CC BY
47
УДК: 519.2+(086.48)+(049.3)+339.I3.017+33I.46I ГРНТИ: 06.35.51
QUANTILE METRICS OF RISK ASSESSMENT
O. S. Vidmant*
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation 49/2 Leningradsky av., 125993, Moscow, Russia * email: [email protected]
Recently risk management has become an integral part of any company. It allows not only to reduce the uncertainty level of any business but also to expand the measures themselves due to the adaptation to various market factors. The author focuses on one of the most popular and recognized methods for risk prediction, VaR, and the distinctive features of its structure. The main characteristics of the reduced model are analyzed by discriminating the strengths and weaknesses.
Ключевые слова: financial risk management, uncertainty, global market, reserves, VaR, quantile, portfolio, probability of loss.
КВАНТИЛЬНЫЕ МЕТРИКИ ОЦЕНКИ РИСКА О. С. Видмант*
Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации Россия, 125993, г. Москва, Ленинградский пр. 49/2 * email: [email protected]
В наши дни риск-менеджмент стал неотъемлемой частью любой компании, это позволяет не только снизить уровень неопределенности любого бизнеса, но и расширить сами метрики, за счет адаптации к различным факторам рынка. В работе исследуется одна из самых распространенных и признанных методик по прогнозированию риска - VaR, а также особенности её строения; анализируются основные свойства упрощенной модели, с выделением сильных и слабых сторон.
Keywords: финансовый риск-менеджмент, неопределенность, глобальный рынок, резервы, VaR, квантиль, портфель, вероятность убытков.
After a number of downfalls in the financial market, the amount of speculations with instruments whose risks are very hard to consider has increased. That is why all market players must be familiar with the basics of risk management
Risk management is the process of making and enforcing managerial decisions aimed at the reduction of the potential unfavorable result and the minimization of potential project loss, triggered by its implementation. This economic science is particularly relevant in the financial sphere, because even insignificant risks in a big company can push the market. That is why leading top-managers must have deep knowledge on risk management and risk measures.
The aim of the paper is to study fundamental features of market risks measures using quantile metrics. Different approaches to interpreting VaR are being reviewed; advantages and disadvantages of the methods are brought forward.
Before reviewing models based on quantile metrics of estimation, it is extremely important to systemize the fundamental definitions, which are inseparable part of analyzed models.
Quantile is a value, not exceeded by a random variable with a certain probability a. For any a between 0 and 1, a distribution quantile of continuous random values of X is a value xa which equals to:
Grapf 1. Quantile of a continuous random variable
In (Pt /Pt1) ~ N (p, a2) as its parameters. In Figure 1 we have a 0.1-quantile which means that P(X < -5%) = 0.1.
In this case graphical data may be interpreted in the following manner: with a probability of 90% "x" will not belong to the interval of 5% of the smallest values. Quantiles can be marked using percentiles, where
P(X <x) = a.
(1)
a =p/100
(3)
If it is known that F(x) belongs to X, then a may be represented by xa:
xa= F-1 (a). (2)
Let's take a normal distribution as an example, using rt =
"p" denotes percentile
It must be said that some of the quantiles have specific names:
- 0.25-quantile is called the first quartile and is sometimes called lower quantile
20
Juvenis scientia 2016 № 4 | ЭКОНОМ1/КА 1/ ynPAB/IEHl/E
- 0.5-quantile is median or the second quartile
- 0.75-quantile is called the third quartile and is sometimes called upper quantile
Usually standard values are used when it is needed to calculate a quantile, where a equals to 0.1%, 1%, 5% or 10%.
When estimating market risk, X reflects instrument's returns (profit and losses), while minimum values are used to ensure that the quantile corresponds to losses which won't be exceeded with a certain probability.
