Научная статья на тему 'Оценка изменения затрат пластовой энергии при эксплуатации скважины на севере Пермского края'

Оценка изменения затрат пластовой энергии при эксплуатации скважины на севере Пермского края Текст научной статьи по специальности «Энергетика и рациональное природопользование»

CC BY
137
30
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Ключевые слова
ЩЕЛЕВАЯ ГИДРОПЕСКОСТРУЙНАЯ ПЕРФОРАЦИЯ / КИСЛОТНАЯ ОБРАБОТКА / ПРОНИЦАЕМОСТЬ / ЗАБОЙНОЕ ДАВЛЕНИЕ / ПЛАСТОВОЕ ДАВЛЕНИЕ / ФИЛЬТРАЦИОННЫЕ СОПРОТИВЛЕНИЯ / СКИН-ФАКТОР / КОЭФФИЦИЕНТ ПРОДУКТИВНОСТИ / ABRASIVE JET PERFORATION / ACID TREATMENT / PERMEABILITY / BOTTOMHOLE PRESSURE / RESERVOIR PRESSURE / FILTRATION RESISTANCE / SKIN FACTOR / PRODUCTIVITY INDEX

Аннотация научной статьи по энергетике и рациональному природопользованию, автор научной работы — Уирсигроч Мариан, Поплыгин Владимир Валерьевич, Русинов Дмитрий Юрьевич

Тщательно исследована история работы одной из скважин, эксплуатирующих карбонатные отложения в Пермском крае. В течение рассматриваемого периода на скважине проводилось два геолого-технических мероприятия: щелевая гидропескоструйная перфорация (ЩГПП) и кислотная обработка. Выполнен анализ результатов щелевой гидропескоструйной перфорации и кислотной обработки, проведена оценка изменения прироста коэффициента продуктивности после геолого-технических мероприятий от значений пластовых и забойных давлений. В результате промысловых исследований отмечено, что дополнительная добыча нефти в ходе применения геолого-технических мероприятий может существенно снижаться при уменьшении забойных и пластовых давлений. Установлено, что при проведении ЩГПП с кислотной обработкой прирост добычи нефти за счет ЩГПП составил около 65 %, за счет кислотной обработки 35 %. Отмечено, что щелевая перфорация помогает щадящим способом увеличить дебит скважины и снизить затраты пластовой энергии на движение флюидов в призабойной зоне скважины. После проведенной на скважине спустя два года кислотной обработки увеличение добычи нефти за счет воздействия кислотой составило 15 %, за счет роста забойного давления и увеличения трещинной проницаемости 85 %. Выявлено полное исключение затрат пластовой энергии на преодоление дополнительных фильтрационных сопротивлений сразу после проведения геолого-технических мероприятий. Поскольку залежь, эксплуатируемая рассматриваемой скважиной, имеет развитую трещиноватость, то и значения проницаемости призабойной зоны пласта, затрат пластовой энергии будут существенно зависеть от уровней пластовых и забойных давлений. Для повышения эффективности проведения геолого-технических работ на месторождениях с развитой естественной трещиноватостью рекомендуется поддерживать забойные давления выше бокового горного давления.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Похожие темы научных работ по энергетике и рациональному природопользованию , автор научной работы — Уирсигроч Мариан, Поплыгин Владимир Валерьевич, Русинов Дмитрий Юрьевич

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Evaluation of Reservoir Energy Consumption During Oil Well Operation on the North Perm Region

In the article an account of extensive investigations of a well with carbonate deposits operating over a period of 44 months in Perm Region is given. Two well production enhancement techniques were used, namely abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment. A detailed analysis of abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment results was carried out, where changes of productivity index depending on reservoir and bottomhole pressures after operations were evaluated. It was shown, that an incremental oil production can significantly decrease with decreasing reservoir and bottomhole pressures. It was found that during the abrasive jet perforation with acid treatment, an incremental oil production has increased for abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment to about 65 % and 35 % respectively. It was also shown, that the abrasive jet perforation helps to slightly increase a well rate and decrease a reservoir energy consumption for fluid communications in bottomhole formation zone. After the acid treatment taking place two years later, oil production was increased and it is understood that 15 % of this increase is due to acid attack, and on 85 % due to growth in bottomhole pressure and fracture permeability. There was revealed a complete exclusion of reservoir energy consumptions to overcome the additional filtration resistance immediately after conducting operations. The reservoir has an excellent intrinsic fracturing property, so bottomhole formation permeability and energy consumption significantly depend on the reservoir and bottomhole pressures. It is recommended to maintain reservoir and bottomhole pressures higher than lateral rock pressure to increase effectiveness of well operations in reservoirs with advanced natural fracturing.

