EXOSOMAL MIR-449C AND MIR-135A EXPRESSION IS ASSOCIATED WITH MALE INFERTILITY AND EFFICACY OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
E.F. Galimova1, I.D. Gromenko1, I.R Gilyazova1'2, D.D. Gromenko1, K.Sh. Galimov3, G.R. Abdeeva1, Yu.Yu. Gromenko4, E.K. Khusnutdinova2, Sh.N. Galimov1*
1 Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Bashkir State Medical University» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 3 Lenina St., Ufa, 450008, Russia;
2 Institute of Biochemistry and Genetics, Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 71 Prospect Oktyabrya, Ufa, 450054, Russia;
3 State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), 8 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119048, Russia;
4 LLC "Medical Center Semya", 73 Prospect Oktyabrya, Ufa, 450075, Russia. * Corresponding author: [email protected]
Abstract. Infertility is a major public health problem worldwide and its prevalence is as high as 17, 5% depending on the population studied The research is aimed to study the possibility of using miR-20a, miR-135a, miR-34b, miR-449v, miR-449c as markers of male infertility and to evaluate the dependence of the effectiveness of ART programs on the level of expression of exosomal microRNAs. The experimental group included patients entering the program of ART (assisted reproductive technologies) with the diagnosis of idiopathic male infertility (n = 30), the control group included couples with female infertility of tubal origin (n = 19). The isolation of exosomal microRNA from ejaculate was performed using the exoRNeasy Midi regent kit. The miRCURY LNA miRNA SYBR® Green PCR System was used to evaluate the expression of the following exosomal microRNAs: miR-20a, miR-135a, miR-34b, miR-449c, miR-449c and control miR-16. The expression of exosomal miR-449c and miR-135a was significantly different in the experimental group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively). There was also a tendency to decrease the expression for such microRNAs as: miR-20a, miR-34b and miR-449c. Moreover, the expression level of miR-34b, miR-449c, and miR-449c and miR-135a has a direct correlation with the effectiveness of ART programs (p < 0.05 for miR-135a). The strength of correlation relationship of the above relationships using Cheddock scale was moderate. MicroRNA molecules selected for the study not only demonstrated their potential ability to be used as a diagnostic marker of male infertility, but also showed the ability to reflect the efficiency of fertilization and embryo formation processes.
Keywords: exosomal microRNA, male infertility, microRNA expression levels.
List of Abbreviations
ART - Assisted reproductive technologies
IVF - In vitro fertilization
NOA - Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
Introduction
Infertility is a major public health problem worldwide and its prevalence is as high as 17, 5% depending on the population studied (Cox et al., 2022). According to a recent meta-anal-ysis by the Levine H. et al. group, global trends in the decline of total sperm count in the ejaculate are of serious concern: for example, between 1973 and 2018, it decreased by 62.3% at a rate of minus 4.70 million/year, while the percentage of decline in sperm concentration per year doubled, increasing from
1.16% after 1972 to 2.64% after 2000 (Levine et al., 2023).
The causes of male infertility are highly diverse and, in most cases, poorly understood, such that idiopathic genesis accounts for up to 30-40% of all identified cases (Jungwirth et al., 2019; Agarwal et al., 2021). Although various diagnostic tests exist, their interpretation is inaccurate and often subjective (Esteves et al., 2020).
The current gold standard for the diagnosis of male infertility has a number of drawbacks: (1) normal spermogram results do not guarantee conception, (2) there is a significant overlap between semen parameters of fertile and infertile men, (3) semen analysis does not provide information about the fertilizing ability of the sperm (Daneshmandpour et al., 2020).
Spermatogenesis is a complex process that requires precise and highly organized regulation of gene expression at multiple levels, including transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. A wide variety of investigations have found out more than thousands of protein coding genes responsible for the regulation of spermatogenesis (Mateo & Sassone-Corsi, 2014). Spermatozoa are also rich in small non-coding RNAs (Khadhim & Manshd, 2023), which could have played an essential role in the process of spermatogenesis or may have critical roles in the post-fertilization development (Alves et al., 2020).
