CC BY
29
Excessive Labeling Technique Provides a Highly Sensitive Fluorescent Probe for Real-time Monitoring of Biodegradation of Biopolymer Pharmaceuticals in vivo
S. S. Terekhov1*, I. V. Smirnov1,4, O. G. Shamborant1, M. A. Zenkova2, E. L. Chernolovskaya2, D. V. Gladkikh2, A. N. Murashev3, I. A. Dyachenko3, V. D. Knorre1, A. A. Belogurov145, N. A. Ponomarenko1, S. M. Deyev1, V. V. Vlasov2, A. G. Gabibov145
1Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 16/10, GSP-7, Moscow, Russia, 117997
institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentiev Ave., 8, 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia
3Branch of the Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, 142290, Moscow region, Russia
4Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya str. 18, 420008, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan, Russia institute of Gene Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str., 34/5, 1 19334, Moscow, Russia
*E-mail: [email protected]
Copyright © 2014 Park-media, Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
ABSTRACT Recombinant proteins represent a large sector of the biopharma market. Determination of the main elimination pathways raises the opportunities to significantly increase their half-lives in vivo. However, evaluation of biodegradation of pharmaceutical biopolymers performed in the course of pre-clinical studies is frequently complicated. Noninvasive pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies in living organism are possible using proteins conjugated with near-infrared dyes. In the present study we designed a highly efficient probe based on fluorescent dye self-quenching for monitoring of in vivo biodegradation of recombinant human buty-rylcholinesterase. The maximum enhancement of integral fluorescence in response to degradation of an intravenously administered enzyme was observed 6 h after injection. Importantly, excessive butyrylcholinesterase labeling with fluorescent dye results in significant changes in the pharmacokinetic properties of the obtained conjugate. This fact must be taken into consideration during future pharmacokinetic studies using in vivo bio-imaging.
KEYWORDS fluorescent probe, biodegradation, pharmacokinetics, in vivo bioimaging, self-quenching, butyrylcholinesterase, proteolysis.
ABBREVIATIONS SPECT - single-photon emission computed tomography; PET - positron emission tomography; HIV - human immunodeficiency virus; rhBChE - tetrameric recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase; PRAD - proline-rich attachment domain; MMP - matrix metalloproteinase; sCy5 - Sulfo-Cyanine5; sCy7 -Sulfo-Cyanine7; F - relative fluorescence intensity enhancement; F - fluorescence intensity enhancement
^ max ^ enz ^
after proteolytic digestion; F0 - fluorescence intensity before proteolytic digestion; N - modification degree of pharmaceuticals; rhBChE-sCy7 ON - fluorescent rhBChE-sCy7 conjugate having no self-quenching effect; rhBChE-sCy7 OFF - nonfluorescent rhBChE-sCy7 conjugate having a quenching effect; BSA - bovine serum albumin; KLH - hemocyanin.
INTRODUCTION
Modern pharmacokinetics is a technology-intensive field that utilizes cutting-edge noninvasive approaches, such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPEcT), positron emission tomography (PET), and in vivo bioimaging not only for determining pharmacoki-
netic parameters but also for studying biodistribution and evaluating the accumulation profiles of pharmaceuticals [1]. Since recombinant protein-based pharmaceuticals are widely used in treatment of serious diseases such as cancer [2, 3], autoimmune diseases [4], and blood disorders [5], it is extremely important to examine
their biodistribution and biodégradation during preclinical studies. The new infrared fluorescent dyes with a high brightness allow working in the tissue transparency window (700-900 nm), are commercially available, safe, and efficient, which makes fluorescence bioimag-ing one of the most widely used imaging techniques [6, 7]. The imaging data can reveal pharmaceutical accumulation compartment [8] and pharmacokinetic parameters of elimination [9]. The relationship between accumulation and biodegradation is especially crucial for the recombinant protein-based pharmaceuticals with specific activity. The knowledge about pharmaceutical biodegradation is also of great interest as it allows one to determine the main elimination routes.
