УДК 517.55
Analytic Continuation of Power Series by Means of Interpolating the Coefficients by Meromorphic Functions
Aleksandr J. Mkrtchyan*
Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science Siberian Federal University Svobodny, 79, Krasnoyarsk, 660041
Russia
Received 07.04.2015, received in revised form 20.04.2015, accepted 25.04.2015 We study the problem of analytic continuation of a power series across an open arc on the boundary of the circle of convergence. The answer is given in terms of a meromorphic function of a special form that interpolates the coefficients of the series. We find the conditions for the sum of the series to extend analytically to a neigbourhood of the arc, to a sector defined by the arc, or to the whole complex plane except some arc on the convergence disk.
Keywords: Power series, analytic continuation, interpolating meromorphic function, indicator function.
Introduction
The problem of analytic continuation and finding singular points of a function has a rich and long history. It has been studied by many prominent mathematicians such as Carlson, Polya, Hadamard, and others (see, for example, [1]). There are different approaches to studying such problems. In this paper we consider the question of continuation of a power series across the boundary of its circle of convergence. First, we recall some definitions and results. Consider a power series
f (z) = £ fr^ (1)
n=0
in z £ C, whose domain of convergence is the unit disk Di := {z £ C : |z| < 1}. The Cauchy-Hadamard theorem yields that
iim rfi = 1. (2)
r—
We say that a function ^ interpolates the coefficients of the series (1), if
<^(n) = fr for all n £ N. (3)
Recall (see, e.g. [2]) that the indicator function hv(0) for an entire function <f is defined as the upper limit
hv(Q) = urn ln ^)|, 0 £ R.
r—r
Let ACT be the sector {z = rel° £ C : |0| < a}, a G [0, n). By Ya,P we denote the open arc dDp \ Aff.
* [email protected] © Siberian Federal University. All rights reserved
There are at least three types of questions of analytic continuation of (1) across the arc Ya . The first one asks about the conditions for continuation to the whole complex plane except dDi \ Aa. The answer is given by Polya's theorem.
Theorem (Polya [3]). The series (1) extends analytically to C, possibly except the arc dDi \ya, if and only if there exists an entire function of exponential type p(Z) interpolating the coefficients fn such that
hv(6) < <j\ sin6\ for \e\ < n.
Two other questions concern continuation to the sector C \ Aa defined by the arc Ya = dDi\ Aa, or to a neighbourhood of this arc. Both of them are answered by Arakelian's theorems.
Theorem (Arakelian [4, 5]). The sum of the series (1) extends analytically to the sector C \ Aa if and only if there is an entire function p of exponential type interpolating the coefficients of the series fn whose indicator function hv(9) satisfies the condition
n
hv(0) < a\ sin e\ for \e\ < 2. (4)
The continuation property of f (z) to a neighbourhood of the arc Ya was studied in [6] (see also [7]). In this case we refer to Ya as an arc of regularity for the series (1).
Theorem (Arakelian [7]). The open arc Ya = C \ Aa is an arc of regularity of the series (1) if and only if there is an entire function p of exponential type interpolating the coefficients of the series fn whose indicator function hv(e) satisfies the conditions: hv(0) = 0 and
y— hv(e)
l™ ^ a. (5)
\e\
The inequality (4) implies (5), and (5) together with (2) and (3) gives hv(0) = 0. Sometimes it can be easier to interpolate coefficients by meromorphic functions instead of entire ones. Here we consider interpolating functions of the form
nj=i r(q3-Z + bj) nk=i r(ck Z + dk)
m(z) = ^(z)^q J ' , ; , (6)
where ^(Z) is entire, aj > 0, j = 1, ...,p, and
p q
J2aJ =13 Ck. (7)
j=i k=i
Denote also
q p
1 = J2\ck aj.
k=1 j=i
In this paper we find the conditions on a meromorphic interpolating function such that the conclusions of all theorems formulated above still hold.
Theorem 1. The sum of the series (1) extends analytically to C \ (dDi n Aa) if there exists a meromorphic function M(Z) of the form (6) interpolating the coefficient fn such that the entire function
np-i a/jZ
p(Z ):= *Z' irsF
satisfies
n
hv(e) + 21\sine\ < a\sine\ for \e\ < n.