Recent scientific studies have suggested that small non-coding RNA molecules known as microRNAs (miRNAs), single-stranded RNA molecules of 22 to 24 nucleotides in length, whose main function is to regulate gene expression by forming semi-complementary structures in the 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) of their target matrix RNA (mRNA) may be involved in the pathogenesis of male infertility (Daneshmandpour et al., 2020).
Regulation of gene expression by miRNA is one of the most important levels of post-transcriptional regulation levels. miRNA expression varies at different stages of spermatogenesis, so there are specific types of miRNAs at each stage of sperm production and maturation and miRNA alterations can result in molecular etiology of male infertility and dysregulated expression of miRNA can be inherited by next generations (Hua et al., 2019). The presence of microRNAs in testes, epididymis, spermatozoa, seminal plasma, and extracellular vesicles (i.e., exosomes and microvesicles) and the ability of these molecules to modulate different steps of spermatogenesis by upregulating or downregulating genes has been shown to suggest to many researchers that microRNAs may be of interest as a potential screening method of investigation (Salas-Huetos et al, 2020; Barbu et al, 2021). Altered levels of their expression in men have been found to be associated with reduced sperm count (oligozo-ospermia), low sperm motility (asthenozoo-spermia) and abnormal sperm morphology (teratozoospermia) (Zhou et al, 2019).
Nixon et al. found that spermatozoa are loaded with different miRNAs during epididymal maturation, suggesting their role in postfertilisation development (Nixon et al., 2015). Sperm from Drosha and Dicer germline conditional knockout mice showed reduced embryo developmental potential, which was rescued by injecting sncRNAs from wild-type sperm into the embryos, suggesting that sncRNAs are critical for pre-implantation embryo development (Yuan et al., 2016). Sperm-borne miRNAs, such as miR-34c, have been shown to be critical for the first cleavage in the zygote (Liu et al, 2012). Hua et al. (2019) identified five miRNAs (miR-132-3p, miR-191-3p, miR-520a-5p, miR-101-3p and miR-29a-3p) that could serve as potential markers for sperm quality assessment in IVF (Hua et al., 2019). It has also been reported high miR-191-5p expression level in sperm had a higher fertilisation rate (FR), effective embryo rate (EER) and high quality embryo rate (HQER), suggesting that miR-191-5p could be used as a potential biomarker to detect high quality sperm for IVF (Xu et al, 2020). Abu-Halima et al. selected five miRNAs (hsa-miR-34b*, hsa-miR-34b, hsa-miR-34c-5p, hsa-miR-122 and hsa-miR-429) and suggested their potential to discriminate the subfertile group from the fertile group (Abu-Halima et al, 2014). Later in 2019 Corral-Vazquez et al selected the best miRNA pairs from their previously reported data and found out that the hsa-miR-942-5p/hsa-miR-1208 pair were the best markers for the diagnosis of infertile men with seminal changes, while the hsa-miR-34b-3p/hsa-miR-93-3p pair showed the potential for the diagnosis of infertile men with unexplained male infertility or when seminal parameters were close to the threshold values (Corral-Vazquez et al, 2019). Several studies on fertile and infertile sperm samples have identified hundreds of differentially expressed miRNAs (Abhari et al, 2014; Salas-Huetos et al., 2015; Muñoz et al., 2015; Salas-Huetos et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2018; Mokánszki et al, 2020). In the study by Ahmet Tektemur et al. (2018) it was shown that changes in testicular and/or spermatozoal ion channels and miRNA expressions due to verapamil treatment may affect male fertility. They
found downregulated levels of miR-20a, miR-92a, miR-132, miR-320 and miR-760 expressions in spermatozoa. These altered gene expressions were found to be associated with decreased sperm concentration (Tektemur et al., 2022).
