Научная статья на тему 'Magnetoelastic Effects and magnetization in LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 single crystals'

Magnetoelastic Effects and magnetization in LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 single crystals Текст научной статьи по специальности «Физика»

CC BY
161
41
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
Область наук
Ключевые слова
MAGNETIZATION / MAGNETOSTRICTION / CRYSTAL FIELD / LIHOF4 / LIDYF4

Аннотация научной статьи по физике, автор научной работы — Romanova I. V., Abdulsabirov R. Yu, Korableva S. L., Malkin B. Z., Mukhamedshin I. R.

Temperature and magnetic field dependences of the magnetization of LiHoF4 and LiDyF4 single crystals were measured with a dc-SQUID magnetometer MPSM-2 (Quantum Design) with the magnetic field applied along and perpendicular to the c axis. Experimental data are well reproduced by simulations based on the microscopic model of the crystal field and magnetoelastic interactions.

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.
iНе можете найти то, что вам нужно? Попробуйте сервис подбора литературы.
i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.

Текст научной работы на тему «Magnetoelastic Effects and magnetization in LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 single crystals»

Magnetoelastic Effects and Magnetization in LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 Single Crystals

I.V. Romanova1’2’*, R.Yu. Abdulsabirov1, S.L. Korableva1, B.Z. Malkin1,

I.R. Mukhamedshin1,2, H. Suzuki2, M.S. Tagirov1

1Kazan State University, Kremlevskaya, 18, Kazan 420008, Russian Federation 2Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, 920-11, Kakuma-machi, Japan * E-mail: [email protected]

Received November 18, 2006 Revised November 30, 2006 Accepted December 1, 2006

Volume 8, No. 1, pages 1-5, 2006

http://mrsej.ksu.ru

Magnetoelastic Effects and Magnetization in LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 Single Crystals

I.V. Romanova1,2*, R.Yu. Abdulsabirov1, S.L. Korableva1, B.Z. Malkin1,

I.R. Mukhamedshin1,2, H. Suzuki2, M.S. Tagirov1

1Kazan State University, Kremlevskaya, 18, Kazan 420008, Russian Federation 2Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, 920-11, Kakuma-machi, Japan * E-mail: [email protected]

Temperature and magnetic field dependences of the magnetization of LiHoF4 and LiDyF4 single crystals were measured with a dc-SQUID magnetometer MPSM-2 (Quantum Design) with the magnetic field applied along and perpendicular to the c axis. Experimental data are well reproduced by simulations based on the microscopic model of the crystal field and magnetoelastic interactions.

PACS: 548.0

Keywords: magnetization, magnetostriction, crystal field, LiHoF4, LiDyF4

1. Introduction

Double lithium-rare earth fluorides which crystallize in the tetragonal scheelite C46h structure attract much interest as model objects in physics of dipolar magnets and quantum phase transitions [1]. The unit cell of LiRF4 contains two magnetically equivalent lanthanide R3+ ions at sites with the S4 point symmetry. LiDyF4 is a dipolar antiferromagnet with Dy3+ magnetic moments normal to the crystal symmetry axis (7N=0.62 K), LiHoF4 is a dipolar Ising-like ferromagnet with Tc=1.53 K [1]. The main goal of the present study was to elucidate the role of magnetoelastic interactions in formation of the magnetization and the energy level pattern of LiRF4 crystals in the external magnetic fields.

2. Experimental results and discussion

Single crystals of LiDyF4 and LiHoF4 were grown by Bridgeman-Stockbarger method. After X-Rays orientation they were shaped as spheres to acquire a definite demagnetizing factor. To prevent the samples from rotation in the strong magnetic field, they were fixed in Stycast 1266 epoxy resin. The temperature dependences of the magnetization of all single crystals in the temperature range of 2^300 K and the dependences of the magnetization on the magnetic field in the interval 0^5 T applied along and perpendicular to the c axis were measured with a dc-SQUID.

