CC BY
16Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 8 (2014 7) 1327-1341
УДК 323.2 (=47+57-81)
Mechanisms of Interaction Between the State, Businesses
and Small-Numbered Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Federation Under Global Transformations
Vladimir S. Luzan*
Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041, Russia
Received 10.05.2014, received in revised form 14.06.2014, accepted 05.07.2014
Sustainable social and cultural development of small-numbered indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation (hereinafter referred to as SIPN) under global transformations, besides the mobilization of the inner resources of the peoples themselves, depends on the currently functioning mechanisms of interaction between the state, businesses and such peoples. Consequently, the article makes an attempt to take an insight into foreign, and, first of all, Russian experience of implementing various mechanisms of interaction, targeted at the preservation of the original habitat, traditional lifestyle and cultural values of SIPN.
The article remarks, that despite the presence of multiple examples of mutually profitable cooperation between business entities and SIPN, we may state that unlike foreign practices, Russian examples are not regular and bear an incentive character (first of all, due to absence of clear mechanisms established at the federal and regional levels, obliging each business entity to get engaged into such interaction).
Keywords: small-numbered indigenous peoples; state; business; original habitat; political and legal mechanisms; interaction.
Introduction into the problem. Under the conditions of expanding globalization processes, the fundamental role in further preservation of the original habitat and identity of SIPN is played by political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state authority bodies, businesses and ethnocultural SIPN groups. There is no doubt that the main subject of this interaction is the state as the body which determines political and legal mechanisms not only for its own
© Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved
* Corresponding author E-mail address: luzan84@mail.ru
interaction with SIPN, but for building similar communication of SIPN with other entities, such as, first of all, publically owned joint-stock companies and private business entities engaged in industrial development of the SIPN original habitat. At the same time, the existing geopolitical trends provide the grounds to assert, that the scope of industrial development of such territories is expected to be rapidly expanding both in the short and the long-term prospective
due to the exhaustion of natural resources in the traditional extraction venues.
Conceptological grounds of the research. In Russian scientific and journalistic works, researches of political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state and SIPN were described by famous scientists, politicians, public officials and community leaders. All existing works may be divided into two categories:
1) works regarding the conceptual bases of building such mechanisms: Abdulatipov R.G., Arutiunov S.A., Guboglo M.N., Drobizheva L.M., Zorin V.Iu., Kalinina K.V., Mikhaylov V.A., Tishkov V.A. etc.;
2) fundamental and practical works directly dedicated to the analysis of the problems of building such political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state and small-numbered indigenous peoples. First of all, these are works by Abashidze A.Kh., Andrichenko L.V., Arakchaa K.D., Donskoy F.S., Zaydfudim P.Kh., Krylov B.S., Kriazhkov V.A., Samar Iu.A., Pik A.I., Khabrieva T.Ia,. Khariuchi S.N. etc.
It is worth mentioning that recently in Russia a significant number of researches dedicated to the issues of management of nature use and industrial development of the Northern territories in the context of ethnical and environmental problems has been published, such as those by: Ananidze F.R., Arakchaa K.D., Bakhtin N.B., Bogoslovskaia L.S., Mischenko V.L., Murashko O.A., Pavlov P.N., Rayshev I.A. etc. First of all, this tendency is connected with the new stage of industrial development of such territories.
Numerous dissertations are dedicated to building political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state and SIPN: Kal'te Z.M. "Political and Legal Aspects of Development of Saami, an Indigenous Small-Numbered People of the Russian Federation" [Kal'te, 2003], Sleptsov A.N. " State Policy in Enforcement of SIPN Rights in Russia" [Sleptsov, 2005], Sondykov V.S. "SIPN
of the North: Management Development Problems (Based on Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug)" [Sondykov, 2001], Khariuchi S.N. "Legislative Safeguarding of Rights and Freedoms of Russian SIPN: Implementation Problems" [Khariuchi, 2002] etc.
For better understanding of the genesis of the political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state and small-numbered indigenous people of Russia, the most interesting research is the dissertation by Doronina I.A. "Political and Legal Basis for Forming Traditional Nature Use of SIPN Territories in the Russian North (Based on Nenets Autonomous Okrug)" [Doronina, 2005].
The conducted analysis brought the dissertation author to the conclusion, that, despite the succession of the special indigenous peoples' status, throughout the whole history, at different temporal stages the state policy has been undergoing conceptual transformations: from non-interference into administration and conservation of the traditional aborigine lifestyle in the 16th - 19th centuries, through the attempts of integration and organization of their customs in the Soviet epoch, to the modern principles of respectful attitude to their right for preservation of the traditional lifestyle, methods and means of traditional nature use.
Studying modern (from mid-80-s of the 20th century) state policy concerning SIPN, I.A. Doronina outlines three main development stages [Doronina, 2005]:
1) Mid-80-s - early 90-s: "political" stage. Throughout this period it is possible to trace the change of SIPN policy priorities in regulative legal documents connected to the recognition of the peoples' specific interest and right for self-government in these or those forms, for the lands and natural resources.
2) Years 1994-1998: "regulation-creating" stage. This stage is characterized by drawing up
a legislative system for solving SIPN problems at the federal and regional levels, making up regulations and Constitution clauses concerning SIPN interests. The practice of creating small-numbered peoples' communities and assigning free-use lands begins.
3) Since 1999 until present time: "law implementing" stage, which begins with passing the Federal Law "On the Guarantee of SIPN rights in the Russian Federation" in the year 1999 and continues with multiple laws intended to regulate SIPN rights in these or those fields. This stage is specific for the attention demonstrated by the state to SIPN problems, and for adoption of a significant number of acts intended to safeguard and actualize rights and interests of the peoples, which proves the fact, that the state does recognize its obligation towards small-numbered peoples.
