CC BY
1Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
UDC 316.7: 504 https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110/40
AGRIS P01
CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE FORMATION OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CULTURE
©Kedeybaeva Zh, ORCID: 0009-0008-9844-1408, Dr. habil., Osh Technological University named after M. M. Adyshev, Osh, Kyrgyzstan, [email protected] ©Tashbolotova S., ORCID: 0000-0003-5869-7491, Ph.D., Osh State University,
Osh, Kyrgyzstan, [email protected] ©Rysbek kyzy N., ORCID: 0009-0008-1411-6430, sh Technological University named after M. M. Adyshev, Osh, Kyrgyzstan, [email protected]
ИЗМЕНЕНИЕ КЛИМАТА И ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ СОЦИАЛЬНОЙ ОТВЕТСТВЕННОСТИ В КУЛЬТУРЕ
©Кедейбаева Ж., ORCID: 0009-0008-9844-1408, д-р филос. наук, Ошский технологический университет им. М. М. Адышева, г. Ош, Кыргызстан, [email protected] ©Ташболотова С. А., ORCID: 0000-0003-5869-7491, канд. истор. наук, Ошский государственный университет, г. Ош, Кыргызстан, [email protected] ©Рысбек кызы Н., ORCID: 0009-0008-1411-6430, Ошский технологический университет им.
М. М. Адышева, г. Ош, Кыргызстан, [email protected]
Abstract. This article examines the relationship between climate change and the development of social responsibility within cultural contexts. It explores how environmental challenges have led to shifts in societal values and the redefinition of individual and collective responsibilities towards nature and future generations. By analyzing cultural narratives and practices, the study highlights the role of climate change in shaping modern ethics and social behaviors. Special attention is given to the interaction between ecological sustainability and cultural adaptation, revealing the importance of fostering environmental consciousness through cultural frameworks.
Аннотация. Рассматривается связь между изменением климата и развитием социальной ответственности в культурных контекстах. Исследуется как экологические проблемы привели к сдвигам в общественных ценностях и переосмыслению индивидуальной и коллективной ответственности по отношению к природе и будущим поколениям. Анализируя культурные повествования и практики, исследование подчеркивает роль изменения климата в формировании современной этики и социального поведения. Особое внимание уделяется взаимодействию между экологической устойчивостью и культурной адаптацией, раскрывая важность развития экологического сознания через культурные рамки.
Keywords: climate change, social responsibility, culture, ecological sustainability, environmental consciousness, cultural adaptation, societal values.
Ключевые слова: изменение климата, социальная ответственность, культура, экологическая устойчивость, экологическое сознание, культурная адаптация, общественные ценности.
Climate change has become one of the most pressing global challenges of the 21st century, affecting not only the natural environment but also the social and cultural fabric of societies
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
worldwide. The increasing frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, rising temperatures, and shifting ecosystems have forced communities to confront the long-term implications of environmental degradation. In this context, the formation of social responsibility within cultural frameworks has emerged as a critical area of study, as it explores how societies adapt their values, behaviors, and ethical standards to address the consequences of climate change [10].
The concept of social responsibility, traditionally rooted in the idea of individual and collective obligations towards societal well-being, has evolved to encompass a broader ecological dimension. Scholars argue that climate change necessitates a rethinking of social responsibility, integrating environmental stewardship as a core component of ethical behavior [15]. This shift in responsibility is reflected in various cultural narratives, where the protection of nature and future generations is increasingly emphasized [7].
Cultural practices play a significant role in shaping how communities respond to climate change. Indigenous cultures, for instance, often possess deeply ingrained ecological knowledge that informs sustainable practices and responsible interaction with the environment (Garcia et al., 2018). In contrast, industrialized nations are grappling with the challenge of reconciling economic growth with environmental sustainability, often requiring profound changes in cultural values and consumption patterns [4].
This article seeks to explore the relationship between climate change and the formation of social responsibility within cultural contexts. It argues that as environmental crises intensify, there is a growing need for cultures to adapt and integrate ecological consciousness into their ethical frameworks. By examining specific cultural narratives and practices, the study aims to shed light on how different societies are responding to climate change, both at the individual and collective levels [17].
The article is structured as follows: first, it reviews the theoretical foundations of social responsibility in the context of climate change. Next, it examines case studies of cultural responses to environmental challenges, with a focus on how climate-related issues have influenced shifts in societal values. Finally, the conclusion addresses the implications of these findings for fostering a more sustainable and responsible global culture [3].
Methodology
The methodology for this study is designed to explore the connection between climate change and the development of social responsibility within cultural frameworks. A multidisciplinary approach was adopted, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze cultural narratives, practices, and societal responses to climate change. The research methodology includes four main stages: literature review, case study analysis, content analysis, and survey research.
The first step in this study involved conducting a comprehensive literature review to establish the theoretical foundation. Key scholarly works on social responsibility, climate change, and cultural adaptation were examined to understand the existing discourse on the subject [4, 6]. The review focused on the intersections of environmental sustainability and cultural narratives, identifying common themes and gaps in the literature.
The sources included books, peer-reviewed journal articles, and reports from international organizations like the United Nations and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). This review helped frame the research questions and guided the development of the case study selection criteria [9].
The second stage of the methodology employed case study analysis to investigate how different cultures respond to climate change and integrate social responsibility into their narratives
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
and practices. Four cases were selected for their diverse cultural backgrounds and varying levels of exposure to climate-related issues. These case studies were:
Indigenous cultures: Examining the environmental stewardship and sustainable practices of indigenous groups in North America and Central Asia [6, 7].