Theorem 2. The sum of the series (1) extends analytically to the open sector C \ Aa if there exists a meromorphic function ^(Z) of the form (6) interpolating the coefficients fn such that the entire function
P(Z) := ¿(Z)
nk+1 |ck|CfcC
satisfies the conditions
1) M0) = 0, 2) max { hv (-+ 21, hv (+ |^
Theorem 3. The open arc ya = dD 1 \ ACT is an arc of regularity for the series (1) if there exists a meromorphic function ^(Z) of the form (6) interpolating the coefficients fn such that the entire function
P(Z) := ¿(Z)
n
j=1 a
ai C
satisfies the conditions
1) hv(0) =0,
nk+1 |ck|CkZ
_h
2) lim hv
lim —+ - l < o". 0^0 |0| 2
1. Proof of Theorem 2
To begin with, we prove theorem 2 in the case when all ck are positive, i.e. l = 0. Then the statement is the following.
The sum of the series (1) extends analytically to the open sector C \ Aa if there exists a meromorphic function ^(Z) of the form (6) interpolating the coefficients fn such that the indicator function of
a,ajz
(8)
P(Z) := ¿(Z)"r1 c?CkZ
nk+1 Ckc
satisfies the conditions
1) h„(0) = 0, 2) max {hv (-, h„ (} < a.
(9)
The indicator of an entire function of exponential type has the following property [7]: if
hv(0) = 0 then for a G (0, n)
hv(0) < ca| sin0| for all |0| < a,
1
L-a — -
sin a
max{hv(a), hv(-a)}.
Let f be an entire function of the form (8) satisfying the conditions (9). Show that the series (1) extends to the open sector C \ ACT. It follows from the definition of an indicator that
|f(reie)| < eh^(e)r+o(r) for d G R,
where o(r) is infinitesimally small compared to r as r ^ ro.
Taking into account the property of indicator function stated above, we get
|f(reie)| < eff| sin0|r+o(r) for |0| < 2.
Since p(Z) has the form (8), we obtain the inequality
, jIj
< e^sin 0|r+o(r) for |0| <
which in terms of Z = £ + in is written as
j jZI
,nLi KfcC I
We need the following estimate. Lemma 1. For all Z G An
~ 9
-1
eCTM+o(|z|) for Z G An.
' 9
(10)
np=i r(aj Z + bj )
nk=i r(cfc z + dk )
<
nP=i jCI —-
nk=i I4fcC I
o(ICI).
Proof. It is easy to see that for IZI ^ œ one has
IaZ P5 ( 1 -M;) I ZI e-av arg(C) < IaZ + bK < IaZ a (1 + r^ )IaCIe-an arg(C).
V IaZ \) KI
This fact together with Stirling's formula gives
ji Ir(q3-Z + bj)I np=i I(ajZ + bj)(ajC+b;)e-(ajC+b;)(2n(ajZ + b3))^
nk=i Ir(ck Z + dk )I
nk=i I(ckZ + dk)(ckC+dk)e (cfcZ+dfc)(2n(ckZ + dk))21
<
<
j Iaj Z Ia 5 (1 + j )|ajZI e-ajn arg(Z)I(aj Z + bj )bj e-(aj C+bj )(2n(aj Z + bj ))2 I
I aj CI
nk=i Ick ZI ck 5 (1 - ICkCT )CfcC e-Ck n arg(C)I(ck Z + dk )dk e-(ckC+dk )(2n(ckZ + dk))2 I
IcfcCI • aj C\
<
nP=i Iaj" I
ffi=i IckkC I
ZC(Ep=i aj -E k=i
ck)
"C(EP= i aj-Ek=i ci)
j (1 + j )aj 5 e-aj n arg(C) np=i Iaj Z + bj Ibj e-bj I2n(aj Z + bj )12
nk = i (1 + m )ck5e-ckV arg(C)
.. nk=i \ckZ + dk\dk\2n(ckZ + dk)| =
In view of (7), this inequality after some simplifications turns into
-a3 C|
np=i r(ajZ + bj)
nk=i r(ckZ + dk)
<
np=i Iaj" I
nk=i IcCkkCI
IAZ + BI
where A, B and C are some constants. Since \AZ + B\C = eln|AZ+B|C and
lim
ICH«
ln IAZ + BIC
IZ
(11)
<
we get IAZ + BIC = eo(ICI) as Z ^ œ, i.e. the lemma's statement. C
It follows form (10) and (11) that for a meromorphic function ^(Z) defined by (6) we have
I
I
x
e
0
№(Z)| < eff|n|+o(|c|) for Z G An. Consider the following function
(12)
g(Z,z)
zC
e2niZ — 1
of two complex variables Z = C + ¿n, z = x + ¿y. It is meromorphic in Z G C and holomorphic in
z G C\R+.