As a result, the author comes to the conclusion, that at the modern development stage the necessity to safeguard the rights and interests of SIPN in Russia was finally recognized at the governmental level. The proof is the fact of forming target policies and legislation for solving SIPN problems.
For better study of the mechanisms of interaction between the state and SIPN it is essential to remark the fundamental work of the Doctor of Law, Professor Kriazhkov V.A. "SIPN of the North in Russian Law" [Kriazhkov, 2010], which, based on the deep insight into Russian and foreign legal practices, studies the topical issues of constitutional and legal SIPN status: it researches the retrolegal aspects of the status, modern state of the legislation and international legal regulation of the sphere; reveals governmental and alternative mechanisms for safeguarding them.
As a result of the conducted research, Kriazhkov V.A. suggests to improve the existing political and legal mechanisms of interaction between the state and SIPN in the following way [Kriazhkov, 2010]:
1) determine procedures for free identification of ethnicities classified as peoples of the North, and of the ethnical groups seeking for being included into this category;
2) consolidate the conditions of the special right obtaining process for the persons belonging to small-numbered indigenous peoples, and provide the exercise of such rights by people not belonging to this category but related to an indigenous people, living traditional lifestyle;
3) establish mechanisms for exercising group rights of small-numbered peoples, including assignment of an authorized representative status to certain persons;
4) strictly fix the right of the Northern peoples and persons categorized as belonging to such for free unlimited use of lands in the places of their traditional habitat and the right for priority use of such lands and natural resources following from the existing rights for reimbursement and compensation of damage caused by their relations with the entities leading non-traditional economic activity in the territories;
5) enforce the Northern peoples' right for administrative and territorial autonomy;
6) recover the right of small-numbered peoples for quota-based representation in the regional legislative bodies and representative agencies of local government;
7) guarantee the right of the Northern peoples and persons belonging to such peoples for their native language and education concerning the lifestyle and culture of the peoples, along with the right for their cultural heritage, folklore and traditional knowledge.
Moreover, we cannot help agreeing with the author, that the strategic prospective of creating new political and legal mechanisms in the subject sphere is mostly determined by the engagement of SIPN into current global processes. First of all, we mean globalization, the phenomenon which means the expansion of common values
in the elements of the global economic, social and legal systems. As a consequence, we may forecast the enforcement of the majority, dilution of traditional economy, extinction of languages and cultures of minor ethnic communities, which stimulates the group activities of SIPN, striving to preserve their identity. Under such conditions the state, exercising its legal tools and considering international and legal demands, has to temper the negative tendencies connected with the lifestyle of such peoples, at the same time, striving not to conserve it or "pay their indemnities", but to encourage their new traditions and modernization, creating the background for development of independence and self-government of SIPN, their territorial, national and cultural autonomy.
Problem statement. At the same time, in the world and especially in Russian practice the mechanisms of interaction between businesses and SIPN bear more individual than systematic character. For this reason, today we analyze the most indicative foreign practices, where such mechanisms were best developed and supported by historical circumstances (USA, Canada, Australia, Finland), but most important, where business entities, unlike the majority of Russian companies, understand the significance of their own social responsibility to SIPN.
Foreign experience analysis is best presented in the research by Maximov A.A. "Realization of Interests of the Northern Peoples Under Industrial Development Situation: From Foreign Experience to Russian Practice" [Maximov, 2007].
The principle of supporting indigenous population, according to which the local population is entitled to receive the full volume of profit from local resources' development, to be protected from any possible hazard, was recognized simultaneously with the rights of indigenous peoples for lands and resources. This principle was practically implemented in one of
agreements for providing social and economic profits and advantages to local population.
Paying royalty (monetary compensation for the use of natural resources) is typical for Australia, which at the present moment practices several flexible mechanisms of royalty rate calculation. For example, one of the agreements foresees low fixed rates at the initial stage of project development (construction of mines, processing enterprises, development of ore extraction), higher rates from the derivative product for the community to receive optimal profit at all stages of project development.
Another way of interaction between businesses and SIPN is the participation of the latter in the joint-stock equity of companies: if an indigenous peoples' community possesses the main property rights for a resource deposit or its part, or if it is entitled to control the access to such resources, then the community becomes the joint venture shareholder. For example, such practice was implemented in the agreement with indigenous peoples of Alberta, or in the agreement concluded in 1995 for providing profits to Inuvialuits of North-Western territories of Canada under Darnley Bay project of non-ferrous ore extraction [Maximov, 2007].
Maximov A.A. remarks, that development of entrepreneurship assumes new opportunities for the aborigines' businesses, their corporations, enterprises, individual ventures as contractors and subcontractors. For contract organizations the priority belongs to those managed by aborigines.
Social and cultural support may include measures on settlement infrastructure development (for example, construction of new roads), on adaptation of the population for industrial work, on solution of the most acute local social problems.
Other conditions are resolution of disputes, management of the agreement performance through a special Committee with a certain range
of authority, through the company's and special committees' reporting on each point of the agreement [Maximov, 2007: 28].
Another example of interaction between the state, businesses and small-numbered indigenous peoples is the situation in Alaska (USA), where two opposite interaction models co-exist at the same time [Maximov, 2007: 31-32]:
1) "Mainstream" model. All population of the state of Alaska has equal access to natural resources and equal relation to common institutions of municipal and regional authorities. The authority and property are separate in the aborigine communities. Local authority institutions are separated from the village and district corporations, which own the major amount of lands and resources.
2) Communal model. The reaction to destructive assimilative forces was the movement for sovereignty (self-government) of aborigine peoples of Alaska. The key institution of the communal model is a national settlement, which acts simultaneously as a source of political authority and a collective economic venture.
Discussion. In modern Russian reality there are examples when Russian companies, enhancing their corporate image, would take up social obligations not only to their own employees, but also to the territories of their economic activities. However, the most advanced in the development of corporate and territorial relations are the largest oil and gas corporations of the Russian Federation, stimulating the influence of their business on preservation of the original SIPN habitat through various political and legal mechanisms. At this level they conclude agreements on the priority aspects of the regional economic policy, which concerns the interests of the whole population of the region.