The aim of this study was to design a probe that enables determination of the main biodegradation compartments of a recombinant protein. Recombinant human butyrylcholinesterase, a bioscavenger of or-ganophosphorus agents, was used as an example of the protein-based biological antidote against nerve-agent poisoning [10, 11]. The approach employed is based on self-quenching of fluorophores [12]. The essence of this phenomenon is that fluorescence quenching is typical of fluorophore molecules characterized by a small Stokes' shift (~20-30 nm) and situated at a distance of less than 10 nm from one another. Quenching effectiveness depends, among other factors, on the aggregation tendency of fluorophore molecules due to their n-n and hydrophobic interactions [13]. Thus, excessive modification of a protein-based pharmaceutical with an infrared fluorophore having the self-quenching effect gives rise to a conjugate with "switched off" fluorescence, while its degradation and the formation of peptide products enhances the integral fluorescence. This approach is currently used for tumor imaging based on the presence of MMP activity or presence of specific or hyperexpressed receptors [14-18] and to detect the activity of proteolytic antibodies against HIV surface protein, gp120 [19]. In this study, we proposed excessive labeling of recombinant butyrylcholinesterase to visualize the compartments responsible for biodegradation and elimination of the pharmaceutical in vivo and to evaluate the parameters of enzyme biodistribution and biodegradation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Protein-based pharmaceuticals
Tetrameric recombinant human butyrylcholinester-ase (rhBChE) was produced in CHO-K1 cells trans-fected with a pFUSE PRAD-F2A-BChE construct, which results in simultaneous expression of the PRAD tetramerization peptide gene and the human buty-rylchoninesterase gene. rhBchE was purified by affinity chromatography on a procainamide-Sepharose
XK10/50 column (GE Healthcare, USA) followed by ion exchange chromatography on a MonoQ 5/50 column (GE Healthcare, USA). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomassie staining and Karnovsky and Roots's staining to detect specific bu-tyrylcholinesterase activity [20] showed 95% protein purity. Commercially available KLH and BSA proteins were purchased from Sigma Aldrich.
Synthesis of pharmaceuticals based on fluorescently labeled proteins
The proteins were labeled with various NHS-activated fluorophores of the cyanine family: Sulfo-Cyanine5 (sCy5) and Sulfo-Cyanine7 (sCy7) (Lumiprobe). The conjugation procedure was performed in 0.1 M NaHCO3 in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol. Reaction products were removed from the fluorescently labeled proteins by gel filtration chromatography on a HiTrap Desalting column (GE Healthcare, USA). The fluorescence of the pharmaceuticals was measured on a Varioscan Flash instrument (Thermo Scientific). To determine the maximum relative fluorescence enhancement, the protein-based pharmaceuticals were subjected to proteolysis with a solution containing a protease mixture (1 mg/ml proteinase K (Fermentas) and 2 mg/ml subtilisin Carlsberg) in phosphate buffered saline pH 7.4 at 370C for 4 h. The completeness of proteolysis was monitored fluorimetrically according to saturation attainment on the fluorescence intensity (RFU) vs. time curve. The relative fluorescence enhancement (F ) was calculated as the ratio between
v max'
the difference of fluorescence intensity after proteo-lytic digestion (F ) and fluorescence intensity before proteolytic digestion (F„): F^ = ^ - F0)/F0*100%. The modification degree of the samples (N), i.e., the number of fluorophore groups per protein molecule, was determined by the absorbance measurements of the solutions at 280 nm (E№=18) and 760 nm; the molar extinction coefficient of sCy7 was assumed to be 240600 M-1cm-1.
