CC BY
46
Parameter Estimation of Mukherjee-Islam Model under Step Stress Partially Accelerated Life Tests with Failure
Constraint
Ahmadur Rahman*, Showkat Ahmad Lone, Arif-Ul-Islam
Deptt of Statistics & Operations Research, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202002 *Email: [email protected]
Abstract:
In this paper, we have studied the estimation of parameters under failure censored data using step stress partially accelerated life testing. The lifetimes of test items are assumed to follow Mukherjee-Islam distribution. The estimation of different parameters and acceleration factor are obtained by Maximum Likelihood Method. Relative absolute bias (RAB), mean squared error (MSE), relative error (RE), standard deviation and confidence intervals are also obtained. Asymptotic variance-covariance matrix and also test method are given. Simulation studies have been introduced to illustrate the performance of all the statistical assumptions.
Keywords: Mukherjee-Islam distribution, Step-stress partially accelerated life test, Maximum likelihood, failure censoring.
Introduction:
The present era is the era of high reliability. The products and items made nowadays are too much reliable. Usually they do not fail early at normal use condition. So it is not easy to get reasonable amount of failure data under use condition for a given period of time. For this reason, Accelerated Life Testing is the modest procedure to be applied. By using it, products would fail early and at the end of test we have sufficient failure data to study the behaviour of products. ALT quickens the procedure that's why it costs less money and consume less time.
In ALT, the relationship between lifetime stress is known either in the form of acceleration factor or there exists a mathematical model. But in many situations neither acceleration factor is known nor there exist any such model. Then partially accelerated life test is the better option to use. In PALT, the acceleration factor and mathematical model which sustain the relationship between the life time and stress are not known and cannot be assumed any type of such model.
Nelson [19] introduced that the stress can be applied on test item in various ways, commonly used are step-stress and constant-stress. Under step-stress PALT, a test unit is first subjected to run at normal use condition and if it does not fail for a specified time, then it is run at accelerated use condition until failure occurs or the observation is censored. But in constant stress PALT each item runs at daily use condition or at accelerated condition.
DeGroot and Goel [12] have introduced the concept of step-stress PALT in which a
test item is first run at use condition and, if it does not fail for a specified time V, then it is run at accelerated condition until failure.
A lot of literature is available on SS-PALT analysis, for example, see Goel [13], Bhattacharyya and Soejoeti [11], Bai and Chung [10], Abdel-Ghani [8] and Abdel-Ghaly et al. [6,7], Abdel-Ghani [9]. Ismail [15] studied the estimation and optimal design problems for the Gompertz distribution in SS-PALT with type I censored data. P.W. Srivastava and N. Mittal [20] considered optimum step stress partially accelerated life tests for the truncated logistic distribution with censoring. This article include type I and type II both censoring. S. Hyun and J. Lee [21] used constant stress partially accelerated life testing for log logistic distribution with censored data. F. K. Wang et al [22] have studied partially accelerated life tests for the Weibull distribution under multiply censored data. Recently, Showkat Ahmad Lone et al [23] studied estimation in step stress partially accelerated life tests for the Mukherjee-Islam distribution using time constraint. For a brief knowledge of step-stress ALT, one should go through [14, 17, 16, and 18].
II. Test Methods and Model
Mukherjee-Islam failure model is introduced by Mukherjee and Islam [1]. It is finite range distribution which is one of the most important property of it in recent time in reliability analysis. Its mathematical form is simple and can be handled easily, that is why, it is preferred to use over more complex distribution such as normal, Weibull, beta etc. The pdf of the distribution is given as a
f(x,a,X) = C xa-\ 0 < x <X, a> 0, X> 0 X
Where A is the scale parameter and a is the shape parameter. The cdf is given as
F (x) =
— I , 0 < x < X, a > 0, X > 0 KXj , , ,
And the Reliability function of finite range model is given as R( x) = 1 -
/ \ a
V
In SS-PALT, all of the n units are tested first under normal condition, if the unit does not fail for a pre-specified time r , then it runs at accelerated condition until failure. This means that if the item has not fail by some pre-specified time r , the test is switched to the higher level of stress and it is continued until items fail. The effect of this switch is to multiply the remaining lifetime of the item by the inverse of the acceleration factor p. In this case, switching to the higher stress level will shorten the life of the test item. Thus the total lifetime of a test item, denoted by Y, passes through two stages, which are the normal and accelerated conditions. The lifetime of the test unit in SSPALT is given as follows
r=i r, f r<r
[r + P^T -r) ifT > r Where T is the lifetime of item at use condition.