In the presence of an applied magnetic field B (below a direction of B relative to the [001] and [100] axes is specified by spherical coordinates 6 and q>), we write the Hamiltonian of a single R3+ ion in the following form (the nuclear Zeeman energy is neglected):

H = Hf -gjMbBJ + AJI+ X V'apeap +Yy "a (sw(s). (1)

afi a,s

Here the first term is the crystal field Hamiltonian:

Hf = aB0O0 + fi( BO + BO4 + B-4Q4) + y(B06O06 + BO4 + B-4Q4) (2)

determined in the crystallographic system of coordinates by the set of seven crystal field parameters Bpk (Opk and Qpk are the Stevens operators, a, ft, y are the reduced matrix elements). The second term in Eq. (1) is the electronic Zeeman energy (mb is the Bohr magneton, gj is the Lande factor, J is the total angular momentum). The third term represents the magnetic hyperfine interaction, and the last two terms define linear interactions of rare earth ions with the homogeneous macro- and microdeformations, respectively, where e is the deformation tensor, and w(s) is the vector of the s-sublattice displacement. The electronic operators V’ap and V”a(s) can be presented, similar to the crystal field energy, through the linear combinations of Stevens operators with the parameters which have been calculated earlier in the framework of the exchange charge model [2,3].

Taking into account a linear coupling between the lattice macro- and micro-deformations and the equilibrium conditions for the coupled paramagnetic ions and the elastic lattice, we obtain the lattice macrodeformation induced by the magnetic field

n

e(B) =-----S[<V>b -<V>0] (3)

V0

and the sublattice displacements, which define the internal magnetostriction,

w(B) = -—a-1 [(V "> b-<V ">0]. (4)

V0

Here n = 2 is the number of rare earth ions in the unit cell, S is the compliance tensor of the lattice, v0 is the volume of the unit cell, a is the dynamic matrix of the lattice at the Brillouin zone centre, and angular brackets <...>B, <...>0 indicate thermal averages over the eigenstates of the rare earth ion Hamiltonian (1) for B^0 and B=0, respectively. Operators V in Eq.(3) equal to operators V’ renormalized due to linear coupling of macro- and microdeformations.

To take into account magnetic dipole-dipole interactions between the rare earth ions, we use the mean field approximation. The local field Bioc = B + (Q - N I) M in the spherical sample (Q is the tensor of dipole lattice sums, N=4n/3, M is the magnetization, I is the unity matrix) is substituted for B in the Hamiltonian (1), and the expressions (3) and (4) are substituted for e and w, respectively. Thus we obtain the effective self-consistent single-ion Hamiltonian parametrically dependent on the magnetization. When studying magnetic properties of the system, it is enough to consider the matrix of this Hamiltonian in the subspace of states of the ground multiplet of a rare earth ion. The magnetic moment of an ion satisfies to the self-consistent equations

-Ei (M)/kT

X gj Mb < i I Ja 1 i >

Et (M)/kT

(5)

where Ei(M) are the energy levels of a rare earth ion (eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian (1)), T - temperature, k is the

Boltzman constant. To obtain energies of sublevels of the ground multiplet and the magnetization M = nm / v0, the

following actions are performed: the matrix of the effective Hamiltonian with M = e = w = 0 is diagonalized, and the macro- (e(B)) and microdeformations (w(B)), and the magnetic moment (5) are calculated. At the next step the obtained values of M, e, w are substituted into the Hamiltonian, and the procedure is repeated (up to five times) to get a steady solution.

The calculations are essentially simplified when making use of symmetry properties of a system. Really we worked with linear combinations of the deformation tensor and the sublattice displacements corresponding to irreducible representations Ag, Bg, Eg of the lattice factor group C46h. In particular, the magnetic field directed along the crystal symmetry axis c brings about only totally symmetric Ag deformations, and the field in the basal plane induces only Ag and rhombic Bg deformations. The corresponding internal Ag and Bg deformations are described by three and five independent linear combinations of sublattice displacements, respectively. We used in calculations the low-temperature compliance constants of LiErF4: S(A„11)=7.79-10-12 m2/H; S(Ag12)=-2.5-10-12 m2/H; S(Ag22)=3.26-10-12 m2/H; S(Bg11)=63.2-10-12 m2/H; S(Bg12)=24.2-10-1f m2/H; S(Bg22)=29.4-10-12 m2/H; and the parameters of a rigid ion model of the lattice dynamics [1-3].

Magnetic field (kOe)

T-1, K-1

Fig. 1. Magnetic field dependences of LiHoF4

magnetization. Solid lines are theoretical results,

points are experimental data.