Determination of the pharmacokinetic parameters of rhBChE-sCy7 conjugates
rhBChE samples (without a fluorescent label, low-labeled rhBChE-sCy7 ON and excessively conjugated rhBChE-sCy7 OFF) were intravenously injected at a dose of 200 ^g/mouse into three groups of BALB/c mice with 6 animals per group to assess blood concentrations of rhBChE conjugates. rhBChE concentration in mouse blood serum was determined according to its activity using the Ellman's method [21]. The pharma-cokinetic characteristics of rhBChE samples were obtained from fitting the serum rhBChE vs time curve using the two-compartment model [10].
In vivo imaging experiments
The biodistribution and the degradation pattern of rhBChE were determined using rhBChE-sCy7 OFF and rhBChE-sCy7 ON. The rhBChE-sulfo-Cyanine7 conjugates were intravenously injected into BALB/c mice at a dose of 500 ^g/mouse. An In Vivo MS FX PRO small animal imaging system (Bruker) was used to visualize the distribution of BchE and its degradation products. The excitation (730 nm) and emission (790 nm) filters were used to detect the fluorescence of scy7.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The application of excessively labeled protein fluorescence quenching with subsequent fluorescence enhancement via proteolytic degradation has been successfully demonstrated in studies with a low level of proteolytic activity [22] or by analyzing low enzyme levels [23]. It is evident that fluorescein cannot be used as a source of analytical signal in in vivo studies, since organs and tissues provide a high background signal. To eliminate this disadvantage, we conjugated protein molecules to scy5 and scy7 dyes under various conditions. We also suggested that the use of red and near-infrared fluorophores results in more sensitive probes for proteolytic activity as fluorescence enhancement would be more efficient. We used the conventional substrate proteins utilized to analyze nonspecific proteolytic activity (bovine serum albumin (BSA)) and hemocyanin (KLH)) and butyrylcholinesterase—a pharmaceutical utilized as a biological antidote against nerve-agent poisoning. As a result, KLH-scy5, BSA-sCy5, rhBChE-sCy5, BSA-sCy7, rhBChE-sCy7 ON and rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimens were obtained (Table 1).
The conjugates were subjected to proteolysis to determine the fluorescence enhancement efficiency. All the fluorescent substrates exhibited high levels of maximum enhancement of fluorescence (F ) (Table 1), which ex-
ceeded those of the conventional BSA-FITC substrate. The rhBChE-sCy5 specimen showed the highest efficiency (fluorescence increased over 700-fold).
The fluorescence of the rhBChE-sCy7 ON specimen remained unchanged before and after proteolytic digestion, while the fluorescence of the rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimen was significantly quenched and increased 220-fold after proteolytic digestion. Thus, the rhBchE-scy7 OFF specimen can act as a probe to assess the proteolytic degradation of rhBchE in pharma-cokinetic experiments. We analyzed several variants of excessively labeled butyrylcholinesterase to design a fluorescent probe with maximum efficiency. We relied on two selection criteria: relative fluorescence intensity enhancement and specific activity of the modified enzyme (Fig. 1). The variant with a modification degree N=32 was eventually chosen, since more than 70% of its specific activity was retained.
<u и с <u и
800
600
400 -
200 -
800
600
400
200
0.1
1 10 sCy7/BChE
100
Fig. 1. Analysis of rhBChE-sCy7 conjugates with different modification degrees
0
0
Table 1. Properties of the fluorescent dye labeled proteins used in the present study
Conjugate N F0, RFU F , RFU em' F max
BSA-FITC (V tl) (Voss et al.) 25 - - 3450
KLH-sCy5 380-750 6.25 1140 18100
BSA-sCy5 6.7 2.37 1680 70800
rhBChE-sCy5 30 6.17 1750 28300
BSA-sCy7 6.5 1.8 660 36500
rhBChE-sCy7 OFF 32 2.71 597 21900
rhBChE-sCy7 ON 1 50 50.05 0.1
N - modification degree; F0 - fluorescence before proteolytic digestion; F - fluorescence after proteolytic digestion.