The next level is concluding agreements with the municipal entity administrations. This is the level at which the agreements of greatest
significance for SIPN are concluded (e.g. Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug). Before 2003, such an agreement was based on providing companies with considerable tax exemptions.
A different form of agreement targeted at gaining profits for SIPN is agreement concluded with reindeer-breeding economies, family and tribal communities. In this situation relations between subsoil users and the communities are mostly of informal character and are based, as a rule, on personal relationships.
Analysis of the positive Russian experience in arranging interaction between a large business and SIPN was presented in the dissertation by Koroleva Iu.A. "Interaction Between the State Governmental Bodies and Commercial Entities in the Sphere of Social Security of Northern SIPN" [Koroleva, 2007], where the author remarks, that thanks to the work of certain companies a stable tendency for forming a Russian model of corporate social responsibility of the state, businesses and society to the small-numbered indigenous peoples has begun to develop. One of such examples is Salym Project run by oil extracting company Salym Petroleum Development (SPD), which has been developing not only when the mentioned research was being done, but until the present time [Web-Site of the Company]. For this reason, the examples presented are taken from the last five years' practice, which, for natural reasons, were not included into the work by Koroleva Iu.A., for instance:
- in the year 2008 SPD signed a 5 years' cooperation agreement with the government of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, which outlines the obligations of SPD on actualization of social investments at the amount of 15 million dollars in the years 2009-2013;
- Salym residents participate in selection of social projects to be conducted by SPD. They form a communal committee, which,
besides SPD representatives, includes representatives of the local authorities and population. The committee regularly discusses the social projects run by SPD in Salym. At the end of each year SPD carries out a social investment project competition among local organizations;
- conducting its activities with the minimal influence on the environment is one of the basic principles of SPD. The company strictly follows safety regulations to avoid any pollution of the atmosphere, soil, water or damage of flora and fauna in the process of its work;
- SPD supports and sponsors a wide range of incentives and projects, such as: purchasing modern equipment for hospitals and advanced training courses for local doctors, providing microcredits to small businesses located in the settlement of Salym, providing academic and occupational opportunities to local school graduates, organizing summer camps for children from poor families etc.
Another example of a give-and-take cooperation between the residents of national settlements and commercial entities is the development of raw hydrocarbon deposit by Kholmogorneft Company. The deposit is located in the lands historically owned by 32 families of Khanty and Nenets. In the process of the project, economic agreements with each family were concluded, under which the families received significant assistance from the company, such as, monetary compensations, snowmobiles, fuel and lubricants, construction materials etc. [Korolea, 2007: 124].
As a conclusion, Koroleva Iu.A. explains the prospective of sustainable and well-balanced development of social sphere in the Northern regions by the following factors:
a) capital investments into Russian oil and gas deposits made by large foreign companies, which contribute their money in the development of social infrastructure, environment protection and social security of SIPN;
b) occupation of foreign managers at the deposit development sites, which provides higher requirements for the personnel and work organization, which, along with the use of high-tech equipment, provides flawless oil and gas extraction;
c) a stable tendency of assigning large business representatives for governing positions of the regions rich in natural resource, which leads to the decrease of the state sector share in the modern economy, and, as a consequence, causes re-distribution of responsibility for the social wealth of the indigenous peoples between businesses and the state.
At the same time, the territory of Russia becomes a site for active development of transnational companies, which prefer to lead their own policy in their relationships with the small-numbered indigenous peoples. A positive example is Kinross Gold Corporation, one of the world leaders in gold mining. Having started their work in Russia in the year 1995, today the Company generally focuses on managing large-scale gold mining projects in Chukotka Autonomous Okrug (CAO).
Participation in the local population's social life is the basic principle of the company as a responsible subsoil user. Within this framework, the company performs the following actions:
- provides annual gold mining report;
- carries out public consultations and round tables with the participation of the local population;
- in the year 2009, the Company founded Social Development Foundation "The
Kupol". The initial target contribution made by Kinross counted one million dollars. Today the Foundation has financed and launched 26 socially significant projects for the total value exceeding 16 million roubles;
- provides economic and social support to local indigenous population by creating jobs, purchasing goods and services including partnership agreements with 50 local enterprises and entrepreneurs;
- provides logistic support for solving medical and other vital issues to the people resident in the areas inaccessible without a helicopter;
- granting great importance to environmental issues: in December 2009 "The Kupol" deposit became the first Russian company to be certified for compliance to International Cyanide Management Code;
- in April 2011, Chukotka Mining and Geology Company (affiliate of Kinross Gold Corporation) concluded a social and economic cooperation Agreement with CAO Government.
From modern Russian companies, one of the most active ones to cooperate with the local population is LLC "LUKOIL - Western Siberia" [Web-Site of the Company], which concludes agreements with tribal leaders for social and economic development of their districts and natural habitat of the Northern SIPN for the sake of environment protection. All issues concerning the relationships between the company and the indigenous peoples are solved at the meetings of the company management with the representatives of SIPN Assembly, municipal entity representatives and tribal leaders.
In Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug (YNAO) "LUKOIL - Western Siberia" takes an active part in implementation of the program
for "Preservation of Traditional Lifestyle and Cultural Heritage of SIPN of the North", makes a significant contribution into the preservation of their natural habitat by increasing environmental friendliness of their industry.
Another example of effective interaction between a large business and local population is the work of "Sakhalin Energy" Company, which, in cooperation with the Sakhalin Region Administration and the Regional Council of Authorized Sakhalin SIPN Representatives, prepared a plan for assistance and encouragement of 3,500 representatives of indigenous peoples of the island, the majority of whom is resident in the rural area [Web-Site of the Company].