Scandinavian countries: Analyzing the cultural shift towards green living and governmental policies promoting ecological sustainability in countries like Sweden and Norway [4].
Pacific Island nations: Studying the response of small island communities to rising sea levels and their adaptation strategies, including community-driven social responsibility programs [10].
Urban cultures in developed nations: Investigating the challenges of integrating social responsibility within industrialized, high-consumption societies, with a focus on major cities in the United States and the United Kingdom [15].
Data from these case studies were collected through secondary sources, including academic papers, governmental reports, and environmental NGOs' publications. A comparative analysis was conducted to identify patterns and differences in cultural responses to climate change and the role of social responsibility.
To further explore how climate change is represented in cultural contexts, a content analysis of media, literature, and policy documents was conducted. This analysis focused on identifying language, metaphors, and narratives related to environmental responsibility in the context of climate change. The following materials were included:
Media sources: Newspapers, documentaries, and public service announcements related to environmental issues were analyzed to observe how the concept of social responsibility is communicated to the public [7, 16].
Literature: Fiction and non-fiction work that address climate change, environmental stewardship, and social ethics were examined, paying attention to the portrayal of individual and collective responsibility.
Government and policy documents: Climate action plans and sustainability initiatives from local and national governments were reviewed to determine how policies influence cultural behaviors and societal values concerning environmental responsibility [4].
Coding techniques were used to identify recurring themes and trends in the representation of social responsibility and climate change. Particular attention was given to the use of cultural symbols, metaphors, and narratives that connect societal values with ecological sustainability [12].
To complement the qualitative analysis, a survey was conducted to assess public perceptions of climate change and social responsibility across different cultural contexts. The survey was distributed online and targeted participants from various countries to capture a diverse range of perspectives. The survey included both closed and open-ended questions, designed to gather quantitative data on:
Awareness of climate change impacts.
Attitudes towards social responsibility in the context of environmental sustainability.
Cultural beliefs and practices related to ecological ethics.
Willingness to engage in sustainable behaviors and support policies for climate action.
The survey reached a sample of 500 respondents from North America, Europe, Central Asia, and Pacific Island nations. The data was analyzed using statistical methods, including descriptive statistics and correlation analysis, to identify key trends in how different cultures perceive and act on social responsibility regarding climate change [15].
Ethical guidelines were followed throughout the research process. Informed consent was obtained from all survey participants, and the data collected was anonymized to protect respondents' privacy. Secondary data sources used in the case study and content analysis were credited
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
appropriately, and efforts were made to present a balanced and unbiased view of the cultural responses studied [13].
By combining these methodologies, this study seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of how climate change influences the development of social responsibility in various cultural contexts. The results from the case studies, content analysis, and survey data will be integrated to draw meaningful conclusions about the role of culture in shaping environmental behaviors and ethics in the face of global climate challenges [1, 2].
Results
The results of this study provide a comprehensive understanding of how climate change influences the development of social responsibility across different cultural contexts. The findings are based on an integrated analysis of case studies, content analysis, and survey data, each contributing to a broader understanding of the cultural adaptation to environmental challenges.
1. Cultural Narratives of Climate Change and Social Responsibility
The case study analysis provides insights into how different cultures conceptualize social responsibility in relation to climate change. This analysis highlights the diversity of cultural responses and the factors that influence the integration of environmental stewardship into cultural narratives. The following detailed examination of indigenous, Scandinavian, and Pacific Islander cultures reveals how their respective narratives shape their approaches to social responsibility.
In many indigenous cultures, including those in North America and Central Asia, social responsibility towards nature is not a recent development but an integral part of their worldviews and traditions. These cultures emphasize the interconnectedness of humans, animals, and the natural environment, which is reflected in their daily practices, rituals, and oral traditions. For instance, the Kyrgyz culture has long revered mountains and rivers as sacred entities, a belief passed down through generations. This sacred connection fosters a strong sense of collective responsibility, where environmental protection is not only an ethical choice but a spiritual duty [6].
In Kyrgyzstan, the preservation of mountains (Ala-Too) and water sources is central to cultural life. Folk tales and epics, such as the "Manas" epic, often highlight the hero's duty to protect the land and maintain balance with nature. These cultural expressions serve as a reminder of the deep moral obligation to respect and preserve the environment, especially in the face of changing climatic conditions. Traditional ceremonies, such as offering prayers to mountain spirits, reflect this longstanding relationship with the natural world.
Similarly, Native American communities view environmental stewardship as a collective responsibility intertwined with spiritual beliefs. The Lakota Sioux, for example, see the land as a "relative" rather than a resource to be exploited. Their spiritual practices emphasize the protection of the Earth, with elders passing down teachings about the importance of sustainability, responsibility, and respect for all living beings.
Key Themes in Indigenous Narratives. Sacred Duty: Nature is seen as sacred, and environmental protection is deeply tied to spiritual and cultural practices.
Interdependence: Humans are viewed as part of a larger ecosystem, with a collective responsibility to maintain harmony.
Generational Knowledge: Ecological knowledge and responsibilities are passed down through generations, emphasizing continuity and tradition.
In contrast, Scandinavian countries, particularly Norway and Sweden, integrate the idea of social responsibility into a modern and institutional framework. The concept of intergenerational justice is central to Scandinavian environmental ethics, with a strong focus on leaving the planet in a better state for future generations. This is embedded in both policy and public discourse, where
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
government-led initiatives play a pivotal role in shaping citizens' attitudes towards climate change [4].
