyone can join the technology of producing knowledge or symbols that unite in modern tribes. This flexibility, immeasurable creativity is critical for the traditional vertical structures of education management, in the information society we have no time to respond to the rapid circulation of information. The collision of traditional and modern approaches to education that underlies resistance to change and is caused by frequent failures of reforms will be overcome in the case of tracing those framework points of educational requests without disrupting, the analysis of which as a result will help to more accurately predict the development of education and successfully design, introduce the relevant phases of the epochal cycle of educational Change.
The modern era is characterized by the fact that along with the creation of new forms of social life, the old ones are also reproduced. Many opposite tendencies coexist or are twofold. However, through monitoring the grassroots level of society it is possible to track which trend vector will be more relevant in the near future. After all, in conditions of freedom of functioning of the structures of the grassroots level of society as close to natural, local, it will be reflect the real symptomatology of society. Virtual, affective tribes are alternative forms of organization, communication, interaction, where a person finds himself again. The basis
for the new sociality is the emotional dimension of social life, backed up by media activity in social networks. The vector on the formation of the collective subject "We" in the modern Euro-Atlantic countries within the normative phase of the evolution of the 3rd cycle - the postmodern, accompanying their probable transition to the normative phase of the involution of the 4th cycle, is largely not possible due to the phenomenon of neotribalism (started here approximately From the late 60s of the 20th century and prepared the necessary prerequisites for such a transition).
Tribes of the modern world are formed on the basis of the diversity of individual acts of self-determination. The multiplicity of membership contributes to the creation of a more complex personality orientation than just ethnocentrism. A person who deeply feels himself a member of various groups can develop the ability to compare, understand the conventionality of certain positions. The possibilities of education as a regulator of social conflict in the society are unrivaled much more and more variably than at the stage of the modernism.
The assistance in the development of civil society (non-inflexes can form public organizations to enter into a dialogue with the state), the decentralization of power and further democratization and the formation of a new quality-fully correspond to the trends of postmodernity and contain a significant potential for preventing social conflicts. At the stage of non-urbanization, the state should support the desire of individual communities to make education more approximate to re-
gional needs, to promote the diversity of forms of education and to stimulate creative principles at its basis. Now the components of collective consciousness archetypes are used by separate groups artificially as an instrument of hi-hume technologies (humanitarian forms of point manipulative influence by human behavior). We are convinced that it is possible to warn such a manipulative action in the conditions of a developed culture of life of the community (public, Gromad culture), because of the large volume of live, open, daily communication between its members.
The neotrayb is a simple means for an individual to fulfill his desires and protect himself from the demands of other modern tribes. For today neurai-rabs are relatively successful in performing the educational function. This problematic aspect of interdisciplinary research is promising for further analytical work.
The content of education differs in relation to various types of sociality. And the type of sociality, in turn, is a sign of the curriculum of actual educational transformations. This is one of the strategies for preventing and resolving conflicts in the modern world through educational changes respond to social changes, accompany them with appropriate educational influences, thus contributing to the organic logic of the cyclical development of society.
REFERENCES -
1. Bauman Z. Intimations of Postmodernity. — L. : Routledge, 1992.
2. Bauman Z. Liquid modernity. — Mal-den : Polity Press, 2000.
3. Beck U. Risk Society : Towards a New Modernity. — L. : Sage, 1992.
4. Durand G. Wyobraznia symbolicz-na. — Warszawa: Panstwowe Wydaw — nictwo Naukowe, 1986.
5. Ethnicity : Theory and Experience / Ed. N. Glazer and D. Moynihan. — Cambridge, 1975.
6. Jenkins R. Rethinking Ethnicity: Arguments and Explorations. — L. : Sage, 1997.
7. Maffesoli M. The Time of the Tribes. The Decline of Individualism in the Mass Society. — London : SAGE Publications ; Thousand Oaks, New Delhi, 1996.
8. Rosaldo R. Cultural Citizenship and Educational Democracy / R. Rosaldo // Cultural Anthropology. — 1994. — Aug. — Vol. 9. — № 3. Further Inflections: Toward Ethnographies of the Future. — P. 402-411.
