Economic Accelerator with Memory: Discrete Time Approach Tarasova V.1, Tarasov V.2 Экономический акселератор с памятью: подход дискретного времени Тарасова В. В.1, Тарасов В. Е.2
'Тарасова Валентина Васильевна / Tarasova Valentina - магистрант, Высшая школа бизнеса;
2Тарасов Василий Евгеньевич / Tarasov Vasily - доктор физико-математических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Научно-исследовательский институт ядерной физики им. Д. В. Скобельцына, Московский государственный университет им. М. В. Ломоносова, г. Москва
Abstract: accelerators with power-law memory are proposed in the framework of the discrete time approach. To describe discrete accelerators we use the capital stock adjustment principle, which has been suggested by Matthews. The suggested discrete accelerators with memory describe the economic processes with the power-law memory and the periodic sharp splashes (kicks). In continuous time approach the memory is described by fractional-order differential equations. In discrete time approach the accelerators with memory are described by discrete maps with memory, which are derived from the fractional-order differential equation without approximations. In order to derive these maps we use the equivalence of fractional-order differential equations and the Volterra integral equations.
Аннотация: предложены акселераторы со степенной памятью в рамках подхода дискретного времени. Для описания дискретных акселераторов используется принцип регулирования основного капитала, предложенный Мэтьюсом. Дискретные акселераторы с памятью описывают экономические процессы со степенной памятью и периодическими всплесками (ударами). В подходе непрерывного времени память описывается дробными дифференциальными уравнениями. В подходе дискретного времени акселераторы с памятью описаны дискретными отображениями с памятью, которые получены из дробных дифференциальных уравнений без использования каких-либо приближений и аппроксимаций. Чтобы получить эти отображения, используется эквивалентность дробных дифференциальных уравнений и интегральных уравнений Волтерры.
Keywords: accelerator, power-law memory, macroeconomics, Matthews' capital stock adjustment principle, discrete map with memory.
Ключевые слова: акселератор, степенной, память, макроэкономика, принцип Мэтьюса, дискретные отображения с памятью.
DOI: '0.2086'/2304-2338-20'6-78-002
JEL Classification: C00; C02; C65; E00; E20
1. Introduction
One of the basic concepts of macroeconomics is the accelerator [1, 2, 3, 4]. Accelerator equations can be represented in the frameworks of the discrete time and continuous time approaches. We consider an exact correspondence between these two approaches for economic processes with power-law memory. Initially we prove that the discrete accelerator equations, which contain standard finite differences, can be derived from the differential equation with periodic kicks. Using the generalization of these equations, which take into account power-law memory, we derive the discrete accelerator equations with memory in the form of discrete maps with memory.
2. Accelerator without memory
In continuous terms, the simplest equation of the accelerator [1, p. 62] is the continuous linear form without memory
tSH-W' (1)
where dY(t)/dt is the rate of output (income), I(t) is the rate of induced investment, and v is a positive constant, which is called the investment coefficient [1, p. 62] that indicates the power of the accelerator. The coefficient v is also called the accelerator coefficient or the capital intensity of the income growth rate [2, p. 91], where 1/v is the capital productivity incremental or marginal productivity of capital [2, p. 91]. Equation (1) means that the induced investment is here a constant proportion of the current rate of change of output.
In discrete time approach, the accelerator without memory is to be written [1, p. 63] in the linear form by the equation
Y„-Yn_1=^-In. (2) Here Y„ = Y(nT) and I„ = I(nT), where T is a positive constant indicating the time scale. If T=1, then t=n and Y„ = Yt. In this case, equation (2) has the form It = v • (Yt — Yt_1). Equation (2) means that induced investment depends on the current change in output [1, p. 63].
3. Capital stock adjustment principle
There is an alternative approach to the accelerator equation, which is proposed by Matthews in the form of the capital stock adjustment principle [3].
Let us consider the capital stock K(t), which can be taken as varying, and so the level of net investment I(t) depends on K(t) [4, p. 68]. The investment I(t) must depend on profits, both as an indicator of profitability of production (or the level of demand), and as one of the sources of funds available to finance investment. In general case, we can take income Y(t), instead of profits, as an indicator of the level of demand and of the availability of finance. On this approach, we can write the investment function I=I(Y,K), where we ignored the influence of the interest rate. In the linear case, the investment function is linear in Y(t) and K(t), and we have
I(Y(t),K(t),)=a-Y(t)—b-K(t), (3) where a and b are positive coefficient of the investment function. This case corresponds to the capital stock adjustment principle proposed by Matthews [3].