Denote D* := UmeZD1/4(m). Notice that there exists a constant c > 0 such that
|e2niZ — 1| >
I"(|n|-n)
for Z G C \ D*
From this we get the estimate
|g(Z, Z)| < Ce«log |z|-(n-|n-arg z|)|n| for Z G C \ D* and z G C \ R+. Using (12) for Z G A2 \ D* and z G C \ R+, we see that
№(Z )||g(Z,z)| < ce«log |z|-(n-^-|n-arg z|)|n|+o(|z|) For Z G (A2 \ D*) and z G C \ ACT+ there is the following bound
№(Z)||g(Z,z)| <ce«log| z | - | n |+o( | z | ).
(13)
Consider the integral
Im = J V>(Z )g(Z,z)dZ,
dGm
over the oriented boundary of Gm that consists of the segments (see Fig. 1)
Fig. 1.
e
c
r1
r2
11
a — i m +— , a + i m +— 1 2j , + 1 +2
11
a + i m +— , a + m + i m +—
+ 1 + 2 / , + + I +2
11
a + m + i ( m + 2 J , a + m — i I m + ^
11
a + m — i ( m + 2 / , a — i I m + ^
1 3
where - < a < -. 4 4
The integral /m is the sum of four integrals im, im, im, Im over rm, rm, rm, rm respectively. For Z G A n \ D* h z G C \ there hold the following estimates
a+m
im = J |^(Z)g(Z,z)||dZ| < ce-5(m+ 2) J e«ln|z|+o(|z|)d£,
rm
a
r3
i(m +1)
||^(Z)g(Z,z)||dZ| < ce(a+m)ln| z |+o(m) J dn,
rm -i(m+1)
a
im = / |^(Z)g(Z,z)||dZ| < ce-5(m+ 2) J e«ln|z|+o(|z|)d£.
r4 a+m
We see that for z G D1 \ the integrals /m, im, im tend to 0 as m ^ to. Thus,
lim im = lim f ^(Z)g(Z,z)dZ = lim f ^(Z)g(Z, z)dZ = lim 4.
m—►to m—J m—►TO J m—►TO
dGm
rm
In the domain Gm, the integrand has simple poles in real integer points and finitely many —v — b'
poles in points -- G Gm v = 0,1,... (recall that a-, b- are parameters in the definition (6)
a-
of V(Z)).
The residue theorem yields
« m
J ^(Z)g(Z,z)dZ = £ ^(n)z" + P(z),
dGm "=1
where P(z) is a polynomial. Consider the integral
a+iTO
/ = f y(Z)g(Z,z)dZ.
4
r
m
a—iTO
For Z = a + in and z G C \ we have
№(Z )||g(Z,z)| < cea inM-%\+o(\C\).
It follows from this inequality that the integral I converges absolutely and uniformly on any compact subset K c C \ , and defines a holomorphic function on the set of interior points of K. For z G Di \ Aff+(5
a+iw
J v(Z)g(Z,z)dZ ^ J <p(Z)g(Z,z)dZ as m ^ to.
r1 a-iw
Since Im ^ I as m to, I(z) = f (z) + P(z) for z G D1 n Ko. This means that f (z) extends analytically to Ko. Because K is an arbitrary compact set in C \ for any small S, the
function f (z) extends to the open sector C \ ACT. Thus, the theorem is proved if all ck are positive.