Текст научной работы на тему «Оценка изменения затрат пластовой энергии при эксплуатации скважины на севере Пермского края»

ВЕСТНИК ПНИПУ. ГЕОЛОГИЯ. НЕФТЕГАЗОВОЕ И ГОРНОЕ ДЕЛО BULLETIN OF PNRPU. GEOLOGY. OIL & GAS ENGINEERING & MINING

ISSN 2224-9923

Том / Volume 15 №21 2016

http://vestnik.pstu.ru/geo/

УДК 622.276.5.001.5

Article / Статья © PNRPU / ПНИПУ, 2016

EVALUATION OF RESERVOIR ENERGY CONSUMPTION DURING OIL WELL OPERATION ON THE NORTH PERM REGION

M. Wiercigroch1, V.V. Poplygin, D.Iu. Rusinov

'University of Aberdeen (39 Meston Building, Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Scotland)

Perm National Research Polytechnic University (29 Komsomolskii av., Perm, 614990, Russian Federation)

ОЦЕНКА ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ ЗАТРАТ ПЛАСТОВОЙ ЭНЕРГИИ ПРИ ЭКСПЛУАТАЦИИ СКВАЖИНЫ НА СЕВЕРЕ ПЕРМСКОГО КРАЯ

М. Уирсигроч1, В.В. Поплыгин, Д.Ю. Русинов

'Абердинский университет (AB24 3UE, Шотландия, г. Абердин, Местон Билдинг, 39)

Пермский национальный исследовательский политехнический университет (614990, Россия, г. Пермь, Комсомольский пр., 29) Received / Получена: 11.08.2016. Accepted / Принята: 12.10.2016. Published / Опубликована: 02.12.2016

Keywords:

abrasive jet perforation, acid treatment, permeability, bottomhole pressure, reservoir pressure, filtration resistance, skin factor, productivity index.

In the article an account of extensive investigations of a well with carbonate deposits operating over a period of 44 months in Perm Region is given. Two well production enhancement techniques were used, namely abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment. A detailed analysis of abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment results was carried out, where changes of productivity index depending on reservoir and bottomhole pressures after operations were evaluated. It was shown, that an incremental oil production can significantly decrease with decreasing reservoir and bottomhole pressures. It was found that during the abrasive jet perforation with acid treatment, an incremental oil production has increased for abrasive jet perforation and acid treatment to about 65 % and 35 % respectively. It was also shown, that the abrasive jet perforation helps to slightly increase a well rate and decrease a reservoir energy consumption for fluid communications in bottomhole formation zone. After the acid treatment taking place two years later, oil production was increased and it is understood that 15 % of this increase is due to acid attack, and on 85 % due to growth in bottomhole pressure and fracture permeability. There was revealed a complete exclusion of reservoir energy consumptions to overcome the additional filtration resistance immediately after conducting operations. The reservoir has an excellent intrinsic fracturing property, so bottomhole formation permeability and energy consumption significantly depend on the reservoir and bottomhole pressures. It is recommended to maintain reservoir and bottomhole pressures higher than lateral rock pressure to increase effectiveness of well operations in reservoirs with advanced natural fracturing.

Ключевые слова: щелевая гидропескоструйная перфорация, кислотная обработка, проницаемость, забойное давление, пластовое давление, фильтрационные сопротивления, скин-фактор, коэффициент продуктивности.

Тщательно исследована история работы одной из скважин, эксплуатирующих карбонатные отложения в Пермском крае. В течение рассматриваемого периода на скважине проводилось два геолого-технических мероприятия: щелевая гидропескоструйная перфорация (ЩГПП) и кислотная обработка. Выполнен анализ результатов щелевой гидропескоструйной перфорации и кислотной обработки, проведена оценка изменения прироста коэффициента продуктивности после геолого-технических мероприятий от значений пластовых и забойных давлений. В результате промысловых исследований отмечено, что дополнительная добыча нефти в ходе применения геолого-технических мероприятий может существенно снижаться при уменьшении забойных и пластовых давлений. Установлено, что при проведении ЩГПП с кислотной обработкой прирост добычи нефти за счет ЩГПП составил около 65 %, за счет кислотной обработки - 35 %. Отмечено, что щелевая перфорация помогает щадящим способом увеличить дебит скважины и снизить затраты пластовой энергии на движение флюидов в призабойной зоне скважины. После проведенной на скважине спустя два года кислотной обработки увеличение добычи нефти за счет воздействия кислотой составило 15 %, за счет роста забойного давления и увеличения трещинной проницаемости -85 %. Выявлено полное исключение затрат пластовой энергии на преодоление дополнительных фильтрационных сопротивлений сразу после проведения геолого-технических мероприятий. Поскольку залежь, эксплуатируемая рассматриваемой скважиной, имеет развитую трещиноватость, то и значения проницаемости призабойной зоны пласта, затрат пластовой энергии будут существенно зависеть от уровней пластовых и забойных давлений. Для повышения эффективности проведения геолого-технических работ на месторождениях с развитой естественной трещиноватостью рекомендуется поддерживать забойные давления выше бокового горного давления.