Moreover Gianmartin Cito et al. (2020) showed that miR-20a-5p could represent a novel non-invasive diagnostic biomarker of male infertility. They detected that median blood plasma miR-20a-5p was significantly higher in patients affected by NOA (0.16 2-ACt, range: 0.05-0.79 2-ACt ) than in fertile controls (0.06 2-ACt , range: 0.04-0.10 2-ACt ), P < .001. MiR-20a-5p was positively correlated with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (rrho = -0.490, P = .015) and luteinizing hormone (LH) (rrho = -0.462, P = .023), and negatively correlated with serum total testosterone (TT) (rrho = -0.534, P = .007) and right and left testicular size (rrho = -0.473, P = .020 and rrho = -0.471, P = .020, respectively) (Cito et al, 2020). Li et al. (2021) aimed to determine the molecular mechanism by which JAK2 mRNA and miR-135a-5p affect asthenozoo-spermia. The authors showed that MiR-135a-5p overexpression suppressed the expression of JAK2 mRNA and protein by targeting the 3'UTR of JAK2 mRNA. Correlation analysis revealed that miR-135a-5p level was significantly negatively correlated with sperm progressive motility, whereas JAK2 mRNA level was significantly positively correlated with sperm progressive motility. They concluded that low JAK2 mRNA expression and high miR-135a-5p expression were associated with asthenozoospermia and male infertility (Li et al, 2021).
Stefano Comazzetto identified two miR-34 family miRNA loci (miR-34b/c and miR-449) that are specifically and highly expressed in postmitotic male germ cells. Reduced expression of several miRNAs, including miR-34b/c in sperm has been associated with reduced fertility in humans. The scientists found that deletion of the miR34b/c and miR-449 loci results in oligoasthenoteratozoospermia in mice. Deficiency of miR-34bc/449 impairs both meiosis and the final stages of sperm maturation. Ana-
lysis of miR-34bc-/-;449-/- pachytene spermatocytes revealed a small cohort of dysregulated genes that were highly enriched in miR-34 family target genes. Thus, the miR-34 family has been suggested to be important for spermato-genesis, and its dysregulation may lead to oli-goasthenoteratozoospermia and infertility (Comazzetto et al, 2014). Despite numerous studies on the role of microRNAs in the development of male infertility, the data obtained are contradictory and poorly reproduced in subsequent studies, but the search for a new diagnostic marker of the resulting condition is one of the urgent tasks of modern medicine (Li et al., 2021). Taking into account the conflicting results of different authors on the expression of miR-20a, miR-135a, miR-34b and miR-449, we aimed to study the possibility of using them as markers of male infertility and to evaluate the dependence of the effectiveness of ART programs on the level of expression of exosomal microRNAs.
Materials and Methods
The selection of patients for participation in the study was carried out from married couples who entered the programs with the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), on the basis of the Family Medical Center. The experimental group included 30 couples diagnosed with idiopathic male infertility, abnormal sper-mogram parameters, absence of female factor and sufficient response to ovarian stimulation (more than 8 oocytes obtained after transvaginal follicle puncture). Patients with female tubal factor infertility, with normal ejaculate parameters and proven fertility in the male partner were allocated to the control group. The criteria for exclusion from the study were the age of the male partner over 50 years old and the age of the female partner over 35. In addition to age, patients without pronounced somatic pathology were selected for the study. In accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 married couples were selected for the experimental group and 19 for the control group. The study was conformed to the standards set by the latest revision of the Declaration of Helsinki. All study participants signed informed voluntary
consent. Local ethics committee of Bashkir State Medical University approved the project and all the procedures used in the investigation (protocol#10-24, 2024).
After two days of abstinence, patients from the experimental and control groups donated ejaculate by masturbation. Part of the material was used for repeated extended evaluation of ejaculate morphokinetic parameters, the remaining material, with a volume of at least 1 ml, was transported to the Research Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology after preliminary freezing to -90 o for the main stage of the study.
During further investigation, the expression of the following exosomal microRNAs was characterized: miR-20a, miR-135a, miR-34b, miR-449c, miR-449c and 1 control miR-16. Subsequently, the information obtained was used to assess correlations with the efficacy of ART programs (assessed by relying on embry-ological results).