9. Sumner W. G. Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals [internet Resources]. — Ginn, 1906. — 692 p. — Mode to access : https://books.google.com.ua/ books/about/Folkways.html?id = dX9qAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
10. Volpp L. The Culture of Citizenship [Internet Resource] / L. Volpp // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. — 2007. — July. — Vol. 8. — № 2. — P. 571-602. — UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1015142. — Mode to access : http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=1015142
11. Anderson B. Imaginary communities. Reasoning about the origin and spread of nationalism / Trans. Znogorskogo and V. Morozov. — Moscow: Criticism, 2001. — 272 p.
12. Afonin E. A. Great co-evolution (global problems of the present: socio-historical analysis) / E. A. Afonin, A. M. Bandurka, A. Yu. Martynov. -Moscow: Parapan, 2002. — 352 p.
13. Bauman З. Philosophy and Postmodern Sociology // Questions of Philosophy. — 1993. — № 3.
14. Galchinsky A. The world unfolds on the left — in the Biklodins [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: http: // gazeta.dt.ua/macrolevel/anatoliy-galchinskiy-svit-rozvertayetsya-livoruch-u-bik-lyudini-_.html/
15. Gatto J. T. The Hidden History of American Education. Deep study of the prison of modern school education / Trans. From English M. Plesak. — Kharkov: "Publishing house" DiorTo", 2016. — 448 p.
16. Gatto J. T. The hidden program of compulsory school education. Stupid / Trans. From English A. Litvinyak. — Lviv: Annals, 2016. — 100 p.
17. Golovaha E. About "phenomenon of immoral majority" [Electronic resource] // Day. — Access mode: http://m. day.kyiv.ua/uk/article/podrobyci/ pro-fenomen-amoralnoyi-bilshosti
18. Zayats D. Indie-rock sociology of Michel Mafesola // Sociology: theory, methods, marketing. — 2011. — № 3. — P. 74-83.
19. Ionin L. The Rise of Minorities. — Moscow: University Book, 2013. — 240 p.
20. Ionin L. Parade of minorities [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: http://lifeinbooks.net/chitat-online/ parad-menshinstv-leonid-ionin/
21. Kaiku M. Physics of the Future / Trans. From English A. Kamenets. — Lviv: Annals, 2013. — 432 p.
22. Castells M. The formation of a network society. In the book: A new post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. — M .: Academia, 1999. — P. 492-505.
23. Martynov A. Historic Sociology (cyclic parradigm). — Moscow: UAD "Rada", 2004. — 228 p.
24. Maffesoli M. Wizardry of the World or the Divine Social // SOCIOLOGOS. — Moscow: Progress, 1991. — P. 274-283.
25. Maffesoli M. Man postmodernity / Translationofthe article, included inthe collection "L'Hommepostmoderne", Paris, Bourinediteur, 2012 [Electronic resource]. — Access Mode: http://syg.ma/@marisya-prorokova/ mishielmaffiesoli-chieloviek-post-sovriemiennosti-pierievod-stati-voshiedshiei-v-sbornik-lhomme-post-moderne-paris-bourin-editeur-2012
26. Methodical recommendations on the development of the regulations on the structural division of education of the executive body of the united territorial community. [Electronic resource] / Letter of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine № 1 / 9-633 dated 30.12.2015. - Access mode: http: // osvita. Ua / legislation / other / 49450 /
27. Musyzedov A. territoriality of modern society // Sociological Journal. -2013. — № 4. — P. 21-34.
28. Postmodernism: the encyclopedia / Pod. Sci. Ed. A. Gritsanov, M. Mozheiko. — Minsk: Interpresservice, 2001. — 1038 p.
29. Pyatkov N. Archetype of change: its place and role in archaically mythological thinking // Izv. The Urals. State. University. — 2008. — № 57. — P. 101-114.
30. Rozin V. Education in conditions of modernization and uncertainty: Concept. — Moscow: The Book House "LIBROKOM", 2013. — 80 p.
31. Schnaper D. Community of citizens. About the modern concept of the Nation / Trans. With the French R. Marder. — Kharkov: Folio, 2007. — 223 p.
