STRATEGIC PLANNING OF BUDGETARY PROVISION OF ECONOMIC ACCESSIBILITY OF PRODUCTS Текст научной статьи по специальности «Социальная и экономическая география»

РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ И ОТРАСЛЕВАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА / REGIONAL AND SECTORAL ECONOMICS_

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23 STRATEGIC PLANNING OF BUDGETARY PROVISION OF ECONOMIC ACCESSIBILITY OF PRODUCTS

Research article

Samigin D.Y.1' *, Keleinikova S.V.2, Takmakova Y.V.3, Alukaev R.R.4

1 ORCID : 0000-0002-5715-1227;

2 ORCID : 0000-0001-6971-5820;

1 Penza State University, Penza, Russian Federation 2 Russian University of Cooperation, Saransk, Russian Federation 3 Oryol State University named after. I.S. Turgenev, Orel, Russian Federation 4 Research Institute of Humanities under the Government of the Republic of Mordovia, Saransk, Russian Federation

* Corresponding author (vekont82[at]mail.ru)

Abstract

The problem of substantiating and making strategic decisions to assess the internal food support of the population aimed at reducing the pressure of risks and threats on the economic availability of products is considered in this article. Criteria of the appropriateness of the methodological approach of strategic planning of the support level are justified. They are based on a provision on rational consumption standards by type of product, which should be linked to the level of average per capita income of the population and the natural and economic conditions of the regions of residence. The proposed analysis of science-based food support planning methods has been conducted to assess whether they meet the criteria, and it has been shown that the simulation capabilities of these methodologies are not sufficient to support the level of domestic food aid. A methodology is proposed to determine the level of food support funds based on the comparison of actual consumption costs and costs according to rational standards and to comply with certain requirements in the process of planning funds. The practical use of the methodology is aimed at creating such a structure of demand and supply, which are optimally linked to the norms of rational consumption of basic products.

Keywords: strategic planning, food security, food support, sustainable consumption standards, economic accessibility, support planning, nutrition costs.

СТРАТЕГИЧЕСКОЕ ПЛАНИРОВАНИЕ БЮДЖЕТНОГО ОБЕСПЕЧЕНИЯ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ

ДОСТУПНОСТИ ПРОДУКЦИИ

Научная статья

Самыгин Д.Ю.1' *, Келейникова С.В.2, Такмакова Е.В.3, Алукаев Р.Р.4

1 ORCID : 0000-0002-5715-1227;

2 ORCID : 0000-0001-6971-5820;

1 Пензенский государственный университет, Пенза, Российская Федерация 2 Российский университет кооперации, Саранск, Российская Федерация 3 Орловский государственный университет им. И.С. Тургенева, Орёл, Российская Федерация

4 Научно-исследовательский институт гуманитарных наук при Правительстве Республики Мордовия, Саранск,

Российская Федерация

* Корреспондирующий автор (vekont82[at]mail.ru)

Аннотация

Рассматривается проблема обоснования и принятия стратегических решений по оценке внутренней продовольственной поддержки населения, направленной на снижение давления рисков и угроз на экономическую доступность продукции. Аргументированы критерии соответствия методического подхода к стратегическому планированию уровня поддержки. В их основе лежит положение о рациональных нормах потребления по видам продукции, которое целесообразно увязать с уровнем среднедушевых доходов населения и природно-экономическими условиями регионов проживании. Проведена аналитика предлагаемых в науке методов планирования продовольственной поддержки на предмет соответствия выдвинутым критериям и показано, что имитационных возможностей данных методик недостаточно для научного обоснования размеров внутренней продовольственной помощи населению. Предлагается методика, позволяющая определить размер средств продовольственной поддержки на основе сравнения фактических расходов на потребление и расходов по рациональным нормам и соблюсти определенные требования в процессе планирования средств. Практическое использование методики направлено на формирование такой структуры спроса и предложения, которые оптимальным образом увязаны с нормами рационального потребления основных видов продукции.

Ключевые слова: стратегическое планирование, продовольственная безопасность, продовольственная поддержка, рациональные нормы потребления, экономическая доступность, планирование поддержки, расходы на питание.