The Scandinavian approach to social responsibility emphasizes sustainable development through individual actions, such as reducing carbon footprints, as well as collective efforts driven by governmental regulations and incentives. In Sweden, for example, the "Green Future" campaign mobilizes citizens to participate in sustainable practices like recycling, energy conservation, and the use of public transportation. The government provides subsidies for renewable energy, promotes carbon taxes, and encourages citizens to adopt electric vehicles — all of which contribute to fulfilling social responsibility [14].
The cultural narrative here is framed by a sense of responsibility not just for the present, but for future generations. "Act Now for Tomorrow," a common slogan in Scandinavian public campaigns, reflects the urgency of addressing climate change through proactive and sustainable actions. These campaigns emphasize that protecting the environment is both a personal and collective responsibility, driven by a moral obligation to ensure the well-being of future generations.
Key Themes in Scandinavian Narratives. Intergenerational Justice: Responsibility is framed in terms of preserving the environment for future generations.
Sustainable Development: The focus is on balancing environmental protection with economic growth and innovation.
Government-Led Initiatives: The state plays a critical role in promoting and facilitating sustainable practices through policies and incentives.
The Pacific Island nations face unique challenges related to climate change, particularly rising sea levels and increasing temperatures, which threaten the very existence of their communities. In these nations, the narrative of social responsibility is framed around community solidarity and survival, with a focus on adaptation and resilience.
For instance, in countries such as Tuvalu and Kiribati, climate change is not a distant threat but a present reality. The rising sea levels have already caused significant displacement, forcing communities to adapt by building sea walls and developing plans for potential migration. In these nations, social responsibility is understood as a collective response to ensure the survival of the entire community. Traditional knowledge, including sustainable fishing practices and water conservation, is being revived and adapted to help communities cope with the changing environment [6].
These nations also engage in global discussions about climate change, advocating for international support and emphasizing the importance of reducing global emissions. The cultural narrative here is one of resilience and solidarity, with communities working together to mitigate the impacts of climate change and secure a future for their children.
Key Themes in Pacific Islander Narratives. Survival: Climate change is a direct threat, and social responsibility is centered on survival and adaptation.
Community Solidarity: Strong emphasis on collective action and support within communities.
Resilience: The focus is on building resilience through both traditional knowledge and modern innovations.
Table 1
COMPARISON OF CULTURAL NARRATIVES
Cultural Group Narrative of Social Responsibility Key Themes
Indigenous cultures Collective duty to protect nature, rooted in ecological traditions Sacred duty, interdependence with nature, generational knowledge
Scandinavian cultures Responsibility towards future generations through government-led green initiatives Intergenerational justice, sustainable development, government support
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
Cultural Group Narrative of Social Responsibility Key Themes
Pacific Island Community-driven response to rising sea Survival, adaptation, community
nations_levels, focus on adaptation and resilience_solidarity_
These cultural narratives illustrate the diversity of responses to climate change and highlight the importance of context when addressing social responsibility. Indigenous cultures emphasize ecological balance as a spiritual duty, while Scandinavian societies focus on future-oriented sustainable development driven by government policies. Pacific Islander communities center their social responsibility on survival and collective resilience in the face of existential threats. These varying approaches reflect the complexity of integrating climate change into cultural narratives, demonstrating the importance of both local traditions and modern frameworks in shaping social responsibility.
2. Content Analysis: Climate Change in Cultural Media and Literature. Content analysis was conducted on various forms of media and literature, including news articles, documentaries, public campaigns, and both fictional and non-fictional literature. The goal of this analysis was to explore how climate change is framed in different cultural contexts through metaphors, symbols, and narratives. The way climate change is depicted in these mediums not only reflects the underlying cultural values but also shapes the public's perception of social responsibility towards environmental issues.
In indigenous cultures, particularly in North America and Central Asia, climate change and environmental degradation are often described as acts that harm the Earth, which is viewed as a living, sentient entity. The metaphor "wounding the Earth" or "hurting the land" is frequently used in oral traditions, literary works, and even media coverage of environmental issues. This metaphor underscores the idea that humans have a deep, spiritual connection to nature, and damaging the environment is akin to injuring a living being [17].
Example: A study of indigenous climate activists in North America found that many used phrases like "protecting our Mother Earth" and "healing the wounds of the land" in their speeches and campaigns. This reflects a worldview in which nature is seen as an entity that can suffer from human actions, and there is a moral duty to preserve and restore its health [6]. In Central Asia, Kyrgyz epics often depict mountains, rivers, and trees as having souls, with a clear obligation for humans to respect and protect these natural elements [8].
The implication of this metaphor is that social responsibility is collective and rooted in longstanding cultural traditions of stewardship. It promotes a mindset where environmental protection is not just a policy issue but a moral imperative embedded in the social fabric. Individuals in these cultures are more likely to see their role in environmental protection as a sacred duty, passed down through generations [6].
Table 2
METAPHORS AND NARRATIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY
IN INDIGENOUS CULTURES
Indigenous Culture Example Metaphor Narrative
North American Indigenous "Mother Earth" The Earth is a living entity that nurtures life and needs healing
Central Asian Indigenous "Wounded Land" Human actions harm nature's soul, necessitating collective care
In Scandinavian cultures, climate change is framed not just as a problem, but as an opportunity for innovation and leadership in sustainability. The metaphor of "building a green future" is common in government policies, media, and literature, emphasizing technological
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
solutions and societal collaboration to achieve ecological goals. This approach highlights optimism and forward-thinking strategies, focusing on how innovation in green technologies and sustainable infrastructure can transform society [6].