Prove now the theorem in the case when ck may be negative. Without loss of generality we may assume that only cq among ck is negative, i.e. ^ = — cq. Then
IT 1 r(a„ Z + b) ^(Z) = &(Z)-113=1 (jZ j)-
nk-i rKZ + dk)r (-2Z + d)'
l r
a, Z ( l \ 2 Z
np-i Z np-i Z (2)
nk+i ick rz m+i ckck z
According to the condition of the theorem
max{K (-1)+ 2l,K(2)+ 21) < a. Note that the function ^(Z) may be rewritten in the form (6) such that all ck are positive
*(Z) = "(Z) n;=i r(ck Z+ät) r(,1 + 2Z+V sm * l-2Z - V.
Consider now the entire function
flz ) := <t>(Z ) sin M - k - d^1 ^ Z (2) 2C
2 ^ nk+i
lfc+1 '
Its indicator is bounded
hp(0) = lim - ln
^IEU j^ (2)2" ein2re»0 - e-in2r
nk+1
2i
< hv(0) + n21 sin(0)|.
Thus
h^(0)=0, hp (±D < a.
The function ip(Z) satisfies the conditions of (9), hence the sum of the series (1) extends analytically to the open sector C \ Aa. Theorem 2 is proof.
The proof of Theorem 3 is largely similar to that of Theorem 2. Namely, from condition 2) of Theorem 3 it follows that for any a > 0 there exists 6 > 0 such that ^ (a + 6)| sin 0| for
|0| < a. Consequently, the bounds (12) and (13) for the modulus of ^(Z) and ^(Z)g(Z, z) hold for Z G Aa. The domains G and Gm become
G = Di U A° and G.
Z = £ + «n G G : £ < m + 2
(see Fig. 2), i.e. SGm = U r^.
Fig. 2.
The integral /m is then the sum J^ and /m over r^, and r^, and for z G K n D° the integral Im — 0 as m —> to.
The integral / over dG converges for Z G Aa, z G K, (Fig. 3) where K = Dee \ (A°+25 UDi),
6 sin a £ = ~ •
Fig. 3.
The rest of the proof is the same.
As for the proof Theorem 1, it is enough to note that the main estimates (12) and (13) hold for all Z G C. Therfore, by choosing appropriate contours of integrations we prove analytic continuation of the sum of the series to C \ (dD n ACT).
2. Examples
Consider two examples clarifying why interpolation of the coefficients by meromorphic functions, and not entire, may be advantageous. Example 1. Consider the series
œ r ( 2 n + 1 ^ 3" f(z) = V-M3 ( + 3) „ 2 z", (14)
r(n + 1)r (-3n + I) 21n ' 1 j
whose domain of convergence is the unit disk. Its coefficients
= r( 2 n + I )3"
f n
r(n +1)r(-3 n + 4 )2 3 n
are given by the values of a meromorphic function of the form (6), namely,
^(c) = 2K r(z +ri)FC(+ 33Z+4) • (15)
In this case the entire function from Theorem 2 is
3Z ( 2 ) 23z
^(Z) = ^ AsJ = 1. (16)
12 2 ( ( n\ n (n\ n
Here l = 1 + 3 - 3 = 3, M#)=0 and max j ^J — 3, 2J + 3 J ^ 3 •
According to Theorem 2, the series (14) extends analytically to the open sector C \ A3.
Note that the series (17) is the normalized series representing a branch of solution to the algebraic equation y3 — zy — 1 = 0. This branch has poles in e-i 3n and e®3n and extends to the sector C \ A 2 n [9].
It seems that an entire function interpolating the coefficients cannot be constructed so easily. Example 2. Consider now the series
^ r(" + I) 3"
n=0 r(n + 1)r (+ I) 2*
f (z)=V„, , " (-23" . I^2n zn, (17)
with the same domain of convergence the unit disk. Its coefficients are
fn
r( n + 3) 3"
r(n + 1)r(+ )) 2^'
They are interpolated by the following entire function
( ) = 2n_2—2!_
^ 31 r(3 + D r() + 1)r(3 — ¥)"
Indeed, in Gauss's multiplication formula
r(w)r fw + —^ „T (w + ^^= m2-(2n)r(mw) V m) V m
n 1
let m = 3, w = 3 + 3, then
1
r( i + MM 3 + 0=3" 2-"2nr(n +1).
Express r ^nn + through the other terms of this identity and substitute it into the expression
for fn, to see that <p(n) = fn n G N.