Introduction

The modern Doctrine of Food Security, among its strategic priorities, focuses on creating the physical and economic accessibility of food products for every citizen of the country in volumes no less than rational consumption standards. The scientific community's concerns about the accelerated solution of these food problems are associated with new socio-economic

risks and financial threats to the state of the food system [1], [2]. Increasing pressure on purchasing power jeopardizes the achieved level of food security, especially in terms of the economic availability of products [3], [4].

All this led to the fact that the Government of the Russian Federation was forced to adopt a package of anti-crisis measures, strengthening monitoring and measures to establish maximum permissible retail prices for certain types of socially significant essential food products [5]. In the State Duma in 2021-2023. Ways to prevent a collapse in the economic availability of products were actively discussed. Among them, the introduction into the practice of strategic planning of measures to establish maximum amounts of trade markups for certain types of agricultural products and food [6] and measures of targeted social support for needy low-income citizens for the purchase of food products, so-called food certificates [7]. However, the relevant bills were rejected by the relevant committees, including due to insufficient justification for financial support and socio-economic effects.

Today, the need for strategic planning measures to increase the economic accessibility of products is more relevant than ever. The authors of the article support the point of view of scientists [8], [9] on the development of a system of domestic food assistance to the population, since resolving the issue on the basis of containing food prices can negatively affect the level of profitability of commodity producers and the continuity of the reproduction process, without which the agricultural business will not be able to provide the necessary growth rate of physical availability of products [10], [11], [12]. The introduction of food certificates into the practice of strategic planning requires a thorough scientific substantiation of their financial and economic component.

Research methods and principles

To understand what functionality a food support planning methodology should have, let's analyze the situation. In the country as a whole in 2022, per capita consumption within the framework of rational standards can be noted only for meat, vegetable oil, sugar, eggs and bread products (Table 1).

Table 1 - The ratio of consumption of main types of products per capita with rational standards for the country as a whole and

population groups by level of average per capita income

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.!

Prod Countrywide By household groups depending on the level of average per capita income in 2022.

ucts 2019 2022 First Seco nd Thir d Fourt h Fifth Sixth Seve nth Eight h Nint h Tent h

Potat o, % 99 93 50 55 58 59 60 59 59 60 63 58

Vege

table oil, 117 115 70 77 80 82 87 86 83 85 88 86

%

Milk

and

dairy prod 73 75 53 65 72 79 81 84 86 91 100 106

ucts,

%

Meat

and

meat prod 103 105 85 106 113 120 126 132 139 149 160 159

ucts,

%

Vege table

s and melo 77 74 47 57 65 70 74 75 80 84 90 95

ns,

%

Fish

and

fish prod 75 69 49 61 67 74 76 79 82 89 95 109

ucts,

%

Suga 488 488 298 339 354 380 390 401 395 409 431 393

r and

conf ectio nery, %

Fruit

s and berri 62 63 39 49 57 63 67 71 77 83 93 102

es, %

Brea d prod ucts, % 120 116 82 88 92 95 96 94 95 98 98 93

Eggs , % 110 111 66 79 83 88 91 94 95 102 108 112

Note: compiled by the authors based on [13], [14]

The increase to rational standards should affect dairy products (+25%), potatoes (+7%), vegetables (+26%), fish (+31%), fruits (+37%). In the first four population groups (40% of the population), in terms of per capita income, the situation is significantly worse than the national average. In addition, according to our research [15], population groups also differ in the level of prices for purchasing products. In population groups with low per capita incomes, cheaper food products prevail than in groups with high per capita incomes. The diet in these groups is more monotonous and less balanced in assortment.

Differences in consumption levels are also observed between households, depending on where they live. The share of food expenses in the structure of household consumer spending in rural areas is almost 25% higher than in the city. At the same time, the consumption level for fruits, meat, milk and eggs is lower. At the same time, in rural areas, much more people consume cheap carbohydrate-containing products (bread, potatoes, sugar) than in cities. According to research by scientists [16], [17], relatively low incomes in rural areas lead to a worse structure of food consumption by the rural population compared to the urban population.

Differences are also observed by region. Suffice it to say that only the share of food expenses in 2022 varied significantly across the constituent entities of the Russian Federation from 26% in Moscow to almost 62% in the Republic of Dagestan. The natural and economic conditions of the regions make their contribution to the formation of the physical and economic accessibility of products in these territories. The grouping of regions according to the cadastral value of 1 hectare of farmland showed that in groups of regions with favorable territories and climate the level of per capita consumption is higher than in groups of regions with less favorable natural and economic factors (Table 2).