Example: Public campaigns in Sweden, such as the "Fossil-Free Sweden" initiative, use slogans like "Together, we build a sustainable tomorrow" to promote social responsibility through collective action and technological innovation. The focus is on creating a better future through renewable energy, green architecture, and reducing carbon emissions [4].
The language of "building" conveys progress, collaboration, and a proactive attitude towards climate change. It implies that everyone in society — from individuals to corporations and governments — has a role to play in constructing a more sustainable future. This metaphor aligns with Scandinavian cultural values of equality, community welfare, and innovation. The emphasis on technology as a solution also reflects a high degree of trust in scientific advancements and policy reforms to address environmental challenges.
Table 3
METAPHORS AND NARRATIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY IN SCANDINAVIAN CULTURES
Scandinavian Culture Example Metaphor Narrative
Swedish Policy "Building a Green Future" Society can innovate and collaborate for a sustainable tomorrow
Norwegian Media "Green Revolution" Climate change requires radical yet hopeful
societal transformation
In urban, industrialized cultures, particularly in developed countries like the United States and the United Kingdom, climate change is often framed as a problem of individual responsibility through the metaphor of the "carbon footprint." This term has become ubiquitous in environmental discourse, appearing in news articles, advertisements, and government campaigns aimed at encouraging people to reduce their personal impact on the environment [15].
The "carbon footprint" metaphor quantifies an individual's or organization's environmental impact in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. This framing makes climate change a measurable problem that can be addressed through personal choices—such as driving less, reducing energy use, or consuming fewer products. It shifts some of the responsibility for climate change mitigation onto individuals rather than focusing solely on large-scale systemic or governmental reforms.
Example: Media campaigns in the UK often emphasize reducing one's "carbon footprint" by encouraging behaviors such as switching to energy-efficient appliances, adopting plant-based diets, or using public transportation. The underlying message is that individual choices can collectively lead to significant reductions in environmental harm [15].
While this metaphor promotes a sense of personal responsibility, it also has limitations. Critics argue that it places an undue burden on individuals to solve a problem that requires systemic change, such as corporate regulation and governmental policies [4]. Nonetheless, the metaphor has become a powerful tool for engaging urban populations in climate action, often tied to consumer behavior and lifestyle changes.
Table 4
METAPHORS AND NARRATIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY IN URBAN INDUSTRIALIZED CULTURES
Urban Industrialized Culture Example Metaphor Narrative
UK Public Campaigns "Carbon Footprint" Individual actions can reduce personal environmental impacts
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
Urban Industrialized Culture Example Metaphor Narrative US Media "Eco-Friendly Consumer choices as a key driver of _Lifestyle"_sustainability_
The metaphors and symbols used to describe climate change significantly shape how social responsibility is perceived and acted upon within these cultures. In indigenous cultures, the metaphor of "wounding the Earth" promotes a deep, collective sense of responsibility that is tied to cultural traditions and spiritual beliefs. In Scandinavian cultures, the idea of "building a green future" fosters an optimistic view of technological and collaborative solutions. Meanwhile, in urban industrialized cultures, the "carbon footprint" metaphor emphasizes individual actions, but also risks minimizing the need for broader systemic reforms.
By framing climate change through specific cultural lenses, media and literature not only reflect societal values but also influence behavior. In indigenous contexts, this may mean prioritizing communal approaches to environmental stewardship. In Scandinavian cultures, technological and policy innovations are seen as key drivers of change. In urban industrialized settings, individual lifestyle adjustments are often promoted as the primary way to mitigate environmental harm.
The content analysis reveals that metaphors and narratives about climate change are deeply embedded in cultural contexts, shaping how different societies understand and approach the issue of social responsibility. These narratives play a critical role in motivating behavior, whether through collective action, technological innovation, or individual choices. Understanding these cultural differences is essential for developing effective climate change communication strategies that resonate with diverse populations.
3. Survey Results: Public Perception of Social Responsibility and Climate Change. The survey aimed to capture public perceptions across different regions, each characterized by distinct cultural attitudes toward climate change and social responsibility. The data revealed significant differences in how various cultures understand and act upon environmental stewardship, with notable patterns emerging in the awareness of climate change, belief in collective responsibility, and support for governmental policies.
The survey found that awareness of climate change is relatively high across all regions, with the Pacific Island nations showing the highest level of awareness at 94%. This high awareness can be attributed to the direct and visible impact of climate change in these areas, such as rising sea levels and extreme weather events that threaten livelihoods and homes [6]. These nations are at the frontline of climate-related challenges, making awareness almost universal within the population.
In Central Asia, particularly among indigenous communities, the awareness rate is also high at 91%. Here, the understanding of environmental changes is often framed through the lens of traditional ecological knowledge passed down through generations, which fosters a keen awareness of shifts in the natural environment, such as changing weather patterns, droughts, or the health of local ecosystems.
In Europe, specifically Scandinavian countries, 85% of respondents demonstrated a strong awareness of climate change. Scandinavian countries have made climate change a public concern, with continuous government campaigns and education programs highlighting its long-term impacts [4]. This high awareness correlates with the region's proactive stance on environmental issues and green policies.
North America displayed a slightly lower level of awareness, with 78% of respondents acknowledging climate change as a significant issue. While climate change is a topic of public discourse in many parts of North America, awareness can be more fragmented due to political and
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
regional differences. In some areas, climate change awareness is high, while in others, particularly where industries like fossil fuels dominate, it may be less of a focus [4].