We can approach to the accelerator equation by starting from the linear investment function (3) on the basis of the Matthews' capital stock adjustment principle [3, 4]. Considering the particular case of this principle in which b = 1 and T=1, we have [4, p. 73] the equation
a-Yt = Kt + It = Kt+i. (4) Then we have Kt+1 = a • It and Kt = a • It_1 that give
It = Kt+i — Kt = a • (Yt — Yt_i). (5) As a result, the acceleration equation is obtained as a particular case (a=v, b=1, T=1) of the capital stock adjustment principle.
Let us consider the Harrod-Domar model, which is translatable into period terms. The variables for a sequence of periods t=0, T, 2T, ... are output (income) Y„ as the flow in the period t=nT, the capital stock K„ timed at the beginning of the period, and the investment in period t=nT is given by I„ [4, p. 204]. In the fixed-coefficients version of the Harrod-Domar model, the "investment = saving" equation (equation 1 of Section 11.4 in [4, p. 204]) has the form
K„+i — K„ = s • T • Y„, (6) where the parameter s is the constant propensity to save. For T=1, equation (6) has the form Kt+1 — Kt = s • Yt. In the continuous time approach, equation (6) is considered (equation 1 of Section 11.2 in [4, p. 199]) in the form
^ = s-Y(t), (7) where dK(t)/dt is the derivative of first order of the capital stock function K(t). This formulation can be relaxed [4, p. 204-205] by dropping explicit reference to the capital stock and the production function. Then full capacity equation (equation 4 of Section 11.4 in [4, p. 205]) has the form
Y„+1 — Y„ = ~ • I„. (8) where v is a fixed coefficient of the production function. For T=1, equation (8) has the form It = v • (Yt+1 — Yt). In the continuous time approach, equation (8) is considered (equation 1 of Section 11.2 in [4, p. 199]) in the form (1), where dY(t)/dt is the derivative of first order of the income function Y(t).
The multiplier-accelerator version is a variant of (8) in which the full-capacity condition is reversed [4, p. 205] in its lag/lead interpretation to give the investment function by equation (3).
4. Connection between discrete and continuous time approaches
Equations (2), (8) and (6) cannot be considered as exact discrete analogs of equation (1) and (7). This is caused by that the standard finite differences, such as the forward difference AforwardY(t) := Y(t + 1) — Y(t), and the backward difference AbackwardY(t) := Y(t) — Y(t — 1), do not have the same basic characteristic properties as the derivatives of first order [5, 6]. For example, the standard Leibniz rule (the product rule) is violated for these finite differences [5, 6].
Using the approach, which is suggested in [7, 8] and [9, p. 409-453], we can propose the differential equation of the accelerator that gives discrete time analogs of equations (2), (8) and (6),
which corresponds to the capital stock adjustment principle. Discrete equations (2), (8) and (6) can be derived from the suggested differential equation without the use of any approximations. Let us consider the differential equations
^ = s-Y(t)-Z E=iSg-k). (9)
^ = (10) where S(z) is the Dirac delta-function, which is a generalized function [10, 11]. The delta-function has an important role in modern economics and finance [12, 13]. The delta functions describe the periodic sharp splashes (kicks). It should be noted that the generalized functions are treated as continuous functionals on a space of test functions. These functionals are continuous in a suitable topology on the space of test functions. Therefore equations (9) and (10) should be understood in a generalized sense i.e. on the space of test functions.
To derive a discrete equation from equations (9) and (10), we can use the fundamental theorem of calculus and the Newton-Leibniz formula in the form
/¿f ( «(t) dx = f(t)-f( 0) , (11) where is the derivative of first order.
Using integration of equation (9) from 0 to t, where nT<t<(n+1)T, we get the discrete equation Kn+ i = K o + s-T-S k=iYk, (12)
where and
(13)
Kn+ i : = K( ( n + 1) - T - 0) = limE^o+ K( ( n + 1) - T - s) . (14) In equation (12), we replace n + 1 by n and get
Kn = K o+s-T-S n=iYk. (15) Subtracting equation (15) from equation (12), we obtain which coincides
with equation (6).