Prior to analysis, the ejaculate was centri-fuged after thawing at 1600 g for 10 minutes and then at 16000g for another 10 minutes to remove cells and cell fragments. The exoRNe-asy Midi regent kit was used to isolate and isolate exosomal microRNA contained in extracellular vesicles. The method was based on the ability of special membranes to bind and isolate exosomes and other extracellular vesicles from biological fluids previously purified from cells. At the same time, particles other than vesicles, such as protein complexes, were removed in the washing step. QIAzol Lysis Reagent containing phenol and guanidine thiocyanate was used for lysis of exosomes and elution of microRNAs contained in them. The reagent facilitated almost complete removal of proteins and residual DNA from the solution by organic extraction. After adding chloroform to the lysate, and separating the resulting solution into two phases, the upper aqueous phase containing all the RNA was withdrawn. The resulting material was then mixed with 96% alcohol in a 1:2 ratio (phase:alcohol) to give the RNA the desired properties and poured into RNeasy MinElute spin columns, where the microRNA was bound to the membrane. Finally, microRNA of high
concentration and quality was eluted into a small tube by adding 14 |il of RNA-purified water.
The miRCURY LNA miRNA SYBR® Green PCR System characterized by high specificity to microRNAs and the ability to form strong thermostable complementary bonds between RNA strands - LNA (Locked nucleic acids) technology - was used to assess the expression of the microRNAs under study. The method is based on universal reverse transcription followed by amplification by real-time PCR.
Reverse transcription was performed on a BIO-RAD Real-time CFX96 Touch amplifier. The reaction was performed using 5x miR-CURY RT SYBR® Green Reaction Buffer, 10x miRCURY RT Enzyme Mix reverse tran-scriptase (containing Poly(A) polymerase), RNA purified water and microRNA isolated during the previous step of the study. Reverse transcription was performed at 42 °C for one hour, followed by enzyme inactivation by rapid warming to 95 °C for a 5 minute period. Then, immediately, the resulting solution was cooled to a temperature of 4 °C. The above process allowed to obtain single-stranded cDNA matrix for all types of PCR analysis allowed by the kit.
The cDNA obtained in the previous step was amplified in real time on a Rotor Gene Q 6 plex machine. The reaction used 2x miRCURY SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix solution containing both buffer - 2x miRCURY SYBR® Green PCR Buffer and DNA polymerase Quan-tiNova DNA Polymerase enzyme together with SYBR® Green I fluorescent dye. SYBR® Green I dye is able to bind to double-stranded DNA and produce fluorescent staining at wavelengths between 494 nm and 521 nm. The QuantiNova polymerase used in the reaction was in an inactive state due to tight affinity binding to the QuantiNova Antibody. To activate the enzyme, it was necessary to increase the temperature to 95 °C, which resulted in de-naturation of the protective antibody and release of the polymerase. Real-time amplification was performed for 50 cycles at 60 -95 °C. Simultaneously, fluorescence detection at 494 nm was performed for the final determination
of microRNA expression. In total, the expression of 6 microRNAs was determined: miR-20a, miR-135a, miR-34b, miR-449c, miR-449c and control miR-16.
The bioinformatic analysis 2A-AACt was used to interpret the obtained results. The method is based on the assumption that the difference in the value of the "threshold cycle" (AACt) - the cycle at which detectable fluorescence was formed - between the gene of interest and the control gene is proportional to the relative expression level of the gene of interest. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess
the effect of microRNA expression on the efficacy of HRT programs, using the Cheddock scale to characterize the strength of correlations. The results were visualized using the capabilities of Statistica 10 package (Tibco, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2019.
Results
According to the results of this study, it was found that the expression of exosomal miR-449c and miR-135a was significantly lower in the experimental group (p = 0.03 and p = 0.04, respectively) (Fig. 1, 2). There was also a trend
Fig. 1.