Therefore, the probability density function of total lifetime Y of an item is given by
f (y )=
0
f (y) f2 (y )
y < o
0 < y <t
y >t
Where
fi( y) = f ya— f2( y) = P^ [t + P( y — T)]a—1
A
a > 0, A > 0
P > 1, a > 0
III. Estimation Procedure
The maximum likelihood estimation method is used here because it is very robust and gives the estimates of the parameters with good statistical properties such as consistency, asymptotic unbiasedness, asymptotic efficiency and asymptotic normality. In this section, point and interval estimation for the parameters and acceleration factor of Mukherjee-Islam distribution based on type II censoring are evaluated using this method. 3.1. Point estimates
In type II censoring scheme, we set the number of units or subject to the experiment and stop the experiment at a predetermined number of failure. The observed values of the total lifetime Y are y(i) <... < y(nu )<t< y(„u+i) <... < y(„u+na -i) < y(r), where nu and na are the number of subjects or items failed at normal conditions and accelerated conditions respectively. Let ( and cp2i be indicator functions, such that
( =f y(D<T i = 1,2,..., n
[0 elsewhere
And,
i1 T< y(l) < y(r) . 10 (=\ , = 1,2,..., n
[0 elsewhere
For our convenience, y^ is written as yi. The likelihood function of independent and identically distributed random variables y ,... , y , the life times of the items is given by
L(y; P,A,a) = n ja
,=1
Pa t+p(y , -T)ia-1
(i
1 —
T + ,
P(y(r) -t)
A
(1i (2i
(3.1.1)
Where ( = 1 — ( and(2i = 1 — (2i ,We take the logarithm of the likelihood function and write it as follows;
ln L = r loga — ra log A + (a — 1)j ^ ( log y + ( log A > + na logP + (n — r )log(1 — Ba)
[ i=1 i=1 J
(3.1.2)
Where, A = [t + p(y — t)J B =
t +,
P(yr) —t)
A
= nu , Z(2i = na ,
<
a
i=1
i=1
ZPP = n - nu - na & r = nu + na
i=1
The maximum likelihood estimates of |3, a and A can be obtained by solving the system of equations which are the first partial derivatives of the above log likelihood equation, and equate to zero with respect to |3, a and A respectively. Thus the system of solutions are given as:
3InL na / lVA ,-u \ i ,\raa-iL W)-r)
= ^ + (a - l)Z ç2îA~> (y -r)-(— - r)rBa-1 (l - Ba Y = 0 (3.1.3)
Op p i=i A
dI—L — y__j . » i j j / \ » i j j .__(—_r )
a - rI—A + X <AJ— (Vi ) + Z &iI—A - (—-¿0] BaI—B = 0 (3.1.4)
r/nXWW+£ ^ --1-Ba))
dML =-ra + (n-r) -i - Ba)-1aBa=i0 (3.1.5)
dX X X v ; The solution of above equations cannot be obtained in closed form because the equations are non linear in three unknown parameters |, a and A. Therefore, to find numerical solution we use an iterative method. Newton-Raphson Method is used to obtain the numerical estimate of the parameters |, a and A.
3.2. Interval estimates
If La= Lm-yi,y2,...,yn) and Um= U w{y i,y2,...,yn) are functions of the sample data y1,...,yn, then the confidence interval for a population parameter co is given by p[L„<a< Ua\ = n (3.2. i)
Where, Lc and Uc are the lower and upper confidence limits which enclose c with probability n. The interval [LC,UC]is called a i00n%confidence interval forc . For large sample size, the maximum likelihood estimates, under appropriate regularity conditions, are consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. Therefore, the approximate i00n% Confidence limits for the maximum likelihood estimate C of a population parameter c can be constructed, such that
P
-Z Z
j(â> ) Where, Z is the
= n (3.2.2)
standard normal percentile. Therefore, the approximate
i00-i -n)
2
100n% confidence limits for a population parameter c can be obtained, such that p[c -Za-CC)<CC <c + Za-CC)] = n (3.2.3)
Then, the approximate confidence limits for p, a and X will be constructed using Eq. (3.2.3) with confidence levels 95% and 99%.