As a result, we can conclude that discrete time equations (6) and (8) correspond to the differential equations (9) and (10) respectively. In the continuous time approach the discrete economic accelerators describe economic processes with the periodic sharp splashes (kicks), which are represented by delta functions. We can state that the discrete accelerator (6) actually describes the economic dynamics with the periodic sharp splashes of the output or the periodic sharp splashes of propensity to save s. The discrete accelerator (8) actually describes the economic dynamics with the periodic sharp splashes of the net investment or periodic sharp splashes of capital productivity 1/v. 5. Continuous time accelerator with power-law memory
To take into account the power-law memory effect in acceleration principle and the Matthews capital stock adjustment principle, we can use concept of the margin of non-integer order [17, 18] and the accelerators of non-integer order [19]. Equations (1) and (7) can be generalized by using accelerators with memory [19], which describes the relationship between the net investment (the output) and the margin output (the capital stock) of non-integer order. In order to have the correct dimensions of economic quantities we will use the dimensionless time variable t. These generalizations of the standard accelerator equations (1) and (7), which takes into account the memory effects of order a, can be given [19] in the form
(DO+Y) (t) = i -1(t) , (16) (DO+K) (t) = s - Y (t), (17) where DO + is the left-sided Caputo derivative of order a>0, which is defined by
(DO+K) (t)=~/o^ (18)
where r (a) is the gamma function, K(n) (t) is the derivative of integer order n:=[a]+1 of the function K( ) with respect to : 0< <t. For the existence of the expression (18), the function K( ) must have the integer-order derivatives up to the (n-1)-order, which are absolutely continuous functions on the interval [0, t]. For integer a = n, the Caputo derivatives coincide with standard derivatives [15, p. 79], [16, p. 92-93], i.e. (Dn+K)(t) = K(n)(t). The derivatives of non-integer order have an economic interpretation [20, 21]. It should be noted that equations (16) and (17) with a = 1 takes the form (1) and (7) respectively.
The accelerator equations (16) and (17) include the standard equations of the accelerator and the multiplier, as special cases [19]. This statement can be proved by considering these equations for a=0 and a=1. Using the property ( D O+Y) (t) = Y( i)(t) of the Caputo derivative [16, p. 79], formula (16) with a=1 takes give equation (1) that describes the standard accelerator. Using ( D O+Y)(t) = Y(t),
equation (16) with a=0 is written as I(t)=v Y(t), which is the equation of standard multiplier. Therefore, the concept of the accelerator with memory generalizes the concepts of the standard multiplier and accelerator [19].
Let us consider the fractional differential equations
( D g+Y) (t)=1-I ©•Z £=1Sg —k), (19)
( D g+K) (t) = s • Y (t) • Z5 g — k), (20) which should be understood in a generalized sense i.e. on the space of test functions. In the framework of continuous time approach, equations (19) and (20) can be considered as accelerator equations for economic processes with memory and crises (periodic sharp splashes).
The action of the left-sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order a on equations (19) and (20) is defined on the space test functions on the half-axis by using the adjoint operator approach [14, p. 154-157]. The left-sided Riemann-Liouville fractional integration provides operation inverse [16, p. 96-97] to the left sided Caputo fractional differentiation, which is used in equations (19) and (20). The Lemma 2.22 of [16, p. 96-97] is a basis of the equivalence of fractional differential equations and the Volterra integral equations [17, p. 199-208]. For fractional differential equations (19) and (20) this equivalence should be considered on the space of test functions [14, p. 154-157], since these equations contain the Dirac delta functions.
6. Continuous time accelerator with power-law memory
Let us obtain an equation of discrete accelerator with memory, which corresponds to fractional differential equation (20). For this purpose, we use Theorem 18.19 of [9, p. 444], which is valid for any positive order a>0 and which was initially suggested in [7, 8]. This theorem is based on the equivalence of fractional differential equations and the Volterra integral equations in the generalized sense, i.e. on a space of test functions. Using Theorem 18.19 of [9, p. 444], we can state that the Cauchy problem with differential equation (20) and the initial conditions K (k) (k=0, 1,...,
N-1), where N-1<a<N, is equivalent to the discrete equation
N-m-l , *—i tk
(m) _ \ 1
Kn+1
k=0
Z „=1(n + 1 — k^-^-Yk, (21)
r (a _ m)
where Y(m)(t) = dmY(t) /dtm, Y,(m): = lime^0+ Y(m)(k • T — e), and m=0, 1, ..., N-1. Equation (21) is the discrete map with memory. Equation (21) defines the accelerator with memory in the framework of discrete time approach.