Expression level of exosomal microRNA-449c in experimental and control groups
Fig. 2. Expression level of exosomal microRNA-135a in experimental
and control groups
towards lower expression for miRNAs such as: miR-20a, miR-34b and miR-449c (p = 0.08, p = 0.15 and p = 0.18, respectively) (Fig. 3, 4, 5).
The insufficient reliability of the obtained correlation interactions can be explained by both the small number of study participants and the exosomal localization of the microRNAs under study.When comparing the results of the
embryological stage of ART programs, it was found that with high reliability the expression level of miR-34b, miR-449c, and miR-449c has a direct correlation with the frequency of obtaining embryos of day 5 of good quality (p < 0.01). Simultaneously, the strength of the correlation relationship of the above relationships according to the Cheddock scale corre-
miR-20a
p-value = 0,08
■ experimental ■ control
/
Fig. 3. Expression level of exosomal microRNA-20a in experimental and control groups
miR-34b
p-value = 0,15
■ experimental ■ control
17
Название оси
Fig. 4. Expression level of exosomal microRNA-34b in experimental and control groups
miR-449b
p-vaLue = 0,19
■ experimental □ rontrol
11 12
Fig. 5. Expression level of exosomal microRNA-449b in experimental and control groups
sponds to moderate, with the highest value obtained for miR-449c (r = 0.48762), then miR 34b and the final mir-449b (r = 0.44375 and r = 0.37661, respectively) (Fig. 6a, 6b, 6c). The ex-
pression of miR-135a was also characterized by a correlation with the frequency of obtaining high quality blastocysts, but with a lower degree of certainty (p < 0.05). The strength of the
correlation of this relationship was moderate (r = 0.33333), and with the lowest significant value obtained (Fig. 6d). For miR-20a, no asso-
ciations were found with the effectiveness of ART programs (p > 0.05, r = 0,059912) (Fig. 6e).
p-value < 0,01
p-value < 0,01
• •
„.•■I •
)' 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 8
% of blastocysts obtained
a
25 20
>
■S 15 c o
w
¡5 10
Q.
x
m 5
%_
•
•
• 0
0 50 60 70 8
% of blastocysts obtained b
p-value < 0,01
'55 6 0
I 4
LLI
2
■- •
! • . •
L ....... ,M t .i{ t •
0 10 2 0 30 40 50 60 70 8
% of blastocysts obtained
c
p-value < 0,05
■s 6 >
01
I 4 tfl </) 0J
jj. 2 LLI
0
-2
•
•
•
•
•
1 10 0 30 4 0 5 60 70 8
% of blastocysts obtained d
p-value > 0,05
10
8 •
__ 7
"3
C c •
o b ¡A 4
a> _%_
a. 3 X LLI 2 1 j 0 < —m—
10 20 30 4 • * 0 50 60 70 8
% of blastocysts obtained
e
Fig. 6. a) Correlation of microRNA-449b expression with the results of the embryological stage of ART programs. b) Correlatin of microRNA-449c expression with the results of the embryological stage of ART programs. c) Correlation of microRNA-34b expression with the results of the embryological stage of ART programs. d) Correlation of microRNA-135a expression with the results of the embryological stage of ART programs. e) Correlation of microRNA-20a expression with the results of the embryological stage of ART programs
Discussion
The choice of microRNAs evaluated in our study was determined by the existing original and basic scientific works devoted to the evaluation of the role of small RNA forms as bi-omarkers of male infertility. Thus the attention of researchers has been attracted for several years by the miR-34 family, which consists of six members (miR-34a, miR-34b, miR-34c, miR-449a, miR-449b, miR-449c) located on three different chromosomes 1p36.22, 11q23.1 and 5q11.2 (Momeni et al., 2020; Najafipour et al., 2021; Eikmans et al., 2020; Khadhim et al., 2023; Finocchi et al., 2020; Mokanszki et al., 2020; Joshi et al., 2023). Combining the results of these and other studies, Pantos et al., managed to suggest the main pathogenetic mechanisms underlying this relationship (Pantos et al., 2021). Thus, according to the authors, decreased expression of microRNA-34/449 may lead to impaired ciliogenesis in the efferent ducts of the testis, which in turn leads to decreased reabsorption of seminal fluid, to aggregation and agglutination of spermatozoa, thereby leading to obstruction of efferent tubules and increased hydrostatic pressure in the testes, which ultimately leads to impaired semen quality ranging from oligospermia to azo-ospermia. Another postulated mechanism may be the significant involvement of the miR-34/449 microRNA family in the regulation of spermatogenesis.