IV. Asymptotic variances and covariance of Estimates
The asymptotic variances of maximum likelihood estimates are the elements of the inverse of the Fisher information matrix I^ -p) = e{-3 2 InL / 3p;.3p.}. The exact
mathematical expressions for the above expectation are very difficult to obtain. Therefore, the observed Fisher information matrix is given by I^-p)= {-32InL/3pi3pj} which is
99
obtained by dropping the expectation on operation E . The approximate (observed) asymptotic variance-covariance matrix F for the maximum likelihood estimates can be written as follows
F = VM\ i,j = !,2,3 (<?) = (P,a,X) (4.1)
The second partial derivatives of the maximum likelihood function are given by the following
^---jt"(«" 1)1^2, (y,-rf - r ]pB2-2 (1 - + (a- (1 - Ba)-1 \
(4.2)
d2 InL - r
-(n - r )B
InB
da2 az x ' - B d2InL ra a(n - r
dX2
X
)[aB2a(1 - Ba)
- Ba) +aBa (1 - Ba)-1 + Ba(1 - Ba)-
(4.3) (4.4)
d2 InL
dpda 7"!
n
Y^A-(y, -T)-(n -r 1
y r ) -r
d2 InL dpdX
= a2 (n - r )Ba-1 (1 - Ba)
-if y(r)
-T
X2
[aB2a1 (1 - Ba )-2 InB + (1 - Ba )-1 Ba1 (aInB +1)] 1 + Ba(1 - Ba)-1 ] (4.6)
(4.5)
d InL r f n - r
■ = - — + \
dadX X
X
\Ba (1 - Ba )-11 + aInB + aInB(1 - Ba )-1 Ba
(4.7)
2
a
a
Consequently, the maximum likelihood estimators of f5, a and X have an asymptotic variance-covariance matrix defined by inverting the Fisher information matrix F and by substituting P for P for a and /1 for X.
V. Simulation studies
Simulation studies are very important part of the study. It has been performed to illustrate the precision and consistency of the theoretical results of estimation parameters. R software is used in simulation studies. Absolute relative bias (RAB), mean square error (MSE) and relative error (RE) are the main measure to check the performance of resulting estimators. The detailed steps of procedures are presented below:
Step 1. 1000 random samples of sizes 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 were generated from the Mukherjee-Islam distribution. The data generation of the Mukherjee-Islam distribution is very simple, if U has a uniform (0, 1) random number, and then Y — [AwA(1/a)j follows a Mukherjee-Islam distribution. The true parameter values are selected as (a —1.6, X — 2, p —1.05) and (a —1.5, X — 2, p —1.1).
Step 2. Choosing the censoring time t at the normal condition to be t=1 and the total number of failure in PALT is to be r=0.75*n
Step 3. For each sample and for the two sets of parameters, the acceleration factor and the parameters of distribution were estimated in SS-PALT under type II censored sample. Step 4. The Newton-Raphson method was used for solving the nonlinear equations given in (3.1.3), (3.1.4) and (3.1.5).
Step 5. The RABias, MSEs, and REs of the estimators for acceleration factor and other
100
parameters for all sample sizes were tabulated.
Step 6. The confidence limit with confidence level y=0.95 and y =0.99 of the acceleration factor and other parameters were constructed.
The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 presents the RABias, MSEs, and REs of the estimators. The approximated confidence limits at 95% and 99% for the parameters and acceleration factor are presented in Table 2.
Following are the observations can be made from the tabulated data on the performance of SS-PALT parameter estimation of the above used lifetime distribution:
1. For the second set of parameters (a = i.5, X = 2, P = i.i), the maximum likelihood estimators have good statistical properties than the first set of parameters (a = i.6, X = 2, P = i.05) for all sample sizes (see Table 1)
2. As the acceleration factor increases the estimates have smaller MSE, and RE. As the sample size increases the RABias and MSEs of the estimated parameters decreases. Hence the estimates provide asymptotically normally distributed and consistent estimators for the acceleration factor and other parameters.