Estimate |y(r)| by using Stirling's formula
2 23rr(f — 1)sin(n)
3 2 r( 3 + | )r( 3 + 1)
A 23r (2n)2 (2t — 1) *-3 e-(2r"3) sin (n) < Cr + eo(r)
32 (2n) 2 (3 + |) 3 + 3 e-(r+2) (2n(3 + 1)) 2 (33 + 1) 3+1 e-(r+i) It follows that
— ln U(r)| -— ln(Cr + eo(r))
hJ0) = lim < lim —----< 0,
r—►w r r—►w r
on the other hand
hJ0) > urn ln |y(n)| = urn ln |fn|n =0,
n—>w n n—>w
therefore hv(0) = 0.
In order to estimate |^>(re® 2 )| and |^(re-i 2 )| we use the double-sided estimate for the Gamma-function (see [8])
ci(|y| + 1)x-2e-nly\ < r(x + iy) < c2(|y| + 1)x-2e-nly\,
where x G K c R \ {0, —1, —2,...}, K is compact. The constants c1 and c2 depend on the choice of K, y G R. Then
— r n r 2n r
i-n e 6 e 6 e 6
Mre^2)| < C-2-i-^-—,
c^3 + 1)3~2 c^3 + 1) 2 c^2r + 1)3~2
or
ln |^(re±®2)| < — r + o(r).
Therefore
(±2) < Y
It follows from Arakelian's Theorem [4] that the series (17) extends to the open sector C \ A 2 n.
On the other hand, the coefficients of the series (17) are interpolated by the meromorphic function
3Z r ( . ,
^(Z) = 3 M 3S 3y
2f 1 4
2 i(Z + 1)r V"
The entire function of Theorem 2 is
3l r{ 1 z+3)
2 3 C r(z + 1)r (—2 Z +1).
3Z 3-3f
-' = 23,^ - 1
2 1 4 , [, / 2n fK\ 2n| 2n
and 1 =1 + 3 - 3 = 3' M0) = ° and mäx1 [-2J - ^ T'
Therefore, by Theorem 2 the series (17) extends to the open sector C \ Д 2 n.
The research is supported by the grant of the RF Government for carrying research under supervision of leading scientists in Siberian Federal University (Project 14-Y26.31.0006), the research was also carried out by the partial financial support of the fund "Dynasty".
References
[1] L.Bieberbach, Analytische Fortsetzung, Springer, Berlin, 1955.
[2] L.I.Ronkin, Introduction to the Theory of Entire Functions of Several Variables, Nauka, Moscow, 1971 (in Russian).
[3] G.Polya, Untersuchungen über Lücken und Singularitäten von Potenzreihen, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 29(1929), 549-640.
[4] N.Arakelian, On efficient analytic continuation of power series, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 52(1985), no. 1, 21-39.
[5] N.Arakelian, V.Martirosyan, Power series: Analytic continuation and location of singularities, University Press, Yerevan, 1991 (in Russian).
[6] N.U.Arakelian, Approximation by entire functions and analytic continuation, Progress in Approximation theory (Tampa, FL, 1990), Computational Mathematical Series, Springer, New York, 19(1992), 295-313.
[7] N.Arakelian, W.Luh, J.Muller, On the localization of singularities of lacunar power series, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, 52(2007), no. 7, 561-573.
[8] O.N.Zhdanov, A.K.Tsikh, Investigation of multiple Mellin-Barnes integrals by means of multidimensional residues, Sib. Math. J., 39(1998), no. 2, 281-298.
[9] I.A.Antipova, E.N.Mikhalkin, Analytic continuations of a general algebraic function by means of Puiseux series, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 279(2012), no. 1, 3-13.
Аналитическое продолжение степенных рядов путем интерполяции коэффициентов мероморфными функциями
Александр Д. Мкртчян
В 'работе исследуется вопросы об аналитическом продолжении степенного 'ряда через открытую дугу на границе круга сходимости. Ответ на такой вопрос дан в терминах мероморфной функции специального вида, интерполирующей коэффициенты ряда. Получены условия при которых сумма ряда аналитически продолжается в некоторую окрестность дуги в сектор, определенный дугой, во всю комплексную плоскость, кроме некоторой дуги.
Ключевые слова: степенные ряды, аналитическое продолжение, интерполирующая мероморфная функция, индикатор функция.