When the expression of these microRNAs decreases, the cell cycle of spermatogenesis is disrupted, cell differentiation is impaired, sperm fla-gellum formation slows down or completely stops, and cell apoptosis increases. The results of our study demonstrate that miR-449c expression is significantly lower in the group of patients with established male factor infertility. At the same time, miR-34b, miR-449c, and miR-449c from the miRNA-34/449 family show a significant effect on the efficiency of conception and embryo development in ART programs.
Experimental data of many scientific works reveal similar patterns. Thus, Eikmans et al. noted a significant decrease in miRNA 34b expression in patients with oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, re-
spectively) (Eikmans et al., 2020). Similar correlation has been reported by other studies in patients with oligoasthenozoospermia and with azoospermia (Khadhim et al., 2023; Finocchi et al., 2020; Mokanszki et al., 2020). An interesting study by Momeni A et al. in which, in addition to the expression of miR-34 family, the degree of methylation of the promoter of the gene encoding the corresponding microRNA molecule was assessed. The results of the study demonstrate not only a significant decrease in expression in the group of infertile men (P = 0.011), but also a greater degree of promoter methylation (82.4% vs. 23.3%) (Momeni et al.,
2020). Similar conclusions regarding miR-449 were reached by Najafipour et al. (2021), thus, with significantly lower expression of miR-449-b (p = 0.0001), the frequency of promoter methylation was higher in the experimental group (60.8% vs. 23.3%) (Najafipour et al.,
2021). A recent study by Burgos CF et al. found that the effect of miR-34 expression on fertility may be due to the effect on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway (Burgos et al., 2022). Another microRNA whose expression was analyzed in our work was miR-135a. The results of the study demonstrated not only a significant difference in the expression of the molecule in the experimental group, but also a significant effect on the embryological stage of ART programs. Among other scientific works evaluating the role of miR-135a we can highlight the study of Daneshmandpour Y et al. (2020), where in addition to the role of miRNA-34b, the association of miRNA-135a with oli-gozoospermia was noted, as well as the work of Li et al., 2021 in which the authors claim the association of miR-135a with asthenozoo-spermia (Daneshmandpour et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). Al-Mawlah et al. also confirmed the presence of a significant difference in the expression of miRNA-135 in the ejaculate of infertile men (Al-Mawlah et al., 2022). The above work also highlighted and putative mechanism of miR-135a's effect on male fertile function, particularly spermatogenesis. It is believed that miR-135a, along with other microRNAs, is involved in sperm maturation, development, mo-tility, proliferation and survival by regulating
the expression of the Foxo1 gene, which is localized in spermatogonia stem cells. In turn, the O1 Foxo1 protein is a transcription factor that is upregulated in the stem cell nucleus.
The last miR-20a microRNA evaluated in our study was selected based on the encouraging data of Cito et al. who found a significant change in miR-20a-5p expression in blood from patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (Cito et al., 2020). This microRNA molecule is believed to be bound to genes associated with cell apoptosis. Moreover, the authors noted the possibility of using the assessment of the expression of miR-20a-5p as a predictor of the effectiveness of testicular sperm extraction, which is of great clinical importance, given the invasiveness of the manipulation. Unfortunately, the results of our study do not allow us to confirm the conclusions obtained by Cito G. et al, as no significant correlation of expression changes in ejaculate of experimental and control groups was found.
