CC BY
0é
IF = 7.921
www.in-academy.uz
1 JÊÊ^m \
1 if !\
■ W.Jf* \ M I V
BTMIB3SLb
1 jKfliia|¡L32
GENETICS IN MEDICAL PRACTIC
Kasimova Shoira Khalilovna
Abu Ali ibn Sino Technical School of Public Health, "Teacher of Medical Biology and General Genetics, Head of the Department https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14724979
ARTICLE INFO
Received: 18th January 2025 Accepted: 22nd January 2025 Online: 23rd January 2025 KEYWORDS
Medical practice.
genetics, clinical
ABSTRACT
Medical genetics has been formally recognized as a medical specialty in the United States only within the past decade. Initially, medical genetics was concerned with relatively rare single gene or chromosomal disorders, but with the sequencing of the human genome, genetics has become the driving force in medical research and is now poised for integration into medical practice. This article offers a perspective on the role of genetics in medical practice and how this role may evolve over the next several years. The author classifies the genetic contribution to medical practice into three categories: monogenic or chromosomal disorders, more common disorders due to a monogenic or single gene mutation, and common multifactorial disorders in which the interaction of multiple genes and the environment contribute to the cause of the condition. The author discusses the positives and the potential pitfalls facing primary care physicians and specialists as they incorporate medical genetics into their practices and points out some of the anticipated changes medical genetics will necessitate, such as an increased medical genetics workforce, including geneticists and genetic counselors. The Human Genome Project has made information of inestimable diagnostic and therapeutic importance available. The medical profession now must rise to both the opportunities and challenges that this wealth of information presents.
Medical genetics is a young discipline. Its roots go back to around the middle of the 20th century, and it was formally recognized as a medical specialty in the United States only within the past decade. For most of its history, medical genetics has concerned itself with relatively rare single gene or chromosomal disorders conditions that are very important to the families who must deal with them, but occupy little of the attention of most medical practitioners. With the elucidation of the human genome sequence and efforts to understand the links
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES
Innovative Academy Research Support Center IF = 7.921 www.in-academy.uz
between the genome and human health, genetics is now a major driving force in medical research. It is clear that genetics is relevant to all aspects of medicine. Exciting predictions have been made,1 questions have been raised about the complexity of presymptomatic genetic diagnosis,2 and concerns have been raised about ethical implications of genetics in medical practice. How will physicians use genetics in their practice in the coming years? In this review, I will offer a perspective on the role of genetics in medical practice and how this role is likely to evolve over the next several years.
How do genetics and genomics fit into medical practice?
It has been argued that all medical conditions and encounters have a genetics component and can be viewed through a "genetic lens."3 The contribution of genetics to medical practice is sometimes close to the surface and other times runs more deeply. Here we classify the genetic contribution to medical practice into three categories. The first is composed of monogenic or chromosomal disorders, such as phenylketonuria, sickle cell anemia, neurofibromatosis, or Down syndrome. This is the classical domain of medical genetics, and most physicians would agree that medical geneticists have a role to play in the care of individuals with these disorders in diagnosis, counseling, and, in some cases, management. The second category comprises the more common disorders in which a substantial subset of affected individuals are affected due to a monogenic cause or, at least, where single gene mutations can, in some families, cause the disorder. Examples are breast and ovarian cancer, colon cancer, hemochromatosis (as a cause of liver disease), and cardiomyopathy. These disorders tend to have incomplete and age-dependent penetrance. Here, too, the physician might agree that genetics is important to the care of some of their patients. The challenge is in recognizing which of their patients have a substantial genetic cause and would benefit from further evaluation. The third and largest category comprises the common disorders such as diabetes, hypertension, cancer, cardiovascular disease. Some of these—perhaps most—have rare single gene causes, but, for the most part, the genetics contribution is more complex. These are multifactorial disorders, in which multiple genes interact with one another and with the environment to contribute to the cause of the condition.
We will examine each of these categories in terms of their role in medical practice. In doing so, we will consider the impact of genetics on the activities of three types of medical practitioners. First is the primary care provider, the pediatrician, internist, family practitioner, etc. Second is the specialist, such as the gastroenterologist, the oncologist, or the neurologist. Third is the medical geneticist. We will create a matrix, looking at how these three types of professionals are likely to address the three categories of genetic influence on health and disease.
These three categories are, admittedly, somewhat arbitrary. There is probably no example of a true "single gene disorder"—the environment and modifying genes make all disorders "complex." The borderline between "rare" and "common" is also ambiguous. The designation of three categories of practitioners is likewise artificial. Primary care providers might include pediatricians, internists, and family practitioners with very different levels of knowledge about genetics. Geneticists themselves may be grouped according to area of subspecialty, and the category subsumes both physician geneticists and genetic counselors.
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES
Innovative Academy Research Support Center IF = 7.921 www.in-academy.uz
Nevertheless, this simplified scheme may be helpful in identifying major arenas in which geneticists will work alongside other practitioners in providing genetic services.
Monogenic and chromosomal disorders
Disorders due to mutations in single genes or abnormalities of chromosome number or structure are individually rare, but collectively comprise a significant proportion of morbidity as measured, for example, by hospital admissions.4 Physicians who practice pediatrics or obstetrics and gynecology tend to be most aware of genetic disorders, since many present in childhood or are subject to prenatal testing.5 Those who care for adults tend to be less aware, since the more severe disorders may not be compatible with survival to adulthood, or the issues may have already been addressed by the time an affected individual has reached adulthood (although review of genetic counseling issues with the patient as he or she reaches adulthood may not have occurred).