The Plan is developed to solve three key tasks: to avoid or soften the potential negative impact of Sakhalin-2 project; to increase the living standards and conditions of the Northern SIPN; to expand the opportunities for such peoples to take active part in the Cooperation Plan implementation.
Norilsk Nickel Company also has a certain experience of cooperation and assistance provided to the indigenous peoples, resident in the territories of Taymyr (Dolgano-Nenets) Municipal District of Krasnoyarsk Region. At the present time, besides tax payments and implicit subsidies to the municipal entities (financial assistance to housing and utilities, transportation services etc.), the Company conducts a charity program for the local settlements populated with the small-numbered indigenous peoples of the North.
Conclusion. Therefore, despite the presence of a great number of positive examples of interaction between business entities and SIPN, we may conclude, that, unlike foreign practice, Russian examples are not the result of a consistent resource management and natural habitat preservation policy followed together with the SIPN, but single and individual phenomena (which occur, mostly, due to the
absence of sufficient legislative mechanisms at the federal and regional levels, obliging each business entity to engage itself into such an interaction). It is proved by quotation from the article "Aborigines and Oil" by Vinogradova O. [Vinogradova, 2012: 59]: "The problem is, that the existing laws only create the background for solving a problem instead of offering certain mechanisms. For example, the basic Federal Law "On the Guarantee of Rights." states, that the national government of the Russian Federation, entity administration and local authority bodies "may" and "are entitled to" protect the interests, traditions, habitat and economic activities of
SIPN, though nothing states that such protection to be compulsory".
At the same time, the existing examples should be treated as positive examples of international experience adoption by the Russian companies, reflecting the general process of forming social responsibility of businesses manifested not only in tax payments, but also in conduction of various programs for social and economic development of SIPN. At the same time, such activity is to be carried out by means of all business entities engaged in any work in the territories of the historical habitat of small-numbered indigenous peoples of the North.
References
1. Andreianova, E.L. Kontseptual'nye podkhody k tranformatsii korennykh narodov Severa i Sibiri v sovremennoy ekonomike [Conceptual Approaches to the Transformation of the Northern and Siberian Small-Numbered Indigenous Peoples' Engagement in the Modern Economy]: dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Economics. Irkutsk, 2006. 203 p.
2. Andrichenko, L.V., Postnikov, A.E. Problemy razgranicheniia zakonodatel 'nykh polnomochiy v sfere zaschity iskonnoy sredy obitaniia i traditsionnogo obraza zhizni KMNS Rossii [Problems of Legislative Authority Assignment for the Protection of Original Habitat and Traditional Lifestyle of Russian SIPN] // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, 2008. No.5. P.28-37.
3. Araslanov, R. Problemy traditsionnykh promyslov korennykh narodov Severa [Problems of Traditional Crafts Practiced by Small-Numbered Indigenous Peoples of the North] // Ekonomist, 2010. No.7. P. 68-77.
4. Vinogradova, O. Aborigeny i neft' [Aborigines and Oil] // Neftegazovaia vertikal', 2012. No.4. P. 58-62.
5. Gavrilova, N.I. Pravovoy status KMNS Kamchatki [Legal Status of the Kamchatka SIPN], dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law. Khabarovsk, 2006. 232 p.
6. Doronina, I.A. Politiko-pravovye osnovy formirovaniia territoriy traditsionnogo prirodopol 'zovaniia KMNS Severa Rossii (na primere Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga) [Political and Legal Basis for Forming Traditional Nature Use of SIPN Territories in the Russian North (Based on Nenets Autonomous Okrug)]: dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Political Science. Moscow, 2005. 196 p.
7. Zharkova, A. Regional 'naia politika organov vlasti v otnoshenii KMNS Taymyra [Regional Policy of the Authority Bodies Concerning the Taymyr SIPN]. Norilsk: Taymyr Branch of A.S. Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2010. P. 12-20.
8. Zhukova, E.V. Problemy pravovogo obespecheniia prav KMNS v oblasti traditsionnogo prirodopol 'zovaniia [Problems of Legal Coverage of SIPN Rights Concerning Traditional Nature Use] // Ekologicheskoe pravo, 2009. No.1. P. 11-14.
9. Zhuravskiy, A.V. S natsional 'nym aktsentom [With a National Accent] // Voprosy mestnogo samoupravleniia, 2011. No.2, P. 19-25.
10. Zamaraeva, Iu.S. Aktual'nost' isslenovaniia otnosheniia migranta i prinimaiuschey sredy v sovremennoy filosofii kul 'tury [Urgency of Researching Relations Between a Migrant and Accepting Environment for the Philosophy of Culture] // Nauka i sovremennost', 2010. No.5-3. P. 96-100.
11. Kal'te, Z.M. Politiko-pravovye aspekty razvitiia korennogo malochislennogo naroda Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Political and Legal Aspects of a Small-Numbered Indigeneous People's Development in the Russian Federation - Saami] Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Political Science. Moscow, 2003. 170 p.
12. Kirko, V.I., Verkhovets, S.V., Keush, A.V. Rol' federal'nykh universitetov v formirovanii innovatsionnoy regional'noy struktury (na primere Sibirskogo federal'nogo universiteta) [Role of Federal Universities in Forming an Innovative Regional Structure (Based on Siberian Federal University)] // Innovatsii, 2010. No. 10, P. 60-64.
13. Kirko, V.I., Zakharova, K.N. Traditsionnaia khoziaystvennaia deiatel'nost' -etnosokhraniaiuschiy obraz zhizni [Traditional Economic Activity as an Ethnos-Preserving Way of Life] // Arktika i Sever, 2013. No. 12, P. 24-31.
14. Kiselev, E.A. Pravovoe polozhenie KMNS Priamur'ia. [Legal Status of ] Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Law. Khabarovsk, 2001. 171 p.