Marian Wiercigroch - PhD of Technical Sciences, Professor at the School of Engineering (tel.: +440 122 427 25 09, e-mail: [email protected]).

Vladimir V. Poplygin - PhD of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Oil and Gas Technologies (tel.: +007 342 219 82 38, e-mail: [email protected]).

Dmitrii Iu. Rusinov - postgraduate student at the Department of Oil and Gas Technologies (tel.: +007 342 219 82 07, e-mail: [email protected]). The contact person for

correspondence.

Уирсигроч Мариан - доктор технических наук, профессор Школы инженерии (тел.: +440 122 427 25 09, e-mail: [email protected]).

Поплыгин Владимир Валерьевич - кандидат технических наук, доцент кафедры нефтегазовых технологий (тел.: +007 342 219 82 38, e-mail: [email protected]).

Русинов Дмитрий Юрьевич - аспирант кафедры нефтегазовых технологий (тел.: +007 342 219 82 07, e-mail: [email protected]). Контактное лицо для переписки.

Introduction

In oil well operations a decrease in flow rates and an increase in reservoir energy consumption are usually due to various factors including collector deformation, degassing, salt and paraffindeposition. To increase flow rates and reduce reservoir energy consumptiona variety of production enhancement methods can be applied.

And after conducting production enhancement operations, the impact on the increase in oil production of various technological parameters should be assessed.

One of the effective methods to increase well productivity and reduce reservoir energy consumption for fluid movement in the bottomhole formation zone is the abrasive jet perforation technology. Perm scientists under the leadership of N.I. Krysin [1] have developed a method of creating deep filtration channels using the features of the dynamic behavior of abrasive jet perforation in a combination with Production Tubing (PT) lift and an appropriate implementation of the relevant regimes of Abrasive Jet Perforation (AJP). Unlike the known and established technologies, it is recommended to make AJP without the use of perforator's movers and centering devices. Long, wide slots are formed due to the PT column extraction in the transition from one to another operating mode,the longitudinal and transverse vibrations of perforator are generated. AJP is performed in two stages at the working pressures of twenty and thirty MPa (for wells up to 2500 meters). During the performance in the first stage, there is a creation of slot channels in the production casing, cement, and reservoir rockto a certain depth. In the second stage there is an increase in the length of the PT, ashiftof AJP and formation of slot filter channels below the place where cracks were formed during the first stage and deepening of the slots already created. At the same in the second stage, a speed of creating perforation channels increases significantly because of a more high-speed sand carrier liquid discharge from nozzles reducing a backflow resistance. The created slot filtration channels increase in transverse dimensions due to the longitudinal and transverse vibrations of abrasive jet perforator. As a result of these actions at eachrun using the perforator with four nozzles, it is possible to cut four channels disposed at an angle of 90°. This allows to obtain a significant increase in filtration area and reduction of filtration resistance.

Operating practice of abrasive jet perforation

The paper deals with indicators of well operating in fractured carbonate reservoir on one of the fields of the Perm Region (Table 1).

Table 1

Geological and physical characteristics of a reservoir of the Perm Region

Characteristics Value

The average total thickness, m 28.2

Average oil saturated thickness, m 4.4

Porosity, % 15

Core permeability, ^m2 0.008

Initial reservoir temperature, ^ 23

Initial reservoir pressure, MPa 15.5

Oil viscosity at reservoir conditions, mPa-s 2.41

Oil density at reservoir conditions, g/cm3 0.804

Oil density in the surface conditions, g/cm3 0.839

Paraffin content in oil, % 2.71

Saturation pressure, MPa 13.58

Gas content, m3/t 53.8

Over the well lifetime, two well production enhancement operations were performed, the AJP with the acid treatment and two years lateronly acid treatment.

For the AJP a perforator of construction [2] was used. The AJP parameters in the well were as follows: perforator nozzles diameter (d^) 6 mm, sand carrier liquid density (psi) 1057.75 kg/m3, PT of K brand with diameter (dpT) 73 mm, number of perforator's nozzles (n) 2 units. A quartz sand of the GS-PK brand (fractions of 1.0...0.63) was used. The AJP was conducted in two stages wherein the first the injection pressure of the sand carrier liquid was 20 MPa and in the second -30 MPa. By increasing the injection pressure of the sand fluid carrier, an extension of the PT column and vertical cuts and channels were achieved. The rock cavern is washed out into apear shapewhich size depends on the rock strength, the duration of exposure and the power of sand and liquid jet (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. A schematic of the bottomhole formation zone after AJP where 1 - casing string; 2 - cement stone; 3 - rocks; 4 - perforation channel

Six cuts in the production casing were made at depths from 1836.2 to 1830.8 m by pumping of either 1960 or 700 kg of sand on each level. The injection time on each mode was between 15 and 20 min.