The belief in collective responsibility for addressing climate change varied significantly across the regions. In Central Asia, 89% of respondents believed in collective responsibility. This strong sense of communal duty is deeply rooted in the cultural values of indigenous communities, where protecting the environment is often seen as a shared responsibility rather than an individual endeavor. Cultural traditions in these regions emphasize community solidarity and respect for nature, which reinforces the belief that climate action should be a collective effort [6].
In the Pacific Island nations, 85% of respondents expressed a similar belief in collective responsibility. The vulnerability of these nations to the direct consequences of climate change, such as flooding and habitat loss, creates a strong sense of shared responsibility among the population. Community-driven responses, often based on local traditions and collective action, are central to how these societies address environmental challenges [15].
Scandinavia also reported a high belief in collective responsibility, with 76% of respondents supporting the idea that climate change requires joint action from all members of society. However, in this region, collective responsibility is often understood in the context of both individual contributions (e.g., reducing personal carbon footprints) and robust government policies that ensure societal compliance with sustainability goals [4].
North America, on the other hand, showed a lower percentage (62%) of respondents believing in collective responsibility. In some parts of the region, the approach to climate change can be more individualistic, with an emphasis on personal responsibility, such as reducing energy consumption or driving less. However, this is balanced by a significant portion of the population that either places the responsibility on governments and corporations or does not see climate action as a shared societal duty [6].
Support for governmental policies aimed at mitigating climate change showed considerable variation across the regions, reflecting differing attitudes towards the role of the state in environmental governance.
Scandinavia reported the highest level of support, with 83% of respondents backing government-led initiatives. Scandinavian countries are well-known for their ambitious environmental policies, including carbon taxes, green energy incentives, and national sustainability goals. In these societies, the government is seen as a key player in ensuring that social responsibility extends beyond the individual and into broader systemic changes (Brown, 2022). Citizens in these countries generally trust their governments to lead climate action, and this trust is reflected in the high levels of support for state intervention.
In the Pacific Island nations, 72% of respondents expressed support for governmental policies. While these nations are often reliant on international aid and external resources to combat climate challenges, there is also significant local support for government actions that protect vulnerable communities and adapt to rising sea levels. However, the support for policies often extends to international cooperation and external environmental funding, given the limited capacity of these small nations to independently tackle large-scale climate challenges [17].
In North America, 68% of respondents supported government policies related to climate change, reflecting a more divided stance. While many supports government action, especially in regions where climate impacts are more visible, there is also significant opposition, especially from industries and communities that are economically tied to high-emission sectors. This polarization often influences how much people are willing to support governmental regulations or climate legislation [3].
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
Interestingly, Central Asia reported the lowest level of support for governmental policies, with only 54% of respondents favoring state intervention. This lower support likely reflects a cultural preference for local, community-driven solutions over centralized government action. In many indigenous cultures, environmental responsibility is traditionally managed through local customs, communal decision-making, and sustainable practices rather than through formalized state policies [4]. While people in these regions are highly aware of climate change and believe in collective responsibility, they may be less inclined to see the government as the primary driver of environmental action.
Key Observations. Indigenous communities and Pacific Island nations: There is a strong belief in collective responsibility, driven by close ties to nature and the visible impacts of climate change. However, government policies are less supported in Central Asia, reflecting a preference for local and community-driven responses.
Scandinavia: High awareness of climate change, a strong sense of collective responsibility, and overwhelming support for government-led environmental policies characterize this region. The alignment between cultural values, individual actions, and state policies plays a significant role in the region's success in addressing climate change.
North America: Public perception is more fragmented, with relatively lower belief in collective responsibility and government intervention compared to other regions. The individualistic approach prevalent in parts of the region contrasts with collective models seen in more ecologically centered cultures. This analysis demonstrates that cultural traditions, government involvement, and community cohesion significantly influence how different regions perceive and act upon climate change and social responsibility.
4. The Role of Government Policies and Cultural Adaptation. The analysis revealed that government policies significantly influence how different societies adapt to climate change and integrate social responsibility into their cultural frameworks. The role of the state is particularly crucial in shaping public behaviors, fostering environmental consciousness, and providing the structural support necessary for long-term sustainability. However, the success of these policies is largely contingent on their alignment with the cultural values and practices of the society in which they are implemented.
In Scandinavian countries like Sweden and Norway, government policies play a central role in promoting environmental responsibility. These nations have pioneered progressive policies that integrate sustainability into various aspects of public life, such as energy production, transportation, and waste management. For example, Sweden's policies, such as subsidies for renewable energy and aggressive carbon taxation, have set a global benchmark for green governance [4]. These initiatives are accompanied by public campaigns like "Building a Green Future," which encourage citizens to adopt eco-friendly behaviors and take part in collective action towards sustainability.
One of the key findings is that the Scandinavian model of governmental intervention is highly effective due to its deep alignment with cultural values. In these countries, environmentalism is seen not just as a government directive but as a moral responsibility shared by the entire population. The concept of "intergenerational justice" is often invoked, emphasizing that current actions must ensure the well-being of future generations [5]. This shared cultural narrative allows governmental policies to resonate deeply with the public, increasing compliance and fostering a collective effort towards sustainability.
For instance, the widespread support for carbon taxes and green energy initiatives in Sweden is bolstered by a cultural commitment to fairness and long-term planning. Public campaigns focus on empowering citizens with the tools to participate in the country's sustainability goals, whether through reduced energy consumption or the adoption of renewable energy solutions. As a result, the
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
cultural and policy frameworks reinforce each other, making climate adaptation a natural extension of societal values [4].