Table 2 - Consumption of products per capita in groups of regions by cadastral value of 1 hectare of farmland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.2

Indicators First Second Third Fourth Fifth Second to first, % Fifth to first, %

Bakery products, kg/person per year 93 94 95 108 97 101.1 104.3

Potato, kg/person per year 51 57 58 64 62 111.8 121.6

Dairy products, kg/person per year 227 248 264 257 273 109.3 120.3

Vegetable s, kg/person per year 80 88 101 97 108 110.0 135.0

Meat products, kg/person per year 80 85 84 86 88 106.3 110.0

Eggs, 207 225 225 223 228 108.7 110.1

pcs./perso n, kg/person per year

The results of the analysis show that the country's population living in the first group of regions consumes less per person per year than the population living in the second and fifth groups of regions, respectively: bread products by 1.1% and 4.3%, potatoes by 11, 8% and 21.6%, dairy products by 9.3% and 20.3%, vegetables 10% and 35%, meat products by 6.3% and 10%, eggs by 8.7% and 10%.

The results of the analysis confirm the need for measures to support domestic food aid. It is advisable to study the methods available in science for planning food support for the population to increase the economic accessibility of products (Table 3).

Table 3 - Methods for planning food support DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.3

Methodology The essence Author's rating

Project for the creation and implementation of a system of targeted food assistance to needy citizens of the Russian Federation, developed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade [18] The volume of food assistance to the population is determined based on the estimated value of food subsidies per 1 household member per year (taking into account the dietary deficit) and the number of poor people eligible for food certificates The calculation algorithm is not related to the types of products consumed by the population specified in the Doctrine

VNIIESKH (Borkhunov N.A., Rodionova O.A.) [19] At the first stage, an assessment is made of the total volume of food aid by decile groups of the population, and at the second, a determination is made per capita. The point is to increase the level of consumption of the first and second groups to the level of the third group Rational norms of food consumption and territorial characteristics of regions are not taken into account

RANEPA under the President of the Russian Federation (Shagaida N.I.) [20] The group of people in need is determined through their actual consumption and the degree of its compliance with rational consumption standards. The assessment is carried out in the context of population groups according to available resources. The correspondence of the costs of the actual and rational set of products is compared with the prices at which families buy them (each group buys products at different prices). It is proposed to increase the first and second groups of the population to the third Not every group of products is evaluated; the natural and economic characteristics of the regions where the population lives are not taken into account.

Institute of Agrarian Problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Reshetnikova E.G., Iosipenko V.D.) [21] To estimate the volume of domestic food aid, it is proposed to use the input-output method. The justification for the amount of targeted food assistance to low-income groups of the population is carried out on the basis of a modified intersectoral balance model. This methodological approach allows us to coordinate indicators of consumption of basic food products, the level of income of Rational standards for food consumption and the natural and economic characteristics of the regions where the population lives are not taken into account.

the population, the volume of national food production and complementary imports

Analyzing the methods for planning food assistance to the population presented in Table 3, it can be noted that each of them uses different approaches to justify the volume of necessary funds. According to various estimates by the authors of these methods, the planned volume of food support funds varies in the range of 200-400 billion rubles. At the same time, according to organizations of food producers and suppliers, about 800 billion rubles were required in 2020 for the issuance of food cards [22]. In this regard, and taking into account the weaknesses of the methods proposed by scientists, it can be noted that their functionality is insufficient to justify the amount of food assistance to the population.

Thus, approaches and methods for planning food support for the population when justifying financial resources should be based on rational standards of product consumption, taking into account the average per capita income of the population and the natural and economic characteristics of the regions of residence.

The authors of the article developed such a technique (Table 4).