« rhBChE O rhBChE-sCy7 ON * rhBChE-sCy7 OFF
0 1000 2000 Time, min
3000
F , %
max
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0
--•-- rhBChE-sCy7 ON rhBChE-sCy7 OFF
10 100 Time, min
1000 10000
Fig. 2. Analysis of the pharmacokinetic parameters of elim- Fig. 3. Analysis of the elimination kinetics of rhBChE-sCy7 ination of rhBChE and rhBChE-sCy7 conjugates from serum conjugates observed by sCy7 fluorescence
Pharmacokinetic studies of rhBChE-sCy7 ON and rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimens
Studying the pharmacokinetic parameters of the rhBChE-sCy7 ON and rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimens, we used a unique opportunity to assess the butyryl-cholinesterase level in the blood flow simultaneously using the kinetic and fluorescent methods. Indeed, the pharmacokinetic parameters of protein-based pharmaceuticals are usually assessed using either a direct radioactive method or indirect methods (e.g., ELISA). However, all these methods often indicate only that there is a protein fragment (containing a radioactive label or specific antibody-epitope binding, respectively) but do not prove the presence of an active protein-based pharmaceutical. In the case of butyrylcholinesterase, only the active enzyme acts as a biological antidote; hence, the actual pharmacokinetic parameters of the pharmaceutical can be evaluated by observing the changes in its activity in the blood. The fluorescent probe shows the existence of the integral protein as well as its fragments. Hence, comparison of the elimination profiles observed using two different methods demonstrates pharmaceutical degradation against a background of elimination from the organism.
Figure 2 and Table 2 show the identity of the elimination pattern and parameters of rhBChE-sCy7 ON to the respective unmodified enzyme, while the rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimen is characterized by drastic changes in its behavior in the organism. The elimination rate greatly increases (Table 2).
It was found by analyzing the elimination profiles observed by fluorescence in different time points after the pharmaceutical had been administered (Fig. 3) that the maximum fluorescence level is observed 1.5-8 h after administration. It is fair to say that within this period pharmaceutical accumulation reaches the highest level in liver where the enzyme is actively degraded, which results in an increase in fluorescence (Fig. 4). The pharmacokinetics of elimination of rhBChE-sCy7 ON with fluorescent detection (Fig. 3) does not significantly differ from a similar elimination curve for rhBChE-sCy7 ON detected according to the enzymatic activity (Fig. 2). Hence, fluorescent detection of enzyme distribution adequately shows the accumulation of rhBChE in a certain compartment. Meanwhile, the comparison of these curves for the rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimen clearly indicates that two different processes take place: 1 - rapid elimination of rhBChE-sCy7 OFF from
Table 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of rhBChE and rhBChE-sCy7 conjugates
Parameter rhBChE rhBChE-sCy7 ON rhBChE-sCy7 OFF
Tj/2 disr, min 100±40 140±50 6±2
Tj/2 el, min 1600±300 2200±400
MRT, min 2400±600 2700±700 9±3
the blood flow (which is unrelated to the degradation of rhBChE-sCy7 OFF and results in a rapid decrease in rhBChE activity in blood but is not accompanied by fluorescence intensity enhancement); 2 - slow degradation of rhBchE-scy7 OFF in the accumulation area (fluorescence increases to attain its maximum while zero activity of rhBChE in blood is detected).
The results of an in vivo biodistribution of rhBChE-sCy7 ON and rhBChE-sCy7 OFF specimens in mouse organs are shown in Fig. 4. Both specimens mainly accumulate in the liver, kidneys, and bladder. The liver is the main organ responsible for degradation of the enzyme; maximum enhancement of integral fluorescence indicating enzyme biodegradation is observed 6 h after intravenous injection. The degradation products enter the blood flow and are eliminated mostly by the kidneys. Hence, in vivo distribution data of a protein-based pharmaceutical mainly confirm the findings obtained at the previous stages (see Fig. 2, 3 and Table 2).