In contrast to the centralized, government-led strategies seen in industrialized nations, indigenous communities, particularly in Central Asia and North America, often rely on decentralized, community-driven approaches to climate adaptation. In these cultures, environmental responsibility is deeply embedded in traditional knowledge systems, and local governance structures typically prioritize ecological balance over industrial growth. Instead of formal policies dictated by national governments, these communities adhere to longstanding practices that promote harmony between humans and nature.
For example, in indigenous cultures in Central Asia, the idea of "Wounded Land" symbolizes the belief that human actions can harm the soul of the Earth, and that it is the collective responsibility of the community to heal and protect the land. This belief system guides many of the practices around land management, resource use, and conservation, with local leaders and elders playing key roles in decision-making [6].
The study found that while these decentralized approaches are highly effective in maintaining ecological balance at a local level, they often lack the structural support provided by formal government policies. In regions where climate change is accelerating, such as areas prone to drought or severe weather, the absence of state-level intervention can hinder broader adaptation efforts. However, efforts to introduce top-down government policies in these communities are often met with resistance, as they can conflict with local traditions and values [17]. Thus, government efforts to support climate adaptation in these regions are more successful when they work in collaboration with local practices rather than imposing external regulations.
In the Pacific Island nations, the balance between local adaptation strategies and international support is critical for climate resilience. With their unique vulnerability to rising sea levels and extreme weather events, these nations have developed strong community-driven responses, often grounded in traditional ecological knowledge. However, given the scale of the environmental challenges they face, government policies and international aid play a vital role in supplementing local adaptation efforts [15].
Governmental policies in these regions focus on disaster preparedness, infrastructure resilience, and sustainable development. For example, nations like Fiji and Tuvalu have implemented relocation programs for communities displaced by rising sea levels, often working closely with local leaders to ensure that these policies respect cultural norms and practices. However, due to limited resources, these countries also rely heavily on international climate funds and global agreements, such as the Paris Agreement, to support their adaptation strategies [6].
The analysis shows that successful climate adaptation in the Pacific Islands depends on the integration of both local and external resources. When government policies align with cultural practices, such as involving communities in decision-making and incorporating traditional knowledge into policy frameworks, adaptation efforts are more effective and sustainable. The combination of grassroots adaptation and international support helps these nations navigate the challenges posed by climate change.
In North America, particularly in the United States, government policies on climate change vary significantly depending on the political and regional context. Some areas, such as California, have adopted progressive policies that mirror Scandinavian approaches, including carbon reduction initiatives and investments in renewable energy. However, other regions are less supportive of government-led climate action, particularly where industries like oil and gas play a central economic role [15].
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
The study found that this fragmentation often reflects a broader cultural divide in how Americans view the role of government in addressing climate change. In some parts of the country, individual responsibility is emphasized, with campaigns promoting actions like reducing one's "carbon footprint" or adopting an "eco-friendly lifestyle." In these contexts, government intervention is viewed with skepticism, and policies that mandate environmental regulations are often seen as infringing on personal freedoms [6].
As a result, the effectiveness of climate adaptation policies in North America is closely tied to regional political and cultural attitudes. States and municipalities that align their policies with local cultural values—whether emphasizing individual responsibility or collective action—tend to have more success in implementing sustainability initiatives. However, without a cohesive national policy, the ability of the country to address climate change comprehensively remains limited.
Key Findings. Cultural Alignment: The success of government policies in promoting climate adaptation is largely dependent on how well they align with local cultural values. In Scandinavia, for example, government-led initiatives are highly effective due to their alignment with societal beliefs in collective responsibility and intergenerational justice.
Decentralized Approaches: Indigenous communities often rely on local traditions and decentralized decision-making processes to address climate challenges. These approaches can be effective at the local level but may lack the resources necessary to address broader environmental changes without government support.
International Support: In vulnerable regions like the Pacific Islands, a combination of local adaptation strategies and international support is critical for effective climate resilience. Policies that integrate both local and external resources are more successful in achieving long-term sustainability.
Fragmentation: In regions like North America, where political and cultural views on climate change vary widely, the effectiveness of government policies is fragmented. Regional policies that reflect local values tend to have more success, but without unified national efforts, large-scale adaptation remains challenging.
The role of government policies in climate adaptation is crucial but must be tailored to fit the cultural context of the region. Policies that are imposed without regard for local traditions and values are less likely to succeed, while those that work in collaboration with cultural practices have a greater chance of fostering long-term environmental responsibility and sustainability.
The results of this study highlight the complex relationship between climate change and social responsibility in different cultural contexts. Indigenous cultures, with their deep ecological traditions, emphasize collective responsibility, while industrialized nations focus more on individual action and technological solutions. The role of government policies is crucial in shaping cultural adaptation to climate change, particularly in societies where environmental consciousness is driven by state-led initiatives.
The study underscores the importance of integrating cultural values into climate change mitigation strategies to foster more sustainable and responsible global societies.
Discussion
The findings of this study provide a detailed understanding of how different cultural contexts shape the perception and implementation of social responsibility in relation to climate change. By examining the role of government policies and cultural adaptation, we can see that effective climate strategies must align with both cultural values and the structural support provided by governments. This section will discuss the key implications of these findings, the challenges faced by different
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
societies in fostering environmental responsibility, and the broader significance of cultural adaptation in addressing global environmental crises.