We should emphasize that discrete equation (21) is derived from the fractional differential equation (20) without the use of any approximations, i.e. it is an exact discrete analog of the fractional differential equation (20). Equations (21) define a discrete map with power-law memory of order a> 0. For 0<a<1 (N = 1) the discrete map (21) is described by the equation
c Ta
K„+ 1 = Kg + gj • Z„=1(n + 1 — k)a-1 • Yk. (22) In equation (22), the replacement n + 1 by n gives
K„ = Kg+^Z „-1(n — k)a-1 • Yk. (23) Subtracting equation (23) from equation (22), we obtain
aa
K„+1 — K„ = ^ • Y„ + ^ Z„-1 Va(n — k) • Yk, (24) where a is defined by a a a . Equation (24) is a generalization of
equation (6) for the case of power-law memory.
Similarly, fractional differential equation (19) gives the discrete equation
aa
Y„+ 1 — Y„ = ^ •• !„ + ^ '• ^ Va(n — k) • h, (25) which is a generalization of equation (8) for the case of power-law memory.
Equations (24) and (25) describe the discrete analogs of accelerators with memory of order 0<a<1. For a=1, we can use V-l ( z) = 0 , and equations (24) and (25) give the discrete maps, which coincides with equation (6) and (8) respectively. 7. Conclusion
As a result, we can conclude that fractional differential equations (19) and (20) exactly correspond to discrete time equations (24) and (25) respectively. In the continuous time approach the discrete economic accelerators with memory are described by economics dynamics with memory and the periodic sharp splashes (kicks). The discrete accelerator (24) actually describes the economic
a
processes with memory and the periodic sharp splashes of the output (or the periodic sharp splashes of the propensity to save s). The discrete accelerator (25) actually describes the economic dynamics memory and the periodic sharp splashes of the net investment (or the capital productivity 1/v).
We emphasize that there is no exact correspondence between the standard discrete and continuous time accelerators, which are described by equations (1) and (2), (6) and (7), (1) and (8). These accelerators are connected only asymptotically. In continuous time approach, the standard discrete accelerators (6) and (8) correspond exactly to the differential equations with the periodic sharp splashes (kicks), which are represented by the delta functions. Therefore the standard discrete accelerators without memory correspond to the continuous time dynamics with the periodic sharp splashes. The suggested discrete accelerators with memory, which are defined by equations (21), (24) and (25), describe the economic processes with power-law memory and periodic sharp splashes. The suggested discrete accelerators with memory can be used to describe economic and finance processes with power-law memory [22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] in the framework of discrete time approach.
References
1. Allen R. G. D. Mathematical Economics. Second edition. London: Macmillan, 1960. 812 p.
2. Volgina O. A., Golodnaya N. Y., Odiyako N. N., Schumann G. I. Mathematical Modeling of Economic Processes and Systems. 3rd ed. Moscow: Cronus, 2014. 200 p. [in Russian].
3. MatthewsR. C. O. The Trade Cycle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959.
4. Allen R. G. D. Macro-Economic Theory. A Mathematical Treatment. London: Macmillan, 1968. 420 p.
5. Tarasov V. E. Exact discrete analogs of derivatives of integer orders: Differences as infinite series // Journal of Mathematics, 2015. Vol. 2015. Article ID 134842. 8 p.
6. Tarasov V. E. Exact discretization by Fourier transforms // Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2016. Vol. 37. P. 31-61.
7. Tarasov V. E. Differential equations with fractional derivative and universal map with memory // Journal of Physics A., 2009. Vol. 42. № 46. Article ID 465102.
8. Tarasov V. E. Discrete map with memory from fractional differential equation of arbitrary positive order // Journal of Mathematical Physics, 2009. Vol. 50. № 12. Article ID 122703.
9. Tarasov V. E. Fractional Dynamics: Applications of Fractional Calculus to Dynamics of Particles, Fields and Media. New York: Springer, 2010. 505 p.
10. Lighthill M. J. Fourier analysis and generalised functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
11. Gel'fand I. M., Shilov G. E. Generalized Functions. Vol. I: Properties and Operations. Boston: Academic Press, 1964.
12. Russell T. Continuous time portfolio theory and the Schwartz-Sobolev theory of distributions // Operations Research Letters, 1988. Vol. 7. № 3. 159-162.
13. Sato R., Ramachandran R. V. (Eds.) Conservation Laws and Symmetry: Applications to Economics and Finance. New York: Springer, 1990.
14. Samko S. G., Kilbas A. A., Marichev O. I. Fractional Integrals and Derivatives Theory and Applications. New York: Gordon and Breach, 1993. 1006 p.