Fig. 2. Temperature dependences of LiHoF4

magnetization. Solid lines are theoretical results (6=830, q>= -150), points are experimental data.

1801601401205 100-D

JL 80S 100120140160180-

150

180

210

90

330

Magnetic field (kOe)

270

Fig. 3. Field dependences of LiDyF4 magnetization. Solid

0 0 Fig. 4. Angular dependences of magnetization in the basal plane

lines are theoretical results (6=90 , m=-5 ), points are n 'n.r /V ti, j u j a +

of LiDyF4 (T=2 K). The dashed curves correspond to zero

experimental data.

magneto-elastic coupling.

The measured temperature and field dependences of the magnetization in LiHoF4 and LiDyF4 single-crystals are compared with results of simulations in Figs.1-3. The calculated angular dependences of the magnetization in the basal plane of LiDyF4 are shown in Fig. 4.

Mixing of the ground multiplet with the excited multiplets of a rare earth ion due to spin-orbit coupling was taken into account by making use of slightly renormalized matrix elements of Stevens operators and values of Lande factors gJ (1.22 and 1.3133 instead of 5/4 and 4/3 for pure 5I8 and 6H15/2 multiplets of Ho3+ and Dy3+, respectively). From fitting the calculated dependences to the experimental data, small corrections for the published earlier crystal field parameters in diluted isomorphic crystals LiYF4:Dy and LiYF4:Ho were determined (Table 1).

Table 1. Crystal field parameters Bpk (cm'1) for LiHoF4 and LiDyF4 single-crystals

k p Dy3+ (4f9) 6H!5/2 Ho3+ (4f10) 5I8

This work Ref. [4] This work Ref. [5]

2 0 170 165 219.7 190.35

4 0 -85 -88 -87.3 -78.25

6 0 -4.2 -4.4 -3.55 -3.25

4 4 -721 -980 -710 -657.2

4 -4 -661 0 -612 -568.6

6 4 -390 -427 -387 -364

6 -4 -248 -65 -253.7 -222.3

3. Conclusion

As it is seen in Figs.1-3, simulated temperature and magnetic field dependences of the magnetization are in good agreement with experimental results. It follows from calculations that magnetoelastic interactions in double lithium-rare earth fluorides bring about essential contributions to the magnetization in external magnetic fields at liquid helium temperatures. In particular, theory predicts a large anisotropy of the magnetization in the basal plane of LiDyF4 (see Fig.4) at temperatures lower than 5 K in magnetic fields larger than 0.7 T.

A possible reason for some discrepancies between the calculated and experimental data is the neglect of dependences of compliance constants on temperature and magnetic field and of the interaction between the paramagnetic ions induced by the phonon exchange.

Results of this work are very important for the correct interpretation of the magnetization measurements in very large pulsed magnetic fields [6].

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by RFBR (the project 06-02-17241), by Ministry of education and science of Russian Federation (the project RNP 2.1.1.7348) and CRDF (BRHE REC-007).

References

1. Aminov L.K., Malkin B.Z., Teplov M.A. Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, 22, ed. K.A. Gschneidner and LeRoy Eyring (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996).

2. Abdulsabirov R.Yu., Kazantsev A.A., Korableva S.L., Malkin B.Z., Nikitin S.I., Stolov A.L. J. Lumin. 117, 225 (2006).

3. Abdulsabirov R.Yu., Kazantsev A.A., Korableva S.L., Malkin B.Z., Nikitin S.I., Stolov A.L., Tagirov M.S., Tayurskii D.A., van Tol J. SPIE Proceedings 4766, 59 (2002).

4. Davidova, M.P. Zdanovich S.B., Kazakov B.N., Korableva S.L., Stolov A.L. Optica i Spectroscopiya, 42, 577 (1977).

5. Shakurov G.S., Vanyunin M.V., Malkin B.Z., Barbara B., Abdulsabirov R.Yu., Korableva S.L. Appl. Magn. Reson. 28, 251 (2005).

6. Kazei Z.A., Snegirev V.V., Chanieva R.I., Abdulsabirov R.Yu., Korableva S.L. Fyz. Tverd. Tela, 48, 682 (2006).

i Надоели баннеры? Вы всегда можете отключить рекламу.