Table 4 - Methodology for calculating the level of financial support for measures to support consumption of agricultural and

food sector products

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.4

Index Calculation algorithm

1. Expenditures on product consumption (Pn^) pn*=^ * n * Hnn

2. Expenses for rational consumption of products (PnH) pnH=^ * PHn * Hn„

3. Domestic food assistance (APn) APn = PnH - Pn*

Explanation

Pn^ - product purchase price; n - level of product consumption; Hnn - food price index; PHn - rational norms of product consumption

The technique is implemented in two stages. At the first stage, expenses for rational consumption are determined by type of product (based on the norms of rational nutrition and prevailing prices for products) and the actual expenses of the population. At the second stage, by comparing expenses for actual and rational consumption, the amount of food support for the population is calculated.

The technique allows you to make calculations by type of product. This is necessary in order to influence the formation of the structure of domestic production through the formation of the structure of domestic demand, thereby linking them with the tasks being solved in the field of food security.

Main results

At the first stage, a comparison was made of actual expenses for product consumption and planned expenses according to rational standards (Fig. 1). Expenditures on food for main types of products vary between groups of regions according to the cadastral value of 1 hectare of farmland and according to the level of disposable per capita income of the population.

Figure 1 - Expenditures on actual consumption and on rational consumption of products in groups of regions by cadastral value

of 1 hectare of farmland and by level of average per capita income DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.5

Note: thousand rubles/person per month

The strongest deviation of actual consumption expenditures from expenditures according to rational standards is observed in the worst natural and economic conditions and in families with the lowest per capita income. In the first group of regions, the deviation for the first group of households with the lowest incomes is 62.2%, for the second group - 37.5%. In the fifth group of regions, deviations in similar groups of households are already 47.7% and 25.2%. On average across the country, these deviations are 47.4% in the first group of low-income families, and 24.9% in the second group. In general, comparing the deviations of expenses according to rational consumption standards and expenses for actual consumption, it can be noted that the first four groups of households in terms of average per capita income in all groups of regions are most in need of food support. The fifth and sixth groups of households in the first two groups of regions and the seventh group of households in the first group of regions also need to support demand for food.

At the second stage, an assessment of food support for the population was carried out (Fig. 2).

Figure 2 - Estimation of the amount of food support per capita in 2024 in groups of regions by the cadastral value of 1 hectare

of farmland and by the level of average per capita income DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.6

Note: thousand rubles/person per month

In the first group of regions for families with the lowest incomes, the average per capita amount of food support is estimated at 34.3 thousand rubles per year, in the fifth group of regions for families with the same income - 22.6 thousand rubles per year. As natural and economic conditions improve and per capita income increases, the need for food support decreases. Thus, in the fourth group of families in terms of per capita income living in the first group of regions, the average per capita amount of food support is estimated at 14.4 thousand rubles per year, and for those living in the fifth group of regions - 4.8 thousand rubles per year.

Calculations have shown that the urgent need to provide food assistance can be traced at least in the first four groups according to the level of average per capita disposable income (40% of the population), as well as partially in the fifth, sixth and seventh groups (about 8% of the population).

Table 5 - Estimation of the amount of food support in groups of regions by cadastral value of 1 hectare of farmland and

population groups by level of average per capita income

DOI: https://doi.org/10.60797/IRJ.2024.144.23.7

Regio n group s 2024 Total

First Secon d Third Fourt h Fifth Sixth Seven th 2024 2025 2026 2027

First, billio n rubles 63.1 47.4 36.3 26.5 15.3 15.0 10.9 214.5 225.2 236.5 248.3

Secon d, 79.3 55.5 39.1 24.6 7.8 6.5 0 212.7 223.4 234.5 246.3

billio n rubles

Third, billio n rubles 79.7 53.1 34.8 18.7 0 0 0 186.3 195.6 205.4 215.6

Fourt h, billio n rubles 56.0 36.3 22.9 11.0 0 0 0 126.2 132.5 139.1 146.1

Fifth, billio n rubles 85.7 56.3 36.1 18.3 0 0 0 196.4 206.2 216.5 227.3

Total, billio n rubles 363.8 248.6 169.2 99.0 23.0 21.6 10.9 936.1 982.9 1032. 0 1083. 6

In 2024, food support for the population is estimated at 214 billion rubles in the first group of regions, up to 196 billion rubles in the fifth group. An assessment by population group by income level shows that the amount of support varies from almost 364 billion rubles in the first group, up to almost 11 billion rubles in the seventh group. The total amount of food support is estimated at 936 billion rubles in 2024 to 1084 billion rubles in 2027

In general, targeted food support to the population is aimed not only at achieving the level of consumption of basic types of products to rational standards, but also at ensuring a balanced diet. The nutritional structure according to rational standards should change compared to the actual one in favor of an increase in dairy products, vegetables and fruits. A simultaneous reduction in spending on meat in the nutritional structure should occur against the backdrop of rising spending on cattle meat consumption.