Conclusion
Thus, idiopathic male infertility remains one of the major challenges facing modern medicine on the way to improving in vitro fertilization techniques, and understanding this problem is crucial to give couples in need a chance to have a child. The microRNA molecules selected for the study not only demonstrated their potential ability to be used as a diagnostic marker of male infertility, but also showed the ability to reflect the efficiency of fertilization and embryo formation processes. However, to fully exploit the potential of small nucleic acids, more research is needed to identify the types of microRNAs involved in these processes, their mechanism of action, and how modulation of their expression may alter the outcome for these patients.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation under grant No. 23-25-00140. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
ABHARI A., ZARGHAMI N., FARZADI L., NOURI M. & SHAHNAZI V. (2014): Altered of microRNA expression level in oligospermic patients. Iranian JReprodMed. 12(10), 681.
ABU-HALIMA M., HAMMADEH M., BACKES C. et al. (2014): Panel of five microRNAs as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and assessment of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 102(4), 989-997.
AGARWAL A., BASKARAN S., PAREKH N. et al. (2021): Male infertility. Lancet 397(10271), 319-333.
AL-MAWLAH Y.H., AL-DARRAJI M.N. & AL-IMARI M.J. (2022) Study of Small Non-Coding RNA (miRNA) Expression Pattern of Fertile/Infertile Male Semen. Acta Inform Med. 30(3), 205-212.
ALVES M.B.R., CELEGHINI E.C.C. & BELLEANNEE C. (2020): From Sperm Motility to SpermBorne microRNA Signatures: New Approaches to Predict Male Fertility Potential. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020(8), 791.
BARBU M.G., THOMPSON D C., SUCIU N. et al. (2021): The Roles of MicroRNAs in Male Infertility. Int J Mol Sci. 22(6), 2910.
BURGOS C.F., CIKUTOVIC R. & ALARCON M. (2022): MicroRNA expression in male infertility. ReprodFertil Dev. 34(12), 805-818.
CITO G., COCCIA M.E., SALVIANTI F. et al. (2020): Blood plasma miR-20a-5p expression as a potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarker of male infertility: A pilot study. Andrology 8(5), 1256-1264.
COMAZZETTO S., DI GIACOMO M., RASMUSSEN K.D. et al. (2014): Oligoasthenoteratozoo-spermia and infertility in mice deficient for miR-34b/c and miR-449 loci. PLoS genetics 10(10), e1004597.
CORRAL-VAZQUEZ C., SALAS-HUETOS A., BLANCO J. et al. (2019): Sperm microRNA pairs: new perspectives in the search for male fertility biomarkers. Fertil Steril. 112(5), 831-841.
COX C.M., THOMA M.E., TCHANGALOVA N. et al. (2022): Infertility prevalence and the methods of estimation from 1990 to 2021: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open 2022(4), hoac051.
DANESHMANDPOUR Y., BAHMANPOUR Z., HAMZEIY H. et al. (2020): MicroRNAs association with azoospermia, oligospermia, asthenozoospermia, and teratozoospermia: a systematic review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 37(4), 763-775.
EIKMANS M., D.H. ANHOLTS J., BLIJLEVEN L. et al. (2020): Optimization of microRNA Acquirement From Seminal Plasma and Identification of Diminished Seminal microRNA-34b as Indicator of Low Semen Concentratio. IJMS 21(11), 4089.
ESTEVES S.C. (2020): Are specialized sperm function tests clinically useful in planning assisted reproductive technology? Int Braz J Urol. 46(1), 116-123.
FINOCCHI F., PELLONI M., BALERCIA G. et al. (2020): Seminal plasma miRNAs in Klinefelter syndrome and in obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Mol Biol Rep. 47(6), 4373-4382.
HUA M., LIU W., CHEN Y. et al. (2019): Identification of small non-coding RNAs as sperm quality biomarkers for in vitro fertilization. Cell discovery 5(1), 1-5.
JOSHI M., SETHI S., MEHTA P., KUMARI A. & RAJENDER S. (2023): Small RNAs, spermatogenesis, and male infertility: a decade of retrospect. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 21(1), 106.
JUNGWIRTH A., DIEMER T., KOPA Z. et al. (2019): Male Infertility. European Association of Urology Guidelines.