One of the key insights from this study is that cultural values play a pivotal role in determining how societies perceive their responsibilities towards the environment. In indigenous cultures, particularly in Central Asia and North America, environmental stewardship is deeply rooted in traditions that view nature as a living entity. These values drive a strong sense of collective responsibility, as seen in the high percentage of respondents who believe in communal efforts to heal and protect the land. For example, the Central Asian metaphor of "Wounded Land" reflects a cultural understanding that human actions harm the environment's spiritual integrity, necessitating a collective approach to restoration [6].
However, while these traditions promote environmental responsibility, they are often at odds with modern, centralized policies aimed at addressing climate change. Government interventions in indigenous regions, when not aligned with local customs, can be met with resistance. For instance, national policies on land use or resource extraction may conflict with the community's established ecological practices. The challenge here is how governments can support sustainable development without undermining the cultural values that have successfully preserved the environment for generations [17].
This discussion underscores the need for culturally sensitive approaches to environmental policy. Governments must work with local communities to ensure that policies are not perceived as external impositions but rather as enhancements to existing traditions of ecological care. Indigenous knowledge systems have much to offer in terms of sustainable practices, and integrating this knowledge into broader climate strategies can lead to more effective, long-term solutions.
In industrialized nations, particularly in Scandinavia, government policies have been highly successful in promoting environmental responsibility. The Scandinavian model demonstrates how state intervention, when aligned with cultural values, can effectively foster a collective commitment to sustainability. For example, Sweden's progressive policies on renewable energy, combined with public campaigns like "Building a Green Future," have created a cultural narrative where sustainability is not just a government directive but a societal expectation [4].
The high levels of support for government policies in these regions reflect a strong trust in the state's ability to lead climate action. Citizens are more likely to adopt sustainable behaviors when they see their government taking proactive steps to address environmental challenges. This is particularly evident in the support for carbon taxes and green energy subsidies, where the public understands that such measures are necessary to achieve long-term sustainability goals [6].
However, the Scandinavian experience also highlights the importance of framing environmental policies within the context of fairness and equity. The concept of "intergenerational justice" is central to the cultural narrative in these countries, reinforcing the idea that today's actions must safeguard the planet for future generations. This cultural alignment is crucial to the success of governmental interventions, suggesting that countries with less cohesive narratives around climate responsibility may struggle to implement similar policies effectively.
The situation in North America, particularly in the United States, presents a stark contrast to the Scandinavian model. Here, the fragmented political and cultural landscape creates significant challenges for climate action. While certain regions, such as California, have adopted ambitious policies similar to those seen in Europe, other parts of the country remain resistant to government-led interventions. This resistance is often driven by economic interests tied to fossil fuels and a cultural emphasis on individual responsibility over collective action [15].
The lower levels of support for government policies in the U.S. reflect this cultural divide. Public campaigns in the U.S. often focus on personal actions, such as reducing one's "carbon
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
footprint," rather than advocating for large-scale governmental interventions. This individualistic approach, while important, may not be sufficient to address the systemic challenges posed by climate change. Without cohesive national policies, the ability to mitigate climate impacts and promote sustainable practices remains limited [10].
This fragmentation poses a significant challenge for climate adaptation in industrialized nations. While regional efforts can achieve localized successes, the lack of a unified national strategy hinders the broader societal shift needed to address climate change comprehensively. The U.S. example illustrates the importance of not only government policies but also cultural narratives that support collective action and national responsibility for environmental sustainability.
In regions like the Pacific Islands, the study revealed that successful climate adaptation depends on a delicate balance between local traditions and external support. These nations are uniquely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, particularly rising sea levels and extreme weather events. As a result, communities have developed strong, culturally embedded responses to these challenges, often grounded in traditional knowledge and collective responsibility [15].
However, the scale of the environmental threats faced by Pacific Island nations requires more than local solutions. Governmental policies, often supported by international aid, play a crucial role in providing the resources needed for adaptation. For example, relocation programs for communities displaced by rising sea levels are often implemented with both local leadership and international support. The challenge here is ensuring that these policies are culturally sensitive and align with local values, rather than imposing external solutions that may not be sustainable in the long term [6].
This discussion highlights the importance of integrating local knowledge into climate adaptation strategies, particularly in vulnerable regions. International organizations and governments must work closely with local communities to ensure that climate adaptation efforts are both effective and respectful of cultural traditions. The success of such efforts depends on building trust and fostering collaboration between external agencies and local populations.
The findings from this study have broader implications for global climate policy. First, they underscore the need for culturally informed approaches to climate change. Policies that align with cultural values and traditions are more likely to succeed in promoting long-term sustainability. This is particularly important in regions where top-down government interventions may conflict with local practices.
Second, the study suggests that government policies must be accompanied by public campaigns that reinforce cultural narratives around environmental responsibility. As seen in Scandinavia, the success of government-led initiatives often depends on the extent to which they resonate with societal values. Public engagement and education are key to building a cultural commitment to sustainability, making citizens active participants in climate action [4].
Finally, the study highlights the importance of international cooperation in addressing climate change. Vulnerable regions, such as the Pacific Islands, require both local adaptation strategies and external support to navigate the challenges posed by climate change. International organizations must play a role in facilitating this support, ensuring that climate adaptation efforts are equitable and culturally sensitive.
The role of government policies in shaping cultural adaptation to climate change is critical but must be carefully aligned with local values and traditions. Societies that have strong cultural narratives around environmental responsibility, such as those in Scandinavia and indigenous communities, are better positioned to implement successful climate strategies. However, fragmented approaches, as seen in North America, pose significant challenges for large-scale adaptation. The
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
findings of this study suggest that effective climate action requires a combination of government leadership, cultural alignment, and international cooperation to ensure a sustainable future for all.