15. Kistova, A.V. Metodologicheskoe znachenie "ponimaiuschey germenevtiki" Vil'gel'ma Di'teia dlia sotsial'no-filosofskogo issledovaniia sovremennykh sotsiokul'turnykh fenomenov [Methodological Significance of "Hermeneutical Understanding" by Wilhelm Dilthey for Socio-Philosophical Research of Modern Sociocultural Phenomena] // Sovremennye problem nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.3, P. 450.
16. Kokin, V.N. Zaschita prav investora pri nedropol'zovanii na usloviiakh soglasheniia o razdele produktsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Protection of the Investor's Rights at Subsoil Use Under Production-Sharing Agreement in the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2002. 176 p.
17. Konstantinova, T. Yamal ob 'ediniaet Arktiku [Yamal Uniting the Arctic] // Rossiyskaia Federatsiia segodnia, 2011. No.21, P. 35-37.
18. Koptseva, N.P., Luzan, V.S. Gosudarstvennaia kul'turnaia politika v Sibirskom federal'nom okruge: kontseptsii, problemy, issledovaniia: monografiia [Governmental Cultural Policy in Siberian Federal Okrug: Concepts, Problems, Researches: Monography]. Krasnoyarsk: SFU Publishing House, 2012. 160 p.
19. Koptseva, N.P. Vvedenie v aletologiiu [Introduction to Alethiology]. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University, 2002.
20. Koptseva, N.P. Integratsiia gumanitarnogo obrazovaniia v Sibirskom federal 'nom universitete [Humanitarian Education Integration at Siberian Federal University] // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnia, 2007. No.4, P.6-8.
21. Koptseva, N.P. Kul'turologicheskaia baza formirovaniia obscherossiyskoy natsional'noy identichnosti v Sibirskikh regionakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Culturological Base for Forming the All-Russian National Identity in the Siberian Regions of the Russian Federation] // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 7. Filosofiia, sotsiologiia i sotsial'nye tekhnologii, 2012. No.3, P.11-15.
22. Koptseva, N.P. Metodologicheskie vozmozhnosti sotsial'noy (kul'turnoy) antropologii dlia sovremennykh kul'turnykh issledovaniy [Methodological Opportunities of Social (Cultural) Anthropology for the Research of Modern Culture] // Filosofiia i kul'tura, 2012. No.10, P. 9-18.
23. Koptseva, N.P. Problema metodologii sovremennykh kul'turnykh issledovaniy: vozmozhnosti klassicheskoy britanskoy sotsial 'noy antropologii [Methodological Problem of Modern Research of Culture: Capacities of Classical British Social Anthropology] // Gumanitarnye i sotsial'nye nauki, 2012. No.4, P. 89-104.
24. Koptseva, N.P. Provedenie eksperimental'nogo prikladnogo kul'turnogo issledovaniia mezhkul'turnoy kommunikatsii: fokus-gruppy, lichnoe interv'iu, anketirovanie, poluchenie ekspertnogo mneniia (na materiale issledovaniia Krasnoyarskogo kraia) [Applied Experimental Cultural Research of Intercultural Communication: Focus Groups, Personal Interview, Survey, Expert Opinion (Based on the Research of Krasnoyarsk Region] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.3, P. 410.
25. Koptseva, N.P. Filosofiia i iskusstvo: edinstvo myslitel'nogo prostranstva [Philosophy and Art: Integrity of the Thinking Space] // Uchenye zapiski fakul'teta iskusstvovedeniia i kul'turologii, Issue 1. Krasnoyarsk, 2000.
26. Koptseva, N.P. Teoriia i praktika innovatsionnoy obrazovatel'noy programmy po esteticheskomy tsiklu distsiplin [Theory and Practice of Innovative Educational Program in a Cycle of Aesthetic Disciplines] // Vysshee obrazovanie segodnia, 2007. No.12, P. 9-13.
27. Koptseva, N.P., Libakova, N.M. Produktivnost' gendernogo podkhoda dlia gumanitarnykh issledovaniy [Efficiency of Gender Approach for Humanitarian Research] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.1.
28. Koptseva, N.P., Nevol'ko, N.N. Vizualizatsiia etnicheskikh traditsiy v zhivopisnykh i graficheskikh proizvedeniiakh khakasskikh masterov [Visualization of Ethnical Traditions in Paintings and Graphics by Khakass Artists] // Iskusstvo i obrazovanie, 2012. No.1, 27.
29. KMNS Severa i Sibiri v usloviiakh global 'nykh transformatsiy (na materiale Krasnoyarskogo kraia). Chast' 1. Kontseptual 'nye i metodologicheskie osnovy issledovaniia. Etnokul 'turnaia dinamika KMNS Krasnoyarskogo kraia [SIPN of the North and Siberia Under Global Transformations (Based on the Example of Krasnoyarsk Region). Part 1. Conceptual and Methodological Basis of Research. Ethnocultural Dynamics of Krasnoyarsk Region SIPN]. Edited by Koptseva, N.P. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University, 2012. 640 p.
30. KMNSipromyshlennoe razvitie Arktiki: (Etnol. Monitoring vIamalo-Nenetskom avt. okruge) [SIPN and Industrial Development of Arctica: Ethnological Monitoring of Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug]. Moscow: Shadrinsk, 2011. 267 p.
31. Koroleva, Iu.A. Vzaimodeystvie organov gosudarstvennoy vlasti i kommercheskikh struktur v sfere sotsial 'noy zaschity KMNS Severa [Interaction Between the State Governmental Bodies and Commercial Entities in the Sphere of Social Security of Northern SIPN]: Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sociology. Moscow, 2007. 180 p.
32. Krivonogov, V.P. Narody Taymyra (sovremennye etnicheskie protsessy) [Peoples of Taymyr (Modern Ethnical Processes)]. Krasnoyarsk: KSPU Publishing House, 2001.