CONCLUSIONS
Fluorescent probes are a simple and very sensitive method to detect proteolytic activity. The advances in the chemistry of fluorescent dyes have made it possible to design substrates with a high fluorescence intensity and low background signal. We designed a panel of fluorescent substrates based on proteins excessively labeled with sulfo-Cyanine5 and sulfo-Cyanine7 fluorophores and attained a 700-fold enhancement of fluorescence after proteolysis. The application of an excessively labeled specimen for in vivo imaging of the organs and tissues responsible for degradation and elimination of pharmaceuticals enable one to characterize the behavior of therapeutic protein-based pharmaceuticals in the organism more thoroughly. It is evident that researchers should take into account the pattern and site of degradation of a potential pharmaceutical when attempting to improve its pharmacokinetic parameters. The methods increasing blood retention together with the liver accumulation rate reduction may contribute to the design of pharmaceuticals with prolonged half-life. It should be mentioned that this approach is universal allowing one to perform in vivo degradation studies of any protein or peptide. However, excessive labeling may drastically change the pharmacokinetic properties and the elimination route of a certain protein-based pharmaceutical [24], which should be taken into consideration when choosing a fluorescent bioimaging technique during pharmacokinetic studies. The proposed approach may prove to be extremely topical during comparative pre-
■à, S 250 %
U
u
cû
u
u
cû
° X 250 %
Brain
Lungs
Heart
Liver
Spleen Kidneys
Brain
Lungs
Heart
Liver
Spleen
Kidneys
Fig. 4. Biodistribution analysis of rhBChE-sCy7 conjugates using fluorescent bioimaging
clinical studies using a panel of similar protein-based pharmaceuticals and selecting the optimal candidate that would exhibit the targeted effect. •
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (project ID RFMEFI57614X0184), the Presidium of the Russian
Academy of Sciences (program "Molecular and Cellular Biology"), State Contract with the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation (№ 13411.1008799.13.128, ID "2.1 Antidot 2013"), Presidential Scholarship SP-2477.2013.4 (I.S.),
Presidential Grant for the support of leading scientific schools NSh-2064.2014.14 "Chemical Foundations of Biocatalysis", and program of basic research of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences № 24 "Foundations of Basic Research in Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials" (project "Nanopharmaceuticals based on myelin basic protein fragments compartmentalized into lyposome containers for treating neurodegenerative diseases"). RFBR grants (14-04-00647 A, 14-04-31207 mol_a), Russian Science Foundation project 14-24-00106. The work was carried out under the state program to improve competitiveness of the Kazan (Volga) Federal University among the world's leading research and educational Centers.
REFERENCES
1. Hoppin J., Orcutt K.D., Hesterman J.Y., Silva M.D., Cheng
D., Lackas C., Rusckowski M. // JPET. 2011. V. 337 № 2 P. 350-358.
2. Yuskevich V., Khodarovich Y., Kagarliskiy G., Stremovs-kiy O., Maksimenko O., Lukash S., Polanovsky O., Deyev S. // Biochimie. 2011 V. 93 №3 P. 628-630.
3. Sreenivasan V.K., Stremovskiy O.A., Kelf T.A., Heblinski M., Goodchild A.K., Connor M., Deyev S.M., Zvyagin A.V. // Bioconjugate Chem. 2011. V.22 № 9 P. 1768-1775.
4. Stepanov A.V., Belogurov A.A. Jr., Ponomarenko N.A., Stremovskiy O.A., Kozlov L.V., Bichucher A.M., Dmitriev S.E., Smirnov I.V., Shamborant O.G., Balabashin D.S. // PLoS One. 2011. V. 6 №6 P. e20991.
5. Orlova N.A., Kovnir S.V., Vorobiev I.I., Gabibov A.G., Voro-biev A.I. // Acta Naturae. 2013. V. 5 № 2 P. 19-39.
6. Yi X.M., Wang F.L., Qin W. J., Yang X.J., Yuan J.L. // International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2014. V. 9 № 1 P. 1347-1365.