Conclusion

Thus, the need to introduce measures to stabilize the situation in the field of food security is recognized at the level of the executive and legislative branches of the Russian Federation. Scientists are inclined to actively use domestic food assistance to the population on the basis of food certificates. However, the full implementation of such measures in the practice of strategic planning is to a certain extent hampered due to the insufficient functional and simulation capabilities of the proposed methods that justify the required amount of food support. The authors of the article propose their own methodology, the approach of which is, first of all, to determine the amount of support funds based on a comparison of actual consumption expenditures and according to rational standards for each type of product, taking into account the average per capita expenditure of the population and the natural and economic conditions of the regions of residence. The authors believe that under the influence of the amounts of food support funds calculated according to the methodology, a demand structure will be formed that optimally meets the standards of rational nutrition. In turn, this structure of demand ultimately determines the structure of production, linked to rational standards of consumption of main types of products. This meets the modern tasks set in the field of ensuring national food security to achieve physical and economic accessibility of products at the level of rational consumption standards.

Финансирование

The research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF) and Penza Region, grant number 23-28-10277, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-10277/.

Конфликт интересов

Не указан.

Рецензия

Все статьи проходят рецензирование. Но рецензент или автор статьи предпочли не публиковать рецензию к этой статье в открытом доступе. Рецензия может быть предоставлена компетентным органам по запросу.

Funding

Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 23-28-10277, https://rscf.ru/project/23-28-10277/ и Пензенской области.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Review

All articles are peer-reviewed. But the reviewer or the author of the article chose not to publish a review of this article in the public domain. The review can be provided to the competent authorities upon request.

Список литературы / References

1. Анищенко А. Н. Обеспечение продовольственной безопасности России в условиях санкционного давления и мобилизационной экономики / А. Н. Анищенко, Д. И. Усманов // Креативная экономика. — 2023. — 17(8). — с. 30393054. — DOI: 10.18334/ce.17.8.118729.

2. Немченко А.В. Продовольственная безопасность: методический инструментарий и системный подход к ее оценке / А.В. Немченко, О.А. Донскова, Е.А. Немкина // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. — 2023.

— 10(136). — DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2023.136.30.

3. Ушачев И.Г. Экономическая доступность продовольствия для населения Российской Федерации / И.Г. Ушачев, А.В. Колесников // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. — 2021. — 4. — с. 59-77. — DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2021_4_59_77.

4. Самыгин Д.Ю. Стратегирование вызовов развития сельского хозяйства: продовольственный аспект / Д.Ю. Самыгин // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. — 2021. — 2. — с. 77-85.

5. Российская Федерация. Постановление Правительства РФ от 15.07.2010 N 530 (ред. от 30.12.2020) «Об утверждении Правил установления предельно допустимых розничных цен на отдельные виды социально значимых продовольственных товаров первой необходимости, перечня отдельных видов социально значимых продовольственных товаров первой необходимости, в отношении которых могут устанавливаться предельно допустимые розничные цены, и перечня отдельных видов социально значимых продовольственных товаров, за приобретение определенного количества которых хозяйствующему субъекту, осуществляющему торговую деятельность, не допускается выплата вознаграждения» : Федеральный закон. — 2020. — URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons_doc_LAW_102841/ (дата обращения: 17.01.2024)

6. Российская Федерация. Законопроект № 1077520-7 О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон "Об основах государственного регулирования торговой деятельности в Российской Федерации" (о введении механизма государственного регулирования цен на продовольственные товары первой необходимости) : Федеральный закон. — 2020. — URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1077520-7 (дата обращения: 17.01.2024)

7. Российская Федерация. Законопроект № 1067795-7 «О продовольственном сертификате» : Федеральный закон : [2024-06-15 :2024-06-15]. — 2020. — URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1067795-7 (дата обращения: 17.01.2024)

8. Решетникова Е.Г. Система внутренней продовольственной помощи в контексте новой парадигмы цивилизационного развития / Е.Г. Решетникова // Экономика и предпринимательство. — 2024. — 1(162). — с. 226-230.

— DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2024.162.1.040.

9. Shagaida N.I. Russia's ways to ensure food security (control food prices) in 2020-2022, and their impact on consumers / N.I. Shagaida, D.S. Ternovsky, I.V. Trotsuk // Russian Peasant Studies. — 2023. — 8(3). — p. 87-112. — DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-3-87-112.

10. Ushachev I. G. Long-term Forecast of Agricultural Development in Russia Based on an Economic and Mathematical Model 2022 / I. G. Ushachev, M. V. Kharina, V. S. Chekalin // Studies on Russian Economic Development. — 2022. — 33(3).

— p. 282-292. — DOI: 10.1134/S1075700722030157.

11. Келейникова С. В. Моделирование продовольственной политики на рынке овощной продукции / С. В. Келейникова, Д. Ю. Самыгин, Н. А. Шлапакова // Аграрная Россия. — 2014. — 11. — с. 29-36.

12. Щербакова А. Соособенности, риски и угрозы продовольственной безопасности населения Арктики России /

A. Щербакова, В. Иванов // Journal of Agriculture and Environment. — 2021. — 4(20). — DOI: 10.23649/jae.2021.4.20.8.

13. Потребление основных продуктов питания населением - 2022 // Федеральная служба государственной статистики. — 2023 — URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Potr22.rar (дата обращения: 27.03.2024)

14. Потребление, пищевая и энергетическая ценность продуктов питания по 10-процентным группам населения // Федеральная служба государственной статистики. — 2023 — URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/potr07_13.xlsx (дата обращения: 27.03.2024)

15. Самыгин Д.Ю. Концепция стратегического планирования в сфере продовольственной безопасности / Д.Ю. Самыгин // Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. — 2021. — 2. — с. 14-20.

16. Алтухов А.И. Стратегия пространственного развития отдельных отраслей сельского хозяйства в России / А.И. Алтухов, А.Г. Папцов, Л.П. Силаева — Москва: Сам Полиграфист, 2023. — 344 с.

17. Гуляева Т. И. Дифференциация между доходами сельского и городского населения в России / Т. И. Гуляева, Е.

B. Такмакова // Экономика сельского хозяйства России. — 2021. — 4. — с. 77-81. — DOI: 10.32651/214-77..

18. Проект создания и внедрения системы адресной продовольственной помощи нуждающимся гражданам Российской Федерации. — URL: https://r55.tmbreg.ru/assets/files/Pred-vo/6066.pdf (дата обращения: 07.12.2023)

19. Борхунов Н.А. Как повысить платежеспособный спрос на внутреннем продовольственном рынке России: размышления и расчеты / Н.А. Борхунов, О.А. Родионова // АПК: экономика и управление. — 2013. — 9. — с. 15-23.

20. Шагайда Н.И. К вопросу о программе продовольственной помощи / Н.И. Шагайда // Экономическое развитие России. — 2021. — 28(2). — с. 38-45.

21. Решетникова Е.Г. Обоснование методологического подхода к формированию системы внутренней продовольственной помощи на основе метода «затраты-выпуск» / Е.Г. Решетникова, В.Д. Иосипенко // Экономика и предпринимательство. — 2020. — 1 (114). — с. 596-599.

22. Бизнес попросил из-за COVID вернуться к идее выдачи продуктовых карточек. — URL: https://www.rbc.ru/business/14/04/2020/ 5e95cfee9a79474fef490636 (дата обращения 07.12.2023)

Список литературы на английском языке / References in English

1. Anischenko A. N. Obespechenie prodovol'stvennoj bezopasnosti Rossii v uslovijah sanktsionnogo davlenija i mobilizatsionnoj ekonomiki [Ensuring food security in Russia in the context of sanctions pressure and a mobilization economy] / A. N. Anischenko, D. I. Usmanov // Creative economy. — 2023. — 17(8). — p. 3039-3054. — DOI: 10.18334/ce.17.8.118729. [in Russian]