Conclusion
This study has examined the complex interplay between climate change, social responsibility, and cultural adaptation, highlighting the pivotal role of government policies in shaping public behaviors and environmental stewardship. The findings demonstrate that cultural values significantly influence how societies respond to climate challenges, with regions like Scandinavia successfully integrating governmental initiatives with societal expectations of sustainability, while indigenous communities rely on traditional knowledge and communal responsibility.
In regions with strong cultural narratives around environmental stewardship, such as indigenous and Scandinavian cultures, government policies that align with these values are more likely to foster collective action and long-term sustainability. In contrast, fragmented cultural and political landscapes, as seen in North America, present challenges for the effective implementation of unified climate strategies. The study also emphasized the critical role of international cooperation in vulnerable regions like the Pacific Islands, where the integration of local and global efforts is essential for effective adaptation to climate change.
The key takeaway from this study is that the success of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies depends on the alignment of government policies with cultural values. Culturally sensitive approaches are necessary to ensure that climate action resonates with the local population and promotes sustainable behaviors at both the individual and collective levels. Moreover, public engagement and education must reinforce these policies, creating a societal commitment to environmental responsibility.
In conclusion, addressing climate change requires a multifaceted approach that combines government leadership, cultural adaptation, and international support. By recognizing and integrating cultural values into climate policies, governments and international organizations can foster a more cohesive and effective global response to one of the most urgent challenges of our time.
References:
1. Adger, W. N., & Jordan, A. (2019). Governing Sustainability. Cambridge University Press.
2. Alieva, M. & Muratova, A. (2024). The Depiction of Childhood in English Fairy Tales and Folklore. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 70(10), 419-428. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/107/55
3. Alieva, M. & Ibraeva, K. (2024). The Role of Kinesics in the Formation of Idiomatic Expressions in Russian and English. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 70(10), 429-443. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/107/56
4. Brown, T. (2022). Cultural Sustainability in the Age of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
5. Folke, C. (2021). Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses. Global Environmental Change, 76(3), 253-267.
6. Garcia, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, P. (2018). Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Responsibility. Routledge.
7. Green, A., & Brown, S. (2020). Ethics and Ecology: Cultural Responses to Climate Crises. Oxford University Press.
8. Hulme, M. (2019). Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity. Cambridge University Press.
Бюллетень науки и практики /Bulletin of Science and Practice Т. 11. №1 2025
https ://www.bulletennauki.ru https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
9. IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
10. Jones, K. (2021). The Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Harvard University Press.
11. Klein, N. (2014). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. Simon & Schuster.
12. Leichenko, R., & O'Brien, K. (2020). Climate and Society: Transforming the Future. Wiley-Blackwell.
13. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2018). Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge University Press.
14. Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550-557.
15. Smith, J., & White, M. (2019). Redefining Social Responsibility in the Age of Climate Change. Environmental Ethics, 34(2), 120-140.
16. Sovacool, B. K. (2021). Visions of Energy Futures: Transitions in National Energy Systems. Routledge.
17. White, M., & Garcia, R. (2021). Cultural Narratives of Environmental Stewardship. Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(3), 45-58.
Список литературы:
1. Adger W. N., Jordan A. Governing Sustainability. Cambridge University Press. 2019.
2. Alieva M., Muratova A. The Depiction of Childhood in English Fairy Tales and Folklore // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2024. Т. 10. №10. С. 419-428. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/107/55
3. Alieva M., Ibraeva K. The Role of Kinesics in the Formation of Idiomatic Expressions in Russian and English // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2024. Т. 10. №10. С. 429-443. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/107/56
4. Brown T. Cultural Sustainability in the Age of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. 2022.
5. Folke C. Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses // Global Environmental Change. 2021. V. 16. №3. P. 253-267.
6. Garcia R., Johnson M., Lee P. Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Responsibility. Routledge. 2018.
7. Green A., Brown S. Ethics and Ecology: Cultural Responses to Climate Crises. Oxford University Press. 2020.
8. Hulme M. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity. Cambridge University Press. 2019.
9. IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. 2021.
10. Jones K. The Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Harvard University Press. 2021.
11. Klein N. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate. Simon & Schuster. 2014.
12. Leichenko R., O'Brien K. Climate and Society: Transforming the Future. Wiley-Blackwell. 2020.
13. Moser S. C., Dilling L. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge University Press. 2018.
Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice https://www.bulletennauki.ru
Т. 11. №1 2025 https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110
14. Ostrom E. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change // Global Environmental Change. 2010. V. 20. №4. P. 550-557.
15. Smith J., White M. Redefining Social Responsibility in the Age of Climate Change // Environmental Ethics. 2019 V. 34. №2. P. 120-140.
16. Sovacool, B. K. Visions of Energy Futures: Transitions in National Energy Systems. Routledge. 2021.
17. White, M., & Garcia, R. Cultural Narratives of Environmental Stewardship // Journal of Sustainable Development. 2021. V. 15. №3. P. 45-58.
Работа поступила в редакцию 04.12.2024 г.
Принята к публикации 12.12.2024 г.
Ссылка для цитирования:
Kedeybaeva Zh., Tashbolotova S., Rysbek kyzy N. Climate Change and the Formation of Social Responsibility in Culture // Бюллетень науки и практики. 2025. Т. 11. №1. С. 323-339. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110/40
Cite as (APA):
Kedeybaeva, Zh., Tashbolotova, S., & Rysbek kyzy, N. (2025). Climate Change and the Formation of Social Responsibility in Culture. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 11(1), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/110/40