Although the genetic contribution to these disorders has long been recognized, there has been a steady increase in the understanding of these conditions over the years and a corresponding increase in opportunities for intervention. Major triumphs of the "pregenomics era" included the advent of newborn screening programs for inborn errors of metabolism, development of approaches for routine cytogenetic analysis (including high resolution analysis), development of methods for prenatal diagnosis and population screening for carrier status of some disorders, and the use of DNA analysis for diagnosis. More recently, we have seen the advent of tandem mass spectrometry, which promises to increase the range of disorders detected by newborn screening. Methods of prenatal diagnosis continue to be refined, and new ones, such as preimplantation diagnosis, have been introduced. Cytogenetic analysis has been brought to new levels of resolution, revealing ever more subtle, but clinically important, structural alterations. The pathophysiology of genetic disorders is increasingly becoming understood, with the promise of development of new methods of treatment. Gene therapy is an active area of investigation. The scope and precision of molecular diagnosis is rapidly increasing.
The roles of the various medical practitioners in the care of individuals and families with monogenic or chromosomal disorders are fairly clear. The primary care physician must be alert to these disorders and will likely rely on the specialist to establish the diagnosis. Once a diagnosis is made (or suspected), the primary provider works with the specialist to provide longitudinal care and must be prepared to support the patient and family in making medical decisions. Specialists are involved in diagnosis and management of genetic problems that lie within their area of expertise, for example, neurologists with neurodegenerative disorders or nephrologists with polycystic kidney disease. The medical geneticist is usually called upon to establish a diagnosis, usually of multisystem disorders, to provide counseling to patients and families, and may be involved in the longitudinal care of patients with such disorders, for example, inborn errors of metabolism or chromosomal abnormalities.
A number of changes might be anticipated over the next several years. The scope of carrier testing for couples contemplating pregnancy is increasing, exemplified by the introduction of cystic fibrosis carrier screening.6 This will increase the need for a medical genetics workforce, especially genetic counselors. Tandem mass spectrometry is increasing the scope of newborn screening, which may place additional demands on clinical services for
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES
Innovative Academy Research Support Center 321 www.in-academy.uz
IF = 7.921
inborn errors of metabolism.7 Prenatal tests may become more widely applicable as refined approaches to screening and less invasive diagnostic methods become available. Improved precision of molecular diagnosis will increase the likelihood that individuals with genetic disorders will be accurately diagnosed early in life, and, in some cases, management options will increase.
Monogenic causes of common disorders
Virtually all disorders have monogenic forms in which multiple family members are affected and exhibit single gene transmission. Examples are MODY for diabetes8 or Liddle syndrome for hypertension.9 These, however, are rare causes of these disorders, and most physicians will see very few such patients. Some of these monogenic traits, however, occur more frequently, and comprise a significant proportion of the individuals who might seek care. Upwards of 10% of individuals with breast or ovarian cancer, for example, may have mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene.10 Approximately 10% of Caucasians have a mutation in the HFE gene, one of the major causes of hemochromatosis. One in 400 individuals will be homozygous, creating a risk of cirrhosis, among other problems.11 Recognition of these disorders can be challenging, since usually the presentation of the monogenic disorder is not significantly different from more usual instances where single genes make less of a contribution. The major clues are likely to be age of onset (younger in the monogenic variants) and the presence of a family history of similarly affected relatives. The "payoff" on recognition can be significant. Individuals at risk can be offered surveillance, and in some cases, such as hemochromatosis, can be offered treatment. There are also major opportunities to provide counseling, both for individuals at high risk, and for others who may think that their risk is higher than it really is.
How will the three types of physicians approach the care of individuals with these disorders? As noted above, the primary care physician is faced with the major challenge of recognizing patients who face the increased risks associated with a genetic cause to their disorders. In part, this requires education of primary providers to recognize these disorders and the indications for further evaluation. Because family history is a major clue to diagnosis, primary providers will need to have access to information about the family history of their patients. This may require asking directed questions focusing on areas of known risk, such as cancer or liver disease. Development of tools, such as questionnaires or computer systems that will allow physicians to learn of major issues in their patients' family histories, may be helpful to facilitate this process. Information on how and when to refer patients for specialty evaluation will need to be placed at the physician's fingertips. The medical specialist faces similar challenges within his or her area of focus and will benefit from similar education and access to information.
The medical geneticist has long had a role in counseling individuals and families affected with single gene disorders, and has increasingly become involved in areas such as cancer genetics and hemochromatosis. It is less likely that the geneticist will assume responsibility for the medical care of individuals with these disorders; individuals at risk of colon cancer, for example, require surveillance (e.g., colonoscopy) that must be provided by an appropriate specialist. The medical genetics community is faced with an educational challenge for these disorders since most geneticists were trained to deal with rare disorders, such as inborn
é
Ei
References:
1. F.S. Collins Shattuck lecture: medical and societal consequences of the Human Genome Project 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3psVelug%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199907013410106 N Engl J Med, 341 (1999), pp. 28-37 Google Scholar
EURASIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND NATURAL SCIENCES
Innovative Academy Research Support Center 21 www.in-academy.uz
IF = 7.921
2. N.A. Holtzman, T.M. Marteau Will genetics revolutionize medicine? B. Childs, D. Valle Genetics, biology and disease 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnsVaku78%3D 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.1 Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 1 (2000), pp. 1-19 Google Scholar
3. J.G. Hall, E.K. Powers, R.T. Mcllvaine, V.H. Ean The frequency and financial burden of genetic disease in a pediatric hospital 1:STN:280:DyaE1c3gvVCnug%3D%3D 10.1002/ajmg.1320010405 Am J Med Genet, 1 (1978), pp. 417-436 Google Scholar
4. S.J. Hayflick, M.P. Eiff, L. Carpenter, J. Steinberger Primary care physicians' utilization and perceptions of genetics services 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7lvF2jtQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00125817-199811000-00005 Genet Med, 1 (1998), pp. 13-21 Google Scholar