If returns are independent, equally distributed random variables, with normal distribution, where the mathematical response is ¡u and the standard deviation is a, then for any a e(0, 1) the following transformation may be used:
P(X<xa )=P((X-^)/a<(x_a-^)/a)=P(Z<(x_a-^)/a)=a (4)
where Z is a normal standard deviation
Example: We have a function distribution with returns X~N(0.01, 0.0009) and need to compute P(X <-0.02):
P(X<0.02) =P((X-0.01)/0.03 < (-0.02-0.01)/0.03)=0.1587
Thus, the probability of losses not exceeding 2% equals to 15.87%. Let's demonstrate the obtained result on the diagram - Fig. 2:
n.M
IE f £ £ £ IE K K £ if £ £ jE £ £
Grapf 2. Probability of not exceeding 2%
1 Introduction to Value at Risk
"VaR is a monetary estimation of a variable (in basic currency) which will not be exceeded by expected losses during a given time span with a given probability." [4,63]
"VaR are losses of a portfolio of assets which are not to be exceeded during a given time span with a given probability." [6,47]
VaR is essentially a risk indicator, demonstrating a maximum loss, expressed in cash, for an investment portfolio/ instrument during a given time span, with a given confident probability level (confidence interval). This indicator allows to quantify potential portfolio expenses in monetary terms under normal market behavior. In other words, VaR method is not very efficient during economic crisis.
With a steady portfolio of positions (both long and short positions, reflected in the assets) and a given confidence level (1 - a), confidence interval h, VaR is defined as a value (expressed in portfolio measurement units) which cover all possible portfolio losses during the time span h with probability (1 - a).
P(X<VaR)=1-a (5)
Considering the above mentioned formula, VaR is the biggest losses value being a consequence of assets returns instability.
The calculation reflects data which takes the following into account:
- Pre-determined time horizon h
- Significance level a (or confidence level 1 - a)
- Distribution assumptions
Holding period is a period which essentially depends on the portfolio instrument's liquidity. As a rule, a time span sufficient to realize an asset so that the value won't become negative (to close a position).
Confidence level is a probability indicator, chosen according to relationship to risks. In particular sector (as in banking) this variable is pre-defined to constitute 99% which is deemed optimal, but some other probabilities are used: 95% in Risk Metric or 99.7% in ratings firms' approaches.
There are various approaches to interpreting VaR estimation. Let's give an example of interpreting this indicator for the portfolio of 1 million RUR, time horizon of 1 day and a confidence level of 99%:
- Probability that the portfolio owner loses less than 1 million RUR within next 24 hours is 99%
- Probability that the losses of the portfolio owner will exceed 1 million RUR within next 24 hours is 1%
- Probability of expected losses exceeding 1 million RUR per portfolio equals to 1/100, which is once in a hundred days.
The curve depicted in Figure 3 illustrates normal distribution (though we can think of other kinds of distribution as well), which is composed by distribution of portfolio returns in a particular time interval.
Profit-and-lois distribution function
5% worst casts / \
Grapf 3. Determining the value of VaR on the diagram of profit-and-loss distribution
The area of the diagram which is not painted represents 95% of the total shape's area and a confidence level of 95% (or the significance level of 5%). VaR is a maximum amount of potential losses for the confidence level illustrated in the Figure.
In the case off&r(x) being a returns probabilities distribution function, there can be the following interconnection between VaR and the confidence interval established:
And, represented graphically - Figure 15:
Where S=a is a highlighted area representing 5% of the worst cases in Fig. 3
Estimation of VaR may be carried out in an absolute and relative sense. If VaR is relative, the estimation is made in
Grapf 4. Absolute and relative estimation of VaR
relation to the zero value. In case of relative estimation, the average returns level is added to the absolute value.
Furthermore, there are two approaches to VaR estimation:
- Approach which is based on local valuation where a linear or more complex approximation of instrument value function is being used
- Approach which is based on full valuation, where instrument's value is recalculated and no approximations are employed.
VaR methods are used for:
- Estimation of returns for instruments/operations, taking risk indicators into account
- Implementing reasonable limits policy and limits computation on open positions
- Calculating/measuring capital sufficiency, as well as its placements in different businesses.