After the AJP process, a hydrochloric acid treatment was conducted with the DN-9010 to increase the volume of filtration channels.

The height of slots formed at the working pressure (Pi) of 20 MPa will be called the first mode and at the working pressure (P2) of 30 MPa the second mode.

Results in estimation of AJP

With a cross-section area of the PT (Sp.PT) of 0.00302 m2 and a cross-section area of the PT metal (SmPT) - of 0.00116 m2, the PT column extension in the first mode (ALPT ) will be:

^L'pt —

Р1 ' Sp.PT ' LPT

EE ' S*pT ' z

20 ' 0.00302 '1836.2 20'104 ' 0.00116' 1,75

(1)

— 0,273 m,

where E is Young's modulus in Pa; z is coefficient taking into account the friction between the pipe and casing wall.

The PT column extension during the second mode (ALPT ) was 0.410 m. Then the height of the slot (ls) was 0.137 m.

According to [3-7], for specified conditions of the AJP, the slot depth is 22 cm. We believe that the layer in the well area was homogeneous prior to the AJP, and its average permeability, according to the HDI, was 0.032 m2. After the AJP we assume that the fluid flow to the well is described by the model of zonal inhomogeneous reservoir. It is divided into 2 zones, zone 1where there is a slot and zone 2 where there is no slot. Then, based on the formula of zonal inhomogeneous flow we can determine the permeability in region 1, which amounted to 0.033 |im2.

Immediately after the placing in operationits production rate became equal to 36.5 m3/day, while the relative bottomhole and reservoir pressure were 0.45 and 0.99, respectively, and the productivity ratio was 6.2 m3/(day-MPa).

According to [8-12] the production rate after acid treatment during AJP should increase by 4,2 m3/day. Expected initial well production Qex can be identified by the multivariate statistical dependence [8]:

Qex — A + Ap

Р

V sat J

+н + А 'h+

+ Am ' Kp + А ' k + Aj

f k >

(2)

V №oil J

The coefficients of the multivariate model A, A,

р

A, Ah, Am, Ak, Aj are determined for specific geological and technical conditions of the development. In terms of operational objects of the Upper Kama region for the Bashkirian deposits the following values were established A = 2.2; Ap = 11.85; A^ = -2.534; Ah = 0.574; Am = 0.831, Ak = 0, Aj = 0.

On the basis of equation (2) for the well the initial flow rate without enhanced operation's conducting had to be 12.4 m3/day. It turns out that due to AJP conducting the well production increased to 19.9 m3/day. That is, each run with AJP provided an increase in production of about 3 m3/day.

Dynamics of well performance

When changing the relative bottomhole pressure from 0.45 to 0.25, the value of the well productivity index has declined from 6.2 to 1 m3/(day-MPa). Also the well oil flow rate decreased from 36.48 to 3.95 m3/day.

In [13-16] it is indicated that a decline inwell productivity coefficients is due to rock deformation and oil dissolved gas in afree phase. Let us consider what is a change in well productivity when changing of bottomhole pressure. According to the research undertaken in [17-19], the carbonate reservoirs of the Ozernoe field and the neighboring fields have substantial fracturing. Closures of vertical fractures occur during pressure decreasing below the lateral rock pressure, which for the Ozernoe field's conditions was determined by the method described in [17]. With an average density of rocks 2650 kg/m3 and a total porosity of about 15 % for the Ozernoye field's conditions, the lateral rock pressure is around 5.90 MPa.

Let us estimate the general and fracture permeability of rocks in the area of the well within two years following the AJP (see Table 1). According to the data both the general and fracture permeability of rocks significantly declined, resulting in a significant decrease in well production. It is worth noting, that the bottomhole pressure at the borehole walls was below the lateral rock pressure. The average pressure in the bottomhole zone remained above Plat, so fracture permeability did not reduce to 0 (Table 2).

