CC BY
0
JurayevA.
Associate Professor
Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology
Olimova M.
Student
Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology
Muqimjonov I.
Student
Andijan Institute of Agriculture and Agrotechnology
IMPACT OF SOIL TILLAGE METHODS ON BULK DENSITY
Abstract. Soil tillage methods significantly influence the physical and mechanical properties of soil, including bulk density, which is a critical parameter in soil health and crop productivity. This study evaluates the effects of different tillage practices on the bulk density of loamy soils under experimental conditions. Methods such as deep tillage, shallow tillage, and no-tillage were analyzed to determine their impacts on soil structure, water infiltration, and aeration. Results indicate that deep tillage effectively reduces bulk density and enhances soil structure, while minimal or no-tillage retains natural soil conditions with limited improvement in physical properties. These findings provide actionable recommendations for optimizing tillage practices to improve agricultural outcomes.
Key words: soil tillage, bulk density, soil structure, water infiltration, crop productivity
Introduction. Soil tillage is a fundamental agricultural practice that influences soil health, productivity, and sustainability. Bulk density, a measure of soil compaction and porosity, directly affects water retention, root penetration, and aeration. High bulk density often results in poor root growth and low water infiltration, whereas appropriate tillage can mitigate these issues. In recent years, the focus on sustainable soil management has necessitated an evaluation of various tillage methods and their impact on soil physical properties. This study aims to explore how different tillage methods—deep tillage, shallow tillage, minimal tillage, and no-tillage—affect bulk density and other soil attributes.
Materials and Methods.
Study Site and Soil Characteristics
The experiment was conducted on a loamy soil site in the Andijan region of Uzbekistan, characterized by moderate organic matter content and semi-arid climatic conditions. Initial soil bulk density was measured at 1.35 g/cm3 with moderate water infiltration capacity (15 mm/hour).
Tillage Methods.
Four tillage methods were implemented:
1. Deep Tillage (DT): Plowing up to 30-35 cm depth.
2. Shallow Tillage (ST): Plowing up to 10-15 cm depth.
3. Minimal Tillage (MT): Light surface loosening without inversion.
4. No-Tillage (NT): Soil left undisturbed.
Measurement Parameters
• Bulk Density: Measured using the core sampling method.
• Water Infiltration: Assessed with a double-ring infiltrometer.
• Soil Structure: Evaluated through aggregate stability tests under wet and dry conditions.
Experimental Design
The experiment followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Each plot was 10 x 10 m in size, and data were collected over two growing seasons.
Results.
Effect on Bulk Density. Deep tillage significantly reduced bulk density to 1.27 g/cm3, enhancing porosity and root penetration. Shallow tillage resulted in a moderate reduction to 1.32 g/cm3, while minimal tillage and no-tillage maintained bulk density close to the initial value (1.34-1.35 g/cm3).
Water Infiltration. Plots with deep tillage showed the highest water infiltration rates (25 mm/hour), followed by shallow tillage (18 mm/hour). Minimal tillage and no-tillage plots demonstrated lower infiltration rates (14-15 mm/hour), attributed to surface compaction.
Soil Structure and Aggregation. Deep tillage improved soil structure, increasing the proportion of macroaggregates and enhancing water retention. Shallow tillage moderately affected soil structure, while minimal and no-tillage methods preserved natural aggregation but did not significantly improve soil quality.
Discussion. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate tillage methods based on soil type and agricultural objectives. Deep tillage proved to be the most effective in reducing bulk density and improving soil aeration and water infiltration. However, excessive tillage may lead to long-term degradation of soil organic matter. Shallow tillage offers a balanced approach, providing moderate improvements in soil properties without excessive disturbance. Minimal and no-tillage methods are suitable for conservation practices but may require complementary measures to enhance soil structure and productivity.
Conclusion. Tillage methods play a crucial role in determining soil physical properties and agricultural productivity. Deep tillage is the most effective for reducing bulk density and improving soil conditions, but its sustainability must be considered. Future research should focus on integrating tillage methods with other sustainable practices to ensure long-term soil health and productivity.
References
1. Hillel, D. (2004). Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. Elsevier.
2. Lal, R. (2009). Soil Degradation and Restoration. Springer Agriculture.
3. FAO (2006). Soil Management Guidelines for Sustainable Agriculture.
4. Mirzaev, J. (2020). Tillage Methods and Productivity. Andijan Agricultural Research Institute Proceedings.
5. Karimov, S.O., et al. (2022). Analysis of Soil Quality Indicators. Uzbekistan Agricultural Journal.
'^KOHOMHKa h ^uyM" №12(127)-1 2024
www.iupr.ru
182