2. Nemchenko A.V. Prodovol'stvennaja bezopasnost': metodicheskij instrumentarij i sistemnyj podhod k ee otsenke [Food security: methodological tools and a systematic approach to its assessment] / A.V. Nemchenko, O.A. Donskova, E.A. Nemkina // International Scientific Research Journal. — 2023. — 10(136). — DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2023.136.30. [in Russian]

3. Ushachev I.G. Ekonomicheskaja dostupnost' prodovol'stvija dlja naselenija Rossijskoj Federatsii [Economic accessibility of food for the population of the Russian Federation] / I.G. Ushachev, A.V. Kolesnikov // Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. — 2021. — 4. — p. 59-77. — DOI: 10.52180/2073-6487_2021_4_59_77. [in Russian]

4. Samygin D.Ju. Strategirovanie vyzovov razvitija sel'skogo hozjajstva: prodovol'stvennyj aspekt [Strategizing the challenges of agricultural development: the food aspect] / D.Ju. Samygin // Agricultural Economics of Russia. — 2021. — 2.

— p. 77-85. [in Russian]

5. Russian Federation. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 15.07.2010 N 530 (red. ot 30.12.2020) «Ob utverzhdenii Pravil ustanovlenija predel'no dopustimyh roznichnyh tsen na otdel'nye vidy sotsial'no znachimyh prodovol'stvennyh tovarov pervoj neobhodimosti, perechnja otdel'nyh vidov sotsial'no znachimyh prodovol'stvennyh tovarov pervoj neobhodimosti, v otnoshenii kotoryh mogut ustanavlivat'sja predel'no dopustimye roznichnye tseny, i perechnja otdel'nyh vidov sotsial'no znachimyh prodovol'stvennyh tovarov, za priobretenie opredelennogo kolichestva kotoryh hozjajstvujuschemu sub'ektu, osuschestvljajuschemu torgovuju dejatel'nost', ne dopuskaetsja vyplata voznagrazhdenija» [Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated July 15, 2010 N 530 (as amended on December 30, 2020) "On approval of the Rules for establishing maximum permissible retail prices for certain types of socially significant food products of essential necessity, a list of certain types of socially significant food products of essential necessity, in relation to which may set maximum permissible retail prices, and a list of certain types of socially significant food products, for the purchase of a certain quantity of which an economic entity engaged in trading activities is not allowed to pay remuneration"] : Federal Law. — 2020. — URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons_doc_LAW_102841/ (accessed: 17.01.2024) [in Russian]

6. Russian Federation. Zakonoproekt № 1077520-7 O vnesenii izmenenij v Federal'nyj zakon "Ob osnovah gosudarstvennogo regulirovanija torgovoj dejatel'nosti v Rossijskoj Federatsii" (o vvedenii mehanizma gosudarstvennogo regulirovanija tsen na prodovol'stvennye tovary pervoj neobhodimosti) [Bill No. 1077520-7 On amendments to the Federal Law "On the fundamentals of state regulation of trade activities in the Russian Federation" (on the introduction of a mechanism for state regulation of prices for essential food products)] : Federal Law. — 2020. — URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1077520-7 (accessed: 17.01.2024) [in Russian]

7. Russian Federation. Zakonoproekt № 1067795-7 «O prodovol'stvennom sertifikate» [Bill No. 1067795-7 "On food certificate"] : Federal Law : [2024-06-15 :2024-06-15]. — 2020. — URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1067795-7 (accessed: 17.01.2024) [in Russian]

8. Reshetnikova E.G. Sistema vnutrennej prodovol'stvennoj pomoschi v kontekste novoj paradigmy tsivilizatsionnogo razvitija [The system of domestic food assistance in the context of a new paradigm of civilizational development] / E.G. Reshetnikova // Economics and Entrepreneurship. — 2024. — 1(162). — p. 226-230 . — DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2024.162.1.040. [in Russian]

9. Shagaida N.I. Russia's ways to ensure food security (control food prices) in 2020-2022, and their impact on consumers / N.I. Shagaida, D.S. Ternovsky, I.V. Trotsuk // Russian Peasant Studies. — 2023. — 8(3). — p. 87-112. — DOI: 10.22394/2500-1809-2023-8-3-87-112.

10. Ushachev I. G. Long-term Forecast of Agricultural Development in Russia Based on an Economic and Mathematical Model 2022 / I. G. Ushachev, M. V. Kharina, V. S. Chekalin // Studies on Russian Economic Development. — 2022. — 33(3).