Table 2

Changes in the work indicators and BFZ permeability during well operation

Time after entering into operation, months Q oil m/day P 1 res? MPa Pboth MPa Pres/ 1 res' Psat ktotah 10"Vm2 kr Л;frac? 10-цт2

Secondary completion with AJP and acid treatment

1 36.48 12.23 6.03 0.49 30.60 117.06

5 30.93 12.23 3.89 0.32 25.95 84.18

8 10.84 12.23 3.83 0.31 9.09 10.33

14 9.64 12.23 3.12 0.26 8.09 8.18

16 7.78 12.23 2.78 0.23 6.53 5.32

22 3.95 14.51 3.11 0.21 3.32 1.38

Acid treatment

23 36.23 14.50 5.30 0.37 30.39 115.46

24 34.23 14.50 9.7 0.7 28.72 103.11

30 26.26 14.11 7.69 0.55 22.03 60.68

36 24.96 14.11 6.47 0.46 20.94 54.80

40 22.31 14.27 3.71 0.26 18.72 43.79

43 14.92 14.58 2.43 0.17 12.52 19.58

44 13.81 14.58 2.65 0.18 11.59 16.78

Two years later after the AJP an acid treatment was carried out on the well with DN-9010 composition (Vacid = 30 m3) with a simultaneous increase in bottomhole pressure in 1.8 times. Thereafter, the productivity index reached its initial value. The value of production rate increase after acid treatment exceeded the values obtained for the dependences of the [8-10, 20]. According to [8-101 the production rate had to increase by 4.88 m /day. It turns out that the rest of the production rate increase was due to changes in the bottomhole pressure. Within two years after the acid treatment the bottomhole pressure decreased, and at the same time production rate reduced (see Fig. 2).

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

40

35

СЙ 30-

га 03 CL ?S

CL S S 20

S h 15

1 Ol 10

5

0

0

• •

• .

• •• • • •

• • • :: ° и • •— • • s It

10

20 30 Months Q, m3/day •K.

50

Fig. 2. Changing in well working parameters during the operation

The values of total and fracture permeability, productivity index reduced similar to the period following the AJP.

It is worth noting that with a decrease in the productivity ratios and the flow rates of the well after repeated acid treatment, they remained below the values at the same bottomhole pressure before the acid treatment (see Fig. 3). Moreover, the well

productivity coefficients do not fully recover after a significant reduction in pressure in the bottomhole formation zone. This phenomenon may be associated with plastic deformation of rocks. When we look at Fig. 3 it can be deduced that the well productivity decreases by half.

Fig. 3. Dependence of the well productivity index from relative bottomhole pressure

Estimation of reservoir energy loss

According to the Dupuis formula for fluid inflow into the well, its production rate (for a radial linearly flow in a homogeneous reservoir) can be calculated as

q =

2nkh ( Pres - Pbott ) ^ln ((b 1 rw )

m3/s.

(3)

where k - reservoir permeability, m2; Pres and Pbott -reservoir and bottomhole pressure, Pa; |i - dynamic viscosity of the fluid, Pa s; rw and r - well radius and external boundary radius (reservoir drainage area radius of the well).

In case of reducing the permeability of in a circular reservoir area around the well with a radius of rBFZ, a fluid inflow decreases as follows

4 s =

InkRFZh (Pres - Pbott )

^(ln ( / rw ) + S)

(4)

where kRFz - remote formation zone permeability; S - skin factor - the value which depends on the permeability of BFZ and its size is:

S =

RFZ V kBFZ

- 1

ln ^BFL

(5)

where Ubfz - rocks permeability in BFZ. From (4) it follows

S _ 2^kRFZh (Pres Pbott ) 1 r

qs • m rw

(6)

where kRFZ permeability can be determined by processing the pressure recovery curve, obtained by the study of unsteady well working modes.

Let us estimate the impact of changes in BFZ permeability on the reservoir energy consumptions in the well described in Table 3.

When the pressure recovery curve is processed it was obtained: kppz = 0.0132 |m2; kBFZ = = 0.0076 | m2, in accordance with (6) S = -5.6. That is, in the initial period after the enhancing operation the skin factor is negative and the state of bottomhole zone does not cause a significant loss in formation energy for the fluid inflow into the well. After 22 months following the AJP and acid treatment the BFZ condition deteriorated and skin factor increased to the value of 1.67.

Table 4

Table 3

Initial data for the well

Parameter Value

Net pay thickness h, m 4.4

Reservoir oil viscosity res, Pa-s 2.4110-3

Well radius rw, m 0.1

External boundary radius rb, m 250

Reservoir pressure Pres, MPa 12.23

Bottomhole pressure before stop Pbott, MPa 6.03

Well production before stop qS, m3/day 36.48

According to the formula (7), the loss of reservoir pressure to overcome the additional resistance in BFZ amounts as 0.17 MPa,

APS =

4s ' R 'S

2 ' n ' kRFZ ' h

(7)

Pressure losses in BFZ

No. Time after entering into operation, months Flow rate Ql, m3/day Depression on a layer, MPa Skin factor Additional pressure loss APs APs share of total depression, %

Secondary completion with AJP and acid treatment

1 1 36.48 6.02 -5.60 - -

2 5 30.93 8.34 -0.89 - -

3 8 10.84 8.40 -0.85 - -

4 14 9.64 9.11 -0.25 - -

5 16 7.78 9.45 0.03 0.01 0.04

6 22 3.95 11.4 1.67 0.17 1.52

Acid treatment

7 23 36.23 9.2 -0.18 - -

8 24 34.23 4.8 -3.83 - -

9 30 26.26 6.42 -2.49 - -

10 36 24.96 7.64 -1.47 - -

11 40 22.31 10.56 0.95 0.10 0.94

12 43 14.92 12.15 2.28 0.24 1.95

13 44 13.81 11.93 2.09 0.22 1.82

Thus, 1.5 % of the total depression on a layer (formation energy) APres = Pres - Pbott = 11.4 MPa is spent on overcoming the action of the skin effect in BFZ.