33. Krivonogov, V.P. Narody Taymyra v nachale XXI veka [Peoples of Taymyr in the Early 21st Century]. Krasnoyarsk: KSPU Publishing House, 2007.
34. Krupina, N. Arenda v sisteme ekonomicheskogo mekhanizma zemlepol 'zovaniia [Rent in the Economic Land-Ude Mechanism] // Ekonomist, 2004. No.1, P. 89-96.
35. Kriazhkov, V.A. KMNS Severa v rossiyskom prave [SIPN of the North in Russian Law]. Moscow: Norma, 2010. 560 p.
36. Kugaevsky, A.N. Sovershenstvovanie upravleniia trudovoy deiatel'nost'iu v traditsionnom khoziaystvovanii KMNS Severa [Labour Management Improvement in the Traditional Economy of the Northern SIPN]. Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Economics. Moscow, 2011. 196 p.
37. Kul 'tura korennykh i malochislennykh narodov Severa v usloviiakh global 'nykh transformatsiy: monografiia [Culture of Small-Numbered and Indigenous Peoples of the North Under Global Transformations: Monography]. Edited by Koptseva, N.P. Saint Petersburg: Eydos, 2011. 174 p.
38. Kuropiatnik, M.S. Korennye narody v protsesse sotsiokul'turnykh izmeneniy [Indigenous Peoples in the Process of Sociocultural Transformations]. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sociology. Saint Petersburg, 2006. 360 p.
39. Kuropiatnik, M.S. Otstigmyksamoutverzhdeniiu: poniatie "korennoynarod"vsovremennom diskurse [From a Stigmas to Self-Assertion: "Indigenous People" Notion in a Modern Discourse] // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noy antropologii, 2002. No.1, P. 160-173.
40. Lazhentsev, V.N. Severnye regiony v sisteme vnutrennikh i vneshnikh otnosheniy Rossii [Northern Regions Within the System ofDomestic and External Relations of Russia] // Ekonomicheskaia nauka sovremennoy Rossii, 2002. No.4, P. 72-81.
41. Libakova, N.M. Modifikatsii gendernykh obrazov v rossiyskoy kul 'ture kontsa XIX- nachala XXI vv. [Gender Image Modification in the Russian Culture of Late 19th - Early 21st Centuries]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Krasnoyarsk, 2011. 155 p.
42. Litviakova, A.B. KMNS Eniseyskogo Severa: ekonomicheskiie, sotsiokul'turnye, pravovye problemy zhiznedeiatel 'nosti i integratsii [SIPN of the Yenisei North: Economic, Sociocultural, Legal Problems of Life and Integration]. Krasnoyarsk: Branch of Saint Petersburg Institute of International Economic Relations, Economics and Law, 2007. 185 p.
43. Luzan, V.S. Konteksty ponimaniia intellektual'nogo dosuga v sovremennykh rossiyskikh issledovaniiakh [Contexts for Understanding Intellectual Leisure in Modern Russian Research] // Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V.P. Astaf'eva, 2013. No.4 (26). P. 175-178.
44. Luzan, V.S. Spetsifika zakonodatel'stva, reguliruiuschego zhizneobespechenie i kul'turu KMNS Severa [Specificity of the Legislation Regulating the Sustainment and Culture of the Northern SIPN] // Proceedings of the Third Russian Congress on Culture Studies with international participation "Creativity in the Space of Traditions and Innovations". Saint Petersburg: Eydos, 2010. P. 91-92.
45. Luzan, V.S. Sotsial'no-filosofskiy analiz dinamiki gosudarstvennoy kul'turnoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Social and Philosophic Analysis of the Russian Federation State Cultural Policy Dynamics]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Krasnoyarsk, 2011. 170 p.
46. Liubimov, D.S. Sotsial 'naia otvetstvennost' biznesa v rossiyskom zakonodatel 'stve i nekotorye problemy ee sub 'ektov [Social Responsibility of Businesses Under Russian Legislation and Some Problems of its Entities] // Politika i obschestvo, 2011. No.4 (82). P. 37-41.
47. Maximov, A.A. Realizatsiia interesov narodov Severa v usloviiakh promyshlennogo razvitiia: ot zarubezhnogo opyta k rossiyskoy modeli [Realization of Interests of the Northern Peoples Under
Industrial Development Situation: From Foreign Experience to Russian Practice]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Economics. Syktyvkar, 2007. 136 p.
48. Mangataeva, D.D. Evoliutsiia traditsionnykh sistem zhizneobespecheniia korennykh narodov Baykal 'skogo regiona [Evolution of Traditional Sustainment Systems of the Indigenous Peoples of Baikal Region]. Novosibirsk: SB of Russian Academy of Science, 2000. 213 p.
49. Martynov, M.Iu. Narody khanty i mansi v usloviiakh tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii [Khanty and Mansi Peoples Under the Technogenic Civilization] // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 2000. No. 10, P. 64-65.
50. Proceedings of International Conference "Siberian North and Arctic Under Global Challenges of the 21st Century" (Krasnoyarsk, November 21-22, 2011). URL: www.krskstate.ru/dat/bin/art/7686_ sbornik_tezisov.pdf (date: 26.05.2012).
51. Mendeleev, N.G. Nekotorye proekty sotsial 'nogo razvitiia KMNS Severa i Dal 'nego Vostoka i sovremennaiapraktika ikh realizatsii [Some Projects on the Northern SIPN Social Development and Modern Practice of Their Implementation] // Sotsial'nye i gumanitarnye nauki na Dal'nem Vostoke, 2012. No.1 (33), P. 155-160.
52. Molchanova, A.I. Mental'noe prostranstvo altayskoy kul'tury: spetsificheskie cherty preobrazovaniia [Mental Space of Altai Culture: Specific Transformation Features]. Dissertation for the Degree of a Candidate of Philosophic Science. Barnaul, 2010. 191 p.