3. The interval of the estimators decreases when the sample size is increasing. Also, the range of the interval estimate at y=0.95 is smaller than the range of the interval estimate at y=0.99 (see Table 2).
Table 1 The RABias, MSE and RE of the parameters (a, A, P) for different sample sizes under type II censoring_
N Parameters (1.6,2,1.05) (1.5,2,1.1)
(a, A, |) RABias MSE RE RABias MSE RE
a 0.0102 0.0616 0.0385 0.0008 0.0634 0.0422
50 A 0.0576 0.0829 0.0414 0.0157 0.0861 0.0430
P 0.0013 0.0655 0.0013 0.0702 0.0850 0.0773
a 0.0094 0.0591 0.0369 0.0019 0.0411 0.0274
75 A 0.0484 0.1006 0.0503 0.1139 0.0448 0.0569
P 0.0471 0.0747 0.0711 0.0148 0.0761 0.0692
a 0.0280 0.0451 0.0282 0.0211 0.0328 0.0219
100 A 0.0371 0.0674 0.0337 0.0448 0.1139 0.0569
P 0.0184 0.0550 0.0524 0.0289 0.0643 0.0584
a 0.0061 0.0392 0.0245 0.0066 0.0458 .0305
125 A 0.0641 0.1070 0.0535 0.0331 0.0951 0.0475
P 0.0807 0.1287 0.1225 0.0325 0.0755 0.0687
a 0.0125 0.0185 0.0115 0.0425 0.0568 0.0379
150 A 0.0304 0.0284 0.0142 0.0065 0.0748 0.0374
P 0.0012 0.0264 0.0251 0.0255 0.1080 0.0982
Table 2 Confidence bounds of the estimates at confidence levels 0.95 and 0.99
N Parameters (1.6,2,1.05) (1.5,2,1.1)
(a, A, p) Standard Lower Upper Standard Lower Upper
Deviation Bound Bound Deviation Bound Bound
a 0.2547 1.0842 2.0829 0.2584 0.9948 2.0078
0.9263 2.2409 0.8346 2.1680
50 A
0.2955 1.5359 2.6944 0.3011 1.4413 2.6218
P 1.3527 2.8776 1.2546 2.8085
0.2627 0.5364 1.5664 0.2991 0.4363 1.6091
0.3735 1.7293 0.2508 1.7946
a 0.2495 1.0956 2.0739 0.2080 1.0950 1.9107
0.9409 2.2287 0.9660 2.0397
75 A
0.3255 1.4588 2.7349 0.3463 1.4110 2.7685
P 1.2570 2.9367 1.1962 2.9832
0.2804 0.5498 1.6491 0.2830 0.5615 1.6712
0.3759 1.8230 0.3860 1.8467
a 0.2179 1.1277 1.9823 0.1860 1.1035 1.8329
0.9926 2.1174 0.9881 1.9482
100 A
0.2664 1.5521 2.5966 0.3463 1.4110 2.7685
P 1.3869 2.7618 1.1962 2.9832
0.2408 0.5973 1.5414 0.2602 0.6218 1.6419
0.4480 1.6907 0.4604 1.8033
a 0.2032 1.2115 2.0081 0.2199 1.0789 1.9411
1.0855 2.1341 0.9425 2.0774
125 A
0.3356 1.4705 2.7862 0.3169 1.4449 2.6875
P 1.2624 2.9943 1.2484 2.8840
0.3680 0.4132 1.8562 0.2824 0.5105 1.6179
0.1850 2.0844 0.3354 1.7930
a 0.1397 1.3060 1.8537 0.2446 1.0842 2.0433
1.2194 1.9404 0.9325 2.1950
150 A
0.1731 1.7214 2.4003 0.2806 1.4629 2.5631
P 1.6140 2.5077 1.2889 2.7372
0.1667 0.7218 1.3754 0.3372 0.4109 1.7328
0.6184 1.4788 0.2018 1.9419
Conclusion
Here, we have used type II censored data to obtain the likelihood estimation for performance of Mukherjee-Islam distribution and the acceleration factor under SSPALT. The censoring scheme along with SSPALT will be feasible to the experimenter and he/she will have a fixed number of failure prior to the experiment. That will save cost as well as money. The maximum likelihood estimation technique is used to estimate the parameters and the estimators of it are consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. The current research shows that the second set of parameters has good statistical properties than the first set of parameters. As the sample size increases, the confidence interval become narrower. It can also be noted that interval of the estimators at y=0.99 is greater than the corresponding at y=0.95. Therefore, it can be inferred that the model and test method used in this study works satisfactorily for step stress partially accelerated life testing under the certain assumptions.