Table 4 lists the results of processing the PRC and the calculations for the well. After the second operation (acid treatment) additional losses of energy in the BFZ are not observed.

References

Conclusions

The paper analyzes the results of an abrasive jet perforation with acid treatment and acid treatment alone on one of the wells in the field of the Perm Region. It was found that during the AJP with acid treatment a growth in oil production by the AJP and acid treatments amounted to about 65 and 35 % respectively. The acid treatment carried out two years later acid, has resulted in an increase in oil production, which was 15 % due to the acid treatment and 85 % due to the growth of bottomhole pressure and fracture permeability's increase. Abrasive Jet Perforation helps to increase slightly well production rate and to decrease a reservoir energy consumption for fluid communications in the bottomhole formation zone. It is recommended to maintain the reservoir and bottomhole pressures higher than the lateral rock pressure for increasing effectiveness of well operations in reservoirs with advanced natural fracturing.

Acknowledgments

The reported study was performed due to financial support of Perm Region Government (project No C-26/004.9 from 12 January 2015).

1. Salikhov R.G., Krapivma T.N., Krysm N.I. Primenenie shchelevoi gidropeskostruinoi perforatsii pri vtorichnom vskrytii produktivnykh plastov [Application of abrasive jet slotted perforation during secondary opening of productive layers]. Sankt-Petersburg: Nedra, 2005, 180 p.

2. Matiashov S.V., Iurgenson V.A., Krysin N.I.,

Opalev V.A., Permiakov A.P., Semenishchev V.P. Sposob

gidropeskostruinoi perforatsii skvazhin i ustroistvo dlia ego

osushchestvleniia [Method of hydraulic jet well perforation and device for its realization]: pat. 2185497 Ros. Federatsiia no.2001118520/03.; zaiavl. 04.07.2011; opubl. 20.07.2002. Biul. no.20.

3. Solovkin O.E. Puti sovershenstvovaniia shchadiashchei perforatsii skvazhin [Sophistication ways of wells «spare» perforation]. Burenie i neft', 2010, no.5, pp.48-51.

4. Huang Z. et al. Abrasive water jet perforation experiments under ambient pressures. Atomization and Sprays, 2015, vol.25, no.7, pp.617-627. DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2015011050.

5. Inoue F., Ogawa T., Outa Y. Research that estimates perforation depth opened using abrasive water jet for concrete material by sound resonance propagation model. 22nd International Conference on Water Jetting 2014: Advances in Current and Emerging Markets: conference paper, Haarlem, Netherlands, 3-5 Sept. 2014. Haarlem, 2014, pp.127-135.

6. Purwitaningtyas I.M. et al. Real-time abrasive perforation on coiled tubing saves operation time, improves cost efficiency and boots reservoir production in delta Mahakam field's low-porosity reservoirs. Society of Petroleum Engineers - Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition 2013: conference paper, The Woodlands, 26-27Mar. 2013. Woodlands, 2013, pp.237251. DOI: 10.2118/163912-MS.

7. Huang Z. et al. Mechanism and numerical simulation of pressure stagnation during water jetting perforation. Petroleum Science, 2008, vol.5, no.1, pp.52-55. DOI: 10.1007/s12182-008-0008-2.

iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.

8. Pavlovskaia E. et al. Effektivnost' kislotnykh obrabotok skvazhin, ekspluatiruiushchikh bashkirskie otlozheniia na mestorozhdeniiakh Permskogo kraia [Effectiveness of acidizing in Bashkir deposits of Perm Region]. Neftianoe khoziaistvo, 2015, no.3, pp.28-30.

9. Poplygin V.V., Beloglazova E.A., Ivanova A.S. Analiz rezul'tatov provedeniia kislotnykh obrabotok v slozhnykh geologo-tekhnologicheskikh usloviiakh [Analysis of acid treatments in complex geological and technological conditions]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledova-tel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiia. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo, 2014, no. 10, pp.83-90. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2014.10.8.