15. Podlubny I. Fractional Differential Equations. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998. 340 p.
16. Kilbas A. A., Srivastava H. M., Trujillo J. J. Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. 540 p.
17. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Marginal values of non-integer order in the economic analysis // Azimuth Scientific Research: Economics and Management, 2016. № 3 (16). P. 197-201 [in Russian].
18. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Economic indicator that generalizes average and marginal values // Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016. № 11-1 (76-1). P. 817-823 [in Russian].
19. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. A generalization of the concepts of the accelerator and multiplier to take into account of memory effects in macroeconomics // Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016. № 10-3 (75-3). P. 1121-1129 [in Russian].
20. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Economic interpretation of fractional derivatives // Progress in Fractional Differentiation and Applications, 2016. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 1-17.
21. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Elasticity for economic processes with memory: fractional differential calculus approach // Fractional Differential Calculus. Vol. 6. № 2. P. 219-232.
22. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Hereditarity generalization of Harrod-Domar model and memory effects // Journal of Economy and Entrepreneurship, 2016. № 10-2 (75-2). P. 72-78 [in Russian].
23. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Memory effects in hereditary Harrod-Domar model // Problems of Modern Science and Education. 2016. № 32 (74). P. 38-44 [in Russian].
24. Tarasova V. V., Tarasov V. E. Keynesian model of economic growth with memory // Ekonomika i Upravlenie: Problemy, Resheniya, 2016. № 10-2 (58). P. 21-29 [in Russian].
25. ScalasE., Gorenflo R., MainardiF. Fractional calculus and continuous-time finance // Physica A., 2000. Vol. 284. № 1-4. P. 376-384.
26. Laskin N. Fractional market dynamics // Physica A., 2000. Vol. 287. № 3. P. 482-492.
27. Mainardi F., Raberto M., Gorenflo R., Scalas E. Fractional calculus and continuous-time finance II: The waiting-time distribution // Physica A., 2000. Vol. 287. № 3-4. P. 468-481.
28. Cartea A., Del-Castillo-Negrete D. Fractional diffusion models of option prices in markets with jumps // Physica A., 2007. Vol. 374. № 2. P. 749-763.
29. Vilela Mendes R. A fractional calculus interpretation of the fractional volatility model // Nonlinear Dynamics., 2009. Vol. 55. № 4. P. 395-399.
30. Tenreiro Machado J., Duarte F. B., Duarte G. M. Fractional dynamics in financial indeces // International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2012. Vol. 22. № 10. Article ID 1250249. 12 p.
31. Kerss A., Leonenko N., Sikorskii A. Fractional Skellam processes with applications to finance // Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis., 2014. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 532-551.
Stimulation of subjects of the Russian Federation to attract investment and the development of entrepreneurial activities through intergovernmental
transfers having the purpose Grigorov V.
Стимулирование субъектов Российской Федерации к привлечению инвестиций и развитию предпринимательской деятельности через межбюджетные трансферты, имеющие целевое назначение
Григоров В. Э.
Григоров Владислав Эдуардович / Grigorov Vladislav - научный сотрудник, Центр бюджетной политики, Научно-исследовательский финансовый институт, г. Москва
Аннотация: в статье рассмотрены представляющие практический интерес вопросы использования межбюджетных трансфертов для стимулирования инвестиционной активности в регионах. В статье делаются выводы об оптимальных формах подобных трансфертов и необходимости использования их в рамках программного бюджета. Abstract: in the article of practical interest the issues of the use of intergovernmental transfers to encourage investment activity in the regions. The article draws conclusions about the optimal forms of such transfers and the need to use them in the framework of the program budget.
Ключевые слова: межбюджетные трансферты, инвестиции, налоговые льготы. Keywords: interbudget transfers, investment, tax exemption.
В настоящее время в Российской Федерации большинство регионов сталкиваются с большими проблемами привлечения инвестиций. Снижаются инвестиции за счет всех источников, в том числе за счет региональных бюджетов. Консолидированные региональные бюджеты находятся в достаточно сложных условиях. Несбалансированность консолидированных бюджетов регионов возникла в 2012 году, когда объем расходов превысил ожидаемый уровень из-за новых обязательств, связанных с реализацией указов Президента РФ от 7 мая 2012 г. Соответственно и совокупный бюджетный дефицит оказался больше ожидаемого в 8 раз (278 млрд руб. вместо 32 млрд руб.). При этом регионы столкнулись также со снижением доходной базы. В течение последних нескольких лет консолидированные бюджеты субъектов РФ были не сбалансированы. В целом по Росси консолидированные бюджеты сводились с дефицитом, превышающим 1% ВВП в течение последних трех лет.