References
[1] S. P. Mukherjee, & A. Islam, A Finite-Range Distribution of Finite Times, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 30 (1983): 487-491.
[2] C. D. Lai and S. P. Mukherjee, A Note on "A finite range distribution of failure times", Microelectronics Reliability (Elsevier), 26 (1986): 183-189.
[3] S. A. Siddiqui, S. Jain, S. N. Andrabi, I. Siddiqui, M. Alam, and P. A. Chalkoo, Moments of concomitants of order statistics for a new finite range bi-variate distribution (FRBD), Journal of Reliability and Statistical Studies, 5 (2012): 77-84
[4] S. A. Siddiqui, M. Subharwal, The Mukherjee-Islam Failure Model, Microelectronic Reliability, 32 (1992): 923-924.
[6] A.A. Abdel-Ghaly, A.F. Attia and M.M. Abdel-Ghani, The maximum likelihood estimates in step partially accelerated life tests for the Weibull parameters in censored data, Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 31 (4) (2002): 551-573.
[7] A.A. Abdel-Ghaly, E.H. El-Khodary, A.A. Ismail, Maximum likelihood estimation and optimal design in step stress partially accelerated life tests for the Pareto distribution with type I censoring, in: Proceeding of the 14th Annual Conference on Statistics and Computer Modelling in Human and Social Sciences, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, 2002, pp. 16-29.
[8] M.M. Abdel-Ghani, Investigations of some lifetime models under partially accelerated life tests, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Egypt, 1998.
[9] M.M. Abdel-Ghani, The estimation problem of the log logistic parameters in step partially accelerated life tests using type I censored data, The National Review of Social Sciences, 41 (2) (2004): 1-19.
[10] D.S. Bai and S.W. Chung, Optimal design of partially accelerated life tests for the exponential distribution under type I censoring, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 41 (1992): 400-406.
[11] G.K. Bhattacharyya, Z. Soejoeti, A tampered failure rate model for step-stress accelerated life test, Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods 8 (1989) 1627-1644.
[12] M.H. DeGroot, P.K. Goel, Bayesian estimation and optimal design in partially
accelerated life testing, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 16 (2) (1979): 223-235.
[13] P.K. Goel, Some estimation problems in the study of tampered random variables, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Statistics, Cranegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1971.
[14] E. Gouno, A. Sen and N. Balakrishnan, Optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring, IEEE Transactions on Reliability 53 (3) (2004): 388-393.
[15] A.A. Ismail, On the optimal design of step-stress partially accelerated life tests for the Gompertz distribution with type I censoring, InterStat, Electronic Journal (2006): 1-15.
[16] C. Li and N. Fard, Optimum bi-variate step-stress accelerated life test for censored data, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 56 (1) (2007): 77-84.
[17] W. Nelson, A bibliography of accelerated test plans, IEEE transactions on Reliability, 54 (3) (2005): 370-373.
[18] G. Yang, Life Cycle Reliability Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2007.
[19] W. Nelson, Accelerated Life Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analysis, John, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990.
[20] P. W. Srivastava and N. Mittal. Optimum step-stress partially accelerated life tests for the truncated logistic distribution with censoring, Applied Mathematical Modelling,34(2010) 3166-3178
[21] S. Hyun and J. Lee, Constant-Stress Partially Accelerated Life Testing for Log-Logistic Distribution with Censored Data, Journal of Statistics Applications & Probability 4 No.2, 193-201(2015)
[22] F. K. Wang, Y.F. Cheng and W.L. Lu, Partially Accelerated life Tests for the Weibull Distribution Under Multiply Censored Data, Communication in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, vol 41(2012) 1667-1678
[23] Showkat Ahmad Lone, Ahmadur Rahman and Arif-Ul-Islam, Estimation in Step-Stress Partially Accelerated Life Tests for the Mukherjee-Islam Distribution Using Time Constrain , International Journal of Modern Mathematical Sciences, 2016, 14(3):227-238