10. Poplygin V.V. et al. Rezul'taty obrabotok sostavom DN-9010 prizaboinykh zon plastov BSh neftianykh mesto-rozhdenii raiona VKMKS [Composition DN-9010 treatments results on bottomhole zones of the layer BSh oilfields of VKMKS area]. Vestnik PGTU. Geologiia, geoinformatsionnye sistemy, gorno-neftianoe delo, 2010, no.5, pp.70-74.

11. Kent A.W. et al. Intelligent completion inside uncemented liner for selective high-rate carbonate matrix acidizing. SPE Drilling and Completion, 2014, vol. 29, no.2, pp.165-181. DOI: 10.2118/166209-PA.

12. Cui B. et al. Acidizing technology of carbonate reservoir used for enhanced oilrecovery in the oilfield of Iraq. 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference: conference paper, Busan, South Korea, 15-20 June 2014. Busan, 2014, pp.174-179.

13. Poplygin V.V. Prognozirovanie produktivnosti skvazhin i tempov nefteizvlecheniia pri vysokoi gazonasyshchennosti plastovoi nefti (na primere mestorozhdenii Verkhnego Prikam'ia) [Prediction of well productivity and oil recovery rates at high gas saturation of reservoir oil (on example of the Upper Kama region fields)]: dis. ... kand. tekhn. nauk. Perm', 2011.

Список л

1. Салихов Р.Г., Крапивина Т.Н., Крысин Н.И. Применение щелевой гидропескоструйной перфорации при вторичном вскрытии продуктивных пластов. - СПб.: Недра, 2005. - 180 с.

2. Способ гидропескоструйной перфорации скважин и устройство для его осуществления: пат. 2185497 Рос. Федерация № 2001118520/03 / Матяшов С.В., Юргенсон В.А., Крысин Н.И., Опалев В.А., Пермяков А.П., Семенищев В.П.; заявл. 04.07.2011; опубл. 20.07.2002. Бюл. № 20.

3. Соловкин О.Е. Пути совершенствования щадящей перфорации скважин // Бурение и нефть. - 2010. - № 5. -С. 48-51.

14. Mordvinov V.A. et al. Produktivnost' skvazhin posle kislotnykh gidrorazryvov plasta na Gagarinskom i Ozernom mestorozhdeniiakh [Wells productivity after acid fracturing in the Gagarinskoye and Ozernoye oilfields]. Neftianoe khoziaistvo, 2013, no.4, pp.44-45.

15. Poplygin V.V. Dinamika produktivnosti dobyvaiushchikh skvazhin pri vysokoi gazonasyshchennosti plastovoi nefti [Dynamics of the wells productivity in case of the high gas saturation of the oil]. Neftianoe khoziaistvo, 2011, no.10, pp.28-29.

16. Berry S.L. et al. Improved oil recovery from combining well stimulation with novel surfactant technologies. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2009: conference paper, New Orleans; United States; 4-7 Oct 2009. New Orleans, 2009, pp.1393-1405. DOI: 10.2118/124215-MS.

17. Viktorin V.D. Vliianie osobennostei karbonatnykh kollektorov na effektivnost' razrabotki neftianykh zalezhei [The influence of carbonate reservoirs on the efficiency of oil deposits development]. Moscow: Nedra, 1988, 150 p.

18. Martiushev D.A., Lekomtsev A.V., Kotousov A.G. Opredelenie raskrytosti i szhimaemosti estestvennykh treshchin karbonatnoi zalezhi Logovskogo mestorozhdeniia [Determining openness and compressibility of natural fractures of carbonate reserves in the Logovskoye deposit]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledo-vatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiia. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo, 2015, no. 16, pp.61-69. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2015.16.7.

19. Mordvinov V.A., Martiushev D.A., Ladeishchikova T.S., Gorlanov N.P. Otsenka vliianiia estestvennoi treshchi-novatosti kollektora na dinamiku produktivnosti dobyvaiushchikh skvazhin Ozernogo mestorozhdeniia [Estimation of effects of natural reservoir fracturing on producing well performance]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledovatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiia. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo, 2015, no.14, pp.32-38. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2015.14.4.

20. Raspopov A.V., Novokreshchennykh D.V. Analiz rezul'tatov primeneniia metodov intensifikatsii na karbonatnykh kollektorakh mestorozhdeniiakh Permskogo kraia [Results analysis of intensification methods application in carbonate reservoirs of Perm region fields]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional'nogo issledo-vatel'skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Geologiia. Neftegazovoe i gornoe delo, 2014, no.10, pp.73-82. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2014.10.7.

4. Abrasive water jet perforation experiments under ambient pressures / Z. Huang [et al.] // Atomization and Sprays. - 2015. - Vol. 25, № 7. - P. 617-627. DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2015011050.

5. Inoue F., Ogawa T., Outa Y. Research that estimates perforation depth opened using abrasive water jet for concrete material by sound resonance propagation model // 22nd International Conference on Water Jetting 2014: Advances in Current and Emerging Markets: conference paper, Haarlem, Netherlands, 3-5 Sept. 2014. -Haarlem, 2014. - P. 127-135.