— p. 282-292. — DOI: 10.1134/S1075700722030157.

11. Kelejnikova S. V. Modelirovanie prodovol'stvennoj politiki na rynke ovoschnoj produktsii [Modeling food policy in the vegetable market] / S. V. Kelejnikova, D. Ju. Samygin, N. A. Shlapakova // Agrarian Russia. — 2014. — 11. — p. 29-36. [in Russian]

12. Scherbakova A. Soosobennosti, riski i ugrozy prodovol'stvennoj bezopasnosti naselenija Arktiki Rossii [Features, risks and threats to food security of the population of the Russian Arctic] / A. Scherbakova, V. Ivanov // Journal of Agriculture and Environment. — 2021. — 4(20). — DOI: 10.23649/jae.2021.4.20.8. [in Russian]

13. Potreblenie osnovnyh produktov pitanija naseleniem - 2022 [Consumption of basic food products by the population -2022] // Federal Service State Statistics. — 2023 — URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Potr22.rar (accessed: 27.03.2024) [in Russian]

14. Potreblenie, pischevaja i energeticheskaja tsennost' produktov pitanija po 10-protsentnym gruppam naselenija [Consumption, nutritional and energy value of food by 10 percent population groups] // Federal Service State Statistics. — 2023 — URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/potr07_13.xlsx (accessed: 27.03.2024) [in Russian]

15. Samygin D.Ju. Kontseptsija strategicheskogo planirovanija v sfere prodovol'stvennoj bezopasnosti [Concept of strategic planning in the field of food security] / D.Ju. Samygin // Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises. — 2021. — 2. — p. 14-20. [in Russian]

16. Altuhov A.I. Strategija prostranstvennogo razvitija otdel'nyh otraslej sel'skogo hozjajstva v Rossii [Strategy for spatial development of individual sectors of agriculture in Russia] / A.I. Altuhov, A.G. Paptsov, L.P. Silaeva — Moskva: Sam Poligrafist, 2023. — 344 p. [in Russian]

17. Guljaeva T. I. Differentsiatsija mezhdu dohodami sel'skogo i gorodskogo naselenija v Rossii [Differentiation between the incomes of rural and urban populations in Russia] / T. I. Guljaeva, E. V. Takmakova // Agricultural Economics of Russia.

— 2021. — 4. — p. 77-81. — DOI: 10.32651/214-77. [in Russian]

18. Proekt sozdaniya i vnedreniya sistemy adresnoj prodovol'stvennoj pomoshchi nuzhdayushchimsya grazhdanam Rossijskoj Federacii [Project for the creation and implementation of a system of targeted food assistance to needy citizens of the Russian Federation]. — URL: https://r55.tmbreg.ru/assets/files/Pred-vo/6066.pdf (accessed: 07.12.2023) [in Russian]

19. Borhunov N.A. Kak povysit' platezhesposobnyj spros na vnutrennem prodovol'stvennom rynke Rossii: razmyshlenija i raschety [How to increase effective demand in the Russian domestic food market: thoughts and calculations] / N.A. Borhunov, O.A. Rodionova // AIC: economics and management. — 2013. — 9. — p. 15-23. [in Russian]

20. Shagajda N.I. K voprosu o programme prodovol'stvennoj pomoschi [On the issue of the food assistance program] / N.I. Shagajda // Economic development of Russia. — 2021. — 28(2). — p. 38-45. [in Russian]

21. Reshetnikova E.G. Obosnovanie metodologicheskogo podhoda k formirovaniju sistemy vnutrennej prodovol'stvennoj pomoschi na osnove metoda «zatraty-vypusk» [Justification of a methodological approach to the formation of a domestic food aid system based on the input-output method] / E.G. Reshetnikova, V.D. Iosipenko // Economics and Entrepreneurship. — 2020. — 1 (114). — p. 596-599. [in Russian]

22. Biznes poprosil iz-za COVID vernut'sya k idee vydachi produktovyh kartochek [Due to COVID, the business asked to return to the idea of issuing food cards]. — URL: https://www.rbc.ru/business/14/04/2020/5e95cfee9a79474fef490636 (accessed: 07.12.2023) [in Russian]