KHADHIM M M. & MANSHD A.A. (2023): Association between microRNA expression and risk of male idiopathic infertility in Iraq. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 69(9), e20230341.
LEVINE H., J0RGENSEN N., MARTINO -ANDRADE A. et al. (2023): Temporal trends in sperm count: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of samples collected globally in the 20th and 21st centuries. Hum Reprod Update 29(2), 157-176.
LI W., ZHANG L., YIN X. & YU T. (2021): Expression of miR-135a-5p and its target gene JAK2 in spermatozoa of patients with asthenozoospermia. Andrologia 53(11), e14214.
LIU W.-M., PANG R.T.K., CHIU P.C.N. et al. (2012): Sperm-borne microRNA-34c is required for the first cleavage division in mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 109(2), 490-494.
MATEO S. & SASSONE-CORSI P. (2014): Regulation of spermatogenesis by small non-coding RNAs: role of the germ granule. Semin CellDevBiol. 29, 84-92.
MOKANSZKI A., MOLNÄR Z., VARGA TOTHNE E. et al. (2020): Altered microRNAs expression levels of sperm and seminal plasma in patients with infertile ejaculates compared with normozoospermic males. Hum Fertil Camb Engl. 23(4), 246-255.
MOMENI A., NAJAFIPOUR R., HAMTA A., JAHANI S. & MOGHBELINEJAD S. (2020): Expression and Methylation Pattern of hsa-miR-34 Family in Sperm Samples of Infertile Men. Reprod Sci. 27(1), 301-308.
MUNOZ X., MATA A., BASSAS L. & LARRIBA S. (2015): Altered miRNA signature of developing germ-cells in infertile patients relates to the severity of spermatogenic failure and persists in spermatozoa. Sci Rep. 2015(5), 17991.
NAJAFIPOUR R., MOMENI A., YOUSEFIPOUR F., MOUSAVI S. & MOGHBELINEJAD S. (2021): Underexpression of hsa-miR-449 Family and Their Promoter Hypermethylation in Infertile Men: A Case-Control Study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 19(1), 23-34.
NIXON B., STANGER S.J., MIHALAS B P. et al. (2015): The microRNA signature of mouse spermatozoa is substantially modified during epididymal maturation. Biol Reprod. 93(4), 91.
SALAS-HUETOS A., BLANCO J., VIDAL F. et al. (2015): Spermatozoa from patients with seminal alterations exhibit a differential micro-ribonucleic acid profile. Fertil Steril. 104(3), 591-601.
SALAS-HUETOS A., BLANCO J., VIDAL F. et al. (2016): Spermatozoa from normozoospermic fertile and infertile individuals convey a distinct mi RNA cargo. Andrology 4(6), 1028-1036.
SALAS-HUETOS A., JAMES E.R., ASTON K.I. et al. (2020): The role of miRNAs in male human reproduction: a systematic review. Andrology 8(1), 7-26.
TEKTEMUR A., ETEM ONALAN E., KAYA TEKTEMUR N. et al. (2020): Verapamil-induced ion channel and miRNA expression changes in rat testis and/or spermatozoa may be associated with male infertility. Andrologia 52(10), e13778.
TIAN H., LV M., LI Z. et al. (2018): Semen-specific miRNAs: Suitable for the distinction of infertile semen in the body fluid identification? Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018(33), 161-167.
XU H., WANG X., WANG Z. et al. (2020): MicroRNA expression profile analysis in sperm reveals hsa-mir-191 as an auspicious omen of in vitro fertilization. BMC Genomics 21(1), 1-9.
YUAN S., SCHUSTER A., TANG C. et al. (2016): Sperm-borne miRNAs and endo-siRNAs are important for fertilization and preimplantation embryonic development. Development 143(4), 635-647.
ZHOU Q.Z., GUO X.B., ZHANG W.S. et al. (2019): Expressions of miR-525-3p and its target gene SEMG1 in the spermatozoa of patients with asthenozoospermia. Andrology 2019(7), 220-227.