53. Moskaliuk, M.V. Vse, chto v serdtse. Khudozhniki Krasnoyar'ia vchera, segodnia, zavtra [All From the Heart. Artists of Krasnoyarsk Land Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow]. Krasnoyarsk: Polikor, 2010.
54. Mulukaev, R.S. Istoricheskiy opyt zaschity prav KMNS Rossii [Historical Experience of Protecting Russian SIPN Rights] // Istoriia gosudarstva i prava, 2010. No.3, P. 2-4.
55. Naletov, A.M. Vzaimodeystvie byta KMNS Severa i kul 'tury pereselentsev v sovremennykh usloviiakh [Interaction of the Everyday Life of the Northern SIPN with the Migrants' Culture Under Modern Conditions]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Tyumen, 2005. 176 p.
56. Naprasnikov, A.T., Ragulina, M.V., Kalep, L.L. et al. Territorii traditsionnogo prirodopol 'zovaniia Vostochnoy Sibiri: Geograficheskie aspekty obosnovaniia i analiza [Traditional Nature Use Territories of Eastern Siberia: Geographical Aspects of Substantiation and Analysis]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005. 212 p.
57. Novikova, N.I. Kul 'turno-tsennostnye i pravovye vzaimodeystviia KMNS Severa i neftegazovykh koproratsiy v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: 1990-2000-e gg. [Cultural, Value, Legal Types of Interaction between the SIPN of the North and Oil and Gas Corporations in the Russian Federation: Years 1990-2000-s]. Thesis of the dissertation for the degree of Doctor of History. Moscow, 2011. 54 p.
58. Novoe buduschee Sibiri: ozhidaniia, vyzovy, resheniia: monografiia [New Future of Siberia: Expectations, Challenges, Solutions: Monography]. Bakhova, N.A., Bukharov, A.V. Viktoruk, E.A., Il'beykina, M.I. et al. // edited by Karlova, O.A., Koptseva, N.P. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University, 2013.
59. Oktiabr'skaia I.V., Smirnova N.E., Antropov E.V. Etnosotsial'nye aspekty otsenki chelovecheskogo potentsiala Sibirskogo federal 'nogo okruga [Ethnosocial Aspects of Evaluating the Human Potential of Siberian Federal Okrug] // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury, 2009. Issue 4 (26). P. 225-229.
60. Official Web-Site of Salym Project. URL: http://www.spdnv.ru/ (date: 26.12.2013).
61. Official Web-Site of Sakhalin Energy. URL: http://www.sakhalinenergy.ru/ (date: 26.06.2013).
62. Official Web-Site ofLLC "LUKOIL - Western Siberia". URL: http://lukoil-zs.ru/responsibility/ collaboration/ (date: 26.10.2013).
63. Petrova, E.V. Russkoe naselenie v etnosotsial'noy strukture respublik Sibiri: osobennosti razvitiia v usloviiakh transformatsii sovremennogo rossiyskogo obschestva [Russian Population Within Ethnosocial Structure ]. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Sociology. Ulan-Ude, 2009. 421 p.
64. Povorozniuk, O.A. Evenki severa Chitinskoy oblasti: Sotsial 'nye, ekonomicheskie i kul 'turnye transformatsii na rubezheXX-XXIvv. [Evenki of the North of Chita Region: Social, Economic, Cultural Transformations at the Turn of the 20th - 21st Centuries]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of History. Moscow, 2005. 318 p.
65. Pozdniakova, O.A., Reznikova, K.V. Osobennosti sub'ektov khudozhestvennoy kinokommunikatsii [Peculiarities of Communication Between Subjects of Feature Film Communication] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.4, P. 385.
66. Popkov, Iu.V., Tiugavshev, E.A. Stsenarnyy podkhod k analizu razvitiia KMNS Severa: aktual 'nost ', kriterii, opyt ispol 'zovaniia [Scenario Approach to the North SIPN Development Analysis: Urgency, Criteria, Experience] // Ural'skiy istoricheskiy vestnik, 2005. No.12, P. 140-144.
67. Reznikova, K.V. Znachenie kinematografa dlia formirovaniia obscherossiyskoy natsional 'noy identichnosti [Role of Cinematograph in Forming the All-Russian National Identity] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.3, P. 416.
68. Reznikova, K.V. Sotsial 'noe konstruirovanie obschenatsional 'noy identichnosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Social Modelling of All-National Identity in the Russian Federation]: thesis of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Krasnoyarsk, 2012. 20 p.
69. Russkiy Sever v sisteme geopoliticheskikh interesov Rossii [Russian North in the System of Geopolitical Interests of Russia]. Russian Presidential Academy of State Service. Moscow, 2002. 149 p.
70. Saratovskaia, T.S. Kooperativnoe upravlenie na territoriiakh prozhivaniia KMNS Severa [Cooperative Management in the Territories of the Northern SIPN Habitat] // Region: Ekonomika i sotsiologiia, 2005. No.1, P. 198-203.
71. Semenova, A.A. Vizual'naia kul'tura modernizirovannogo sotsiuma [Visual Culture of a Modernized Socium] // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 7. Filosofiia, sotsiologiia i sotsial'nye tekhnologii, 2012. No.3, P. 141-149.
72. Semenova, A.A., Gerasimova, A.A. Osobennosti tvorcheskogo metoda Sergeiia Anufrieva [Peculiarities of the Creative Method of Sergei Anufriev] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.2, P. 542.
73. Semionova, A.A. Modifikatsii drevnerusskogo kontsepta "gosudarstvo" v rossiyskoy kul 'ture XXI veka: metodologicheskiy aspekt [Modifications of the Ancient Russian Concept "Gosudarstvo" in the Russian Culture of the 21st Century: Methodological Aspect]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Krasnoyarsk, 2009. 198 p.
74. Sertakova, E.A. Issledovanie "goroda" v klassicheskikh kontseptsiiakh zarubezhnykh uchenykh [Research of the "City" in Classic Concepts by Foreign Scholars] // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniia, 2013. No.4, P. 381.