7. Vonwil D., Christensen J., Fischer S., Ronneberger O., Shastri V. P. // Molecular Imaging and Biology. 2013. V. 16 № 3 P. 350-361.
8. Satoa K., Watanabea R., Hanaokaa H., Haradaa T., Nakaji-maa T., Kimb I., Paikc C.H., Choykea P.L., Kobayashi H. // Molecular Oncology 2014. V. 8 № 3 P. 620-632.
9. Dobosz M., Strobel S., Stubenrauch K.-G., Osl F., Scheuer W. // Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2014. V. 19 № 1 P. 16022.
10. Ilyushin D.G., Smirnov I.V., Belogurov A.A., Dyachenko I.A., Zharmukhamedova T.Iu., Novozhilova T.I., Bychikhin
E.A., Serebryakova M.V., Kharybin O.N., Murashev A.N. et al. // PNAS. 2013. V. 110 № 4 P. 1243-1248.
11. Ilyushin D.G., Haertley O.M., Bobik T.V., Shamborant O.G., Surina E.A., Knorre V.D., Masson P., Smirnov I.V., Gabibov A.G., Ponomarenko N.A. // Acta Naturae. 2013 V. 5 № 1 P. 73-84.
12. Kobayashi H., Choyke P.L. // Acc Chem Res. 2011. V. 44 № 2 P. 83-90.
13. Zhegalova N. G., He S., Zhou H., Kim D.M., Berezin M.Y. // Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 2014. V. 9 № 5
P. 355-362.
14. Moin K., Sameni M., Victor B.C., Rothberg J.M., Mattingly R.R., Sloane B.F. // Methods in Enzymology. 2012. V. 506
P. 175-194.
15. Hama Y., Urano Y., Koyama Y., Kamiya M., Bernardo M., Paik R.S., Shin I.S., Paik C.H., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. // Cancer Research. 2007. V. 67 № 6 P. 2791-2799.
16. Akers W. J., Xu B., Lee H., Sudlow G.P., Fields G.B., Achil-efu S., Edwards W.B. // Bioconjugate Chem. 2012. V. 23 № 3 P. 656-663.
17. Vinita A.M., Sano K., Yu Z., Nakajima T., Choyke P.L., Ptaszek M., Kobayashi H. // Bioconjugate Chem. 2012. 23 № 8 P. 1671-1679.
18. Springa B.Q., Abu-Yousifa A.O., Palanisamia A., Rizvia I., Zhenga X., Maia Z., Anbila S., Searsa R. B., Mensaha L.B., Goldschmidta R. et al. // PNAS. 2014. V. 111 № 10 P. E933-E942.
19. Ponomarenko N.A., Vorobiev I.I., Alexandrova E.S., Reshetnyak A.V., Telegin G.B., Khaidukov S.V., Avalle B., Karavanov A., Morse H.C. 3rd, Thomas D., // Biochemistry. 2006. V. 45 № 1 P. 324-330.
20. Karnovsky M.J., Roots L. // J Histochem Cytochem. 1964 V. 12 P. 219-221.
21. Ellman G.L., Courtney K.D., Andres V. Jr., Feather-Stone R.M. // Biochem Pharmacol. 1961. V. 7 P. 88-95.
22. Ponomarenko N.A., Pillet D., Paon M., Vorobiev I.I., Smirnov I.V., Adenier H., Avalle B., Kolesnikov A.V., Kozyr A.V., Thomas D. et al. // Biochemistry. 2007. V. 46 № 50
P. 14598-14609.
23. Voss E.W., Workman C.J., Mummert M.E. // Biotechniques. 1996. V. 20 №2 P. 286-291.
24. Sano K., Mitsunaga M., Nakajima T., Choyke P.L., Kobayashi H. // Breast Cancer Research. 2012. V. 14 № 2 R61.