Thus, we can distinguish a number of advantages pertaining to VaR methodology, which enable us to assess metrics' performance:
- Equals to the sum which can be lost with more or less probability;
- Gauges risk or risk factors on the basis of their sensitivity;
- Can be subject to comparison on particular markets;
- This is a generic method of measurement, applicable to all assets and types of risk;
- Can be measured on any level, be it an individual instrument level or a portfolio level;
- When risk aggregation or risk segmentation is used, there is an opportunity for improved study of assets interdependencies within a portfolio.
2. Market risk estimation models with VaR. Covariance method of computing VaR value
Variance-covariance method, also referred to as parametric, analytical or delta-normal method of VaR computing, assumes that all primary assets' prices are normally distributed, therefore shaping value of the whole portfolio.
For assets returns computations (rt), logarithmical increment of prices are generally used
r= lnPt/P-1 = ln(P) - ln(P(l l)) ~ N(M, a2)
(7)
Nevertheless, other methods for returns' computations, covered in Chapter 1, can be equally implied.
Taking the formula for continuous accrual of interest as a basis, we can come up with the following equation:
P
(i+i)
- P er 1(i-i) e
(8)
An assumption on normal distribution of risk's portfolio factors greatly facilitates the process of obtaining VaR value, because instruments' returns distribution, enclosed in the given portfolio, will also be normal. This feature remains true for any instrument with linear characteristics of the price (currencies, shares).
In case of a random variable's distribution, corresponding to normal type, the confidence interval (1 - a) is characterized only by a quantile (k1a), which demonstrates random variable's target position in relation to an average (r) shown among volatilities of the given portfolio (a).
Having an investment position, comprising one instrument, we obtain the asset's profit/loss in the amount of its daily value change. Thus, the smallest expected price with a probability (1 - a) can be formulated as follows:
P
(l+1,1+a)
-- Pi exP(V-ki-a a)
(9)
where Pt denotes the current price Which can also be shown as,
p =P e^_i-k-1-a a_i
(i+i,i+a) i
(10)
Mathematical expectation of returns (one-day returns) is often taken as zero [4,212] which yields
P
p g-k_(1-a) a_i
(l+1,1+a) i
VaR., . =P.,+ n-P, = P, e-k_(1-a> -Pt
(i-a) (i+i) i i i
(e\-k, a-i)VaR., . = P,
^ I i-a i / (i-a) i
(11) (12) (13)
When computing VaR, in most cases we use linear approximation of value (e\-k1a a-1), which during Taylor expansion roughly equals (-k(1a) a. ) when working with small variables1. Also the negative sign of the value is often omitted, leading thus to the creation of a relative value.
VaR
(i-a)
-k,, . a,
(i-a) ii
(14)
where a. denotes volatility, k1a is a quantile corresponding to the confidence interval (1 - a).
N-day value for VaR can be computed using the following equation:
N - day
VaR, *^NVaR,
i-dtay i
(15)
However such an estimation is applicable for relatively short time spans only (10-15 days), and in cases of increasing time frames, the risk of inaccurate calculated data will find itself in direct dependence with the scaling interval.
Delta-normal method has the following advantages:
- Simple estimation method implementation
- High speed of computations
- Possible use of different indicators of volatility and correlation.
Drawbacks of the delta-normal method:
- Inability to obtain efficient data for distributions, other than normal, for the reason of heavy tails of distribution
- Inability to account nonlinear instruments' risks accurately
- Complexity for understanding by top management
Probability of significant mistakes in used models.
22
Juvenis scientia 2016 № 4 | ЭКОНОМ1/КА 1/ ynPAB/IEH/E
REFERENCES
1. Alexander C., Elizabeth S. The Professional Risk Managers' Handbook. A Comprehensive Guide to Current Theory and Best Practices, 2004
2. Alexander C. Value-at-Risk Models. John Wiley & Sons,2008
3. Alexander J.McNeil. Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. - Princeton University Press, 2006
Damodaran A. Strategic Risk Taking: A Framework for Risk Management. Wharton School Publishing - 2007 Philippe Jorion. Financial risk manager handbook: FRM. Part I/Part II - John Wiley& Sons , 2007
Wong M. Bubble Value at Risk. A countercyclical risk management approach - John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Received 01.06.2016
4
5
6.