75. Sertakova, E.A. Kul'turnaia geografiia A. Lefevra v svete gumanitarnykh issledovaniy sotsial'nogoprostranstvagoroda [Cultural Geography of H. Lefebvre in the Context of Humanitarian Research of an Urban Social Space] // Teoriia i praktika obschestvennogo razvitiia, 2012. No.3. P. 2426.
76. Sertakova, E.A. Funktsionirovanie proizvedeniy iskusstva v seti INTERNET [Functioning of Works of Art Within the INTERNET] // Nauka i sovremennost', 2013. No. 3-1, P. 64-68.
77. Sleptsov, A.N. Gosudarstvennaia politika v sfere obespecheniia prav KMNS Rossii [State Policy in Enforcement of SIPN Rights in Russia]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Law. Moscow, 2005. 188 p.
78. Sovremennoe polozhenie i perspektivy razvitiia malochislennykh narodov Severa, Sibiri i Dal 'nego Vostoka [Modern Situation and Development Prospects of Small-Numbered Peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East]. Moscow, 2004. 183 p.
79. Sondykov, V.S. KMNS Severa: problem razvitiia i upravleniia (na primere Khanty-Mansiyskogo avtonomnogo okruga) [SIPN of the North: Management Development Problems (Based on Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug)]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Political Science. Moscow, 2001. 181 p.
80. Suliandziga, P.V. Instrumenty sokhraneniia i razvitiia traditsionnogo khoziaystva KMNS Severa Rossii: regional 'nyy aspekt [Preservation and Development Tools for the Traditional Economy of the Russian Northern SIPN: Regional Aspect]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Economics. Novosibirsk, 2006. 169 p.
81. Suliandziga, R.V. Vliianie samoorganizatsii grazhdan na institutsionalizatsiiu novykh form sotsial 'nogo upravleniia: na primere KMNS Severa Rossii [Influence of Citizens' Self-Organization on the Institutionalization of New Social Management Forms]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Sociology. Moscow, 2005. 136 p.
82. Skhatum, B.A. Konstitutsionno-pravovye voprosy zaschity prav KMNS v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Constitutional and Legal Issues of SIPN Rights Protection in the Russian Federation]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Law. Moscow, 2002. 215 p.
83. Toriia, R.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie ekonomicheskogo i sotsial 'nogo razvitiia KMNS Severa, Sibiri i Dal 'nego Vostoka: finansovo-pravovoy aspekt [Legal Regulation of Economic and Social Development of SIPN of the North, Siberia and Far East: Financial and Legal Aspects] // Biznes v zakone, 2011. No.2, P. 70-77.
84. Khariuchi, S.N. Zakonodatel'noe obespechenie prav i svobod KMNS Rossii: problemy realizatsii [Legislative Safeguarding of Rights and Freedoms of Russian SIPN: Implementation Problems ] Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Law. Moscow, 2002. 175 p.
85. Khariuchi, S.N. Pravovye problemy sokhraneniia i razvitiia KMNS Severa Rossii: konstitutsionno-pravovoe issledovanie [Legal Problems of Preservation and Development of the Russian Northern SIPN: Constitutional and Legal Research]. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Law. Tyumen, 2010. 509 p.
86. Chebotarev, A.V. Kontseptsiia ekologobezopasnogo razvitiia malogo regiona (filosofsko-metodologicheskiy aspekt) [Conception of an Environmentally Friendly Development Pattern for the Smaller Region (Philosophical and Methodological Aspects]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Moscow, 2003. 119 p.
87. Shapovalova, E.V. Mikroregional 'nyy tip kul'tury v usloviiakh malonaselennogo Severa: dialektika sotsiokul'turnogo i khoziaystvenno-ekologicheskogo aspektov [Microregional Culture Type in the Sparsely Populated North: Dialecticts of the Sociocultural and Economic-Environmental Aspects]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Philosophy. Tyumen, 2003. 135 p.
88. Iudin, V.I. Gosudarstvennaia politika Rossii v otnoshenii KMNS severa: sotsial'no-politicheskiy analiz [Governmental Policy of Russia Concerning the Northern SIPN: Social and Political Analysis] // Vlast', 2012. No.2, P. 40-44.
89. Iudin, V.I. Evoliutsiia gosudarstvennoy politiki Rossii v otnoshenii KMNS Severa [Evolution of Governmental Policy of Russia Concerning the Northern SIPN] // Vlast', 2012. No.1, P. 29-33.
Механизмы взаимодействия государства и бизнеса с коренными малочисленными народами Российской Федерации в условиях глобальных трансформаций
В.С. Лузан
Сибирский федеральный университет Россия, 660041, Красноярск, пр. Свободный, 79
Устойчивое социально-культурное развитие коренных малочисленных народов Севера, Сибири и Дальнего Востока Российской Федерации (далее - КМНС) в условиях глобальных трансформаций зависит не только от мобилизации внутренних ресурсов самих народов, но и от реальных механизмов взаимодействия государства и бизнеса с данными народами. В связи с этим в статье предпринята попытка рассмотрения зарубежного и, в первую очередь, российского опыта внедрения разнообразных механизмов взаимодействия, направленных на сохранение исконной среды обитания, традиционного образа жизни и культурных ценностей КМНС.
В статье отмечается, что, несмотря на наличие примеров взаимовыгодного сотрудничества бизнес-субъектов и КМНС, можно заключить, что существующие в российской практике примеры в отличие от зарубежных не являются системными и имеют инициативный характер (в первую очередь из-за отсутствия четких законодательных механизмов на федеральном и региональном уровнях, обязывающих осуществлять данное взаимодействие каждого бизнес-субъекта).
Ключевые слова: коренные малочисленные народы, государство, бизнес, исконная среда обитания, политико-правовые механизмы, взаимодействие.