6. Real-time abrasive perforation on coiled tubing saves operation time, improves cost efficiency and boots reservoir

production in delta Mahakam field's low-porosity reservoirs / I.M. Purwitaningtyas [et al.] // Society of Petroleum Engineers - Coiled Tubing and Well Intervention Conference and Exhibition 2013: conference paper, 26-27 Mar. 2013. -Woodlands, 2013. - P. 237-251. DOI: 10.2118/163912-MS.

7. Mechanism and numerical simulation of pressure stagnation during water jetting perforation / Z. Huang [et al.] // Petroleum Science. - 2008. - Vol. 5, № 1. - P. 52-55. DOI 10.1007/s12182-008-0008-2.

8. Эффективность кислотных обработок скважин, эксплуатирующих башкирские отложения на месторождениях Пермского края / Е. Павловская [и др.] // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2015. - № 3. - С. 28-30.

9. Поплыгин В.В., Белоглазова Е.А., Иванова А.С. Анализ результатов проведения кислотных обработок в сложных геолого-технологических условиях // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Геология. Нефтегазовое и горное дело. - 2014. - № 10. - С. 83-90. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2014.10.8.

10. Результаты обработок составом ДН-9010 призабойных зон пластов БШ нефтяных месторождений района ВКМКС / В.В. Поплыгин [и др.] // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2010. - № 5. - С. 70-74.

11. Intelligent completion inside uncemented liner for selective high-rate carbonate matrix acidizing / A.W. Kent [et al.] // SPE Drilling and Completion. - 2014. - Vol. 29, № 2. - P. 165-181. DOI: 10.2118/166209-PA.

12. Acidizing technology of carbonate reservoir used for enhanced oilrecovery in the oilfield of Iraq / B. Cui [et al.] // 24th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference: conference paper, Busan, South Korea, 15-20 June 2014. -Busan, 2014. - P. 174-179.

13. Поплыгин В.В. Прогнозирование продуктивности скважин и темпов нефтеизвлечения при высокой газонасыщенности пластовой нефти (на примере месторождений Верхнего Прикамья): дис. ... канд. техн. наук. - Перм, 2011.

14. Продуктивность скважин после кислотных гидроразрывов пласта на Гагаринском и Озерном месторождениях / В.А. Мордвинов [и др.] // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2013. - № 4. - С. 44-45.

15. Поплыгин В. В. Динамика продуктивности добывающих скважин при высокой газонасыщенности пластовой нефти // Нефтяное хозяйство. - 2011. - № 10. -С. 28-29.

16. Improved oil recovery from combining well stimulation with novel surfactant technologies / S.L. Berry [et al.] // SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2009: conference paper, New Orleans; United States; 4-7 Oct 2009. - New Orleans, 2009. - P. 1393-1405. DOI: 10.2118/124215-MS.

17. Викторин В. Д. Влияние особенностей карбонатных коллекторов на эффективность разработки нефтяных залежей. - М.: Недра, 1988. - 150 с.

18. Мартюшев Д.А., Лекомцев А.В., Котоусов А.Г. Определение раскрытости и сжимаемости естественных трещин карбонатной залежи Логовского месторождения // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Геология. Нефтегазовое и горное дело. - 2015. - № 16. - С. 61-69. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2015.16.7.

19. Оценка влияния естественной трещиноватости коллектора на динамику продуктивности добывающих скважин Озерного месторождения / В. А. Мордвинов, Д.А. Мартюшев, Т.С. Ладейщикова, Н.П. Горланов // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Геология. Нефтегазовое и горное дело. - 2015. - № 14. - С. 32-38. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2015.14.4.

20. Распопов А. В., Новокрещенных Д. В. Анализ результатов применения методов интенсификации на карбонатных коллекторах месторождениях Пермского края // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Геология. Нефтегазовое и горное дело. - 2014. - № 10. - С. 73-82. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2014.10.7.

Просьба ссылаться на эту статью в русскоязычных источниках следующим образом:

Уирсигроч М., Поплыгин В.В., Русинов Д.Ю. Оценка изменения затрат пластовой энергии при эксплуатации скважины на севере Пермского края // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Геология. Нефтегазовое и горное дело. - 2016. - Т.15, №21. - С.313-319. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2016.21.2

Please cite this article in English as:

Wiercigroch M., Poplygin V.V., Rusinov D.Iu. Evaluation of reservoir energy consumption during oil well operation on the north perm region. Bulletin of PNRPU. Geology. Oil & Gas Engineering & Mining, 2016, vol.15, no.21, рр.313-319. DOI: 10.15593/2224-9923/2016.21.2

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.